web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "democrats" (Page 32)

That Latest Elizabeth Warren Lying Scandal Just Got Much Worse

Westlake Legal Group warren-scowl-620x317 That Latest Elizabeth Warren Lying Scandal Just Got Much Worse scandal pregnant Politics Native American Heritage lying lied liar Front Page Stories Front Page fired Featured Story Elizabeth Warren Documents democrats contradiction Allow Media Exception

FILE – In this May 18, 2019, file photo, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., speaks at a house party campaign stop in Rochester, N.H. Rising disagreement among congressional Democrats over whether to pursue impeachment of President Donald Trump has had little effect on the party’s presidential candidates, who mostly are avoiding calls to start such an inquiry. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty, File)

Who could have imagined that Elizabeth Warren could have the capacity to lie about her background? Shocking, if true.

Warren has been sharing an anecdote lately involving the claim that she was once fired from a teaching job over being pregnant. This obviously plays into every woke stereotype involving discrimination and the current Democrat presidential candidate has decided to make her story a staple of her stump speech. You can find examples of it being spouted going back to the beginning of the year.

The problem was that Warren had told a completely different story back in 2007, as was covered here at RedState late last week.

But in a March 8, 2007 interview with Harvard Law Professor Leo Gottlieb, Warren made it clear that such discrimination had nothing to do with the loss of that teaching job.

Warren told Gottlieb how she had earned a full scholarship to George Washington University at 16, and graduated with a degree in speech pathology and audiology, and didn’t mention the commuter college that has become another pillar in her bio. She then explained that she left her public school job after one school year because she lacked the educational credentials to qualify for a permanent position, and that she decided on her own to abandon the calling.

Note the language she uses about qualifying for a permanent position, because new documents show that not only was she lying about being let go, she had actually been offered another year long contract extension to keep her job.

The Free Beacon uncovered this today.

Minutes of an April 21, 1971, Riverdale Board of Education meeting obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show that the board voted unanimously on a motion to extend Warren a “2nd year” contract for a two-days-per-week teaching job. That job is similar to the one she held the previous year, her first year of teaching. Minutes from a board meeting held two months later, on June 16, 1971, indicate that Warren’s resignation was “accepted with regret.”

And lest someone tries to pretend this is just Warren living in a gray zone and that she actually meant something else, nope. She pointedly claimed the principal “didn’t ask” her back.

Warren’s book, A Fighting Chance, published a year after she was sworn in as a senator in 2013, tells something of a different story, though the two aren’t necessarily incompatible. “By the end of the school year, I was pretty obviously pregnant,” Warren wrote in the book. “The principal did what I think a lot of principals did back then—wished me good luck, didn’t ask me back the next school year, and hired someone else for the job.”

That, ladies and gentlemen, is calling bald-faced lying for political gain.

Sure, that’s not necessarily unique among politicians, but what is unique is that the media don’t care to report on this at all. If this were Trump or any other Republican caught in such an obvious lie, it’d be headline news for a week but it won’t be. Heck, they aren’t even covering it.

Take this ridiculous tweet by Nate Silver.

Yes, how very interesting. It’s a total mystery why the mainstream media aren’t picking up this story. It’s not like they have been in the bag for Warren since the beginning of the summer or anything.

To tie a bow on all this, Warren is documented in the minutes of the 1971 meeting as actually quitting.

Toward the end of Warren’s first year on the job, in April 1971, the board approved her contract for the following school year, the meeting minutes show. Two months later, the meeting minutes indicate that Warren had tendered her resignation.

“The resignation of Mrs. Elizabeth Warren, speech correctionist effective June 30, 1971 was accepted with regret,” the June 16, 1971, minutes say.

In summary, not only did the school board let her go as she claims, they offered her another year of employment. Her response was to tender her resignation two months later. Perhaps she did that out of frustration, but by her own admission, she didn’t qualify for a more permanent position.

