web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > News Media (Page 2)

If The Senate Doesn’t Stop Trump, Nobody Will, Dems Warn In Last Day Of Arguments

Westlake Legal Group 5e2b6b12220000c2053eb9fe If The Senate Doesn’t Stop Trump, Nobody Will, Dems Warn In Last Day Of Arguments

WASHINGTON ― If President Donald Trump can get away with blocking Congress from investigating his pressure campaign against Ukraine, Democrats argued Friday, then the presidency would essentially have unlimited power.

“We would create a system that allows this president and any future president to really do whatever he or she wants,” impeachment manager Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.) told senators Friday.

Democrats have accused Trump of engaging in a cover-up in addition to abusing his power. When the House investigated Trump’s involvement with Ukraine, the administration refused to turn over documents or allow key individuals to testify.

Demings said the administration has blocked more than 70 requests for documents and testimony, but that Democrats have been able to assemble their impeachment articles thanks to more than a dozen “courageous public servants who were willing to follow the law, comply with subpoenas and tell the truth.”

Democrats are finishing their third and final day of opening arguments Friday, with each impeachment manager taking a few minutes at the top of his or her presentation to thank the increasingly restless senators for listening. Demings spoke to the obstruction-of-Congress charge, the second of two impeachment articles that Democrats have brought against Trump.

The first article charges Trump with abuse of power for his scheme to pressure Ukraine into announcing an investigation of his highest-polling political opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, a 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful. A series of diplomats testified last fall that the pressure campaign on Ukraine subverted U.S. foreign policy for the president’s personal benefit.

Democrats said their case is overwhelming, but that it would have been even stronger if more witnesses had testified.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), another of the seven impeachment managers, who worked as a staffer on the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate hearings in the 1970s, said President Richard Nixon was more forthcoming with aides and documents than Trump has been.

“No president ever used the official power of his office to prevent witnesses from giving testimony before Congress in such a blanket and indiscriminate manner,” Lofgren said.

Impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), wrapping up his comments about how Trump had obstructed congressional investigations, said the president was “the first and only president ever to declare himself unaccountable.”

“Only his will goes,” Nadler said Friday, urging the Senate to remove Trump from office. “He is a dictator. This must not stand.”

On Saturday morning, Trump’s defense team is expected to start the first of as many as three days of arguments against removing Trump from office, and then the Senate will vote on whether to call witnesses. It’s unclear if enough Republicans will break ranks ― four are needed ― to vote in favor of gathering more evidence.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow told reporters on Friday that the “idea that you obstruct Congress by exercising constitutional privileges is absurd.” He said the courts have said that executive privilege rights are “fundamentally important rights to weigh our separation of powers under our form of government.”

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is leading the team of House impeachment managers, said the managers might ask Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to rule on questions of executive privilege ― although he noted that Senate Republicans might overrule him.

“You cannot use executive privilege to hide wrongdoing or criminality or impeachable misconduct, and that is exactly the purpose for which they seek to use it,” Schiff said.

Igor Bobic contributed reporting.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Rabbi Abraham Cooper: Auschwitz mass murders must teach world to reject anti-Semitism and other hatred

Westlake Legal Group holocaust-7 Rabbi Abraham Cooper: Auschwitz mass murders must teach world to reject anti-Semitism and other hatred Rabbi Abraham Cooper fox-news/world/world-regions/israel fox-news/world/religion/judaism fox-news/world fox-news/us/crime/hate-crime fox-news/topic/holocaust fox-news/person/mike-pence fox-news/opinion fox news fnc/opinion fnc article 8eb7346f-1959-5aec-8f98-c7537dacd2b9

I write from Jerusalem, where I attended a ceremony Thursday at which Vice President Mike Pence and other international leaders spoke to mark the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the hellish Nazi death camp where at least 1.1 million people – about 1 million of them Jews – were murdered.

Auschwitz was the deadliest of the concentration camps, playing a key role in the Nazis’ evil plan designed to wipe out the Jewish people. In all, 6 million Jews were shot, starved, gassed and burned to death in the Holocaust – simply because they were Jewish.

Soviet troops liberated Auschwitz on Jan. 27, 1945. They and their American and British counterparts who fought and defeated the Nazi regime that spread death and destruction across Europe and North Africa would soon open more gates of hell at Dachau, Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Mauthausen and other Nazi death camps.

PENCE CALLS FOR WORLD TO ‘STAND STRONG’ AGAINST ANTI-SEMITISM AT AUSCHWITZ LIBERATION COMMEMORATION IN ISRAEL

Before arriving in Israel for the ceremonies at the Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Center for Thursday’s moving ceremony, I was part of a delegation from the Simon Wiesenthal Center that had an audience Monday with Pope Francis. That day marked the 78th anniversary of a meeting of 15 top Nazi leaders in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee to decide on the most efficient “final solution” of the “Jewish Question”: mass murder all 11 million European Jews.

At our meeting, Pope Francis set the stage for the global commemoration of the liberation of Auschwitz. “If we lose our memory, we destroy our future,” the pontiff warned.

More from Opinion

At the ceremony in Jerusalem, in addition to a speech by Vice President Pence there were a series of dramatic speeches from Prince Charles, German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, French President Emmanuel Macron, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Israeli President Reuven Rivlin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

All emphasized the need to remember – but there were demands by some to do more. Netanyahu urged a united front against the Iranian regime that seeks to eradicate 6 million Israeli Jews. Vice President Pence and the President Steinmeier both uttered prayers and blessings in Hebrew in acts of solidarity with the Jewish people.

“We gather to fulfill the solemn obligation, an obligation of remembrance, to never let the memory of those who died in the Holocaust to be forgotten by anyone anywhere in the world,” Pence said. “Today we remember what happens when the powerless cry for help and the powerful refuse to answer.”

“This Germany will only live up to itself if it lives up to its historical responsibility,” Steinmeier said. “We fight anti-Semitism. We resist the poison that is nationalism. We protect Jewish life. We stand with Israel. Here at Yad Vashem, I renew this promise before the eyes of the world.”

But what was especially moving was the primal scream from 82-year-old former Israeli Chief Rabbi Israel Meir Lau, who survived the Buchenwald concentration camp as a young boy and was liberated at age 8, along with his brother. Their parents and other family members were murdered by the Nazis. Rabbi Lau spoke for the silent millions, when he rejected calls “to forgive and forget.”

“I came especially to tell you that I cannot forgive,” the rabbi said, “because I am not authorized.”

Even German President Steinmeier dispensed with politically correct pieties and admitted that “I wish I can say Germans have learned from history, but I cannot say that when hatred is spreading.”

 CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER

Monday morning aging survivors of Auschwitz and the adjacent Birkenau death camp will say the Kaddish prayer for the dead – likely for the last time at the place where their loved ones were tortured, branded, experimented upon, shot, gassed and burned to ash.

The world has now heard from its leaders the importance of memory and solidarity with the victims of the Nazi Holocaust.

But at a time of violent surging anti-Semitism on both sides of the Atlantic there are two major action items for those leaders and each of us must commit to.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

First, we must educate our children that evil is real and must be fought. And second, for the phrase “Never Again” to have any meaning in the 21st century we must not only stand in silent tribute to dead victims of anti-Semitism, racism and terrorism. We must have the courage most people failed to show when it counted during the Nazi era.

We will monitor events in France, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom – and yes on the streets and campuses in America – to see what if anything, we have learned from Auschwitz.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY RABBI ABRAHAM COOPER

Westlake Legal Group holocaust-7 Rabbi Abraham Cooper: Auschwitz mass murders must teach world to reject anti-Semitism and other hatred Rabbi Abraham Cooper fox-news/world/world-regions/israel fox-news/world/religion/judaism fox-news/world fox-news/us/crime/hate-crime fox-news/topic/holocaust fox-news/person/mike-pence fox-news/opinion fox news fnc/opinion fnc article 8eb7346f-1959-5aec-8f98-c7537dacd2b9   Westlake Legal Group holocaust-7 Rabbi Abraham Cooper: Auschwitz mass murders must teach world to reject anti-Semitism and other hatred Rabbi Abraham Cooper fox-news/world/world-regions/israel fox-news/world/religion/judaism fox-news/world fox-news/us/crime/hate-crime fox-news/topic/holocaust fox-news/person/mike-pence fox-news/opinion fox news fnc/opinion fnc article 8eb7346f-1959-5aec-8f98-c7537dacd2b9

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Lev Parnas Says He Has Tape of Trump Calling for Ambassador’s Firing

Westlake Legal Group 24dc-recording-facebookJumbo Lev Parnas Says He Has Tape of Trump Calling for Ambassador’s Firing Yovanovitch, Marie L United States Politics and Government Trump, Donald J Trump-Ukraine Whistle-Blower Complaint and Impeachment Inquiry Senate Parnas, Lev impeachment House of Representatives House Committee on Intelligence Giuliani, Rudolph W Democratic Party

WASHINGTON — A former associate of Rudolph W. Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer, said on Friday that he had turned over to congressional Democrats a recording from 2018 of the president ordering the dismissal of Marie L. Yovanovitch, the United States ambassador to Ukraine at the time.

The associate, Lev Parnas, who worked with Mr. Giuliani on the effort to oust the ambassador and to pressure the Ukrainian government to pursue investigations to help Mr. Trump, located the recording on Friday after its existence was first reported by ABC News, said Mr. Parnas’s lawyer, Joseph A. Bondy.

