web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "democrats" (Page 78)

‘Rent a Child’ Programs in Central American Countries Make It Easier for Illegals To Remain in U.S.

Westlake Legal Group rent-a-child-programs-in-central-american-countries-make-it-easier-for-illegals-to-remain-in-u-s ‘Rent a Child’ Programs in Central American Countries Make It Easier for Illegals To Remain in U.S. Rental Children Politics migrants Mayor Donald Margo maria bartiromo Jim Jordan Impeachment of President Trump immigration Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception 2020
Westlake Legal Group Untitled-1-27-620x317 ‘Rent a Child’ Programs in Central American Countries Make It Easier for Illegals To Remain in U.S. Rental Children Politics migrants Mayor Donald Margo maria bartiromo Jim Jordan Impeachment of President Trump immigration Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception 2020

This frame grab from video provided by Televisa, shows migrants bound for the U.S.-Mexico border waiting on a bridge that stretches over the Suchiate River, connecting Guatemala and Mexico, in Tecun Uman, Guatemala, Friday, Oct. 19, 2018. The gated entry into Mexico via the bridge has been closed. The U.S. president has made it clear to Mexico that he is monitoring its response. On Thursday he threatened to close the U.S. border if Mexico didn’t stop the caravan. (Televisa via AP)

 

Migrants have quickly learned that their chances of gaining entry to the United States or remaining in the country once they’ve arrived are far better if they are traveling with a child.

Under current law, “the government cannot keep migrant families in holding facilities at the border for more than 72 hours. It must either transfer them to an immigration detention facility suitable for children or release them.”

Migrants are also well aware that, if accompanied by a child, they are less likely to “remain detained and they have a better shot at fending off deportation.”

Because the US currently lacks the facilities to accommodate the unprecedented number of illegals who are entering our country, border agents are forced to allow  “thousands of detained migrants go free each week.”  

The New York Times reports that “Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s three residential family centers — two in southern Texas and one in Pennsylvania — can accommodate 3,326 parents and children.

Accordingly, those who do not have children of their own try to “find” children.

Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo traveled to the southern border to broadcast her program,” Sunday Morning Futures.” She visited the El Paso border crossing which she said is the busiest one.

She reported:

What we saw was just stunning. Children put in incredibly difficult, terrible positions.

We got confirmation that there’s a renting of children program going on in El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala, where people are renting their kids, giving their kids to people so that they can cross the border, then sending the kids back.

Here’s what the mayor of El Paso told me.

(Relevant segment starts at 6:53 in video below.)

Bartiromo said, “The children are being put into very dangerous situations.”

Mayor Donald Margo responded:

And in some cases, they’re informing me that we may have – rental children – so to speak. That they’re not necessarily the actual families. That they’re bringing these children in.

So, there’s human trafficking. There are some real serious situations that Congress needs to address.

She turned to her guest, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), and asked, “Is Congress going to address it?”

Jordan replied:

Unfortunately, I don’t think the Democrats are going to work with us to do what everyone in this country knows needs to be done. We need to build a border security wall and we need to change our asylum laws. We have said – and the President’s been clear on this – this is a crisis. Finally even some on the left are realizing it’s a crisis. The human trafficking problem, the gang problem, the drug problem, this is a crisis. But we have to do two fundamental things. Change the asylum law and build the border wall. Those two have to happen first and the Democrats just don’t want to go there, because, for them, it’s all about politics and it’s all about getting Trump.

“Because it’s just going to give him another victory. Unbelievable.” said Bartiromo.

Sadly, nothing will be done. The Democrats have focused solely on destroying Trump. They will have no accomplishments to show voters in 2020. Worse, by then (hopefully) every American will be aware of the Democrats’ attempted coup against the President. And they will be exposed for the hypocrites they are.