No matter how you read these documents, it’s clear she lied and continues to do so.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post That Latest Elizabeth Warren Lying Scandal Just Got Much Worse appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group warren-6-300x225 That Latest Elizabeth Warren Lying Scandal Just Got Much Worse scandal pregnant Politics Native American Heritage lying lied liar Front Page Stories Front Page fired Featured Story Elizabeth Warren Documents democrats contradiction Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Judge in Amber Guyger Case Unapologetic After Receiving Intense Criticism for Hugging, Giving Defendant a Bible

Westlake Legal Group JudgeTammyKempAmberGuyger3-620x377 Judge in Amber Guyger Case Unapologetic After Receiving Intense Criticism for Hugging, Giving Defendant a Bible Texas Social Media Race Politics police North Carolina Media Judicial Grace Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post Faith democrats Culture & Faith Culture crime Courts Christianity Amber Guyger Allow Media Exception

Screen grab via WFAA.

Last week, former Dallas police officer Amber Guyger, 31, was convicted of murder in the September 2018 shooting death of 26-year-old Botham Jean as he sat in his apartment.

Guyger, who said she mistakenly entered the wrong apartment and shot Jean because she believed he was an intruder, received a 10 year sentence.

Botham Jean’s brother Brandt, who is 18, gave a powerful victim impact statementt on forgiveness and asked for a hug afterwards, which Judge Tammy Kemp okayed after a few seconds of consideration of the request.

Not long after Brandt Jean gave his statement, Judge Kemp walked over to his family and consoled them over their loss. But she also walked over to Guyger and spoke with her for a few moments before retreating and then returning with a Bible. She talked to Guyger about John 3:16, and told Gugyger that God had already forgiven her after Gugyer asked if He ever would.

Watch their interaction below:

Their moving exchange predictably caused social justice warriors and freedom from religion types to erupt in outrage, as streiff noted here.

In her first public comments since the trial, Kemp was unapologetic in the face of criticism:

… Kemp said she felt her actions were appropriate since the trial was over and the former officer told her she didn’t know how to begin seeking God’s forgiveness.
[…]
“If she wanted to start with the Bible, I didn’t want her to go back to the jail and to sink into doubt and self-pity and become bitter,” she said. “Because she still has a lot of life ahead of her following her sentence and I would hope that she could live it purposefully.”
[…]
Kemp said that Guyger asked twice if she could hug her as well and, after a moment’s hesitation, the judge wrapped her arms around the former police officer.

“Following my own convictions, I could not refuse that woman a hug. I would not,” said Kemp, who is black. “And I don’t understand the anger. And I guess I could say if you profess religious beliefs and you are going to follow them, I would hope that they not be situational and limited to one race only.”

What a refreshing way to look at things. Nice work, Judge Kemp.

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Judge in Amber Guyger Case Unapologetic After Receiving Intense Criticism for Hugging, Giving Defendant a Bible appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group JudgeTammyKempAmberGuyger3-300x183 Judge in Amber Guyger Case Unapologetic After Receiving Intense Criticism for Hugging, Giving Defendant a Bible Texas Social Media Race Politics police North Carolina Media Judicial Grace Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post Faith democrats Culture & Faith Culture crime Courts Christianity Amber Guyger Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

CBS to Torture Its Audience With a Glowing Mini-Series on a Certain Disgraced Former FBI Director

Westlake Legal Group comey-mueller-620x433 CBS to Torture Its Audience With a Glowing Mini-Series on a Certain Disgraced Former FBI Director suckers resistance Politics Mini-series media bias Laughable james comey Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story democrats CBS Book Sales Biopic Allow Media Exception

FILE – In this Sept. 4, 2013, file photo, then-incoming FBI Director James Comey talks with outgoing FBI Director Robert Mueller before Comey was officially sworn in at the Justice Department in Washington. On May 17, 2017, the Justice Department said it is appointing Mueller as special counsel to oversee investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

It’s the biopic you never knew you needed.

CBS has decided it’d be a great idea to create a mini-series centering on the heroic, country-saving actions of James Comey, because reasons or something.

Jeff Daniels himself is just about as insufferable as Comey is. He’s a rabidly liberal Democrat who sees himself as far more important than he actually is because he played a pompous journalist in a failed television series.

Here’s some of the low down on the new show.

Published in April 2018, A Higher Loyalty was an instant bestseller, moving more than 600,000 copies in its first week. The book covers Comey’s 2013-17 tenure as FBI director, his role in the 2016 election — both in the investigation of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state and in Russian interference with the election — and his relationship with President Trump, who fired Comey in May 2017.

