web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "democrats" (Page 9)

Maxine Waters Just Proved Democrats Want Facebook to Be Their Propaganda Arm

Westlake Legal Group MaxineWatersAPimage-620x317 Maxine Waters Just Proved Democrats Want Facebook to Be Their Propaganda Arm twitter Social Media Regulation Propoganda Politics News Media Maxine Waters Mark Zuckerberg Internet Front Page Stories facebook democrats Allow Media Exception

House Financial Services Committee Chair Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., asks a question of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton, during a committee hearing, Tuesday Sept. 24, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

If you really want to know what the end game is for Democrats, I’ve always found that listening to California Rep. Maxine Waters grill someone during a congressional hearing is a good way to find out. This is the same Waters that told an oil and gas CEO that the end goal was for the government to take over their companies, after all.

In the case of the hearing featuring CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, we learned a few things. For instance, we know that Democrats don’t know what the purpose of a social media network is, but we also know what they want it to be.

Waters was asking Zuckerberg about what kind of fact-checking Facebook does when it comes to political ads. The social media CEO told Waters that they do no fact-checking themselves, and find it important to allow politicians to display their ads because they believe it is important for politicians to be heard plainly.

Waters continuously interrupted, seeming to drive the point home that Facebook does no fact-checking itself. Zuckerberg kept attempting to explain that it does occur thanks to third-party fact-checkers that activate whenever a post is flagged by the Facebook community, or by its technical systems.

Waters didn’t seem to be interested in the answers Zuckerberg was giving and cut him off to say that her time had expired.

What can this tell us?

We know that Democrats view the mainstream media as their territory, and mainstream media tends to agree. Much of what we see from major news networks tend to look more like propaganda than actual news, with an ever-present slant constantly giving the left the high ground.

It’s why ABC News attempted to pass an event at a gun range in Kentucky off as Turkey attacking Kurds in Syria after Trump’s decision to pull the U.S. military out of the region. It’s why they’ll breathlessly report on the heinous racism of a smirking high school student wearing a MAGA hat without looking for any more details.

Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter are some of the most highly trafficked websites in the world, with a constant stream of news and opinion floating through it thanks to its users. Left alone, this could be really bad news for Democrats, who rely on throwing out talking points in a vacuum for a narrative to thrive.

It would behoove people like Waters to ask questions that create a narrative about the nature of Facebook itself. They need to paint it as unreliable and dangerous to the public. This, in turn, does one of two things. It makes people wary of anything they may see on the platform that runs counter to their narrative, and it also sets up the possibility for government regulation with public support.

The end goal is simple. Make Facebook a publisher and not a platform. If they can do that, they can likely make a social media company another propaganda arm.

Judging by the amount of censorship, blacklisting, shadow banning, and punishing that we know occurs on social media platforms against right-leaning people already, they pretty much are publishers already. But it’s much more lucrative and less dicey for Facebook to claim platform status than admit they’re a publisher already. It results in less government oversite and intervention.

Waters wants that intervention. She and the Democrats want to drag Facebook under the control of the state so that they can then decide what is and isn’t proper conduct when it comes to news dissemination. Like she admitted to the oil companies, Waters’s goal is to have the government run the show.

The post Maxine Waters Just Proved Democrats Want Facebook to Be Their Propaganda Arm appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group MaxineWatersAPimage-300x153 Maxine Waters Just Proved Democrats Want Facebook to Be Their Propaganda Arm twitter Social Media Regulation Propoganda Politics News Media Maxine Waters Mark Zuckerberg Internet Front Page Stories facebook democrats Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Mittens, the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS

Westlake Legal Group mitt-romney-looking-heavenward-620x317 Mittens, the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS Uncategorized Ukraine President Trump Mitt Romney John Brennan Impeachment of President Trump Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Featured Story FBI and DOJ Corruption fake news donald trump democrats democrat media complex Deep State Coup corruption Corrupt Democrats Cofer Black cia biden Barack Obama Abuse of Power

Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, waits to participate in a mock swearing-in ceremony in the Old Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 3, 2019, as the 116th Congress begins. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

 

Recently, one of my email pals sent me an incredible opinion piece from Howell Woltz at The International Centre for Justice, in Warsaw, Poland. He is the author of Justice Denied: The United States vs. the People,” a very interesting book about the US justice system and federal prisons and the need for some serious reform. Occasionally, an opinion piece is so profound that it simply MUST be disseminated to a much wider audience than a simple blog post. This is one of such article. In this commentary, he opines on the DoJ/FBI cabal’s ongoing coup against POTUS while explaining some key connections among John Brennan , Mitt Romney, Cofer Black, Burisma Holdings (Ukraine), Bararck Obama, Hillary Clinton, and all the rest. It fills in a lot of gaps and explains much about what is going on with respect to the Ukraine kerfuffle.

While I can’t vouch for the veracity of all the claims here, this just rings true to me and connects a lot of very interesting dots. As usual, I caution you to “trust but verify.” If nothing else, it serves as a departure point for your own dot-connecting activities. The more independent analysis is conducted by all, the clearer picture becomes over time. These are some extended excerpts from Woltz’s opinion piece. More than a few light bulbs may be turned on for you after reading this. Note: this article was published on 8 October, so keep this in mind as you read it.

Donald J. Trump is not a RINO or DC insider.  He’s a tough-guy billionaire from Queens, New York and a street-fighter. When the Democrats realised last week that Trump was actually heading up his own investigation rather than leaving it to their Deep State apparatchiks—and doing so directly with the leaders of Ukraine, Australia, and Italy (and perhaps the U.K.)—they did the political equivalent of starting a fire in a theatre. House of Representatives Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, announced impeachment proceedings against the president just three hours after stating in a speech that she would not. Speaker Pelosi had zero evidence, cause, stated reason and lacked the required vote of the House of Representatives to do so, but announced it anyway.

