2017 General Election
, Andrew Gimson
, Boris Johnson MP
, Conservative Party
, David Cameron
, EU Referendum
, European Union
, General Election 2015
, Liberal Democrats
, Patrick McLoughlin MP
, Paul Goodman
, Philip Hammond MP
, Press Releases
, Theresa May MP
Sir Patrick McLoughlin has defended the Prime Minister’s right to withdraw the whip from Tory MPs who refused last night to support the Government.
McLoughlin, who chaired Jeremy Hunt’s leadership campaign and is the only person ever to have served both as Conservative Party Chairman and as Chief Whip, said “Leadership is about making some very tough decisions” and Tory MPs cannot “just carry on ad nauseam debating this issue”.
He said with deep emotion during this interview, carried out yesterday morning so before last night’s Government defeat, that “I just don’t think we can carry on like we have been doing”.
He added that what is happening to One Nation Toryism is “terrible”, and the party must not become a Brexit party, but in order “not to become a Brexit party we have to deliver Brexit.”
McLoughlin defended David Cameron against the charge that calling the referendum was just a way to fix the problems of the Conservative Party. He pointed out that Tony Blair and Jack Straw had previously raised the idea of a referendum, the Liberal Democrats had committed themselves to one in their 2010 manifesto, and Labour as well as the Conservatives voted for the referendum which was actually held.
ConHome: “You are the only person to have been both Chief Whip and Party Chairman?”
McLoughlin: “I think I probably am. I don’t think anybody else has been punished like that.”
ConHome: “What’s your view of the Government’s proposal to withdraw the whip from those who don’t support it today?”
McLoughlin: “I regret very much that it’s come to this. But the truth is that if the Prime Minister decides something is a matter of confidence, having just got the overwhelming endorsement from his party to lead it, then I think he has the right to do that.
“Leadership is about making some very tough decisions. I think this is a very tough decision and I wish it wasn’t necessary.
“So I don’t come to it with a sort of ‘Yes, let’s do this, bring it on.’ It’s very much a regret, and it’s very much with sorrow, because some of the people we’re talking about have been good, loyal Conservatives.
“But I just don’t think we can carry on like we have been doing. That is part of the problem.”
ConHome: “Friends of ours like Alistair Burt make the point that ‘we’ve been through the lobbies three times to support this deal, and there are all these characters who haven’t, including the Cabinet ministers who abstained on key votes and helped to bring about the deterioration in discipline.’
“They’ve got a point, haven’t they?”
McLoughlin: “Yes they have got a point. I won’t publicly go, but there are some people who I find absolutely staggering, what they’re calling for.
“But the job for the Prime Minister is not necessarily to look at individuals. And sometimes life is tough. But he is taking the position that we promised…
“All these people voted to implement Article 50. And, you know, we’ve had a six-month delay which cost us very dear. They’re now talking about another three-month delay.
“Well I’m not sure what’s going to happen in the next three months that’s not happened in the last six months.
“And I just think we’ve got to move on from this. I’m sorry we’re leaving the European Union. I still remain sorry we’re leaving the European Union.
“But we gave the people a chance in the referendum. And I just would like to say one other thing as well.
“Everybody says the reason David Cameron did this was to try to a) thwart Farage and b) to reunite the Conservative Party.
“It is just worth remembering that in 2010 the Liberal Democrats had an In/Out referendum in their manifesto, and when we actually moved to the referendum the referendum was supported by the Labour Party as well as by the Conservative Party.
“It was never just in my view a ‘try and fix the Tory Party’ scenario.”
ConHome: “When the whip’s removed, the tradition is you remove it on a vote of confidence, and without trying to peer too far into the future, if the Government loses, do you expect the PM to go immediately for a general election if he can, or wait for Second Reading, or wait for the Lords to get its teeth into the Bill, or what?”
McLoughlin: “Well ‘I don’t know’ is the answer to that.”
ConHome: “I’m just trying to establish if it’s really a vote of confidence or not, even if the Fixed-term Parliaments Act…”
McLoughlin: “Well I think the Prime Minister can say I regard this as a vote of confidence in my leadership, and that’s what he’s doing.
“It is not in the technical sense of the word a motion of confidence, as required by the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.
“But it is a motion of confidence, because the Prime Minister says ‘I regard this as a motion of confidence’.”
ConHome: “I mean presumably without encouraging you to speak up for the deselection of endless numbers of Conservative MPs, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander here.
“And if he comes back with a deal, and it’s opposed by some Conservative MPs, he would be entitled to remove the whip from them, would he not?”
McLoughlin: “One step at a time. We’re dealing with today at the moment, and tomorrow will be a different day. The logic of that, which is what your article basically says today, is that would be the case.
“I think one’s got to be always cautious about using these things, and I’m sure that a lot of thought has gone into it, and I hope they’ve considered all the consequences.
“Because as I say I very much regret it has come to this. But I also don’t think we can just carry on ad nauseam debating this issue, which we seem to have done, some people say for the last three years, actually it’s been more like the last four years, following the 2015 election when the referendum was first promised.”