 

The post ‘Rent a Child’ Programs in Central American Countries Make It Easier for Illegals To Remain in U.S. appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group migrant-caravan-adjusted-cropped-AP-300x159 ‘Rent a Child’ Programs in Central American Countries Make It Easier for Illegals To Remain in U.S. Rental Children Politics migrants Mayor Donald Margo maria bartiromo Jim Jordan Impeachment of President Trump immigration Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Rashida Tlaib’s Father Says She Committed Election Fraud

Westlake Legal Group rashida-tlaibs-father-says-she-committed-election-fraud Rashida Tlaib’s Father Says She Committed Election Fraud the daily wire ryan saavedra residency rashida tlaib Politics Israel Hamas Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story election fraud Elabed Detroit News democrats

Yesterday, I posted on Tlaib defending terrorists who were launching hundreds of rockets into Israel. Today, I ran across another interesting story involving her.

Rashida Tlaib’s father claimed in 2010 that she lied on her election affadavit about where she lived in order to qualify for the office she was seeking. Why is something that happened in 2010 just now coming to light? Because the comments were in a Detroit News article that was effectively scrubbed from the internet.

In a March 11, 2010 newspaper article in The Detroit News, Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s (D-MI) father accused her of lying “big-time to get elected” by falsifying her address on an election affidavit.

The details center around a house that Tlaib’s father was part owner of.

He said his daughter misrepresented her residency when she signed an election affidavit in 2008 with the Wayne County Clerk claiming she was a citizen of Detroit.

According to that affidavit, Tlaib claimed she lived at 9123 Rathbone in Detroit. That house is owned in part by her father, Harbi Elabed, and he now says she did not live there and he was only recently made aware that she had claimed so.

“She lied,” Elabed said. “She lied big-time to get elected. I never teach her that way. I teach her the right way. It’s my house. She didn’t live there. She lived in Dearborn in her house with her husband and boy.”

There was apparently a lot of bad blood in the relationship and Tlaib claimed that her father was lying to get back at her. Who’s telling the truth? We’ll probably never know because Tlaib was never made to prove residency despite claims she could. I’d guess any statute of limitations on something like this is long gone and no one in Detroit would prosecute anyway.

Fudging residency to run for office is a favorite pass-time of politicians everywhere. You may recall that AOC faced similar questions that have yet to be resolved (among many others about her campaign finance). Perhaps it’s time for those that run for office to be made to prove this stuff? Seems like a small fail safe to implement given the importance of elections.

Nothing will happen here, but it’s worth exposing nonetheless. A Republican would be grilled on this so we’ll see whether the media finds it even worth mentioning (spoiler: they won’t).

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Rashida Tlaib’s Father Says She Committed Election Fraud appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group rashida-tlaib-channel-4-SCREENSHOT-300x160 Rashida Tlaib’s Father Says She Committed Election Fraud the daily wire ryan saavedra residency rashida tlaib Politics Israel Hamas Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story election fraud Elabed Detroit News democrats   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Bipartisan, Omnibus Infrastructure Plan-Part I

Westlake Legal Group bipartisan-omnibus-infrastructure-plan-part-i Bipartisan, Omnibus Infrastructure Plan-Part I Uncategorized Taxes republicans Politics infrastructure spending Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception
Westlake Legal Group 6543AA7B-0879-4FB1-BA80-818BBDA8A5B5-620x934 Bipartisan, Omnibus Infrastructure Plan-Part I Uncategorized Taxes republicans Politics infrastructure spending Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception

Rep (R) Mike Kelly

As supposed conservatives, we once again appear to be ceding ground to the Democrats when it comes to Federal authorities and responsibilities. Our latest surrender is the “bipartisan” conversation on an “omnibus” infrastructure bill. Those two words in “scare quotes” are meant to do just that—scare you. And you well should be. It’s borderline axiomatic that when politicians start using words like “bipartisan” and “omnibus,” what we really should hear is “unaccountable,” “pork” and “corrupt to the point where the snouts are down in the taxpayer provided trough up to the shoulders.” You can see more of my general thoughts on public corruption here and here. For now, let’s focus on the issue before us.

On Breitbart News Saturday, hosted by Matt Boyle, the subject was that very issue, a massive, multi-trillion dollar infrastructure project. I had some fundamental concerns, beginning with—should the Federal government even being involved in this in the first place? More on that in another piece.