Mr. Bondy said it “is of high materiality to the impeachment inquiry” of Mr. Trump, which House Democrats are presenting in the Senate. He said the tape had been provided to the House Intelligence Committee, whose chairman, Representative Adam B. Schiff, is leading the House impeachment managers in their presentation of the case against Mr. Trump to the Senate.

The recording emerged as Democrats are pressing the Senate to call more witnesses and seek additional evidence for the trial, saying there is more to be learned about the pressure campaign against Ukraine.

Democrats argued on Friday that the recording bolsters their argument that there may be relevant evidence that has yet to be considered.

ABC reported that Mr. Trump could be heard on the tape saying, “Get rid of her.” According to ABC, the president went on to say: “Get her out tomorrow. I don’t care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. O.K.? Do it.”

Mr. Parnas had previously recounted how he and another associate of Mr. Giuliani, Igor Fruman, had met with Mr. Trump at the Trump International Hotel in Washington in April 2018. At that meeting, Mr. Parnas relayed a rumor that Ms. Yovanovitch, then the American ambassador in Kyiv, was bad-mouthing the president — an unsubstantiated claim that Ms. Yovanovitch has denied, according to two people with knowledge of the dinner.

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Ted Cruz piles on CNN’s Manu Raju: ‘EVERY’ GOP senator agrees you’re the ‘MOST partisan’ reporter

Westlake Legal Group Ted-Cruz-Manu-Raju-AP-CNN Ted Cruz piles on CNN's Manu Raju: 'EVERY' GOP senator agrees you're the 'MOST partisan' reporter Joseph Wulfsohn fox-news/tech/companies/twitter fox-news/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry fox-news/politics/senate/republicans fox-news/person/ted-cruz fox-news/media fox news fnc/media fnc article 50cfc448-4ffa-58a0-a567-07dca4d092b1

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, went after CNN senior congressional correspondent Manu Raju days after his dustup with Sen. Martha McSally, R-Ariz., telling him that his Republican colleagues agree that he’s the most “partisan” reporter on Capitol Hill.

Last week, McSally and Raju were the subject of a viral confrontation after the CNN reporter attempted to ask the senator whether she’ll vote in favor of additional witnesses in the impeachment trial of President Trump, a question she quickly dismissed by calling Raju him a “liberal hack.”

Now, Cruz jumped into the “pissing fight” in response to a tweet Raju made about the Texas senator not answering his question.

“Manu, in your pissing fight w/ @MarthaMcSally EVERY GOP Senator agreed you were the MOST partisan/unfair Cap Hill reporter. Rather than address problem, CNN top brass “released the hounds” on McSally. Your Qs aren’t hard, but when you’re obnoxious, we answer other reporters’ Qs,” Cruz shot back.

BERNIE SANDERS FACES BACKLASH FROM LEFT FOR PROMOTING ENDORSEMENT FROM JOE ROGAN

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

McSally’s swipe at Raju sparked a firestorm on social media with many media figures rushing to the CNN reporter’s defense, including several CNN on-air personalities who demanded her to apologize. McSally refused.

“I’m a fighter pilot — I called it like it is,” McSally told Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, “They’re cheerleading the Democrats [but] they hate the president.”

Westlake Legal Group Ted-Cruz-Manu-Raju-AP-CNN Ted Cruz piles on CNN's Manu Raju: 'EVERY' GOP senator agrees you're the 'MOST partisan' reporter Joseph Wulfsohn fox-news/tech/companies/twitter fox-news/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry fox-news/politics/senate/republicans fox-news/person/ted-cruz fox-news/media fox news fnc/media fnc article 50cfc448-4ffa-58a0-a567-07dca4d092b1   Westlake Legal Group Ted-Cruz-Manu-Raju-AP-CNN Ted Cruz piles on CNN's Manu Raju: 'EVERY' GOP senator agrees you're the 'MOST partisan' reporter Joseph Wulfsohn fox-news/tech/companies/twitter fox-news/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry fox-news/politics/senate/republicans fox-news/person/ted-cruz fox-news/media fox news fnc/media fnc article 50cfc448-4ffa-58a0-a567-07dca4d092b1

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Rush Limbaugh: Dems want to ‘pretend’ Trump abused power and sweep Carter Page revelation ‘under the rug’

Westlake Legal Group Limbaugh-Trump_FOX-AP Rush Limbaugh: Dems want to 'pretend' Trump abused power and sweep Carter Page revelation 'under the rug' Victor Garcia fox-news/person/donald-trump fox-news/news-events/russia-investigation fox-news/media fox news fnc/media fnc f00b0aa8-6f2a-5c24-8e57-f51c77e097d6 article

Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh addressed Thursday’s news that at least two of the FBI’s surveillance applications to secretly monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page did not have probable cause, claiming the report has been “glossed over” by the media and Democrats.

“Where are we? The Democrats and their media buddies would rather pretend that Donald Trump abused power in a phone call with the president of Ukraine and sweep this under the rug,” Limbaugh said on his nationally syndicated radio program. “The initial and original operation of this coup — this silent coup designed to get Donald Trump — has never been able to stand the weight of truth and authenticity.”

READ THE DECLASSIFIED ORDER

“Now, I know it’s not all four FISA warrants, but come on. They’re admitting that two of them here were bogus and were not properly put together,” Limbaugh added.

A newly declassified summary of a Justice Department assessment was released Thursday by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). The DOJ’s determination essentially means that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant authorizations to surveil Page, when stripped of the FBI’s misinformation, did not meet the necessary legal threshold and should never have been issued.

“I hope that this latest admission of guilt for these civil rights abuses by the Justice Department marks continued progress towards restoring justice and remedying these reputationally ruinous injuries,” Page told Fox News in a statement.

Limbaugh laid out his perspective on the matter, saying former FBI director James Comey, former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe, FBI attorney Dana Boente and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein have all “admitted to abusing their power.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The entire pretext for the so-called investigation of Donald Trump for colluding with Russia — the FISA warrants that opened up the spying — have now been admitted to as fraudulent,” Limbaugh said. “The FBI and the FISA court now admit that they abused their powers, and all of the people involved in getting those FISA warrants applied for and signed off on — whether they’ve admitted to it or not — have now been caught up in abuse of power and fraud.”

Westlake Legal Group Limbaugh-Trump_FOX-AP Rush Limbaugh: Dems want to 'pretend' Trump abused power and sweep Carter Page revelation 'under the rug' Victor Garcia fox-news/person/donald-trump fox-news/news-events/russia-investigation fox-news/media fox news fnc/media fnc f00b0aa8-6f2a-5c24-8e57-f51c77e097d6 article   Westlake Legal Group Limbaugh-Trump_FOX-AP Rush Limbaugh: Dems want to 'pretend' Trump abused power and sweep Carter Page revelation 'under the rug' Victor Garcia fox-news/person/donald-trump fox-news/news-events/russia-investigation fox-news/media fox news fnc/media fnc f00b0aa8-6f2a-5c24-8e57-f51c77e097d6 article

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Trump’s defense of Russian election interference is an ‘intelligence coup,’ Schiff says.

Westlake Legal Group 24dc-livevid-sub-facebookJumbo Trump’s defense of Russian election interference is an ‘intelligence coup,’ Schiff says.

In some of his most confrontational comments yet, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, laid out President Trump’s refusal to accept the conclusion of American intelligence agencies that Russia, not Ukraine, interfered in the 2016 presidential elections as a betrayal of the nation’s foreign policy.

“I don’t know if there’s ever been a greater success of Russian intelligence,” Mr. Schiff said. “Whatever profile Russia did of our president, boy, did they have him spot on.”

Mr. Schiff said that the president’s defense of Russia in 2018, as he stood in Helsinki next to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, amounted to “one hell of a Russian intelligence coup.”

“I hope it was worth it for the president,” Mr. Schiff concluded, “because it certainly wasn’t worth it for the United States.”

In arguing that President Trump obstructed Congress, Representative Zoe Lofgren zeroed in on the failure of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, along with one his top advisers, T. Ulrich Brechbuhl, to answer subpoenas.

Both are believed to have firsthand knowledge of the Ukraine affair. But neither was on Senator Chuck Schumer’s wish list for Senate witnesses. That is apparently because the Democrats believed Republicans would be more likely to agree to a short list of the former national security adviser, John R. Bolton, and three other witnesses. But Mr. Pompeo is arguably as important as Mr. Bolton.

The American ambassador to the European Union, Gordon D. Sondland, testified that Mr. Pompeo was “in the loop” on the pressure campaign, and other witnesses reported interactions with Mr. Brechbuhl on key issues.

Democrats have focused more heavily on Mr. Bolton for two reasons: He has said he is willing to testify and they believe he will be critical of Mr. Trump.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, during a news conference on Friday.Credit…Anna Moneymaker/The New York Times

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and an impeachment manager during the Clinton trial, offered advice to both legal teams during the most recent break in the proceedings. He suggested that the president’s team should emphasize that Mr. Trump had “no corrupt purpose” and that the impeachment managers should “use the words of the other side, as they used my words — I’m fair game — talking about how they viewed executive privilege when it was a Democratic president.”

“And I wouldn’t take all 24 hours,” he added.

As he fielded questions, Jay Sekulow, a member of the president’s defense team, was behind him, waiting for a turn to speak to the cameras.