ConHome: “If a very senior member of the party is reselected by their association, as the former Chancellor was last night, but they vote against the Government today, they could be finding that reselection vote is in vain, could they not?”
McLoughlin: “That’s my understanding, but I know Philip Hammond seems to have a different view.”
ConHome: “Is there going to be a general election this year, and if so, when?”
McLoughlin: “I think it’s looking very likely there will be a general election, and I only know from what everybody is saying, October 14th, a Monday, which would enable the Prime Minister, whoever he is, to go to the [European] Council that weekend.”
ConHome: “Though that’s not been said on the record.”
McLoughlin: “The only thing I know about this election, unlike the last election, is what I’m reading in the newspapers.”
ConHome: “Just as a former Chief Whip who’s used to watching the Opposition the whole time, what do you think the Labour Party’s going to do if it comes to a general election vote?
“Because part of the point of having an election before October 31st, if there is one, is Labour can’t say ‘We’re not voting for this, because if we do there’ll be a no deal Brexit’. That excuse has been removed from them, so they’re going to have to vote for this.”
McLoughlin: “I would have thought so. I don’t understand this new nuance that somehow we should wait until after 31st October.
“Because if there was an election on 14th October, then that allows for the Prime Minister, whoever he is, to go to the European Council on the 17th.”
ConHome: “And if the election comes before Brexit, presumably the Brexit Party will stand as many candidates as they can, arguing you can’t trust the Tories.”
McLoughlin: “Well look, all that we can do, if the Brexit Party stand in every seat, which they may well do, they may take some votes.
“But it’s a bit like at the last general election, when everybody thought the UKIP vote would come to the Conservatives. It didn’t wholeheartedly come to the Conservatives, it was quite mixed, and in some areas it did, you know the Mansfields and the places like that.
“I remember talking to you after that election, pointing out we’d won some seats that we haven’t won for 70 years.
“So look, this next election will not be like the 2017 election and it won’t be like the 2015 election. No elections are. They’re all individual entities, fought very much as things are then.
“And this will be a very quick election. The 2017 election was too long.”
ConHome: “How comfortable do you feel about where the party is now?
“If there’s an election, going in on a manifesto that’s pro-Brexit, possibly, actually, with a reasonably good relationship with the Brexit Party, Leave voters might find this prospectus attractive, but there would be tremendous problems with former Remain voters, London, the south.
“You’ve been a One Nation Tory all your working life, and you’re seeing that bit of the Tory coalition in peril.”
McLoughlin: “It’s terrible. It is not a nice scenario. I’m not doing any of this with glee.
“But I also think that governments have to govern, and you know, that’s what we said in the referendum, what we would do, and I don’t think we can rejudge that.
“I famously used that line at the Cabinet meeting, which David Cameron’s used since, saying I’ve always wanted to live in Utopia – the only trouble is I’d wake up and find the European Union was still there.
“But I also respect the right of the Prime Minister to say, ‘We’ve fought an election, that election was on leaving on the 31st October, I’m determined to deliver that.’”
ConHome: “How do you think he’s doing? As Jeremy Hunt’s former campaign chairman.”
McLoughlin: “I think he’s doing very well. He’s trying not only to address the Brexit issue, but he’s also trying to address the other issues that needed addressing anyway.
“Such as education funding and also what he’s saying about the Health Service and other issues.
“So I think what you see in Boris is someone who does actually want to move on to the other agendas as well, and perhaps he feels we’re being sucked into one issue and one issue alone.
“I said a few months ago the Conservative Party must not become a Brexit party. I definitely believe that. But for us not to become a Brexit party we have to deliver Brexit.”
ConHome: “That suggests you think under the previous regime all collective discipline by the end had completely broken down.”
McLoughlin: “I wouldn’t say all discipline. I almost think, looking at this now in hindsight, and with the benefit of hindsight, I almost think we had to go through that to get where we are.
“And don’t forget, Theresa May became Prime Minister because everybody else faded away. That’s how she became Prime Minister. And I think she carried out the job with incredible dignity, and I will never criticise Theresa, because I think she was trying to do an incredibly difficult job.”
ConHome: “How is she now? I saw you talking to her yesterday.”
McLoughlin: “I saw her briefly yesterday. She seemed fine. I think when you consider for nine years she’d either been Home Secretary or Prime Minister, with all the constraints that has on life, I look at Philip and I look at Theresa and I think they are people who are of the Conservative Party, were the Conservative Party, and I have nothing but respect and admiration for her.”
ConHome: “You’ve already touched on David Cameron’s decision to hold the referendum. It was in fact disastrous, would you say?”
McLoughlin: “No, because I think again, that is something we probably needed to do… Blair was the first person to start talking about referendums, Blair and Straw.
“So this isn’t something that DC woke up one morning and thought, ‘This’ll sort everything out.’ It rarely does.”
ConHome: “You are going to stand again, aren’t you?”
McLoughlin: “I very much hope to stand again.”
Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com