Boyle’s guest, Republican Congressman Mike Kelly explained his novel approach to funding this multi-trillion dollar infrastructure project, now in its initial discussion phase. Rep. Kelly’s approach would supposedly not increase debt, nor would it increase taxes. Hard to believe, right? Rep Kelly proposes selling current Federal debt to fund this multi-trillion dollar expenditure. On the surface, this sounds like a “win-win.” The Federal government sells off debt for cash. It uses said cash to fund a huge program of construction projects…all without increasing taxes. sounds great. Right?

Not so fast folks. Taxation actually can serve as a brake on the propensity of politicians to spend money. Having to explain to the folks who are paying the bills, just why they are spending this money, can sometimes, provide an incentive to politicians to at least try to be somewhat parsimonious (I would hope). Kelly’s idea removes all such constraints. Basically, what he proposes, is a huge trough of money that politicians can spread around to appease various constituencies—with no pain born by the taxpayer…and with no risk at the voting booth. This idea will be nothing more than another opportunity for politicos of all persuasions to “bring home the bacon.” This is akin to a family deeply in debt, using an unexpectedly large tax refund to go on a cruise instead of paying down some of that debt.

The above discussion presupposes that the Federal government should be involved in this business in the first place. Next up; Just why should Federal Government be involved in funding this boondoggle at all?

Mike Ford is a retired Infantry Officer who writes on Military, Foreign Affairs and occasionally dabbles in Political and Economic matters.

Follow him on Twitter: @MikeFor10394583

You can find his other Red State work here.

The post Bipartisan, Omnibus Infrastructure Plan-Part I appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 6543AA7B-0879-4FB1-BA80-818BBDA8A5B5-199x300 Bipartisan, Omnibus Infrastructure Plan-Part I Uncategorized Taxes republicans Politics infrastructure spending Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Cory Booker on Dems’ 2020 Victory – Americans WANT to Pay More Taxes Because They’re ‘Patriotic’

Westlake Legal Group cory-booker-on-dems-2020-victory-americans-want-to-pay-more-taxes-because-theyre-patriotic Cory Booker on Dems’ 2020 Victory – Americans WANT to Pay More Taxes Because They’re ‘Patriotic’ Uncategorized Taxes socialism Jake Tapper Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Cory Booker Congress communism CNN Barack Obama Allow Media Exception 2020
Westlake Legal Group cory-booker-surprised-look-SCREENSHOT Cory Booker on Dems’ 2020 Victory – Americans WANT to Pay More Taxes Because They’re ‘Patriotic’ Uncategorized Taxes socialism Jake Tapper Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Cory Booker Congress communism CNN Barack Obama Allow Media Exception 2020

[SCREENSHOT FROM URL]

 

Do you love your country? If so, then you also don’t mind being poorer. So says Cory “Farticus” Booker (here).

During an appearance on Sunday’s State of the Union, the vegan senator — who seems to believe carnivorism’s days are numbered — explained the connection between patriotism and wanting to give Washington politicians bunches more of your cash:

“We live in a nation with far more patriotism than people are expressing. … [F]olks want the best for the country.”

Thusly, they won’t re-elect Donald Trump, despite a booming economy.

Host Jake Tapper asked Cory how he’d pitch a Democratic president to voters in light of the economic prosperity, to which he replied that there isn’t prosperity.

Let us pause for pandering:

“I’m the only presidential candidate that lives in a low-income inner-city neighborhood. Talk to folks, and they’ll tell you, ‘I have to work two jobs just to try to keep myself in housing. And by the way, that housing doesn’t reflect the dignity of my family.’ Americans are struggling. Their wages are too low, or decades low. For the last four decades, I don’t think they’ve budged that much.”



When Jake pointed out that there has been improvement — in wages and unemployment — which was absent “during the Obama years,” Cory gave the credit to Obama:

“I love that Trump is taking credit for a recovery that started under Obama.”

So which version of Cory is being genuine? Is there prosperity, or is there not?

Who nose. Pick a booker.