The State Department on Friday afternoon missed another deadline to provide documents requested by Congress, as Democratic impeachment managers accused President Trump of obstructing Congress by stonewalling documents and trying to intimidate witnesses.

The department failed to respond to a deadline set by Representative Eliot L. Engel of New York, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, to provide the panel with records that Mr. Engel said suggested the agency was aware of threats to the security of Marie L. Yovanovitch, whose abrupt dismissal as the American envoy to Ukraine is at the heart of Mr. Trump’s pressure campaign on the country.

“I have serious concerns that the security of an American ambassador and an American embassy were compromised,” Mr. Engel said in a statement. “When she was called in the middle of the night and told to get on the next plane out of Ukraine, Ambassador Yovanovitch was warned, ‘this is about your security.’”

ADVERTISEMENT

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, told reporters his brief but notable absence on Thursday in the chamber was because of illness.

A day earlier, Democratic impeachment managers played a video clip of him from 1999 contradicting a key argument in the president’s legal defense, but he was not at his desk or indeed in the chamber at all.

Mr. Graham said he had been feeling under the weather and told reporters that if he knew the Democratic impeachment managers were going to play a video of him, he would have stayed to watch: “Nobody likes watching me more than me.”

In spite of rules that require them to sit quietly at their desks for the duration of the impeachment trial, senators have struggled with restlessness and have begun increasingly wandering around the chamber and, like Mr. Graham, even leaving altogether for fifteen to twenty minute breaks to check their phones and grab snacks.

Hours after a recording emerged of President Trump apparently ordering the removal of the American envoy to Ukraine, Democratic impeachment managers, laying out their case that Mr. Trump obstructed Congress, sought to weaponize all the evidence still being withheld from lawmakers.

The argument appeared to be aimed not only at the public, but also at Republican senators who have signaled they are open to support a Democratic-led measure that would introduce new witnesses and documents to the trial.

“This evidence will come to light,” Representative Val B. Demings of Florida said, ticking off a list of documents the White House refused to release to House investigators. “We shouldn’t have to wait for a book.”

Democrats don’t usually hold up President Richard M. Nixon as a paragon of transparency. Yet in making their case on Friday that President Trump was unprecedented in his obstruction of Congress, they did just that.

Quoting Nixon’s direction to his administration during Watergate, Representative Zoe Lofgren of California, a House manager, read to senators: “All members of the White House staff will appear voluntarily when requested by the committee, they will testify under oath, and they will answer fully all proper questions.”

Ms. Lofgren, who worked as a young lawyer for the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate hearings, seemed to relish comparing Nixon’s quotation with what Mr. Trump’s lawyers said in a letter in October about the current impeachment inquiry.

“In the letter to the speaker of the House, the White House counsel said that President Trump, quote, cannot permit his administration to participate,” Ms. Lofgren said. “No president has ever used the official power of his office to prevent witnesses from giving testimony to Congress in such a blanket and indiscriminate manner.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Image

Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. in Claremont, N.H., on Friday.Credit…Elizabeth Frantz for The New York Times

Senator Lindsey Graham told reporters this morning that he wants someone “like Mueller” to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden and their activity in Ukraine years ago, a reference to Robert S. Mueller III, the former special counsel who examined Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The comment, which he repeated this afternoon, was a significant pivot from a position he took on Thursday, when he said he would resist pressure from Republicans to call the Bidens as witnesses during the trial, a move he said would not serve the Senate well.

He also disputed the assertion from House managers that Hunter Biden’s involvement in Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, had been investigated.

The managers had raised this as part of their argument that President Trump’s insistence that Ukraine investigation Mr. Biden, the son of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., a possible presidential opponent, was unwarranted.

“They could have called people in the House, close to the president, they chose not to, and they’re dumping this in our lap,” Mr. Graham said. “They should have looked more at what happened with the Bidens, they chose not to.”

The administration, at the direction of the White House, stonewalled 71 requests for documents by House investigators. Some witnesses were able to rely on their own personal notes and records to construct their testimony. But reams of documents have not been turned over or made public.

President Trump’s strategy was an extension of his response to the investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Mr. Trump refused to answer questions in person, and in written answers, he said dozens of times that he could not recall events. When prosecutors complained the responses were inadequate, they were rebuffed.

The House managers accuse Mr. Trump of unprecedented obstruction of justice in withholding documents and blocking the testimony of top aides.

Representative Val B. Demings, a Florida Democrat known for her plainspoken style, told the senators that they should not wait and hope the records might dribble out in the future. “You should be hearing this evidence now,” she said.

Last year, as the Trump administration battled House Democrats in court over information for oversight investigations, the Justice Department of Justice said that such matters were a “purely political dispute” and that the House lacked standing to ask the judicial branch to enforce its subpoenas.

But in the Senate impeachment trial, Mr. Trump’s legal team has seemingly taken the opposite position. Led by Pat A. Cipollone, Mr. Trump’s White House counsel, and his private lawyer, Jay Sekulow, the defense team argued that the Senate ought not subpoena witnesses and documents because the House ought to have pursued that information in court for itself before deciding to impeach Mr. Trump.

On Thursday, the top lawyer for the House of Representatives, Douglas Letter, sent a pair of letters to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia notifying it of the inconsistent legal positions, and urging swift rulings for the House.

“In light of President Trump’s argument, it is not clear whether D.O.J. still maintains its position that courts are barred from considering subpoena-enforcement suits brought by the House,” Mr. Letter wrote, adding: “The executive branch cannot have it both ways.”

The appeals court is weighing two cases won by the House at the district-court level. One seeks access to grand-jury evidence gathered by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, during the Russia investigation. The other seeks testimony from Donald F. McGahn II, Mr. Trump’s former White House counsel, who was a witness to several episodes in which the president sought to impede that investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jay Sekulow, a member of President Trump’s legal team, said during a break in the impeachment trial on Friday that the defense would present a brief overview of its case on Saturday, comparing it to a movie trailer.

“I guess I would call it a trailer, coming attractions — that would be the best way to say it,” Mr. Sekulow said, adding that the Senate had asked the president’s lawyers to limit their presentation on Saturday to no more than three hours, starting at 10 a.m.

“We have three hours to put it out, so we’ll take whatever time is appropriate during that three hours to kind of lay out what the case will look like,” he said. “But next week is when you see the full presentation.”

Mr. Sekulow also previewed the aggressive and confrontational approach the White House lawyers intend to take when it is their turn. He railed against Representative Adam B. Schiff, the lead House manager, for saying that foreign interference in an election was deplorable.

“I wonder if he thought that about the fact that the Clinton campaign had sought — it’s completely cooperated, it’s uncontested — the Steele dossier, who was utilizing both supposedly assets that a former British spy had in Russia to get information on the president,” Mr. Sekulow told reporters, referring to an intelligence report on contacts between Mr. Trump’s campaign and Russia.

“Was that not foreign interference? Was that not an attempt for foreign interference?” he asked. “So you could get on your horse and act haughty and proud about it. But you know what, let’s look at what the evidence says.”

Image

Kellyanne Conway, counselor to the President, speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday.Credit…Pete Marovich for The New York Times

Kellyanne Conway, a counselor to President Trump, seizing on impeachment managers’ references to former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son, took the opportunity on Friday to criticize Mr. Biden, one of Mr. Trump’s political rivals, as well as Congress.

“If anybody should be interested in investigating corruption in Ukraine, it’s probably the members of Congress who are wasting their time investigating the president instead and have just whistled right past” the younger Biden’s work at a Ukrainian energy company, Ms. Conway told reporters at the White House briefing room.

She added, “His father has no energy, but Hunter Biden has no energy experience.”

Her comments are part of a defense mounted by Republicans that argues Mr. Trump’s interest in investigating Mr. Biden’s work in Ukraine was reasonable.

Ms. Conway, who also referred on Friday to the elder Mr. Biden as the president’s “spooky political opponent,” and began a broadside against his campaign, has previously been found by an independent government agency to have repeatedly violated an ethics law preventing federal employees from engaging in campaign politics while at work. The White House rejected that agency’s conclusion as “unfair and unsupported.”

Delving deeper into impeachment managers’ argument that President Trump’s transgressions are evidence of a president who places his own self-interest above the country’s, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, invoked the abrupt dismissal of Marie L. Yovanovitch, the former envoy to Ukraine, an event Democrats say was at the heart of Mr. Trump’s pressure campaign.

“Do you think for a moment that any of you, no matter what your relationship with this president, no matter how close you are to this president,” Mr. Schiff asked. “Do you think for a moment he felt it was in his interest, do you think for a moment he wouldn’t ask for you to be investigated?”

Mr. Schiff’s comments came hours after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo refused to respond to questions about the ire that his refusal to defend Ms. Yovanovitch had prompted among career diplomats at the State Department. In response to questions from the NPR host Mary Louise Kelly, Mr. Pompeo insisted that he had “defended every State Department official.”

But he demurred when Ms. Kelly pressed him to point out one instance in which he defended Ms. Yovanovitch. “I’ve said all I’m going to say today, thank you,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, drew attention when she expressed caution about a drawn-out court battle over executive privilege — noting that the House skipped that ordeal. But there is one witness for whom that fear likely does not apply: John R. Bolton, Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser.

During the House inquiry, Mr. Bolton made clear he would refuse to testify unless a judge ordered him to. This month, however, Mr. Bolton said he would testify if subpoenaed by the Senate, without any judicial ruling. The distinction is crucial because executive privilege works more like a shield than a sword.