I’ll give CBS this. They know how to spot a sucker when they see one and #resistance media projects like this are wallet openers. Anyone that wants to write a book just has to include some snipes at Trump and it’s instance cash. Better yet, start a GoFundMe and Democrats will make it rain harder than Bill Clinton in a strip club.

Perhaps a natural disaster could strike first and save us the misery of seeing Jeff Daniels stare at trees and post cryptic messages on Twitter?

The practical aspect of this is that it’s likely to bomb. Who would seriously want to watch this? Four episodes of Comey acting like he’s the last honest man on the planet? I’m sure they’ll overdramatize some aspects to add some flare, but in the end, this basically boils down to a conniving liar leaking some memos. Scintillating, blockbuster stuff.

Of course, you can expect every “journalist” to be glued to their TV. I’d guess The New York Times will host watch parties like it’s the Super Bowl. The rest of us will probably pass.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post CBS to Torture Its Audience With a Glowing Mini-Series on a Certain Disgraced Former FBI Director appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group ap-comey-eyes-closed-300x200 CBS to Torture Its Audience With a Glowing Mini-Series on a Certain Disgraced Former FBI Director suckers resistance Politics Mini-series media bias Laughable james comey Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story democrats CBS Book Sales Biopic Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Chuck Todd Dismissed Ukraine Meddling In 2016 Election as ‘Conspiracy Theory’ But He Must Have Missed These Facts

Westlake Legal Group chuck_todd2 Chuck Todd Dismissed Ukraine Meddling In 2016 Election as ‘Conspiracy Theory’ But He Must Have Missed These Facts Ukraine investigation into 2016 election interference Ukraine Politico media bias Media Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post fake news donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception

MEET THE PRESS — Pictured: (l-r) — Chuck Todd, Moderator, “Meet the Press,” appears on “Meet the Press” in Washington, D.C., Sunday, August 31, 2014. (Photo by: William B. Plowman/NBC)

On Sunday, Chuck Todd had a meltdown on “Meet the Press” when Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) raised John Brennan, the Strzok-Page texts and the allegations that the Democrats were involved with Ukraine meddling in the election in 2016.

Todd flipped out and refused to let Johnson continue raising the issue of meddling, calling it a “Fox News conspiracy propaganda” despite Johnson referencing a Politico article about the meddling. Todd claimed Johnson just didn’t want to anger President Donald Trump by criticizing him on Ukraine.

On Twitter, Todd was cheered by much of liberal media for his response. CNN’s Chris Cillizza calling Johnson’s response to Todd “nonsensical.”

But that’s part of the problem. No doubt it was nonsensical to Cillizza if he hasn’t been following the facts and had no idea what Johnson was talking about.

Todd and the response of some of the other network media types just proved the point that Johnson was trying to make – that many in media have not only downplayed the questions of the origins of the Russia probe and how that reflects on the FBI, the CIA and the Democrats but they’ve downplayed or ignored any of facts pertaining to Ukraine meddling in the 2016 election and any alleged involvement of the Democrats. If they paint it as a “conspiracy,” maybe Americans will just forget about the question and not see the inherent contradiction between spending two plus years incessantly covering the Russia collusion hoax while not saying “boo” about Democrats and Ukraine.

Some media has committed journalism and looked at the question.

Politico did a bang-up article to which Johnson referred. Here’s Politico’s second paragraph:

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

The New York Times did a report on how a Ukrainian court actually found there was meddling in our election during the campaign in 2016.

The Kiev District Administrative Court, in a statement issued Wednesday, said that Artem Sytnik, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the agency that had released information about the payments, had violated the law. The court’s statement said this violation “resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States in 2016 and damaged the national interests of Ukraine.”

Yesterday we reported that Glenn Beck had a audio tape allegedly of Sytnik admitting he “helped” Hillary during the election by releasing “black accounting records” to hurt Paul Manafort and thereby the Trump campaign.

U.S. Attorney John Durham is now also looking into Ukrainian meddling during 2016.

All this, while it needs to be investigated, is more than a “conspiracy” theory.

Unless what you really mean is an actual conspiracy to undermine Donald Trump. We’ll leave that to John Durham to determine.

But when might we expect the networks to trumpet the facts in this matter as much as they trumpeted the empty Russia collusion hoax?