Is it just me, or does it seem like this recent batch of Democratic congresspeople was picked at random from people in line at a snow cone stand?

Moving on: Jake asked Cory why voters would wanna put a Democrat in the Oval Office, when all of the 2020 candidates — including him — are pushing for a tax increase.

The senator’s response:

“We live in a nation with far more patriotism than people are expressing. What I mean by that is folks want the best for their country. And they know that if your family doesn’t have a great public school for your kid, if your family does not have great access to healthcare, then we all are suffering as a result of that and often creating greater costs.”

Oookay.

A few thoughts:

  • Public schools stink, not because of a money issue. They stink because they’re not doing a good job of teaching academic subjects at an accelerated level.
  • Great healthcare wasn’t accomplished by Obama’s installed system.
  • If things done wrongly “often [creates] greater costs,” then Congress owes us to do rightly and give us back the difference. Not take more from us.

Cory let Jake know he’s a revolutionary:

“I’m going to run a campaign that speaks to all of America.”

No way! No one’s ever thought of that before! Amazing!

He also taught us this:

“We’re all hurting because we have not designed an economy that invests in each other.”

Ya mean like communism?

How’s this for an idea: Americans love their country because of its liberty. Part of freedom from an oppressive government is financial. One of the reasons people love America is because its citizens can thrive economically, aka keep most of the decent money they work for.

As long as the government funds things a giant portion of Americans oppose, and so long as it shows a staggering inability to exercise discretion in spending and produce quality products efficiently (here), how about we don’t throw more money at the problem? Because the problem, truthfully, is government.

How’s that for patriotism?

-Alex

 

Relevant RedState links in this article: here and here.

See 3 more pieces from me:

TREACHERY: Tennessee School System Creates Video For Teachers On How To Teach Kids America Is Racist

Billionaire Diamond Mogul Dies During Penis Enlargement Surgery

Oregon Man Stranded For Five Days In The Snow, Survives On Taco Bell Fire Sauce

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. For iPhone instructions, see the bottom of this page.



 

 

If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” If it fails to automatically refresh, manually reload the page. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”

The post Cory Booker on Dems’ 2020 Victory – Americans WANT to Pay More Taxes Because They’re ‘Patriotic’ appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group cory-booker-surprised-look-SCREENSHOT-300x159 Cory Booker on Dems’ 2020 Victory – Americans WANT to Pay More Taxes Because They’re ‘Patriotic’ Uncategorized Taxes socialism Jake Tapper Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Cory Booker Congress communism CNN Barack Obama Allow Media Exception 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

President Trump Stirs the Pot By Saying Mueller Should Not Testify Before Fat Jerry Nadler’s Committee

Westlake Legal Group president-trump-stirs-the-pot-by-saying-mueller-should-not-testify-before-fat-jerry-nadlers-committee President Trump Stirs the Pot By Saying Mueller Should Not Testify Before Fat Jerry Nadler’s Committee Special Counsel Robert Mueller Politics Mueller report House Judiciary Committee Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception

Earlier today, Rhode Island Democrat David Cicilline announced that special counsel Robert Mueller would testify before the House Judiciary Committee on May 15. (Note, there has been some walk back from this firm date, see below:)

This, as surely as night follows day, caught the attention of President Trump.

And it drew the predictable reaction

(It’s always amusing when people try to use something Trump has said in the past as evidence of something other than Trump said it in the past.)

This is how the New York Times sees it:

That puts the president at odds with the Democrats, and with his own attorney general, William P. Barr.

Actually, Barr’s comment doesn’t “put him a odds” with Trump. Barr never says Mueller will testify, only that he has no objections to it. That does not imply that he feels so strongly on the subject that he cares enough to fight about it.

Whether or not the House has the legal authority to subpoena a temp employee and have them testify on the deliberative process in a particular situation, such as the Mueller report, rather than as part of an impeachment hearing is far from settled. If the administration decided to litigate the issue, it would be some number of months, if not years, before the process played itself out and the House would always run the risk of damaging its authority if the Supreme Court decided that this was a political squabble and not a legal issue or that the House had overreached in demanding testimony on a deliberative and pre-decisional process.