Strangely enough…and what caught my attention… Mitt Romney jumped on the “Impeach Trump” train that same day. How did Nancy go from “There will be no impeachment proceedings,” that morning in New York to announcing impeachment proceedings that afternoon when she got back to Washington, DC? Meet the Grand Master of the Deep State in America. Admitted Communist, John Brennan, who has some serious explaining to do now that his attempted coup of U.S. President Donald Trump has been exposed…and continues! So why did Romney want to shut down any investigation of Ukraine’s role as well? That’s the question that got this investigation started and it’s shocking.

Romney’s National Security Advisor, Joseph Cofer Black, sits on the Board of the same Burisma Holdings that was being investigated for corruption back in 2014, and the Vice President and Obama Administration demanded be shut down. Why? Because Burisma was/is their vehicle for corrupt practices in Eastern Europe. And CIA Director, John Brennan’s 9/11 Deep State partner, Cofer Black, is still the link to all that goes on there. In fact, I can state unequivocally that Burisma is the centre of Ukraine corruption and the Democrats’ shadow organisation for corrupt activities. I live in Eastern Europe (Poland) and my sources are first-hand. And I know this matters greatly to Mitt Romney as he is not yet done with politics. If Black is busted, it will reflect on Romney, and it only makes sense that Cofer Black is the Deep State ‘plant’ in case Romney ever rises above polishing knobs in the U.S. Senate. Romney wants to run for President again in 2024 and if he wins, Cofer Black will be back with his fingers on the strings either as DNI or CIA Chief of Corruption. Burisma Holdings is the hub of U.S. Democrat activities to corrupt both Ukraine and American politics and there is proof. Ukraine President Zelenskyy’s win surprised both Brennan and Black’s Deep State ops as much as Trump’s did in 2016 in America.

So who is this Cofer Black guy? Joseph Cofer Black, joined the CIA in 1974 and rose to be Director of The National Counterterrorism Center, before joining Mitt Romney. If it were not for researching this article, I admit, he was unknown to me as well. What a revelation. Black was also the Head of Counterintelligence who somehow missed the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, though according to The Economist, 16 foreign leaders and heads of intelligence agencies warned him it was not only going to happen but when. Oh well. And nothing was done about Cofer Black for this, indicating this is what the Deep State wanted. But it goes deeper. John Brennan and this guy, Cofer Black, are how 19 terrorists got into the U.S.A. to attack the U.S. on 9/11.

Editor Harry will jump on me or make Nurse Ratched give me a dose of Castor Oil if I say something I can’t prove, so I’m just going to quote the CIA whistleblower at the Jeddah, Saudi Arabia CIA staff hearing, who is the source: “According to Freedom Outpost, Brennan was the CIA station chief in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, when the 9/11 hijackers were given visas to travel to the United States. In September 2014, a whistleblower named Greg Ford, a former military intelligence officer, told Ground Zero Radio’s Clyde Lewis that the CIA had objections to the approval of those visas but Brennan actually overrode them.”

The second in command of the CIA station was directly quoted by the whistleblower as saying, ‘No way, absolutely we are not going to stamp those visas.’ But CIA Saudi station chief, John Brennan, overrode the officer in charge and ordered the visas to be stamped and issued. They came, they learned to ‘take off’ an airplane but said they were not interested in ‘how to land.’ Cofer Black ignored the reports about this strange behaviour, though it was made, I know as a fact, from the people who made it. I was also a Florida-based pilot in 2001.

You know the rest of the story. America lost over 3,000 citizens that day, and I sat for an hour trying to get past the terrorist pilots’ apartment in Coral Springs, Florida. Freedom Outpost concluded, “If it weren’t for John Brennan, 9/11 may never have happened.” I’d add to that, if Cofer Black weren’t the head of Counterterrorism, Brennan could not have gotten his men in to do the job. It took (these) two to tango. That’s an opinion, not news, but I’ll bet money I don’t have, that I’m right as it’s a no risk bet. These are partners in crime.

“Joseph Cofer Black – the former Director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center (1999-2002) and Ambassador at Large for counter-terrorism (2002-2004).”

“Mr. Black is an internationally recognized authority on counterterrorism, cyber security, national security, and foreign affairs.” (these are quotes from Burisma’s website)

Brennan definitely had help in this. These terrorists had to have someone at the highest level in U.S. Counterintelligence to let their mission come to pass and succeed by ignoring all the warnings. They even took their flight training near my home, and I remember being locked down in Coral Springs, FL after 9/11 where they lived for three days while the FBI went through their apartment just a few blocks away. And this is where Romney’s man, Joseph Cofer Black, comes in. He was the partner in crime of John Brennan, (the Deep State Master), as well as being Mitt Romney’s National Security Advisor. Bad news for Mittens. And Cofer Black is the reason Romney is desperate to have President Trump’s real investigation shut down. As Obama’s CIA Director, John Brennan was also in charge of the dirty tricks campaign against then-candidate, Donald Trump. All of that has now been uncovered by investigative reporters Gregg Jarrett (The Russia Hoax) and Peter Schweizer (Secret Empires) with enough references to satisfy Editor Harry and Nurse Ratched.

Amazingly, the plot was actually laid by the Deep State in 2014 before they even knew Trump would be Hillary’s foil in 2016. I found that part pretty amazing. The Ukraine/Russia story was created for whomever was the candidate to run against Hillary Clinton.

For John Brennan, it really didn’t matter to him who ran on the Republican side. He just cared that whomever it was, lost to the Deep State’s choice – Hillary Clinton. Brennan, Black, James Clapper, James Comey and a host of others were prepared to make sure of it. It was exposed just last week that Brennan flew under a fake passport to avoid detection on his trip to set this up in Eastern Europe as early as 2015. There is no explanation for a CIA Director to do this unless what he was doing was illegal.