The post Chuck Todd Dismissed Ukraine Meddling In 2016 Election as ‘Conspiracy Theory’ But He Must Have Missed These Facts appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group chuck_todd2-300x199 Chuck Todd Dismissed Ukraine Meddling In 2016 Election as ‘Conspiracy Theory’ But He Must Have Missed These Facts Ukraine investigation into 2016 election interference Ukraine Politico media bias Media Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post fake news donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Syria Withdrawal Part I: The Right Decision

Westlake Legal Group syria-forces-620x324 Syria Withdrawal Part I: The Right Decision Uncategorized Trump Syria Susan Rice Samantha Power republicans Politics Obama Syria Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception
America woke up this morning to the news that President Trump, in consultation with President Erdogan of Turkey, has decided to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria. The process has already begun—both ways. As U.S. forces withdraw, Turkish forces are moving in to occupy the battlespace.

Because this was President Trump’s decision, predictably there was an immediate uproar, not only from the usual suspects employed by left-wing news outlets, but also never-Trump voices using FOX news as their platform. Note the strident tone of these excerpts from FOX.

And while news of the U.S. pullout stunned Syrian Kurds, the announcement also “completely blindsided” top brass at the Pentagon, U.S. officials told Fox News.

Aside from the existential threat to the Kurdish fighters posed by Turkey, Syrian Kurdish forces are also warning that ISIS sleeper cells are actively plotting to free about 12,000 militants currently detained by the Kurds and may take advantage of the Turkey-triggered turmoil to aid their plans.

Attempting to again promote the idea that President Trump doesn’t “listen to his experts,” in another article FOX says

President Trump first made waves on the issue in December 2018, when he abruptly announced the U.S. would completely pull its troops from Syria, tweeting that the mission to defeat ISIS was completed. The move prompted the resignation of then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and a coordinated campaign by then-National Security Adviser John Bolton to try to protect the Kurds, America’s fighting partner in the region.

Some of these points are valid and there are a number of serious risks attendant to this decision. However, in order to separate the political chaff from the actual data required for a sound National Security decision, we need to go back to the beginning of this entire imbroglio — Syrian President Bashar Al Assad’s alleged decision to employ chemical weapons against an ongoing insurgency in his country. President Obama believed he needed to make some sort of statement because of the (at the time) unverified information regarding this use of chemical weapons. Obama drew his “Red Line,” (im)famously stating.

We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.

At that same time, insurgents known as Islamic State of Iraq & Syria/ Islamic State Of Iraq & the Levant (ISIS/ISIL) were operating in parts of Iraq and Syria, causing significant headaches to Iraqi and Iraqi Kurd forces. President Obama, likely egged on by National Security Advisor, Susan Rice and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, both “Responsibility to Protect” adherents, began operations in Syria against ISIS/ISIL forces using that flawed doctrine as an excuse.

Under orders from President Obama, U.S. manned aircraft and drones (likely along with “National Technical Means”) began surveillance of ISIS/ISIL occupied areas in Syria in September of 2014. Later that same month, a coalition of Arab Air Forces led by the United States, began attacking ISIS/ISILpositions inside Syria, a clear violation of International Convention and U.S. Law.

As I noted in an article back then, if a U.S. Pilot had been shot down by a Russian aircraft, the Russians would have been correct under International Convention, as they had been invited in by the lawful sovereign in Syria, President Bashar Al Assad. What is worse, in 2016 the (then) newly assigned Commander of U.S. Central Command took a clandestine trip into Syria to confer with U.S. Forces on the ground there. Although sharing risks with troops on the ground is of course a stellar leadership technique, imagine the damage to U.S. prestige had he been captured or killed there…not to mention, he is a personal friend of mine.

Then there is the fundamental question—U.S. troops in Syria? By what authority other than a Presidential Order are they there? Had Congress declared War? Had they even passed a Use Of Force Resolution? What rationale, other than the long-discredited “Responsibility To Protect” doctrine, espoused by One World Order acolyte Samantha Power? Power, as a little light reading will show, is one of the architects of the Obama-directed decline of U.S. international power and prestige. As time went on, it appeared that dealing with ISIS/ISIL became an excuse to engage in that (now thankfully abandoned) doctrine, in Syria.