If officials do not want to comply with subpoenas, the privilege can provide them with legal protection. If Congress tries to enforce its subpoenas by suing them, a legal fight will ensue over whether executive privilege trumps the subpoenas.

But the situation is very different for former officials who choose to comply with subpoenas, defying the president’s objections. Executive privilege has no built-in enforcement mechanism that enables a president to involuntarily gag people.

In theory, the White House could sue Mr. Bolton and seek a temporary restraining order. But there is no precedent for that, and the First Amendment severely limits the ability of the government to suppress speech before its expression.

John McCain, the longtime Republican senator who died in 2018, once warned that President Trump’s unusual relationship to Russia was like a centipede.

“I guarantee you there will be more shoes to drop,” he said.

Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the lead impeachment manager for Democrats, apparently shares that view and as he made the case Friday afternoon that Mr. Trump’s pressure campaign on Ukraine had benefited Russia and endangered “our national interest and our national security,” he turned to Mr. McCain to help drive home the point.

He referred to Mr. McCain’s strong advocacy for bipartisan American support of Ukraine as a means to check Russia’s threat. And then he projected a video of the senator into the chamber he served in for three decades.

“Suppose Ukraine, finally, after failing in 2004, gets it right,” Mr. McCain said in the video. “Democracy, gets rid of corruption, economy is really improving and it’s right there on the border with Russia.”

“I think it makes him really nervous if there was a success in Ukraine,” he said of Mr. Putin.

Mr. Schiff using one of their own to press his case may rankle some Republican senators. It could also incite Mr. Trump, who savaged the one-time Republican presidential nominee in life and death.

Image

Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin, on Capitol Hill this week.Credit…T.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times

As the Democratic House managers continued to outline how President Trump and officials in his circle orchestrated and tried to hide his pressure campaign on Ukraine, they ended up name-checking some of the senators now serving as jurors, underscoring the role of several lawmakers when they learned Mr. Trump was withholding the nation’s military aid. It also illustrates the involvement of some senators in the very affair that they are now considering as jurors.

Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio, and Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin, both leaders of the bipartisan Senate Ukraine Caucus, urged Mr. Trump to release the aid. Mr. Johnson traveled to Kyiv to tell the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, that he had tried but failed to persuade Mr. Trump to release the aid; Mr. Portman called Mr. Trump and privately lobbied him hours before he eventually released it.

Mr. Johnson, for his part, became visibly animated on Thursday afternoon when an impeachment manager invoked his name, leaving his seat and gesturing emphatically to Mr. Portman. The Ohio Republican responded only briefly, remaining stone-faced.

ADVERTISEMENT

As House managers began their third full day of arguments on Friday, one thing is clear: They continue to repeat the same set of facts about the Ukraine pressure campaign again and again — this time in service of their argument about the president’s obstruction of Congress.

Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the lead manager, acknowledged this week that some of the case would be repetitive but said it was necessary to put the facts in the proper context.

True to his word, the managers on Friday started by detailing now-familiar moments in the pressure campaign: the July 25 call between Mr. Trump and the president of Ukraine; phone calls with Gordon D. Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union; the hold on security aid; video clips from witnesses in the House inquiry.

For some Republican senators, the familiarity is off-putting.

“You hear it again and again and again. I can almost recite the testimony, which has been roughly the same,” said Senator Thom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina. “There’s about two hours of information you heard for the first time. We heard it with all the motions, we heard it with Schiff in the beginning and the end of the day.”

Senator James Lankford, Republican of Oklahoma, agreed: “That is the big challenge we are having right now is how often we’re hearing the same story. On Tuesday, all day we heard the same stories, the same videos. On Wednesday, all day, the same stories the same video.”

The House impeachment managers are now at work on the heart of their task for the afternoon: stringing together, bit by bit, a story of how President Trump and lawyers around him tried to conceal his Ukraine pressure campaign.

Discussion of Mr. Trump’s alleged cover-up had focused primarily on Mr. Trump’s defiance of subpoenas for testimony and documents in the impeachment inquiry. But Representatives Hakeem Jeffries of New York and Jason Crow of Colorado suggested to senators that behavior is just one part of a longer cover-up, much of which took place behind the scenes before the House had even learned of the pressure campaign.

“They were determined to prevent Congress and the American people from learning anything about the president’s corrupt behavior,” Mr. Jeffries said of lawyers at the White House and Justice Department who bottled up reports in July 2019 from White House foreign policy advisers alarmed by the legality of a White House meeting with Ukrainian officials and Mr. Trump’s July 25 phone call with the country’s leader.

Mr. Crow said the president’s cover-up intensified after three House Democratic committee chairmen announced in early September that they were investigating the suspension of $391 million in military aid earmarked for Ukraine. Now, White House budget officials rushed to put together a justification for a weeks-old freeze.

“This is where the music stops, and everyone starts running to find a chair,” he said.

Image

Vice President Mike Pence shaking hands with Giuseppe Conte, the prime minister of Italy, in Rome on Friday.Credit…Filippo Monteforte/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Vice President Mike Pence, who is on a trip abroad but has been in close contact with the president to compare notes over the impeachment trial, told reporters on Friday in Rome that he expected a speedy acquittal in the Senate.

“I think you will hear a strong defense of this president and then senators will have a choice to make,” Mr. Pence said. “The outcome here is that the president should be acquitted.”

He also said that he would consider turning over transcripts of his phone conversations with President Volodymyr Zelensky if he received a “reasonable” request from the Senate. Mr. Pence initially said he would turn over those transcripts nearly three months ago, but he said on Friday that he decided to withhold them as the House impeachment inquiry unfolded.

“We’d consider any reasonable request by the Senate, and we will work with White House counsel” on any such request, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Representative Hakeem Jeffries, one of the House impeachment managers, focused on the role of John A. Eisenberg, the lead lawyer for the National Security Council.

Three National Security Council staff members reported to Mr. Eisenberg about pressure on Ukraine for investigations of the Bidens. One of those staff members, Fiona Hill, testified that Mr. Eisenberg told her that he was concerned. But because Mr. Trump has blocked his aides from testifying, Mr. Jeffries said, it is unknown whether or how Mr. Eisenberg followed up.

Reporting by The New York Times has shown that Mr. Eisenberg reported the complaints to Pat A. Cipollone, the White House counsel, and Mr. Cipollone invited him to brief the president.

If that is true, Mr. Cipollone appears to have passed the buck. Mr. Eisenberg reports directly to him, and unlike Mr. Cipollone, he doesn’t typically meet directly with the president.

Ultimately, Mr. Eisenberg did not take Mr. Cipollone’s advice, according to our article here.

Image

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. arriving Friday on Capitol Hill.Credit…Anna Moneymaker/The New York Times

A premise of the escalating debate over whether the Senate should vote to call witnesses is that four Republicans would need to support that idea. Along with the 47 members of the Democratic caucus, four Republican senators would create a 51-vote majority.

There’s been little discussion of it, but there’s a musty precedent from the 1868 Andrew Johnson trial whereby, in theory, it could take three Republicans. The catch is that Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. would have to support the idea, too.

If only three Republicans were to vote for a motion to call witnesses, the Senate would be split 50-50. That means the motion would fail. But twice in the 1868 trial, Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase, in his role as the presiding officer, cast a tie-breaking vote on a procedural motion — which therefore passed.

Some senators believed Chase lacked the power to break ties, but votes to nullify his intervention failed, creating a precedent. To be sure, both of those votes were far less momentous than a motion to call witnesses in President Trump’s trial: They involved whether the Senate should take a short break and adjourn for the day, respectively.

In the 1999 impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, Chief Justice William Rehnquist did not cast any tie-breaking votes.

During debate on Tuesday on the impeachment trial rules, Republican senators blocked a bid by Democrats to leave it up to Chief Justice Roberts to decide whether evidence or testimony was relevant and should be allowed.

President Trump’s legal team plans to make a brief appearance on Saturday, using only a few hours to begin to lay out its case on a day when few people are watching, according to people briefed on the plan.

Both Pat A. Cipollone, the White House counsel, and Jay Sekulow, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, will appear. Each will speak for about an hour, although officials said the planning was still fluid.

On Monday, Mr. Trump will get his made-for-television presentation.

That day, another person helping the team, Alan Dershowitz, the veteran defense lawyer, will make a short presentation arguing that the accusations against the president are not impeachable offenses. Mr. Dershowitz, who frequently appears as a television commentator, has rejected the articles against Mr. Trump in his remarks.

ADVERTISEMENT

As they circle around a now familiar set of facts and their time grows shorter, the Democratic House managers are turning a greater part of their attention to pre-emptively rebut what they expect will be the White House’s arguments.

That’s because they may not have much chance to do so later. Under the rules of the trial, the White House defense will be followed by a short debate on witnesses and documents, with perhaps a chance for short closing statements.

So on Friday, Representative Jason Crow, Democrat of Colorado and one of the managers, said the following: “Now since we won’t have an opportunity to respond to the president’s presentation, I want to take a minute to respond to some of the arguments that I expect them to make.”

One of those, he said, was the argument repeatedly made by President Trump and his Republican allies: that the pressure campaign claimed by Democrats must not be true because the security aid for Ukraine was eventually delivered without an announcement of investigations that Mr. Trump had repeatedly sought.

That argument is sure to feature prominently in the White House defense, so early on Friday afternoon, Mr. Crow set out to challenge it before it is even made.