Now let’s go back to Joseph Cofer Black. He is Romney’s Ukraine man, and Brennan’s long-time associate who is still covering here in Eastern Europe (from where I am reporting) for the Deep State in America. Brennan came back Stateside from the Saudi Arabian CIA office the year after arranging for the 9/11 attackers to get into America. So what did he do? He took over CIA Counterintelligence from his partner, Cofer Black.  Convenient, eh? The Counterintelligence guy who ‘missed’ the 16 warnings on 9/11, and the guy who granted the attackers visas to get into the U.S. to take pilot training and do it, swap jobs, perhaps to prevent detection? Well it worked…until now.

And history repeats. The tag team is back at it. Barack Obama chose (or was told) to make John Brennan his CIA Director. Brennan then sets up the Russian hoax through the Ukraine government and intel operatives covertly in 2015 to target any candidate who might face Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Once Trump became the Republican candidate, President Obama authorised illegal spying on Trump’s campaign, we now know, because it was labeled a ‘counterintelligence operation’ which can only be authorised by a President.

The script for the Ukraine/Russia hoax was actually written back in 2007 to use against Republican candidate, John McCain. It was temporarily deployed but then shut down and recycled when it was clear RINO McCain would get his ass handed to him by Obama in 2008 without CIA involvement.. So, Brennan decided to use the script in 2016. The Republican’s candidate would be targeted using the same plan, according to one of Obama’s own secret service agents, now author, Dan Bongino, in his new book, Exonerated (just out last week).

The original script was written by Fusion GPS owner, Glenn Simpson. That’s the same man and company who would be paid $12 million by the Clinton Campaign, The Democrat National Committee and the FBI in 2016 for “the Steele dossier” that caused the Russia Hoax against Trump—though actually written years earlier. Glenn Simpson simply changed the names.

Unfortunately, there was a problem. Socialist Bernie Sanders was leading the Democrats side over the Chosen, Hillary, and had to be eliminated. To achieve this, the Clintons literally did a forced takeover of The Democrat National Committee and its funds. They immediately cut off Hillary’s rival, Bernie Sander’s campaign (as admitted by former DNC Director, Donna Brazille, on television) eliminating Bernie from the race.

John Brennan then began leaking the ‘dossier’ to Congressional Democrats, including then-House Speaker, Harry Reid and their media co-conspirators to begin the take down of the Republican candidate, Donald J. Trump. Ironically, Brennan also leaked the fake dossier to Sen. John McCain, it’s original target, and McCain leaked it back to its original source—the FBI—to apply for warrants to spy on Trump using their own laundered information. The FBI literally paid for the fabricated information, leaked it to the media and politicians who hated Trump, then used their reports and that dossier when fed back to them, to get warrants to spy on Trump. But then the kimchee hits the fan for real. Trump gets elected! So, who jumps over to Ukraine to protect the conspiracy from being found out? Brennan’s 9/11 partner, Joseph Cofer Black…

Within days of Trump’s inauguration was immediately put in place in Ukraine to prevent anyone from talking. The Board of Burisma Holdings—the same centre of Ukraine corruption used by Joe Biden in 2014 to enrich his kid— was the base from which to shield the Democrat origins of the Russia Hoax and its intel roots from any real investigation.

By February of 2017, Cofer Black was a voting member of the Board of Burisma. You’ll hear the screams around the world this week as the democrats realise that Trump has taken this investigation on personally rather than leaving it to the deep state vermin. It’s all starting to fit together now, isn’t it? So, here’s what to expect.

Yes. There will be wailing a-plenty and gnashing of teeth over coming days, and this is the point where the president’s security needs to be at an all-time high, cause The Deep State is spinning out of control and desperate. If the new leaders of the nations that aided Brennan, Black and the Dems—all of whom are admirers of POTUS—have investigated the crimes of their predecessors as Trump asked, he likely has the evidence on his desk rather than having it hidden by the Deep State criminals.

This past Friday, it became known that President Trump had not only launched his own investigation with foreign leaders into the 2016 Election tampering, but that it was almost complete. As soon as that happened, the freak-out began. At 65 years of age, I’ve not seen one quite like it. The Deep State was and is in paroxysms of unmitigated fear and psychosis. They ramped up an immediate media assault using the usual outlets—CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and Washington Post—and the same exact leak specialists who put America through The Russia Hoax.

The media spectacle on Friday past was immediately followed with a sua sponte announcement by Speaker Pelosi that she was impeaching the President—a power she does not possess no matter how many cocktails she’s had. A completely false narrative was spun of what was said in President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, knowing Trump would never allow them to have a copy of the classified transcript to disprove their lies. But guess what?  Within 24 hours, in another act of unprecedented transparency The Donald did just that. He released the full, unredacted transcript of the call, publicly proving them all to be Pinocchios. And I just watched his Attorney, Rudy Giuliani, announce that he is drafting a lawsuit to file against those who lied about his client, Donald Trump—another unprecedented event to my knowledge.

So the price of lying about the President is about to get expensive, and while Rudy’s suit will be in civil court, if proven that these public officials violated Trump’s civil rights ‘under colour of law’,  it might become a criminal referral under 18 USC §§ 241, 242 (Deprivation of rights under colour of law and a conspiracy to do so). I personally believe this is why the President and his lawyers are doing it. Through the civil suit, they’ll have the right of discovery to get records they could never access in any other way. By then, Trump’s team will have enough evidence in the civil suit to refer the defendants for criminal prosecution by the Dept. of Justice.

In the Deep State’s current state of mania, an assassination attempt is not only likely but perhaps inevitable. I predict they will have one of their insiders still in the White House do it, or a foreign team (CIA trained) do the hit on his helicopter. Not a single CIA, DOJ, NSA, DNI or Secret Service leftover from Barack Hussein Obama should be allowed near him and then all 17 illegal spy agencies that have so disgraced my nation should be shaken up or even better, shut down.