This is the main issue. This is the reason the then-candidate, now-President Trump, made it a campaign promise and administration priority to get U.S. troops out of wars we didn’t belong in. All the wailing and gnashing of teeth about this being a surprise, an unexpected decision that somehow “blindsided” senior Department of Defense officials, is just so much drek. That line is merely an excuse for Obama holdovers and deep state operatives who have been slow walking Trump policies and decisions—policies and decisions that have been known to them since the beginning of his post-election transition.

These people need to get it through their heads just who the duly elected Commander In Chief is. If they cannot execute his policies and directives with alacrity and effectiveness, they should exhibit the character of General Mattis…and resign…quietly.

Tomorrow, Part II: Not All Kurds Are Our Friends

Mike Ford, a retired Infantry Officer, writes on Military, Foreign Affairs and occasionally dabbles in Political and Economic matters.

Follow him on Twitter: @MikeFor10394583

You can find his other Red State work here.

The post Syria Withdrawal Part I: The Right Decision appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group syria-forces-300x157 Syria Withdrawal Part I: The Right Decision Uncategorized Trump Syria Susan Rice Samantha Power republicans Politics Obama Syria Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Pence Headed to House Districts of Vulnerable Democrats With a Message: Let’s Settle This at the Ballot Box

Westlake Legal Group MikePenceAPimage-620x317 Pence Headed to House Districts of Vulnerable Democrats With a Message: Let’s Settle This at the Ballot Box white house washington D.C. Target Races republicans Politics North Carolina Mike Pence Indiana Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections donald trump democrats Culture Congress Campaigns Allow Media Exception 2020 Elections 2020

Vice President Mike Pence speaks to the annual meeting of the National Rifle Association, Friday, April 26, 2019, in Indianapolis. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has refused to hold a formal impeachment inquiry vote on the floor of the U.S. House, but we still have a good idea of which Democrats have boarded the impeachment train so far.

There are 235 Democrats in the House and all but 9 of them have publicly expressed support for either an impeachment inquiry or outright impeachment. Some of those who have noted their support for one or the other are in districts won by Trump in 2016 but by Democrats in 2018.

It is some of those districts Vice President Mike Pence will be visiting this week as part of a Trump campaign blitz to remind voters (and the vulnerable Democratic House members) that political disagreements should be settled at the ballot box, not by way of impeachment.

Politico reports:

Each of the districts on Pence’s itinerary were won by Trump in 2016, making them potent targets for Republicans. The vice president will travel Wednesday to the southwest Iowa district of Rep. Cindy Axne, and Thursday he’s slated to visit the suburban Twin Cities district of another freshman Democrat, Minnesota Rep. Angie Craig. The vice president is then scheduled to barnstorm an array of battleground districts, including those held by Michigan Rep. Elissa Slotkin and Virginia Rep. Abigail Spanberger.
[…]
But Republicans are eager to get in sync, saying the impeachment push has given them a powerful argument to use against Democrats. At each stop, Pence is expected to paint Democrats as being more focused on destroying the president than on solving the problems of their constituents.
[…]
Democrats, Republicans point out, successfully prosecuted a similar case during the House GOP-led impeachment of Bill Clinton. Republicans suffered in that year’s midterm election, losing five congressional seats.
[…]
Roughly two dozen of the 31 House Democrats who hail from districts Trump won in 2016 have expressed support for the impeachment inquiry.

In at least one instance, Pence’s visit will be part of a two-pronged approach, appearing in Minneapolis on the same day Trump plans a speech in the Twin Cities:

Vice President Mike Pence is reportedly visiting the Twin Cities on Thursday, the same day President Donald Trump will hold a downtown Minneapolis rally.
[…]
In 2016, Trump carried Craig’s Second Congressional District by just over 1%. That same year, Craig lost the congressional race to Republican Jason Lewis by a similar margin. In 2018, Craig beat Lewis in a rematch by more than 5 percentage points.

In addition to the growing calls from Democrats to impeach Trump, there’s also wild talk about how should Pence himself should be thrown into the impeachment mix, which if successful would leave us with House Speaker Pelosi as president.

With that in mind, Pence shouldn’t have much trouble making a convincing argument that Democratic efforts to date on impeachment look more like coup attempts than legitimate inquiries into so-called “impeachable offenses.”