“Regardless of whether the aid was ultimately released, the fact that the hold became public sent a very important signal to Russia that our support was wavering,” he said. “The damage was done.”

He went on to warn senators about the tactics he expected the president’s lawyers to use when they begin their arguments on Saturday.

“You will notice I’m sure that they will ignore significant portions of the evidence will try and cherry pick individual statements here and there to manufacture defenses,” Mr. Crow said. “But don’t be fooled.”

Image

Representative Adam B. Schiff, the lead House impeachment manager, Friday on Capitol Hill.Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times

Representative Adam B. Schiff’s closing speech Thursday night was drawing acclaim from Democrats for its rousing delivery and pointed depiction of President Trump as untrustworthy and selfish.

But it fell flat with some of its intended audience — Senate Republicans. Multiple senators said they found the remarks offensive and off-putting.

Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, the No. 3 Senate Republican, ticked off positive economic indicators from the Trump era and said the president’s record should be decided by the voters, not politicians.

“What we heard from Democrats is they don’t trust the voters,” he said.

Mr. Barrasso also made the point that Democrats were not only trying to oust the president, but also trying to keep his name off the ballot in November — a claim that left some puzzled.

But the Senate could take such a step if it convicted the president. A little-known aspect of impeachment would allow the Senate to take a second vote to disqualify Mr. Trump from holding office again. And unlike the 67-vote threshold for removal, the disqualification clause requires only a majority vote.

Image

Marie L. Yovanovitch, the former ambassador to Ukraine, preparing to testify before Congress last November.Credit…Anna Moneymaker/The New York Times

A recording of President Trump saying “take her out,” in an apparent reference to the American ambassador to Ukraine, Marie L. Yovanovitch, has emerged, ABC News reported on Friday.

According to ABC News, the recording dates to spring 2018, when Mr. Trump and two associates of his private lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani were dining at the Trump International Hotel in Washington.

“Get rid of her,” says the voice that appears to be Mr. Trump, according to the ABC report. “Get her out tomorrow. I don’t care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. O.K.? Do it.”

One of the associates at the dinner, Lev Parnas, who is under federal indictment, said in an interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that Mr. Trump ordered Ms. Yovanovitch removed at the dinner. ABC did not air the recording, but it said it had reviewed it.

A new voice recording of Mr. Trump like this could generate more calls from Democrats for additional witnesses to be called in the impeachment trial and for new evidence to be sought. The Senate appears likely to consider next week whether to call more witnesses, with nearly all Republicans opposed. The Senate has long been expected to acquit Mr. Trump.

ADVERTISEMENT

House Democrats will rest their case on Friday and, despite bipartisan praise for their presentation, it does not appear to have accomplished its chief objective of persuading enough Republicans that they need to hear from live witnesses and see withheld documents.

Both Republicans and Democrats said that the seven Democratic impeachment managers had done a commendable job, singling out Representative Adam B. Schiff, the lead prosecutor, in particular. But even Democrats were not optimistic there had been a breakthrough.

“Mr. Schiff was phenomenal,” said Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, “but I’m skeptical he moved any votes.”

Many Republicans simply said they had heard enough — and heard it over and over.

“It became mind-numbing after a while,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina.”

“We have heard plenty,” said Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, the No. 3 Senate Republican.

Those two would never have voted for witnesses in any regard. And the jury is still out on whether the other senators considered in play — Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee — would join with Democrats.

But the increasing expectation in the Senate on Friday was that a vote sometime next week to call witnesses would fall short, moving the trial into its end game.

Image

Pat Cipollone, the White House counsel, arriving Friday on Capitol Hill.Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times

President Trump’s White House lawyers will begin their defense of the president at 10 a.m. on Saturday, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, announced at the start of proceedings Friday afternoon.

The early start will give the White House legal team more time to begin making its case on Saturday, though it is not clear whether that will happen. Mr. McConnell said only that he expected the proceeding to go “for several hours” on Saturday. And Jay Sekulow, one of the president’s lawyers, has been cagey about how many hours his team would use to defend Mr. Trump.

One thing is clear: The president would prefer his defense be presented during the week, when more people are watching. In an early morning tweet, Mr. Trump said Saturdays are “Death Valley” for television.

With President Trump’s acquittal all but certain, Republican leaders have narrowed their focus to one overriding strategic goal: ensuring that the Senate does not vote in favor of calling new witnesses or allowing in evidence that could prolong the impeachment trial and scramble the ultimate outcome.

In the hallways of the Capitol, Republican senators were trying out at least a half dozen arguments, all of them apparently aimed at a handful of fellow Republicans who have expressed openness to gathering additional evidence. Here’s a look at some of their most common refrains:

  • A vote for witnesses would surely result in a protracted legal fight to secure testimony, prolonging the trial and paralyzing the government indefinitely.

  • Calling witnesses now would reward the House for rushing its case.

  • The House impeachment managers have claimed to have all the evidence they need to prove Mr. Trump is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, so why bother with more information?

    “The number of times they have made it very clear that they have clear and convincing evidence and that the evidence is all clear and convincing,” said Senator Mike Rounds, Republican of South Dakota. “Time and time again, they have told us how much they’ve gotten.”

  • A fight over access to witnesses could force the courts to settle tricky questions about the scope of the president’s executive privilege, which could result in rulings that could weaken the presidency.

    “I don’t want to call John Bolton because they could have chosen to call him and they refused to,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina. He was referring to House Democrats, who did not subpoena Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser after it became clear he would refuse to appear. “I’m not going to destroy executive privilege, I’m not going to let the House put me in this box,” Mr. Graham added.

  • Be careful what you wish for.

    Some Republicans are playing hardball, threatening to call witnesses pleasing to Mr. Trump, like Hunter Biden or the anonymous whistle-blower whose complaint prompted the impeachment inquiry, that could turn the trial into a circus. The idea, in part, is to send a warning to moderate Republican senators who have signaled they might be open to witnesses that they should not go down that path.

ADVERTISEMENT

Complaining they were tired of listening to the Democratic impeachment managers repeat the same arguments day after day, and piqued by closing remarks made by Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, Republican senators close to President Trump began urging his defense team to mount a vigorous rebuttal focused on the substance of Democrats’ case, not just the process.

Seizing on the House managers’ decision to talk at length about former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son, Hunter Biden, Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, called on the White House defense team to “make a compelling case that there is something, based on good government and foreign policy, to look at here.”

Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, said in an interview that he would encourage the president’s lawyers “to clarify some of these videos” of witness testimony “that have been played that are clipped in ways that don’t really tell the whole story.”

“This will be the first time that the president’s story will be able to be told,” Mr. Barrasso said.

Image

Senator Lamar Alexander speaking to reporters last week on Capitol Hill.Credit…Anna Moneymaker/The New York Times

Senator Lamar Alexander, one of four Republicans who have signaled an openness to calling witnesses in President Trump’s impeachment trial, said on Friday that he wouldn’t make up his mind on the matter until after senators had had a chance to question House Democratic impeachment managers and the president’s team.

The Democratic prosecutors are scheduled to complete their oral arguments against Mr. Trump on Friday, and the president’s lawyers are slated to begin up to 24 hours of his defense as early as Saturday. Under trial rules adopted this week, those presentations will be followed by a question-and-answer period for senators.

“After all of that, I think the question is, do we need more evidence,” Mr. Alexander said on his way into a briefing on Capitol Hill. “Do we need to hear witnesses? Do we need more documents? And I think that question can only be answered then.”

Mr. Alexander, who is retiring from the Senate, is regarded as a potential defector on the question of witnesses who might feel compelled by his reverence for the institution to press for a more thorough airing of evidence in the impeachment trial.

But on Friday, he suggested he may have heard as much as he needs to.

“As the House managers have said many times, they’ve presented us with a mountain of overwhelming evidence, so we have a lot to consider already,” Mr. Alexander told reporters.

Image

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo this week in Bogota, Colombia.Credit…Luisa Gonzalez/Reuters

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will meet with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine next week during a trip to Ukraine and four other countries in Europe and Central Asia,the State Department said on Friday. It will be the first meeting between a member of President Trump’s cabinet and Mr. Zelensky since the impeachment inquiry against Mr. Trump began in the fall.

Mr. Pompeo has twice canceled planned trips to Ukraine in recent months. The first trip had been planned for November, when American officials were testifying in the House about the Ukraine affair, and the second had been intended for this month. When Mr. Pompeo canceled that trip on Jan. 1, the State Department said that he was staying in Washington because of anti-American protests at the embassy in Baghdad. During that period, Mr. Trump, Mr. Pompeo and other top officials were planning a drone strike on Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, Iran’s most powerful general.

The State Department said Mr. Pompeo planned to arrive in Kyiv on Thursday, where he would seek “to highlight U.S. support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.” It said he also planned to take part in a wreath-laying ceremony “to honor those who have fallen” in Donbass, where the Ukrainian military is fighting a yearslong insurgency that is supported by Russia. The American military aid at the center of the impeachment proceedings against Mr. Trump is intended to bolster the Ukrainians in that war and to help deter Russian aggression.

ADVERTISEMENT

As discussion of possible witnesses heats up in the Capitol, there continues to be a widespread misconception about whom precisely Democrats most want to hear from at President Trump’s trial.

While much of the news media is focused on John R. Bolton, Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser, Senate Democrats and the House impeachment managers privately say they are more interested in Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff.