In reality, if Mueller wants to testify on May 15, it is unlikely that anyone is going to care. Trump’s tweet seems like more of his trademark trolling designed to stir the pot and provoke a spittle-flinging rage. And it looks like it will work.

=========
=========
Like what you see? Then visit my story archive.

I’m on Facebook. Drop by and join the fun there.
=========
=========

The post President Trump Stirs the Pot By Saying Mueller Should Not Testify Before Fat Jerry Nadler’s Committee appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group trump-smirk2-300x200 President Trump Stirs the Pot By Saying Mueller Should Not Testify Before Fat Jerry Nadler’s Committee Special Counsel Robert Mueller Politics Mueller report House Judiciary Committee Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Democrat Rep Who Slobbered on KFC During a Hearing Wants to Arrest Bill Barr Now

Westlake Legal Group democrat-rep-who-slobbered-on-kfc-during-a-hearing-wants-to-arrest-bill-barr-now Democrat Rep Who Slobbered on KFC During a Hearing Wants to Arrest Bill Barr Now steve cohen Sargent at Arms Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story democrats delusional Crazy CNN bill barr Arrest Barr Anderson Cooper

This is clearly a person that should be taken seriously.

A few days ago, Rep. Steve Cohen brought a bucket of KFC into a hearing. He giggled his way through eating it in what was a stunt that was supposed to signify that Bill Barr was “chicken” for not letting the clowns in the Democratic House question him. I can’t imagine why Barr wouldn’t want to cooperate with these morons.

Well, he’s back and this time he’s suggesting that Bill Barr should be arrested and forced to testify before his joke of a committee. That doesn’t sound like something a third world dictator would say at all.

(video is cued up at 0:46 seconds where the remarks occur)

If you watch the video you see Cohen suggest that Barr should be charged with “inherent contempt” and that he wants Congress to dispatch the Sargent at Arms to haul Barr in like a prisoner.

Even CNN’s Anderson Cooper is taken aback by what he’s hearing, knowing it’s idiotic on its face. Cohen goes on to say that Barr is being “utterly contemptuous” and that he’s lied to Congress, neither of which is true. Barr was ready to come testify until Jerry Nadler decided to play games by having a team of lawyers question the Attorney General instead of the Congressional members who have the constitutional right to do so. This was obviously done to try to grill Barr to the point of him falling into a perjury trap.

Being that Barr is not an idiot, he told Jerry Nadler to go pound sand over his testimony request until he’s willing to negotiate in good faith. Now, we’ve got a House member suggesting he be arrested.

It’s pretty ridiculous but it’s also dangerous. The fact that so many Democrats are this comfortable with criminalizing political disagreements is an awful indicator of where we are headed and what extent these people are willing to go through to gain power. Nothing appears to be off limits. I can’t say it’s surprising though, given what we are finding out about how the Obama administrations targeted the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

This is one of the reasons big government is such a terrible thing. Whether it’s out of control bureaucracies or Congressional members role-playing as tyrants, the more power these people have, the worse off the country is.

I’ll end by pointing out the hypocrisy that’s evident. Had a Republican suggested arresting Eric Holder and hauling him before Congress back during the Obama administration, the media and Democrats would have lost their minds over it. These are the same people who clutch their pearls when Trump slaps at the media as “fake news,” something that logically does nothing to restrict press rights. Yet, they are completely comfortable with a House member suggesting the Attorney General should be put in handcuffs for no justifiable reason at all. It goes to show just how worthless the press are when it comes to protecting the freedoms and norms they claim to care so much about.

When push comes to shove, they will always side with their partisan narrative.