No other leader in my nation’s history would have the audacity to take on these evil forces—or have a chance of winning other than Donald Trump—and they will do everything possible to take him out before he gets them. In my opinion, we’ll either have a presidential funeral followed by a descent into the darkness of Socialism, or a brighter and better day with dozens of Deep Staters eating institutional food and wearing orange for life. I’m praying for Door #2.

Like I said, the preceding rings true to me, and it comports with my own thinking on the whole sordid subject based on what has been uncovered by many independent journalists over the past two years. There is absolutely no question that the Deep State has been trying to take out President Trump from even before his inauguration in January 2017. There is more to this article which can be read here. Think about the details of this article in the context of everything that has been going on regarding Ukraine since the “whistleblower” started to dominate the news. It’s obvious that the Deep State and their paid media allies are extremely agitated – and for good reason! And why else other than complicity in the corruption would Mitt Romney be out front in the “get Trump” brigade these days? To reiterate, as with all sources, I recommend that you trust but verify, but I’m praying for Door #2, too!

The end.

The post Mittens, the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group mitt-romney-looking-heavenward-300x153 Mittens, the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS Uncategorized Ukraine President Trump Mitt Romney John Brennan Impeachment of President Trump Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Featured Story FBI and DOJ Corruption fake news donald trump democrats democrat media complex Deep State Coup corruption Corrupt Democrats Cofer Black cia biden Barack Obama Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Fusion Natasha Gets Her Marching Orders On John Brennan, Ends Up Whiffing On Two Major Claims

Westlake Legal Group john-brennan-620x443 Fusion Natasha Gets Her Marching Orders On John Brennan, Ends Up Whiffing On Two Major Claims SCARED Russia Probe Politics Politico Nervous natasha bertrand john durham John Brennan Fusion Natasha Fusion GPS Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story FBI doj democrats cia Allow Media Exception

Caricature by DonkeyHotey flic.kr/p/Ct4G4K https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

Yesterday, we got a hilariously bad piece from Fusion GPS’ number one reporter. I say that with the admission that Ken Dilanian might still be fighting for the title but I think Bertrand has him beat lately. It’s like the Cuomo brothers. Andrew is bad, but come on, we all know Fredo is the dumber one.

This is the second clearly telegraphed Fusion GPS propaganda piece Bertrand has pushed out in as many weeks.

RedState’s Sarah Lee first covered it yesterday, focusing on the ridiculous notion that Brennan is just an innocent bystander, being targeted by an obsessed President. I mean, it’s not like Brennan was at the genesis of the Russia probe, lied about his knowledge on national TV, and spent the last three years ranting hysterically about Trump being a traitor. I can’t imagine why John Durham might be looking into this guy.

Politico even suggested that the focus on Brennan was somehow an offshoot of the Trump administration’s “blurring” of the lines between politics and law enforcement.

There’s so much projection in this article, i.e. accusing the DOJ and Trump of doing things the Democrats already did in the later stages of the Obama administration and throughout the Mueller probe. Bertrand either has no self-awareness or she just doesn’t care. Probably the latter.

But I want to focus on two key details she completely whiffed on because they kind of matter. At one point, Bertrand makes this claim.

Brennan allies and skeptics of the Durham investigation note that the CIA played no role in the probe involving Americans, and was narrowly focused on determining Russian President Vladimir Putin’s motivations and how the Kremlin was carrying out its election attack in 2016.

You know who that’s news to? John Brennan.

Brennan admitted in open testimony that he was looking into “US persons.” Further, we know Brennan was at the genesis of the entire Russia probe, including helping kickstart it within the Obama administration. He was doing all this while CIA Director, an agency that is expressly forbidden from targeting Americans. Further, there’s plenty of reason to suspect that the CIA had a hand in the now proven action of running assets against several Trump campaign associates.

You can read a deeper dive into Joseph Misfud’s probable CIA ties in this article. There’s a reason the media who’ve been towing the line for Brennan are now in panic mode.

Bertrand didn’t stop there though. She then made another unbelievably false claim in an attempt to try to paint Republicans as pushing conspiracy theories.

Asked for comment, White House deputy press Secretary Hogan Gidley said: “John Brennan lied before Congress when he got caught spying on American citizens and lied about having Russian collusion evidence that never existed. The only way I’ve ever heard anyone in the White House mention him is as a punchline.”

It’s not clear what Gidley was referring to—Brennan has not been accused of lying to Congress.

A quick google search would have shown Bertrand how laughable wrong that claim is, but apparently she doesn’t even bother to fact-check whatever Glenn Simpson is shoveling her on any given day. Brennan was not only accused of lying to Congress about spying on Senate members, he ended up admitting it.

This kind of nonsense is treated as “journalism” within the mainstream. At first I figured she just wanted “scoops” to elevate her career. Now, I wonder if Fusion GPS isn’t paying her directly. Anytime there’s any possible damaging information on the horizon for Brennan, the Russia Probe, etc. Bertrand is always there to spout the talking points of the other side. She does so uncritically, and as I’ve shown here, often falsely.