Their reasons are pretty simple, but have been obscured somewhat since Mr. Bolton volunteered this month that he would be willing to testify at the trial. Unlike Mr. Bolton, whom witness testimony suggests watched with alarm as the pressure campaign on Ukraine unfolded, Mr. Mulvaney appears to have been intimately involved at every step.

“All of the testimony seems clear that this entire thing was run through Mulvaney,” said Christopher S. Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut. “Mulvaney was the one talking to Trump on a regular basis.”

Speaking to reporters Friday morning, Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, called Mr. Mulvaney “the chief cook and bottle washer in this whole evil scheme.”

Representative Adam B. Schiff, the lead impeachment manager, gave an impassioned speech urging senators to convict and remove President Trump.Image by Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Representative Adam B. Schiff, the former federal prosecutor who has steered the House impeachment investigation into President Trump, secured his place as a liberal rock star — and villain to conservatives — with the fiery closing argument he delivered Thursday night, imploring senators to convict and remove Mr. Trump because “you know you can’t trust this president to do what’s right for this country.”

By Friday morning, the phrase #RightMatters — from the last line of Mr. Schiff’s speech — was trending as a hashtag on Twitter, which was lighting up with reaction from across the philosophical spectrum. “I am in tears,” wrote Debra Messing, the “Will & Grace” actress and outspoken Trump critic. “Thank you Chairman Schiff for fighting for our country.”

Even some Republicans are giving Mr. Schiff, Democrat of California and chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, grudging respect for delivering a masterful performance. But they also view him as nothing more than a shrewd political operator, and say that his words made clear that for Democrats, impeachment is about undoing the results of the 2016 election — and preventing the president from winning in 2020.

“Adam Schiff is already disputing the results of the 2020 election. Impeachment 2.0?” wrote Senator Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee.

Mr. Schiff is known on Capitol Hill for his serious demeanor and dry laconic wit. But on Thursday, he was filled with passion, his voice rising and his face reddening as he made a late-night appeal to a tired and bitterly divided audience of senators, which he was promoting with a video clip on his own Twitter feed on Friday.

“You know you can’t trust this president to do what’s right for this country — you can trust he will do what’s right for Donald Trump,” he said, adding, “This is why if you find him guilty, you must find that he should be removed. Because right matters. Right matters and the truth matters. Otherwise we are lost.”

Image

Democrats want to call Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, as a witness.Credit…Pete Marovich for The New York Times

Friday is the moment of truth for House managers in the Senate impeachment trial as they seek to convince a handful of Republican lawmakers to support their demand for additional witnesses and documentary evidence. So far, there is little apparent evidence that they will succeed.

On Thursday, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the top Senate Democrat, declined to say he was optimistic but said he still had “hope.”

Democrats have accused Republicans of abetting a cover-up by Mr. Trump by refusing to subpoena documents that the Trump administration did not hand over during their inquiry and by refusing to demand testimony from additional witnesses like John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser, and Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff.

In their third day presenting their case, the managers will focus on the second article of impeachment, in which they accuse Mr. Trump of obstructing Congress by blocking witnesses and documents from being provided to the House impeachment inquiry.

For Democrats, that argument — which is expected to once again take the Senate trial late into the evening — could be the ideal backdrop to pressure potentially wavering Republicans who might be willing to break from their party to support the Democratic demands for witnesses.

But the potential targets, a handful of Republican senators, are staying quiet for now. They include Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitt Romney of Utah, Susan Collins of Maine and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee.

On Saturday, Mr. Trump’s White House lawyers will take over for up to three days as they present their defense. Both sides will get an additional two hours to sum up their argument on the issue of witnesses and documents sometime next week. But for the House managers, Friday’s presentation may be their last, best hope.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan will deliver the Democrats’ response to the State of the Union.Credit…Paul Sancya/Associated Press

Democrats, looking ahead to President Trump’s State of the Union address, announced on Friday that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan will deliver the Democrats’ response to the president’s speech, scheduled for Feb. 4 — even though his impeachment trial may still be underway.

Representative Veronica Escobar of Texas, who made history as one of the first two Latinas from that state to serve in Congress, will deliver the Spanish-language response to the speech, according to Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer, the minority leader, who issued a joint statement about the selections.

The two praised Governor Whitmer, a lawyer, educator and former prosecutor, as a get-things-done type of leader, “whether it’s pledging to ‘Fix the Damn Roads’ or investing in climate solutions,” as Mr. Schumer said.

The response to the State of the Union is generally reserved for rising stars in the opposition party, offering a chance for the minority to lay out its own agenda, in contrast to the president.

With the impeachment trial set to begin at 1 p.m., senators are attending a bipartisan briefing on coronavirus, with Senator Dan Sullivan, Republican of Alaska, telling reporters he hoped to learn about preventive measures being taken. The virus is spreading and has sickened hundreds, mostly in Asia.

But senators were also stopping to weigh in on impeachment, as reporters, cordoned off behind velvet ropes, shouted questions about witnesses and the length of the Saturday session of the trial.

Image

Senator Mitt Romeny, Republican of Utah, on his way out of the Capitol on Thursday night via its subway.Credit…Calla Kessler/The New York Times

Republican moderates are in the spotlight on Friday as House managers conclude their oral arguments and senators turn to the question of whether to call witnesses and seek new documents in the impeachment trial. All four of the senators opposed Democratic motions for witnesses and documents at the beginning of the trial, but have said they might be open to switching their stances after opening arguments have been completed.

So far, however, none have committed to do so.

Here are the Republican senators to watch:

Mitt Romney of Utah has not said much since the trial started. But earlier, he indicated he would be open to new witnesses, and said he wants to hear from John R. Bolton, the president’s former national security adviser.

Susan Collins of Maine is usually a swing vote in the Senate. Facing re-election this year, she is facing brutal blowback in her state for voting to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh for his seat on the Supreme Court. She has strongly suggested that she will ultimately vote to call witnesses. Doing so could help her mend fences with moderate voters she needs to keep her seat.

Lisa Murkowski of Alaska is an independent voice in the Senate. She was the only Republican to oppose Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation and has indicated she could be open to having the Senate examine additional evidence in the impeachment case.

Lamar Alexander of Tennessee is retiring after a long career in the Senate. He has not given clear answers to whether he might support additional witnesses and is extremely close with Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader. But Democrats hope his institutionalist impulses might prompt him to be the fourth vote they need.

There has been additional focus on a fifth senator, Cory Gardner of Colorado. Mr. Gardner is a first-term senator who is facing a tough re-election race this year in a politically competitive state. He will need support from independent voters and even some Democrats to win, but Mr. Garnder has so far been mum on the question of witnesses, and has criticized the impeachment inquiry as a politically motivated exercise.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image

People preparing for the March for Life on Friday.Credit…Calla Kessler/The New York Times

Even as the Senate geared up for the third day hearing from prosecutors in the impeachment trial, a different kind of political clash was gathering outside the Capitol.

People attending the annual March for Life — and counterprotesters who support abortion rights — were already arriving Friday morning for an event that is expected to feature an address by President Trump, the first time a sitting president has attended.

People wearing “March for Life” sweatshirts crossed the Capitol grounds on the way to the march, along with others sporting red “TRUMP2020” baseball caps. Nearby, a separate group of counter protesters wearing sweatshirts that said “Literally, no one asked you” chanted “We love abortion, abortion is cool!”

The annual event protesting abortion started after the 1973 Rove v. Wade decision that legalized abortion in the United States.

Other Republican presidents have addressed the gathering by video, but none has attended. Mr. Trump tweeted on Tuesday: “See you on “See you on Friday … Big Crowd!” Friday…Big Crowd!”

10:14 a.m. Jan. 24, 2020

By

The cameras in the Senate are government controlled by the Senate staff, and photographs are not allowed — limiting what viewers can see as lawmakers consider the case against President Trump. To get a more complete picture of the proceedings, here are two alternatives.

A Sketch Artist’s View of the Impeachment Trial

Drawings of the proceedings from inside the Senate chamber, where no photos are allowed.

Jan. 16, 2020

The Senate chamber may be familiar to viewers of C-SPAN, but the room has undergone some significant changes to accommodate the proceedings.

A 3-D Tour of How the Senate Was Transformed for the Impeachment Trial

An immersive diagram of the storied chamber where President Trump’s trial is taking place — including what you won’t see in photos.

Jan. 23, 2020

President Trump complained Friday that his lawyers would begin his defense on Saturday, a day the president said in the world of television was “called Death Valley,” as he unleashed dozens of tweets and retweets attacking the Senate trial.

The president began his social media assault just after 6 a.m. by retweeting Greg Jarrett, a conservative Fox News analyst, who was attacking the Democrats’ case. In one post, Mr. Jarrett accused Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the lead House manager, of lying about the evidence.

Over the next several hours, he retweeted articles by breitbart.com; Lou Dobbs, the Fox Business Network host; Ben Ferguson, a conservative commentator; Dan Bongino, the host of a conservative radio talk show; and several Republican lawmakers, including Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the minority leader in the House.

Later in the morning, Mr. Trump started tweeting his own attacks on the impeachment trial. In addition to complaining about the expected weekend start for his lawyers, Mr. Trump said he had “to endure hour after hour of lies, fraud and deception by Shifty Schiff, Cryin’ Chuck Schumer and their crew.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Image

Representative Val B. Demings of Florida and the other House impeachment managers will conclude their oral arguments on Friday.Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times

The House managers prosecuting the case against President Trump will wrap up their arguments on Friday with a focus on the second article of impeachment: the accusation that the president obstructed Congress by blocking witnesses and documents in an attempt to cover up his misconduct.