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Democrat Rep Who Slobbered on KFC During a Hearing Wants to Arrest Bill Barr Now appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group D5kFqALW0AANbQS.jpg-large-300x225 Democrat Rep Who Slobbered on KFC During a Hearing Wants to Arrest Bill Barr Now steve cohen Sargent at Arms Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story democrats delusional Crazy CNN bill barr Arrest Barr Anderson Cooper   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

MSNBC Host Provides the Most Hilarious Explanation of the Economy in History

Westlake Legal Group chrishayes-620x348 MSNBC Host Provides the Most Hilarious Explanation of the Economy in History trump economy Politics MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Chris Hayes Allow Media Exception

One of the major problems confronting the Democrats in 2020 is the state of the economy. Barring some deus ex machina, President Trump is going to campaign for reelection within the context of a significant economic boom. The stock market is booming. Inflation remains low. Real wages are up. Labor force participation is up. Unemployment is at near historic lows. Ordinarily, people would be happy for a great economy, but, with the Democrats, good news for America is bad news for their party.

Their most immediate problem is how to rationalize the economy under Trump to the economy overseen by Obama. At that point, the conventional wisdom among Democrats and professional economists was that high unemployment, low labor force participation, and stagnant wages were the new normal.

Now MSNBC “personality” Chris Hayes has his own theory to explain the difference:

Everyone who called for austerity got it wrong and caused harm

Everyone who scaremongered about the deficit got it wrong and caused harm

Everyone who wrote about the “skills gap” got it wrong and caused harm

Everyone who kept warning about inflation got it wrong and caused harm

Lots of regular people – critics, bloggers, gadflies, etc were able to see this but the commanding heights of the econ/policy/political worlds either could not or would not.

Or, an even less charitable interpretation: they didn’t get it wrong at all. They didn’t want full employment, they didn’t want wage growth and empowered workers and they certainly didn’t want that happening under a Democratic president.

I mean, years of the titans of industry whining about the skills mismatch, how they can’t find good workers, and chin-stroking conferences about labor force participation, and columns about how it was workers’ own fault, on and on and on, all just garbage.

Yep. That’s exactly what happened. Tens of thousands of American businesses decided they’d go out of business rather than let Obama’s economic plan be a success. Millions of Americans decided they’d just sit at home and not work to screw the black guy.

This is ridiculous.

Not to say that Obama didn’t inherit an economic mess, he did. But, like FDR’s New Deal, Obama tried to use a financial crisis to fundamentally change the US economy and to increase government influence. He reduced the workforce by nearly 9 million by liberalizing rules for disability insurance and did this as much to try to create a new class of benefit recipients who would reliably vote Democrat as for any other reason. But the reason that the economy has taken off under Trump is because both consumers and employers feel more secure in their finances and have more confidence to make major investments and purchases. Putting the brakes on federal rule-making and rolling back rules that inhibit growth have also been a factor. Getting out of the way as oil/gas exploration and extraction has boomed has been a major stimulus to the national economy.

More to the detail of Hayes nonsense. Obama was not burdened with any “austerity” measures

Westlake Legal Group national-debt-620x393 MSNBC Host Provides the Most Hilarious Explanation of the Economy in History trump economy Politics MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Chris Hayes Allow Media Exception

Neither has Trump benefited from an increase in inflation:

Westlake Legal Group inflation-620x383 MSNBC Host Provides the Most Hilarious Explanation of the Economy in History trump economy Politics MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Chris Hayes Allow Media Exception

A lot of the “skills gap” was utter bullsh** pushed by the Chamber of Commerce in its eagerness to bring in more cheap H1B visa recipients to replace American workers. Under Obama, most American STEM graduates didn’t work in that field but no one in the White House ever challenged the narrative because Obama, too, wanted cheap foreign workers and Americans on the dole.

I have no doubt that this will not become a full-fledged scandal, probably rating its own special counsel, by the time the election season is in full swing. There is probably a Michael Moore movies in the making about this conspiracy. But most people are going to see this for what it is, a dimwitted cable talking head trying to rationalize away a very good economy.

=========
=========
Like what you see? Then visit my story archive.