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Pence Headed to House Districts of Vulnerable Democrats With a Message: Let’s Settle This at the Ballot Box appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group MikePenceAPimage-300x153 Pence Headed to House Districts of Vulnerable Democrats With a Message: Let’s Settle This at the Ballot Box white house washington D.C. Target Races republicans Politics North Carolina Mike Pence Indiana Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections donald trump democrats Culture Congress Campaigns Allow Media Exception 2020 Elections 2020  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Democrats Trying to Impeach Trump in Secret Hearings

Westlake Legal Group ap-adam-schiff Democrats Trying to Impeach Trump in Secret Hearings Impeachment of President Trump Impeachment farce impeachment Government Transparency Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, speaks after a closed meeting on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, June 6, 2017, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Nothing about what the Democrats have done so far in regards to the impeachment process has been according to previously recognized rules and precedents.

They’ve failed to even have a floor vote of the full House to open an inquiry as has been done in the past. That has also allowed them to skirt the rules requiring such things as bipartisan questioning in hearings. That’s prompted some to believe they aren’t serious, are playing to their base or are hoping to shake some more information loose to get Trump.

Republicans have ripped them for ignoring proper process so far. The White House has said they do not have to comply with the requests from Democrats if Democrats aren’t even proceeding with a vote on a formal inquiry.

But there’s another big problem in how they are proceeding, as Byron York of the Washington Examiner points out.

There have so far been two hearings in the House Democrats’ effort to impeach President Trump over the Ukraine matter. Both have been held in secret. One was Thursday, the other Friday, and the public does not know what was said in either. Two more are scheduled for this week and will be held behind closed doors, too.

The hearings are part of an effort to remove the president from office. There could not be a matter of more pressing public concern. There could not be a matter in which the American people have a greater stake. And yet the public has no idea what is being discovered.

Last week’s sessions weren’t just secret. They were super-secret. The first hearing, in which the witness was former Ukraine special envoy Kurt Volker, was held in what is known as a SCIF, which stands for sensitive compartmented information facility. It is a room in the Capitol built to be impervious to electronic surveillance so that lawmakers can discuss the nation’s most important secrets without fear of discovery.

The second hearing, in which Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson testified, was also held in the SCIF.

Obviously, there was nothing terribly secret in the Volker and Atkinson hearings, as York notes. GOP came out of the meeting saying that nothing supported the impeachment hearing.

So why would you hold it in the SCIF unless you simply didn’t want the public to hear what he had to say which apparently didn’t support the Democrats’ agenda?

Republicans are ripping the lack of transparency and pointing the finger at Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) who is leading the flawed effort.

“Adam Schiff is running an impeachment inquiry secretly, behind closed doors, and he’s making up the rules as he goes along,” said Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe.

“These proceedings should be public,” added Republican Rep. Jim Jordan. “Democrats are trying to remove the president 13 months before an election based on an anonymous whistleblower … and they’re doing it all in a closed-door process.”

“This is nothing more or less than a show trial for the media,” said Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the Intelligence Committee, noting that with secrecy rules in place, the public knows only what is leaked to the press. “The Democrats leak what they want to leak to build narratives.”

This week they have more interviews coming up which will also be held in secret.

Schiff argues that the secrecy is needed to protect the whistleblower. But that’s nonsense. One doesn’t have to use his name and one can set parameters as to restrict identifying information.

But trying to use that as an excuse to keep the whole proceedings secret from the American public is Orwellian, screams “coup” and abuse of power. They don’t want you to know what’s going on, they want to filter it, feed you their narrative and have media spin it for them.

It isn’t about respect for the American people and or the Constitution, it’s all about how they can seize power. That’s fundamentally wrong and need to be called out.

The post Democrats Trying to Impeach Trump in Secret Hearings appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group ap-adam-schiff-300x200 Democrats Trying to Impeach Trump in Secret Hearings Impeachment of President Trump Impeachment farce impeachment Government Transparency Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Democrats Continue to Soil Themselves Over the Possibility of Voting on Impeachment

Westlake Legal Group NancyPelosiAPimage-620x317 Democrats Continue to Soil Themselves Over the Possibility of Voting on Impeachment vote Running Scared Politics No Vote Nancy Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry impeachment House Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Election donald trump democrats Congress Bluff Called Allow Media Exception 2020

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., reads a statement announcing a formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2019. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

For being such a layup, Democrats sure continue to refuse to take the shot.