John Brennan is nervous. It’s obvious and no amount of Politico articles from friendly reporters is going to change the facts on the ground. We were told for years that if someone has nothing to hide, they should welcome an investigation. Well, here’s Brennan’s chance to be consistent.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Fusion Natasha Gets Her Marching Orders On John Brennan, Ends Up Whiffing On Two Major Claims appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group ap-john-brennan-300x198 Fusion Natasha Gets Her Marching Orders On John Brennan, Ends Up Whiffing On Two Major Claims SCARED Russia Probe Politics Politico Nervous natasha bertrand john durham John Brennan Fusion Natasha Fusion GPS Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story FBI doj democrats cia Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Stunning: CA Gov. Gavin Newsom Orders Investigation to Find Out Why State’s Gasoline Prices are So High

Westlake Legal Group 02f7c7e0-4bf6-401e-9693-e92c39291877-620x317 Stunning: CA Gov. Gavin Newsom Orders Investigation to Find Out Why State’s Gasoline Prices are So High Taxes Liberal Elitism Gavin Newsom Front Page Stories Featured Story Energy democrats Catherine Reheis-Boyd California CA high tax rate CA gasoline taxes Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power

Democratic Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks at his gubernatorial campaign’s primary night watch party in San Francisco, Tuesday, June 5, 2018. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

 

ABC News reports that CA Gov. Gavin Newsom is so concerned over gas prices in the state, which have now topped $4 per gallon, that he’s ordered the attorney general to open an investigation. Yes, really.

According to ABC:

The California Energy Commission said it “does not have any evidence that gasoline retailers fixed prices or engaged in false advertising.” But it said the industry did not provide any proof that its gasoline was better than what the state requires all retailers to sell.

Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Association, said the industry trade group is reviewing the report. But she said it was important to note California’s fuel taxes and standards, which are more strict than other states, account for the first $1.07 per gallon at the pump.

Is it me or has the entire American left taken a dive into the twilight zone over the last three years? How is this a mystery Governor?

Many taxpayers have suggested that Newsom pick up a mirror. CA currently has the highest state income tax in the U.S., that is for those in the state who actually pay taxes. With their ever increasing additions to state-provided social services, they have to find the money somewhere. Given the recent exodus of high earners leaving the state to shield their income, CA would go bankrupt without the revenue they receive from gasoline sales. Blaming it on the oil companies is the height of hypocrisy and foolishness.

Voters were quick to point out the error of Newsom’s ways (Via Twitchy):

So California has basically told anyone in the oil industry to leave the state. And then they create their own extra special grade of difficult to produce gasoline that no other state requires. And then?

This man is a idiot. #GavinNewsom #GavinMustGo #California

This is a joke right? You’re kidding…

This is like Gov. Cuomo ordering the Natural Gas companies to supply more gas after blocking pipelines.

The Dem party is ignorant of science and economics, but thinks it should lecture the rest of us on how to live.

Should be the quickest investigation ever… but not after he hand selects the “investigator”.

California regulations, the gas tax and the carbon taxes would be a good start when he’s done starting in a mirror.

It’s your fault. There, I took care of your Investigation for you. You’re welcome.

Enjoy those high taxes you voted for, and you keep electing the same people who also implemented a cap and trade tax on gas. You don’t even get to see how much that is, it’s built into the price. Surrounding states are laughing.

I needed a good laugh today! He knows why, and a phony investigation won’t make him look any less complicit.

High gas prices caused by high taxes to fund your boondoggles. Investigation complete.

It’s all the taxes and “fees” authorized by California lawmakers who don’t know how money actually works.

How about the 70 cents in state sales tax and the regulations that prevent the building of new refineries…that keep gasoline more scarce…Newsome and his crook cronies in Sacramento are to blame!

And finally:

The post Stunning: CA Gov. Gavin Newsom Orders Investigation to Find Out Why State’s Gasoline Prices are So High appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 02f7c7e0-4bf6-401e-9693-e92c39291877-300x153 Stunning: CA Gov. Gavin Newsom Orders Investigation to Find Out Why State’s Gasoline Prices are So High Taxes Liberal Elitism Gavin Newsom Front Page Stories Featured Story Energy democrats Catherine Reheis-Boyd California CA high tax rate CA gasoline taxes Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

After Schiff’s Latest Witness Claims Quid Pro Quo, Calls Grow Louder for Lindsey Graham to Take Action #WheresLindsey

Westlake Legal Group LindseyGraham-620x317 After Schiff’s Latest Witness Claims Quid Pro Quo, Calls Grow Louder for Lindsey Graham to Take Action #WheresLindsey Rush Limbaugh Rand Paul President Trump Lindsey Graham Kurt Volker John McCain Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats David Kramer Congress Bill Taylor Allow Media Exception adam schiff Abuse of Power 2020

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., pauses while speaking to members of the media outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, after his meeting with President Donald Trump, Sunday, Dec. 30, 2018. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

 

Sen. Lindsey Graham has repeatedly and publicly promised to call witnesses to testify before the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee which he chairs in the search for the truth about the origins of the Trump/Russia probe, the current impeachment inquiry, and several other farces which have been thrust on President Trump by the Democrats. Yet, he fails to act.

The situation has now become critical. Contrary to everything the United States stands for, House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff is trying to unilaterally remove President Trump from office. It’s been said that one witness who appeared before his committee, former Ambassador Kurt Volker, provided testimony which undercut Schiff’s narrative about the July 25th Trump/Zelensky phone call. Today, however, Schiff took a deposition from the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Bill Taylor, who according to witnesses, bolstered the House Democrats’ case. Witnesses said Taylor’s opening statement left Democratic lawmakers “gasping.” My colleague, Bonchie, posted about that train wreck here.

The obvious next step for Republicans would be for Graham to call Volcker, Taylor and others who have given depositions to Schiff’s Committee to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Graham’s reluctance to take action has many people wondering. In his frequent appearances on cable news programs, he’s been talking the talk. On his Monday night show, Tucker Carlson played a video montage of Graham promising to “get the answers, the best he knows how” over and over again.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) joined Carlson and expressed his frustration with Graham’s inertia. Tucker asked Paul if Graham’s foreign policy differences with Trump are the reason for his inaction? Graham has disagreed mightily with the President over his decision to withdraw forces from Ukraine. But that’s a recent event. Graham has led the Sen. Judiciary Committee since January.