It will be their last opportunity to appeal to a handful of moderate Republican senators on the question of seeking additional witnesses and documents before the president’s lawyers take center stage. Debate on that vital question is expected to happen early next week, after the conclusion of the arguments and a period of questions about the case from senators.

In the meantime, the Senate trial has tested the patience of senators, who have sat restlessly in their seats for more than 16 hours over two long days. Despite being admonished that they must remain silent and at attention “upon pain of imprisonment,” some have doodled, traded notes, whispered with their neighbors, or even nodded off.

Mr. Trump’s legal defense team is scheduled to begin their presentation on Saturday, angering the president, who complained on Twitter on Friday morning that “my lawyers will be forced to start on Saturday, which is called Death Valley in T.V.”

There have been discussions in the Capitol that senators could start the Saturday session earlier than the usual 1 p.m., which could give them the chance to leave earlier, especially if the White House lawyers decide to reserve more of their presentation for Monday.

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Trump Impeachment Hearings: Highlights From Today’s Trial

Here’s what you need to know:

ImageWestlake Legal Group 24dc-hilights-articleLarge Trump Impeachment Hearings: Highlights From Today's Trial United States Politics and Government Trump-Ukraine Whistle-Blower Complaint and Impeachment Inquiry Senate Presidential Election of 2020 impeachment House of Representatives Democratic Party

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, speaking to reporters during a break in the trial on Friday.Credit…Anna Moneymaker/The New York Times

House impeachment managers were using most of their final seven hours and 53 minutes of oral arguments to make their case that President Trump obstructed Congress.

Discussion of Mr. Trump’s alleged cover-up had focused primarily on Mr. Trump’s defiance of subpoenas for testimony and documents in the impeachment inquiry. But two of the managers, Representatives Hakeem Jeffries of New York and Jason Crow of Colorado, suggested to senators that those moves were just part of a longer cover-up, much of which took place behind the scenes before the House had even learned of the pressure campaign.

“They were determined to prevent Congress and the American people from learning anything about the president’s corrupt behavior,” Mr. Jeffries said of lawyers at the White House and Justice Department who bottled up reports in July 2019 from White House foreign policy advisers alarmed by the legality of a White House meeting with Ukrainian officials and Mr. Trump’s July 25 phone call with the country’s leader.

Mr. Crow said the president’s cover-up intensified after three House Democratic committee chairmen announced in early September that they were investigating the suspension of $391 million in military aid earmarked for Ukraine. Now, White House budget officials rushed to put together a justification for a weeks-old freeze.

“This is where the music stops, and everyone starts running to find a chair,” he said.

— Nicholas Fandos

A recording that appears to be of Mr. Trump speaking about the American ambassador to Ukraine, Marie L. Yovanovitch, has emerged, ABC News reported Friday.

“Get rid of her” says the voice that appears to be Mr. Trump, according to the ABC report. “Get her out tomorrow. I don’t care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. O.K.? Do it.”

The network said the recording dated to spring 2018, when Mr. Trump and two associates of his personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani were dining at the Trump International Hotel in Washington. ABC did not air the recording, but it said it had reviewed it.

One of the associates at the dinner, Lev Parnas, who is under federal indictment, said in an interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that Mr. Trump ordered Ms. Yovanovitch removed at the dinner.

A new voice recording of Mr. Trump like this could generate more calls from Democrats for additional witnesses and evidence to be part of Mr. Trump’s trial.

Once Mr. Trump’s lawyers conclude their arguments, sometime between Saturday and Tuesday, Senators are expected to have a short debate on whether to admit new evidence and witnesses to the trial. Republicans defeated an effort to consider the matter before the start of oral arguments, drawing outrage from Democrats who have maintained that there could not be a fair trial without them.

The evidence and witness argument is the crux of the charge that Mr. Trump obstructed Congress. New evidence has emerged since the House completed its impeachment inquiry last year, and one of the president’s former national security advisers John R. Bolton, said he would testify at the Senate trial if he received a subpoena. (Mr. Bolton did not testify before the House.)

This is an area where Democrats have been hoping to sway some of the Republicans who have signaled they might be open to hearing from witnesses, including Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. Democrats also are holding out hope for Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, who is retiring at the end of this term.

The No. 1 witness Democrats want to hear from is Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, who played a central role in the Ukraine pressure campaign.

Mr. Mulvaney is “the chief cook and bottle washer in this whole evil scheme,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, told reporters on Friday morning.

Mr. Trump’s team is set to begin presenting his defense at 10 a.m. Saturday. They will have the Senate floor for up to 24 hours, if they choose to use all their time but they plan to start with a short presentation on a day that the president has already derided as “Death Valley” in television ratings.

According to people briefed on the plan, Pat A. Cipollone, the White House counsel, and Jay Sekulow, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, will appear and speak for about an hour each, although officials said the planning was still fluid.

One argument his defense is expected to make — that Mr. Trump and his supporters have repeatedly made — is that there was no pressure campaign on Ukraine, because the Trump administration released the military assistance without getting anything in return from President Volodymyr Zelensky.

One of the House impeachment managers tried to pre-emptively dismiss that argument Friday afternoon.

“Regardless of whether the aid was ultimately released, the fact that the hold became public sent a very important signal to Russia that our support was wavering,” Mr. Crow told the senators. “The damage was done.”

As the Democratic House managers outlined how Mr. Trump and officials in his circle orchestrated and tried to hide his pressure campaign on Ukraine, they ended up name-checking some of the senators now serving as jurors.

The arguments underscore the actions several lawmakers took when they learned Mr. Trump was withholding the nation’s military aid for Ukraine, and the involvement of some senators in the very affair that they are now considering as jurors.

Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio, and Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin, both leaders of the bipartisan Senate Ukraine Caucus, urged Mr. Trump to release the aid. Mr. Johnson traveled to Kyiv to tell the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, that he had tried but failed to persuade Mr. Trump to release the aid; Mr. Portman called Mr. Trump and privately lobbied him hours before he eventually released it.
Catie Edmondson

Mr. Trump on Friday got an early start on Twitter, firing out 42 retweets and quotes from his supporters and two Twitter posts of his own by 8 a.m.

“The Impeachment Hoax is interfering with the 2020 Election,” Mr. Trump wrote in one of the posts, redirecting the Democrats’ arguments on Thursday that he had abused the power of his office by pressuring Mr. Zelensky to undertake politically motivated investigations that could affect the election.

Just before the Senate trial resumed, Mr. Trump addressed the annual March for Life, becoming the first sitting president to appear in person at the gathering of anti-abortion demonstrators. He made the surprise announcement of his plans on Twitter on Wednesday, just ahead of the start of the Senate trial — a reminder to his conservative Christian supporters that he still shared their values.

Catie Edmondson and Nicholas Fandos contributed reporting.

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Dana Perino: Trump impeachment and physical fitness – What to do when you sit for hours watching trial

President Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate got underway at a tough time for people trying to keep their fitness resolutions in 2020. The days are very long when each side gets (and takes) 24 hours for opening statements.

Let’s take, for example, Dry January. Who among us can stick to that goal after a day of impeachment? The only thing I really wanted after a day of sitting for several hours listening to the House managers was a glass of Cabernet. Just one! I gave up on that resolution on the first day. Oh, well. There’s always next year!

And then there is the sitting. And the sitting and the sitting. Sitting is the new smoking, haven’t you heard? While we have been sitting and listening – and we are listening, we promise! – our posture is compromised and our legs are going numb. It is like we are on a non-stop flight around the world. And the entertainment system stopped working after the first hour.

GREGG JARRETT: UNDER DEMS’ TRUMP IMPEACHMENT JUSTIFICATION, LINCOLN WOULD’VE BEEN IMPEACHED

I asked my fitness trainer what he suggested I do during these long days in a chair. Aside from getting a workout in the morning and some yoga or Pilates after work, here are his suggestions:

Westlake Legal Group Williams-and-Perino Dana Perino: Trump impeachment and physical fitness – What to do when you sit for hours watching trial fox-news/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry fox-news/person/donald-trump fox-news/opinion fox-news/health/nutrition-and-fitness/fitness fox news fnc/opinion fnc Dana Perino article 8c701fd4-62a3-53ba-ad62-8afbf75b95b3

Fox News impeachment coverage features Juan Williams, Dana Perino, Andrew McCarthy and Katie Pavlich

Blood flow and circulation

At least once an hour, do some ankle rolls, point and flex your feet, and extend your leg from your knee. Do some neck rolls to keep your shoulders and upper back from getting too tight. Just like being on a long flight.

Higher-intensity squats. “Every time you stand up and sit down counts.” (Note: this is a bit hard to do sitting next to my colleagues and being on camera, but I get his point).

Mobility

Keep everything moving that you can. Simple neck rolls, arm circles, chest stretch with hands clasped behind your back, standing hip flexor and quad stretch, Figure Four stretch, waiters bow … you get the idea.

More from Opinion

Reducing tension

Release muscle tension and deal with boredom or frustration when you can’t move (he knows me … and impeachment … well).

Progressive relaxation (focus on each body part starting at the feet and working your way up and spend a few seconds getting it to relax. By the time you get to your head, you should feel calmer for a while). 