As we enter almost a month of impeachment fever, the House is currently in the midst of an “impeachment inquiry” led by Rep. Adam Schiff, who’s proven himself time and again to be a complete hack. If you have reservations about how fair such a process is going, congrats on being more perceptive than the media, who see no issue with Republicans being frozen out of the matter. Imagine their reaction if Republicans had done that to Democrats on Benghazi, for example.

But aside from the game playing going on, one of the more stark realities that’s being made clear is just how scared Nancy Pelosi and her party are of actually having to vote on impeachment.

Take this line put out by Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, who leads the Democrat Caucus, over the weekend.

Wait, what? A vote is “cosmetic and procedural?” Who knew that actually having to follow the Constitution to enact the privileges and special powers of impeachment was just cosmetic? A lot of future Republican majorities are going to be glad to hear that.

Secondly, how can he know a majority back an inquiry without a vote? Just because they say so with nothing on the line? The logic is ludicrous, which means George Stephawhatever did nothing to push back on the claim.

Here are the facts. Impeachment inquiries, if we are talking about the use of special subpoena powers (which Democrats claim they now have), do not just happen by decree. If they did, every majority in the House throughout history could have just said they are having one and used it to harass and tie up any administration. If they want the ability to compel witnesses and document transfers, they need to actually vote on impeachment or, at the very least, they have to vote on the rules involved in an inquiry.

There’s another reason they are terrified to vote, though. It’s not just that they don’t want their moderates to have to go on record. They also don’t want to allow Republicans any power to rebut what they are doing. By not having an official inquiry, they get to make the rules in committee. The moment impeachment is officially brought to the fore, Republicans will get several tools to use themselves to fight back.

So what’s really going on? This isn’t an impeachment inquiry at all. It’s another useless, partisan committee investigation led by a known liar who’s already been caught orchestrating this entire matter. If we had a media worth anything, they’d be intellectually honest enough to report that.

Republicans should continue to demand a vote and neither they nor the White House should provide Pelosi with anything in the meantime. If they want to impeach, then impeach. Enough of the word games and abuse of power.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Democrats Continue to Soil Themselves Over the Possibility of Voting on Impeachment appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group clowncar-300x160 Democrats Continue to Soil Themselves Over the Possibility of Voting on Impeachment vote Running Scared Politics No Vote Nancy Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry impeachment House Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Election donald trump democrats Congress Bluff Called Allow Media Exception 2020  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Ilhan Omar Files for Divorce From Her Husband

Westlake Legal Group IlhanOmarAOCAPimage Ilhan Omar Files for Divorce From Her Husband ilhan omar marriages Ilhan Omar Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Congress Allow Media Exception

U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., left, joined at right by U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., responds to base remarks by President Donald Trump after he called for four Democratic congresswomen of color to go back to their “broken” countries, as he exploited the nation’s glaring racial divisions once again for political gain, during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, July 15, 2019. All four congresswomen are American citizens and three of the four were born in the U.S. Omar is the first Somali-American in Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Looks like Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) can no longer deny her marital situation.

It’s now being reported that she has filed for divorce from her present husband, Ahmed Hirsi.

She’d previously denied that they were separated amidst accusations that she was having an affair.

Earlier in the year, the wife of Democratic political consultant Tim Mynett accused her husband of having an affair with Omar in court filings pertaining to the couple’s divorce. Mynett filed a response, denying that he’d told his wife he was leaving her for Omar.

As the Washington Examiner observes:

The allegation of the affair brought added scrutiny to Omar’s own marriage. She has faced repeated questions over her marital history after allegations surfaced that she married her brother and committed immigration fraud.

The freshman congresswoman married Hirsi in 2002 during a faith ceremony but did not legally marry until years later. Omar and Hirsi had two children before they separated in 2008. The next year, Omar legally married Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. The two split in 2011, the same year Omar and Hirsi reconciled, but did not legally divorce until 2017. Meanwhile, Omar and Hirsi had a third child in 2012 and legally married in early 2018.