I’m on Facebook. Drop by and join the fun there.
=========
=========

The post MSNBC Host Provides the Most Hilarious Explanation of the Economy in History appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group chrishayes-300x168 MSNBC Host Provides the Most Hilarious Explanation of the Economy in History trump economy Politics MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Chris Hayes Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Rashida Tlaib Defends Hamas Terrorists as They Fire Rockets Into Israel

Westlake Legal Group rashida-tlaib-defends-hamas-terrorists-as-they-fire-rockets-into-israel Rashida Tlaib Defends Hamas Terrorists as They Fire Rockets Into Israel terrorists terrorist sympathizer Rocket Attacks rashida tlaib Palestinians Israel islamist Islamic jihad Hamas Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story democrats

Over the past 36 hours, 600 rockets have fallen on Israel, fired from the Hamas controlled Gaza strip. Reports are scattered right now, but there are numerous videos floating around of the destruction. Several Israelis are confirmed dead.

The attacks are ongoing and in response, Palestinians took the streets last night to celebrate. What exactly they think they are accomplishing worthy of celebration is unclear, well, except of course their rabid anti-Semitism. To many of these people and their leaders, killing Jews is enough, never mind that it’s only sinking them further into desolation.

While political reactions have been sparse, as most Democrats like to avoid this topic, Rep. Rashida Tlaib decided to jump into the fray. This was here response incredibly response. I won’t say surprising because nothing she says really surprises me anymore.

In the midst of a massive attack on Israel by Palestinians, Tlaib rushes to go to bat for Hamas terrorists. She’s also quoting false propaganda by trying to blame Israel for the strikes. Israel did not randomly shoot unarmed people in the Gaza strip on Friday. That’s the kind of made up crap that continues to stoke tensions and she’s peddling in it as a U.S. Congressional member. It’s pretty disgusting.

It’s eye-opening to see someone who claims to represent America and its values defend people that are purposely targeting Jewish civilians in Israel. There’s also a fair bit of irony given the anti-Semitic “dual loyalty” smears she and Ilhan Omar have trafficked in. These two women consistently show they loyalty lies with awful regimes, whether it be Omar defending Maduro or Tlaib defending Hamas. Enough pretending they are anything but anti-American in their worldview at this point.

We’ve reached a place where the insanity is too much to let go. The media need to wake up, get over their bias for a few minutes, and call this stuff out. It’s not normal or acceptable for elected U.S. officials to peddle terrorist propaganda and blame innocent Israelis for having rockets fired at them by Palestinians. Michigan and Minnesota need to wake the heck up and change paths in the 2020 election. These terrorist sympathizers (yeah, I’m going there, they’ve left me no choice) are dangerous and have no business influencing governmental policy.

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

 

 

The post Rashida Tlaib Defends Hamas Terrorists as They Fire Rockets Into Israel appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group RashidaTlaibMarch2019-300x159 Rashida Tlaib Defends Hamas Terrorists as They Fire Rockets Into Israel terrorists terrorist sympathizer Rocket Attacks rashida tlaib Palestinians Israel islamist Islamic jihad Hamas Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story democrats   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

As California Takes Measures To Keep Trump Off Ballot, They Demonstrate Why The Electoral College Is Essential

Westlake Legal Group as-california-takes-measures-to-keep-trump-off-ballot-they-demonstrate-why-the-electoral-college-is-essential As California Takes Measures To Keep Trump Off Ballot, They Demonstrate Why The Electoral College Is Essential President Trump's tax returns Popular Culture Politics National Review Liberal Elitism Jerry Brown Hollywood Gavin Newsom Front Page Stories Featured Story electoral college democrats Dan McLaughlin California Allow Media Exception 2020

Westlake Legal Group California-sanctuary-state-bill-620x349 As California Takes Measures To Keep Trump Off Ballot, They Demonstrate Why The Electoral College Is Essential President Trump's tax returns Popular Culture Politics National Review Liberal Elitism Jerry Brown Hollywood Gavin Newsom Front Page Stories Featured Story electoral college democrats Dan McLaughlin California Allow Media Exception 2020

 

Last Thursday, in a bid to force President Trump to turn over his tax returns, the California State Senate approved Bill 27, the Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act. 

If the bill should become law, all presidential candidates will be required to submit their income tax returns from the past five years before their name can appear on the ballot. “The act would require the Secretary of State, within five days of receiving the returns, to make redacted versions of the returns available to the public on the Secretary of State’s internet website. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.”