Here’s what Paul had to say:

I’ve encouraged him publicly and privately to do this. I’d like to see John Brennan come in. I’d like him to testify and I would ask him very pointedly, “Did you talk to the British intelligence agencies? Did you set up spying by foreign intelligence agencies on the President or the President’s campaign? I think he did and I think that’s against the law. I’ve talked to people who are convinced, these people are so officious, that there’s probably paperwork they have filled out.

I think he did call the British agents and I think he did get them involved. But it’s also important to know, Christopher Steele and that Steel dossier. Did he talk to Russian agents?

That’s been the rumor for years now.

So everything that Trump has been accused of doing, investigating a political rival in a foreign country, all of those questions should be asked of the Democrats.

There are a lot of Republicans who are more loyal to the deep state than they are to the president.

Rush Limbaugh has a theory about why Graham hasn’t used his position to fight back against the Democrats:

He could be subpoenaing people, he could be demanding to see — he could be doing in the Senate what they’re doing in the House except he could be doing it to the people that ran this phony investigation into Trump. He could be tracking them all up there. And people ask, “Why isn’t he doing anything?”

And you know what the popular theory is? The popular theory is that he’s got cold feet about doing this because it would implicate Senator McCain, one of his great friends. And it may be true. John McCain was at the epicenter of the Steele dossier’s dissemination. John McCain was one of the leaders in the effort to get Trump and his election reversed and thrown out of town using the Steele dossier and any investigation of this is going to demonstrate this. And many are theorizing that Lindsey Graham just doesn’t want to see Senator McCain’s name dragged through this kind of mud, so there’s no investigation.

I’m skeptical of this theory, because based on what is publicly known about the Democrat’s Trump/Russia collusion investigation, McCain’s role was minor and it came after the 2016 election. McCain claimed he was approached at a national security conference in Nova Scotia by a retired British diplomat who told him about the dossier. He sent his aide, David Kramer, to London to meet with Christopher Steele. Kramer came back to Washington with a copy of the dossier and told the Senator that Steele had seemed credible. McCain handed the document to James Comey on December 9th. The FBI had known about the dossier since the summer. They had been receiving regular updates through DOJ official Bruce Ohr.

Because Graham and McCain were very close friends, he could very well have information that we don’t. But, on the face of it, it doesn’t sound likely.

Whatever the reason is, (prior to Trump’s decision to pull troops from Syria) Graham has been one of Trump’s most vocal supporters and his lack of action is confounding.

Today, it was reported that Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, will be calling in witnesses to testify about the basis of the impeachment  inquiry. No surprise there. Although Burr certainly isn’t one of the President’s fans, his committee’s Trump/Russia investigation found no evidence of collusion.

Following Volker’s House testimony several weeks ago, Graham again promised to call him before his committee if the Democrats continued with their unethical tactics. Earlier today, Donald Trump, Jr. responded. He tweeted, “I repeat…its continuing.”

The post After Schiff’s Latest Witness Claims Quid Pro Quo, Calls Grow Louder for Lindsey Graham to Take Action #WheresLindsey appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group LindseyGraham-300x153 After Schiff’s Latest Witness Claims Quid Pro Quo, Calls Grow Louder for Lindsey Graham to Take Action #WheresLindsey Rush Limbaugh Rand Paul President Trump Lindsey Graham Kurt Volker John McCain Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats David Kramer Congress Bill Taylor Allow Media Exception adam schiff Abuse of Power 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Video: Lindsey Graham Torches Media, Explains Why He Agrees With Trump Calling Democrat Actions “Lynching”

Westlake Legal Group LindseyGraham-620x317 Video: Lindsey Graham Torches Media, Explains Why He Agrees With Trump Calling Democrat Actions “Lynching” white house washington D.C. south carolina Social Media republicans Politics North Carolina Media Lindsey Graham journalism Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Culture Congress Allow Media Exception

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., pauses while speaking to members of the media outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, after his meeting with President Donald Trump, Sunday, Dec. 30, 2018. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and President Trump don’t see eye to eye on the decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria, but when it comes to House Democrats and their show trial impeachment inquiry, Graham has remained in the president’s corner.

As Streiff wrote earlier today, Democrats, the mainstream media, and even some Republicans pitched fits over Trump’s characterization of the Democratic party’s impeachment charades as a “lynching” in a tweet this morning:

In the midst of the Usual SuspectsWestlake Legal Group 2122 Video: Lindsey Graham Torches Media, Explains Why He Agrees With Trump Calling Democrat Actions “Lynching” white house washington D.C. south carolina Social Media republicans Politics North Carolina Media Lindsey Graham journalism Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Culture Congress Allow Media Exception   erupting in outrage, Sen. Graham was asked his thoughts on what Trump said and if he agreed with the comments. Here’s how Graham responded (transcribed):

I think it’s pretty well accurate. This is a sham. This is a joke. I’m going to let the whole world know that if we were doing this to a Democratic president you’d be all over me right now.

Not one person has asked me [these] questions:

“What do you think about the fact that President Trump doesn’t know who his accuser is?”

“What do you think about the fact that the Republican minority cannot call witnesses, that everything’s done behind closed doors?”

I can only imagine if this were a Democratic president what you would be saying to me right now. So it shows a lot of things about our national media.

When it’s about Trump, who cares about the process, as long as you get him? So yes this is a lynching in every sense, this is un-American.

Watch Graham speak to reporters about this issue below:

Graham later clarified with a journalist that he was talking about a “political lynching” because apparently the journo actually believed he was equating the impeachment inquiry to the lynching (hanging and killing) of African-Americans that happened decades ago under Democratic rule.

I get the impression from Graham’s interviews and other various comments he’s made about what Democrats are doing regarding the impeachment process is that he’s on the verge of a Kavanaugh hearing-style smackdown of Congressional Democrats and their media enablers.

I sure hope he is, because a high-dosage reality check like that is exactly what is needed in the middle of the clown show.