Omar, 37, has denied that she was in a relationship with anyone else. When asked in August whether she had separated from Hirsi or was dating anyone else, Omar said, “No I am not.”

Omar’s relationship with Mynett, her political consultant, has also faced scrutiny because of campaign finance rules.

From Fox News:

The conservative, Virginia-based National Legal and Policy Center filed a complaint against Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on Wednesday, alleging that the lawmaker used campaign funds to illegally reimburse her purported paramour for personal travel expenses.

The complaint also charges that Omar failed to itemize travel reimbursements as required by the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 — and that the travel expenses increased during the same month that Omar’s alleged affair with married Washington, D.C. political consultant Tim Mynett, 38, heated up. ….

Omar’s campaign has paid Mynett’s E. Street Group, LLC around $230,000 for fundraising consulting, digital communications, Internet advertising and travel expenses since 2018, federal election records indicate. Most of those payments occurred after Election Day last year.

Omar’s legal people denied that there had been anything illegal or improper about the expenditures.

Minnesota campaign finance officials found in June that Omar had violated state campaign finance rules when she used campaign funds to pay for personal out-of-state travel. They ordered her to reimburse $3500 and fined her $500. Omar has also faced questions about allegedly filing joint tax returns with her present husband, Ahmed Hirsi, while still reportedly legally married to her past husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi.

The post Ilhan Omar Files for Divorce From Her Husband appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group IlhanOmarAOCAPimage-300x153 Ilhan Omar Files for Divorce From Her Husband ilhan omar marriages Ilhan Omar Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Congress Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Hunter Biden Apparently Gets Around, Caught Doing Shady Deals In Yet Another Country

Westlake Legal Group JoeBidenAPimage-620x317 Hunter Biden Apparently Gets Around, Caught Doing Shady Deals In Yet Another Country Ukraine Rudy Guiliani Romania Politics NYTs Kenneth Vogel Joe Biden hunter biden Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats Chuck Todd China

Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden speaks at the Polk County Democrats Steak Fry, in Des Moines, Iowa, Saturday, Sept. 21, 2019. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

It’s amazing how a guy with zero experience in certain fields kept getting jobs in certain fields. And I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that his father was conducting foreign policy in the same places, right? But don’t ask questions, because Chuck Todd might have an aneurysm.

We’ve already heard about Hunter Biden’s lucrative dealings in Ukraine. Then there was the bribery scheme in China involving a guy under indictment. Now, we are finding out that he advised a guy headed to prison in Romania.

In other words, Biden likely broke the law here by even being involved with this dealing in Romania. He was not registered as a foreign agent and he was clearly operating as an advisor to foreigners. Of course, nothing will happen to him because FARA laws only apply to Trump associates.

At the same time Hunter was doing this, Joe was involved in at least articulating foreign policy in the region. The smell of selling influence is strong. There’s no reason Hunter would have otherwise been getting all these gigs if the people involved didn’t think he it could help their case. The most damning explanation is that they felt he could sway his father, consciously or through indirect suggestion, to change their situations. The more tame explanation is that they thought simply having Hunter around would provide a buffer between them and prosecutors, i.e. the idea that Joe Biden would protect his son. Neither is particularly good.

But who gave this information to Vogel? I have a pretty good idea.

John Kerry’s son is front and center here. The article reads like him trying to get out in front of any accusations of bad dealings on his part. He’s basically throwing Hunter under the bus. Also, remember that the media rushed to accuse Rudy Guiliani of corruption for meeting in Romania earlier in the year. Anyone think they’ll suddenly forget where Romania is on the map? I’m going to guess so.

What all this does do, regardless of how bad it actually is, is continue to bloody Biden. Trump has successfully hung all this around his neck and because so many in the media adore Elizabeth Warren, they are starting to take the chance to put Biden out to pasture. While he continues to dominate in South Carolina, he looks to lose the first three primaries and that’s a terrible position to be in.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Hunter Biden Apparently Gets Around, Caught Doing Shady Deals In Yet Another Country appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 17329344-1af8-4a1f-8631-ab65d20076a0-1-300x153 Hunter Biden Apparently Gets Around, Caught Doing Shady Deals In Yet Another Country Ukraine Rudy Guiliani Romania Politics NYTs Kenneth Vogel Joe Biden hunter biden Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats Chuck Todd China  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com