The bill has been submitted to the California State House for consideration, and if it passes, it will go to Governor Gavin Newsom for his signature. However, his approval is not guaranteed.

According to the L.A. Times, the California State Senate and House passed an identical bill in 2017 which was vetoed by then-Governor Jerry Brown. He told state lawmakers it would likely be overturned in the courts.

In his veto message, Brown wrote, “The proposal could have led to other litmus tests for candidates. Today we require tax returns, but what would be next? Five years of health records? A certified birth certificate? High school report cards? And will these requirements vary depending on which political party is in power?”

For the sake of argument, let’s assume it becomes law in the state.

Such laws actually demonstrate why our founders saw the need to set up the electoral college.

The National Review’s Dan McLaughlin makes the case better than most, and he does so with flair.

His response to a California political official’s tweet set off a twitterstorm that has liberal heads exploding.

I’ve included the entire thread, but it’s not necessary to read the whole thing to get the gist of it.

Dan McLaughlin: @baseballcrank

 

The post As California Takes Measures To Keep Trump Off Ballot, They Demonstrate Why The Electoral College Is Essential appeared first on RedState.

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Nancy Pelosi Is Really Concerned Trump Won’t Leave Office If He Loses in 2020

Westlake Legal Group nancy-pelosi-is-really-concerned-trump-wont-leave-office-if-he-loses-in-2020 Nancy Pelosi Is Really Concerned Trump Won’t Leave Office If He Loses in 2020 Won't Concede voter suppression Stacey Abrams Politics Nonsense Nancy Pelosi Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Faux Concerns donald trump democrats 2020 election

Westlake Legal Group stacey-abrams-point-angry-SCREENSHOT-620x360 Nancy Pelosi Is Really Concerned Trump Won’t Leave Office If He Loses in 2020 Won't Concede voter suppression Stacey Abrams Politics Nonsense Nancy Pelosi Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Faux Concerns donald trump democrats 2020 election

This is what you call projection right? See the photo above for a reason why.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is apparently really concerned that President Trump won’t voluntarily leave office if he loses the election in 2020.

And her’s CNN’s resident Tater dutifully reporting Pelosi’s worries without a hint of skepticism.

Maybe the Democrats should try winning the 2020 election before expressing concerns like this. Better yet, maybe they should worry about their own party members who are still refusing to concede elections they lost.

Case in point, Stacey Abrams, who lost the GA governorship by over 50,000 votes, is still going around telling people she won. She said this on Friday.

“I’m here to tell you a secret that makes Breitbart and Tucker Carlson go crazy: We won,” Abrams said. “I am not delusional. I know I am not the governor of Georgia – possibly yet.”

Let me help her out here. You see, the fact that you aren’t the governor of Georgia means you did not win.

Imagine if Donald Trump said “we don’t have to concede elections anymore.” Abrams continues to whine about non-existent voter suppression in an election where African Americans turned out in higher percentages than whites. Where is the suppression exactly? We keep hearing the voter rolls were purged. Correct, that was done as part of a decades old law that clears off dead, inactive, and ineligible voters. No one who gets purged is stopped from re-registering and you can even register same day to vote provisionally.

Will Trump whine if he loses the election? Probably. But so what? Democrats, including Hillary Clinton have been doing that for years. Clinton is still out there claiming the election was stolen from her. Meanwhile, the media have no qualms with Democrats who question the electoral system. I was once told that’s dangerous for “our democracy.” It’s all partisan nonsense.

Good news for Nancy though. She hopefully won’t have to test her theory.

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Nancy Pelosi Is Really Concerned Trump Won’t Leave Office If He Loses in 2020 appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group nancy-pelosi-monkey-face-SCREENSHOT-300x154 Nancy Pelosi Is Really Concerned Trump Won’t Leave Office If He Loses in 2020 Won't Concede voter suppression Stacey Abrams Politics Nonsense Nancy Pelosi Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Faux Concerns donald trump democrats 2020 election   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com