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 16+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Video: Lindsey Graham Torches Media, Explains Why He Agrees With Trump Calling Democrat Actions “Lynching” appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group LindseyGraham-300x153 Video: Lindsey Graham Torches Media, Explains Why He Agrees With Trump Calling Democrat Actions “Lynching” white house washington D.C. south carolina Social Media republicans Politics North Carolina Media Lindsey Graham journalism Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Culture Congress Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Apparently Every Democrat In Existence Used the Term “Lynching” To Defend The Clintons

Westlake Legal Group hillary-clinton-pointing-harvard-620x317 Apparently Every Democrat In Existence Used the Term “Lynching” To Defend The Clintons white people Politics media bias lynch mob lynch Jerry Nadler impeachment Hillary Clinton Harry Reid Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump democrats CNN Bill Clinton bias Allow Media Exception

Hillary Clinton points to the audience as she is introduced at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., Friday, May 25, 2018. Harvard University’s Radcliffe Institute honored Clinton with the 2018 Radcliffe Medal. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)

While it’s hard to keep up with all the freak-outs constantly percolating within our media establishment, one of the latest involves Donald Trump using the term “lynch” to describe the secret impeachment investigation they are carrying out. This came as part of his frustration with the Democrats refusing to take a vote and shutting off all minority rights for Republicans, something that’s unprecedented.

My colleague streiff wrote on it earlier today. Here’s the tweet in question.

This of course led to all manner of gnashing of teeth. How could the President use such a historically charged word!

Of course, a little digging has turned up the reality that Democrats have used the term “lynch” in its various forms (lynch mob, lynching, etc.) many times. It’s pretty laughable just how prevalent their use of the word has been throughout the years. Worse, they did so specifically decrying impeachment, the very thing Trump is decrying. You can’t make this stuff up.

Check it out.

Here’s Joe Biden in all his double talking glory.

And while it wasn’t specifically on impeachment, this hilarious shot and chaser also exists for your viewing pleasure.

That’s CNN’s Brian Stelter clone fretting at the use of the word lynching to describe a Congressional proceeding. The only problem is that CNN called the Benghazi hearings…a lynching.

I think you could call this hypocrisy, right?

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Apparently Every Democrat In Existence Used the Term “Lynching” To Defend The Clintons appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group hillary-red-AP-300x200 Apparently Every Democrat In Existence Used the Term “Lynching” To Defend The Clintons white people Politics media bias lynch mob lynch Jerry Nadler impeachment Hillary Clinton Harry Reid Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump democrats CNN Bill Clinton bias Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Watch: Elizabeth Warren Shrugs Off Special Needs Student Trying to Ask Her a Question

Westlake Legal Group ElizabethWarrenAPimage-620x317 Watch: Elizabeth Warren Shrugs Off Special Needs Student Trying to Ask Her a Question Teaching student special needs Politics Front Page Stories Featured Story Elizabeth Warren elections Education democrats campaign Allow Media Exception 2020

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., speaks at the Iowa State Fair, Saturday, Aug. 10, 2019, in Des Moines, Iowa. (AP Photo/John Locher)

Remember when Senator Elizabeth Warren was claiming that she was fired from her job as a special needs teacher because she was pregnant?

She told the story during the Democratic debate — even putting it in a tweet — about a principle that didn’t invite her back to teach because she was “visibly pregnant.” Nevertheless, she persisted, Warren told us.

Westlake Legal Group elizabeth-warren-teaching-tweet-620x329 Watch: Elizabeth Warren Shrugs Off Special Needs Student Trying to Ask Her a Question Teaching student special needs Politics Front Page Stories Featured Story Elizabeth Warren elections Education democrats campaign Allow Media Exception 2020

It was all bunk, of course. Warren herself said she didn’t have the necessary certificates and upon trying to get them, decided that this kind of career wasn’t for her. Still, she likes to pretend that if it wasn’t for misogyny, she’d still be a special needs teacher today.

But for a would-be special needs teacher, Warren doesn’t seem to know how to deal with special needs people according to some footage that was just released.

In a video, Warren can be seen on stage addressing what seems to be students. A student is selected to come up and ask a question, and it turns out to be a young black man who clearly has a mental disability. His question is filled with disjointed words and phrasing, and despite being asked to repeat it twice, it makes absolutely no sense.

Regardless, you can hear his fellow students cheering him on in a show of support.

At this juncture, Warren could have brought the man in and helped him get his question out properly. She could have taken the time to understand him better and make him feel important. Instead, Warren dismisses the man.

“Okay,” said Warren, clearly uncomfortable as the man walks away.

“Alright,” she said as she waved goodbye.

As many have noted after watching this clip, this isn’t the behavior of someone who has any kind of special needs training at all. In fact, Warren looked absolutely clueless as to handle the situation.

We likely got a little bit more insight into the dishonesty of Elizabeth Warren.

The post Watch: Elizabeth Warren Shrugs Off Special Needs Student Trying to Ask Her a Question appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group ElizabethWarrenAPimage-300x153 Watch: Elizabeth Warren Shrugs Off Special Needs Student Trying to Ask Her a Question Teaching student special needs Politics Front Page Stories Featured Story Elizabeth Warren elections Education democrats campaign Allow Media Exception 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Mr. President, Please Do the Nation a Favor and Kill These Stupid and Dysfunctional Presidential Debates

Westlake Legal Group debate-number-21-e1350585992784 Mr. President, Please Do the Nation a Favor and Kill These Stupid and Dysfunctional Presidential Debates republicans presidential debates Politics Front Page Stories Featured Story elections donald trump democrats Commission on Presidential Debates Allow Media Exception

Last week, the allegedly non-partisan Commission on Presidential Debates announced that it had set the debate schedule for the 2020 Presidential campaign:

First presidential debate:
Tuesday, September 29, 2020
The University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN

Vice presidential debate:
Wednesday, October 7, 2020
The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Second presidential debate:
Thursday, October 15, 2020
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Third presidential debate:
Thursday, October 22, 2020
Belmont University, Nashville, TN

If President Trump is smart, he’ll tell the commission to roll the schedule up into a very tight little tube, slather it with Astroglide®, a put it in a warm, dark place for safekeeping.