Box breathing (imagine a box – then breathe in for four counts, hold for four counts, breathe out for four counts, and hold again for another four counts before starting the cycle again). This can also help with falling asleep.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER

Hydration

Drink 8 ounces every two hours or less (more reason to leave and use the restroom, which means standing and walking).

Nutrition

Small snacks, like collagen bars, don’t have too much sugar … but allow you to consume enough energy to stay awake!

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Finally, I asked about the wine. “Oh, definitely. You can have wine.”

He’s the best.

I’ve managed to do most of these things during the first week of impeachment – wish me luck for the second week!

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM DANA PERINO

Westlake Legal Group 694940094001_6125368058001_6125371462001-vs Dana Perino: Trump impeachment and physical fitness – What to do when you sit for hours watching trial fox-news/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry fox-news/person/donald-trump fox-news/opinion fox-news/health/nutrition-and-fitness/fitness fox news fnc/opinion fnc Dana Perino article 8c701fd4-62a3-53ba-ad62-8afbf75b95b3   Westlake Legal Group 694940094001_6125368058001_6125371462001-vs Dana Perino: Trump impeachment and physical fitness – What to do when you sit for hours watching trial fox-news/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry fox-news/person/donald-trump fox-news/opinion fox-news/health/nutrition-and-fitness/fitness fox news fnc/opinion fnc Dana Perino article 8c701fd4-62a3-53ba-ad62-8afbf75b95b3

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Test drive: The 2020 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel is ready for the long haul

Get your diesels here!

The latest Ram 1500 is now available with a new 3.0-liter EcoDiesel V6. That is to say, all of them are.

Unlike GM and Ford, Ram offers its new motor an option across the lineup, instead of reserving it for a select few configurations.

Westlake Legal Group RAM1 Test drive: The 2020 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel is ready for the long haul Gary Gastelu fox-news/auto/style/pickups fox-news/auto/make/ram fox-news/auto/attributes/diesel fox news fnc/auto fnc article 8b7d31b6-dbb2-5bb9-b93e-18f7bda64c6d

The new engine is priced $4,995 above the standard 3.6-liter gasoline V6 and $3,500 more 5.7-liter Hemi V8, but it hauls like the Hemi and delivers better fuel economy than both.

The B20-compatible engine is a major update of the one offered in the last-generation Ram 1500 and produces 260 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque. It comes matched to an 8-speed automatic transmission and delivers a maximum tow rating of 12,560 pounds, best among light duty diesel pickups. That’s also just 190 pounds shy of the top Hemi-powered model, the difference due mostly to the EcoDiesel’s heftier weight.

More to the point, it earned an EPA fuel efficiency rating of 32 mpg highway in two-wheel-drive trucks, just one mile per gallon shy of the class-leading Chevrolet Silverado diesel’s 33 mpg rating. Four-wheel-drive versions from both brands are rated at 29 mpg.

Westlake Legal Group RAM2 Test drive: The 2020 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel is ready for the long haul Gary Gastelu fox-news/auto/style/pickups fox-news/auto/make/ram fox-news/auto/attributes/diesel fox news fnc/auto fnc article 8b7d31b6-dbb2-5bb9-b93e-18f7bda64c6d

The EcoDiesel is optional on every Ram trim, including the off-road Rebel. (Ram)

In the top of the line Ram 1500 Limited Crew Cab 4×4 I tested that was loaded with features, including an adaptive cruise control system and an adjustable air suspension that can lower the truck at high speeds, I found that 29 mpg mark easy to achieve as long as I kept it under 60 mph.

At 70 mph you start pushing a lot more air and the engine at about 2,000 rpm in eighth gear. Both factors contribute to a drop to around 24 mpg in my real-world driving, which is still solid for a big truck.

Westlake Legal Group ram-1500-interior Test drive: The 2020 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel is ready for the long haul Gary Gastelu fox-news/auto/style/pickups fox-news/auto/make/ram fox-news/auto/attributes/diesel fox news fnc/auto fnc article 8b7d31b6-dbb2-5bb9-b93e-18f7bda64c6d

The Limited features high-end leather and real wood trim. (Ram)

With the hood closed, the truck is so quiet you’d think Ram pulled up to a Build-A-Bear workshop and filled up the engine bay with stuffing. However, despite its maximum torque arriving at 1,600 rpm, it seems to spend a lot of time near that 2,000 rpm mark, especially on the way uphill, and sounds a little cranky when it does. The Chevy has a 10-speed automatic that lets its inline-six-cylinder lay back and relax more often.

Nevertheless, at today’s pump prices, the EcoDiesel will save an average driver about $550 annually at the pump compared to the Hemi, but the target audience isn’t average. They do a lot of long-haul driving that’ll save them even more. And they can do a whole lot of it. With a 33-gallon tank, the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel is capable of covering over 1,000 miles between fill-ups.

Something you definitely won’t mind doing in a Limited with its plush leather seats and that cushy air suspension, which was just named Cars.com’s luxury CAR of the year.

For $68,980, like my test truck, I should hope so.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Westlake Legal Group RAM1 Test drive: The 2020 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel is ready for the long haul Gary Gastelu fox-news/auto/style/pickups fox-news/auto/make/ram fox-news/auto/attributes/diesel fox news fnc/auto fnc article 8b7d31b6-dbb2-5bb9-b93e-18f7bda64c6d   Westlake Legal Group RAM1 Test drive: The 2020 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel is ready for the long haul Gary Gastelu fox-news/auto/style/pickups fox-news/auto/make/ram fox-news/auto/attributes/diesel fox news fnc/auto fnc article 8b7d31b6-dbb2-5bb9-b93e-18f7bda64c6d

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Michigan bank calls police on black customer trying to deposit settlement check from a racial discrimination lawsuit

A black Air Force veteran is accusing a Detroit-area bank of refusing to deposit money he was awarded in a racial discrimination lawsuit against his employer and calling the police because of his race.

Sauntore Thomas, 44, said he went to the TCF Bank in Livonia, Michigan, to deposit $99,000, when bank employees said they were having issues verifying his checks, Fox News affiliate WJBK-TV reported. Thomas received the money as the result of a lawsuit against his employer, Enterprise Leasing Company of Detroit, who he accused of racial bias.

“This was not a mistake, this was the bank assuming, making their own assumptions of what it is, and what it’s not,” Thomas said Thursday.

OREGON WOMAN FIRED FROM BANK JOB AFTER GIVING STRUGGLING MAN $20 TO GET HOME FOR CHRISTMAS: REPORT

Westlake Legal Group AP20023834735545 Michigan bank calls police on black customer trying to deposit settlement check from a racial discrimination lawsuit Louis Casiano fox-news/us/us-regions/midwest/michigan fox news fnc/us fnc article 6c29c70c-c680-596b-aaf1-9587a6bbeb80

Sauntore Thomas poses in his attorney’s office on Thursday in Bloomfield Hills, Mich. Thomas, a black Air Force veteran who tried to deposit settlement checks from a discrimination lawsuit was rejected by his suburban Detroit bank, which suspected fraud and called police. (AP Photo/Mike Householder)

The checks didn’t appear to be legitimate when bank staff scanned them, TCF spokesman Tom Wennerberg said. He noted that Thomas has a 52-cent account balance at the time and had no recent back activity.

Thomas’ attorney, Deborah Gordon, said the checks “couldn’t have been more solid.”

“I mean, it’s a ridiculous joke that some nationwide company is going to be handing out fraudulent checks to me, that I’m going them pass on to my client,” she said. “So obviously, they didn’t believe my client. It’s obvious.”

Wennerberg said bank employees should have accepted the checks and told Thomas there could be a hold on the funds until they could be validated.

Four police officers responded to the incident but took no action against Thomas.

“I didn’t start cussing and hollering. I didn’t say anything,” he said. “I was very composed, even though it was a very stressful situation to be in, especially in today’s racial times,” Thomas said. “With being African-American, sometimes you don’t have to do nothing to be in trouble. And that’s what I felt like.”

Westlake Legal Group AP20023834734892 Michigan bank calls police on black customer trying to deposit settlement check from a racial discrimination lawsuit Louis Casiano fox-news/us/us-regions/midwest/michigan fox news fnc/us fnc article 6c29c70c-c680-596b-aaf1-9587a6bbeb80

Sauntore Thomas, right, and his lawyer, Deborah Gordon, left, talk Thursday in Bloomfield Hills, Mich. (AP Photo/Mike Householder)

TCF apologized for the incident in a statement.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“We apologize for the experience Mr. Thomas had at our banking center, the statement read. “Local police should not have been involved. We strongly condemn racism and discrimination of any kind. We take extra precautions involving large deposits and requests for cash and in this case, we were unable to validate the checks presented by Mr. Thomas and regret we could not meet his needs.”

Thomas took the checks to a Chase Bank branch and opened a new account, he said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Westlake Legal Group AP20023834735545 Michigan bank calls police on black customer trying to deposit settlement check from a racial discrimination lawsuit Louis Casiano fox-news/us/us-regions/midwest/michigan fox news fnc/us fnc article 6c29c70c-c680-596b-aaf1-9587a6bbeb80   Westlake Legal Group AP20023834735545 Michigan bank calls police on black customer trying to deposit settlement check from a racial discrimination lawsuit Louis Casiano fox-news/us/us-regions/midwest/michigan fox news fnc/us fnc article 6c29c70c-c680-596b-aaf1-9587a6bbeb80

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com