I’m not a fan of the presidential debates. The whole focus is on superficiality. That’s why the candidates hire coaches and media advisers and joke writers for the process. The audience doesn’t watch to be enlightened–you have to be particularly dumb to have waited until a month before the election to educate yourself about the issues and candidates–it watches for the zingers.

“There you go again.”

“I’m paying for this microphone.”

“Where’s the beef.”

“You are no Jack Kennedy.”

These are funny but they are nothing more than a street corner game of “the dozens.”

As the audience has grown in size, the entire enterprise has taken on the air of a WWE event where the candidates are engaged in a verbal smackdown on their opponents to the cheers of their fans.

In the past couple of elections, the ugly specter of the celebrity pseudo-journalist has joined this political danse macabre, with the moderator injecting themselves into the debate–very much like the crooked refs who are a trope in WWE or the old Harlem Globetrotters shows.

If you are constantly carping on the superficiality of political discussions in America and sniveling about “tribalism,” then you should want this nonsense to stop.

Not only have the debates become toxic, but there is also a significant question as to whether they were ever anything else. The media likes to crow about its role in defeating its bête noire, Richard Nixon, in 1960 because during his televised debate he was “testy” and because he had a “five o’clock shadow” (appearing in public with stubble was bad form for a cis-gendered man in those days, go figure). Why is this a badge of honor and not shameful? Glib does not mean smart. Charming, as we saw with JFK, doesn’t mean competent or trustworthy. Why should the media have this outsized role in our elections? Why should we allow a process to exist where trivialities can decide the next president?

More to the point, the debates are simply a ratings draw for the major networks and the moderator slot is nothing more than a way to inject yet more blow-dried nincompoops of all sexes into our political life. President Trump, of all people, should know that agreeing to debate with a moderator from a news organization that has spent the past three years calling him a Russian stooge and insinuating, if not outright stating, that his administration is not legitimate is simply going to hand the Democrat a lot of sympathetic media just a few weeks before the general election. The Washington Post and other outlets have staff who catalog the number of “lies” told by Trump and report on it regularly–this is a world in which a statement that goes against the media’s received wisdom is labeled a lie, so whatever–and there is zero reason to think that any member of these outlets will approach their role as moderator as anything more than a way to stage a “gotcha” at Trump’s expense.

In short, the current presidential debates a) cheapen the political discourse, b) add nothing to the knowledge of the average voter, c) are structured to create conflict and drama, d) are hosted by moderators who overtly favor Democrats who are mostly employed by outlets who overtly endorse Democrats (don’t tell me about the “separation” of news and editorial because I haven’t believed in unicorns or leprechauns for quite a few years), d) boost the profile of a handful of media poseurs who think they should be president, and e) feed into the idea that the news media is some kind of entitled priesthood uniquely qualified to cover policy debates. They make all of us dumber and more ill-mannered simply by their existence

The post Mr. President, Please Do the Nation a Favor and Kill These Stupid and Dysfunctional Presidential Debates appeared first on RedState.

Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Beto: Trump Is Hitler

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-22-at-3.21.21-PM Beto: Trump Is Hitler Hitler Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats big lie Beto O Rourke Allow Media Exception 2020

Screenshot from this video

What do you do when you’re a Democratic candidate at 1% and can’t seem to find any traction in your campaign?

You’ve tried pitching abortion to the moment of birth and “hell yeah, I’m coming for your guns.”

But that doesn’t do it for you because the liberal media is behind other candidates.

Where can you go when you’ve already gone so low?

Well, if you’re Beto O’Rourke, you go to the last resort, violate Godwin’s Rule and compare President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked if he stood by his earlier claim comparing Trump to the Nazis during an interview with Al Sharpton and O’Rourke doubled down.

O’Rourke let loose, repeating a string of debunked lies and blaming Trump for the El Paso mass shooting.

From Daily Caller:

“Find me a better analogy of another leader of a western democracy describing people of one religion as defective or dangerous and that is what the president did when it came to Muslims, seeking to ban them and repeating the lie that Mexican immigrants pose a violent risk to this country,” O’Rourke said.

But even Wolf wasn’t buying it. He asked if O’Rourke understood the criticism in making comparisons to the Nazis or Hitler. “Do you understand that at least most people say that is unacceptable?”

But O’Rourke justified it.

“It is the comparison of last resort. And that is where we are,” siad O’Rourke. “And I don’t mean the last resort politically or last resort in terms of defeating the president in November but the last resort for this country that is descending into an open racism and intolerance and violence led by the president.”

O’Rourke then repeated the lie that Trump said Neo-Nazis and Klansmen were “very fine people.”

So he’s comparing the president of the United States to a socialist dictator who put people in real concentration camps, killed millions and started World War II engulfing a good portion of the world?

Indeed, that is the comparison of the “last resort” and that’s where Beto is at. He’s so desperate at 1%, he’s played every card and he doesn’t know what else to do. Where does he go after this, too, fails him?

As with anyone who breaks Godwin’s Rule, it says a lot more about him, with the minimizing the Holocaust and the horrors of WWII by the comparison.

Not to mention that the “intolerance and open violence” seems a constant feature of the radical left as we’ve seen, as the mob who attacked Trump supporters outside his recent Minnesota rally demonstrated.

Warning for offensive images and language:

The post Beto: Trump Is Hitler appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-22-at-3.21.21-PM-300x186 Beto: Trump Is Hitler Hitler Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats big lie Beto O Rourke Allow Media Exception 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com