web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Featured Story"

Mueller’s Handling of the Obstruction Question Was Total Garbage

Westlake Legal Group muellers-handling-of-the-obstruction-question-was-total-garbage Mueller’s Handling of the Obstruction Question Was Total Garbage Uncategorized Robert Mueller obstruction of justice New York Post Mueller Investigation innuendo garbage Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump Cop-Out Andrew C. McCarthy

Westlake Legal Group Trump-Mueller-620x349 Mueller’s Handling of the Obstruction Question Was Total Garbage Uncategorized Robert Mueller obstruction of justice New York Post Mueller Investigation innuendo garbage Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump Cop-Out Andrew C. McCarthy

When AG Bill Barr first released his summary of the Mueller report some weeks ago there was one part that set hair ablaze all throughout the media. Namely, that Robert Mueller decided to not rule on the most important question before him, i.e. if Donald Trump obstructed justice with his criticism of the Russia investigation. Furthermore, Mueller proclaimed that he had not exonerated the President despite the fact that he was not recommending charges.

As I wrote at the time, this was a total cop-out and not his job as a prosecutor.

It was a total, damaging cop-out for him to include that line instead of just making the call in a normal prosecutorial fashion. That doesn’t mean he needed to say Trump was innocent because that’s not his job, but the proper response would have been to say that he lacks evidence of obstruction and he cannot recommend further action. By ambiguously claiming that he simply can’t make the call, instead leaving it to the DOJ, he’s set us up for another 18 months of mind-numbing stupidity that will end the same way the collusion narrative ended.

Today, Andrew C. McCarthy, far more versed on this topic than myself, opined on just how bad it was for Mueller to do what he did.

In his report, Mueller didn’t resolve the issue. If he had been satisfied that there was no obstruction crime, he said, he would have so found. He claimed he wasn’t satisfied. Yet he was also not convinced that there was sufficient proof to charge. Therefore, he made no decision, leaving it to Attorney General William Barr to find that there was no obstruction.

This is unbecoming behavior for a prosecutor and an outrageous shifting of the burden of proof: The constitutional right of every American to force the government to prove a crime has been committed, rather than to have to prove his or her own innocence.

As I said earlier today, this is why the DOJ has guidelines on not releasing findings under normal circumstances if no one is charged. It is not a fair use of our legal system to slander people who ultimately weren’t found to have committed a criminal act. Gut feelings don’t count. Robert Mueller had two choices in so far as doing his job in a professional way. Either present evidence of obstruction of justice and recommend charges or shut up about it. There should have been no choice number three where he lays out a bunch of insinuations and interpretations, while choosing to not actually do his job and rule on the evidence. That’s not what a prosecutor does.

McCarthy lays the case out for that as well.

This is exactly why prosecutors should never speak publicly about the evidence uncovered in an investigation of someone who isn’t charged. The obligation of the prosecutor is to render a judgment about whether there is enough proof to charge a crime. If there is, the prosecutor indicts; if there is not, the prosecutor remains silent.

If special counsel Mueller believed there was an obstruction offense, he should have had the courage of his convictions and recommended charging the president. Since he wasn’t convinced there was enough evidence to charge, he should have said he wasn’t recommending charges. Period.

Exactly.

Mueller clearly felt the President possibly did something wrong and did everything he could to steer public opinion in that direction with how he wrote the report, but when it came time to take the shot, he couldn’t pull the trigger. Why? Because he knows his “evidence” would have never stood up in a court of law. Mean tweets coupled with full cooperation does not equal obstruction. Firing Comey while allowing the investigation to not only continue, but expand, is clearly not obstruction. Did Trump do some things that could be described as borderline or not recommended? Perhaps, but borderline isn’t a legal standard. A prosecutor either makes a decision to charge or he doesn’t.

By punting on the issue, Mueller deprived Trump of the legal right to defend himself and instead let the issue become purely political. The justice system is not supposed to be used as a tool for innuendo, much less to feed media hysteria for years on end. It strains reason to think Mueller just didn’t realize that would happen.

This is why I’m not on the bandwagon of praising Robert Mueller just because he didn’t frame Trump. That’s a pretty low bar to meet. On the most important question in the entire report (because we’ve known for years the collusion narrative was false), he abdicated his responsibility and ensured the country would spend another two years paralyzed by this nonsense. He had the power and a duty to settle the issue by doing his job and making a decision, which was the only reason for his appointment in the first place. If he wasn’t willing to do that, he should have resigned long ago.

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Mueller’s Handling of the Obstruction Question Was Total Garbage appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group robert-mueller-300x169 Mueller’s Handling of the Obstruction Question Was Total Garbage Uncategorized Robert Mueller obstruction of justice New York Post Mueller Investigation innuendo garbage Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump Cop-Out Andrew C. McCarthy   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Say What? Rashida Tlaib Promotes Hunger Strikes to Protest ICE – But She Won’t Join Them

Westlake Legal Group say-what-rashida-tlaib-promotes-hunger-strikes-to-protest-ice-but-she-wont-join-them Say What? Rashida Tlaib Promotes Hunger Strikes to Protest ICE – But She Won’t Join Them rashida tlaib Politics North Carolina Michigan immigration illegal immigraiton Ice Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture Congress Campaigns Allow Media Exception
Westlake Legal Group RashidaTlaibMarch2019 Say What? Rashida Tlaib Promotes Hunger Strikes to Protest ICE – But She Won’t Join Them rashida tlaib Politics North Carolina Michigan immigration illegal immigraiton Ice Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture Congress Campaigns Allow Media Exception

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI-13). Screen grab via CNN.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI-13) gave a speech over the weekend to a human rights group in Michigan where she urged attendees to take bold action on the issue of illegal immigration and ICE.

The Free Beacon reports:

Tlaib, headlining a Detroit fundraiser this past weekend for the Michigan Coalition for Human Rights, complained of colleagues who are constantly “policing” what she says and lack willingness to embrace bold stands such as abolishing ICE. She called on her activist audience to join her in a hunger strike at the border.

“It’s going to take movements outside the halls of Congress,” Tlaib told the crowd, according to video captured by America Rising, a conservative group.

“I want you all to shut them down, we can shut them down,” Tlaib said to applause. “Don’t wait for this Congress to act, shut them down.”

“I know what they’re going to say, they’ll go, ‘What do you mean Rashida?’ Well I’ll tell you. There are some people that are using hunger strike, all these other things, going to the border, and I plan to.”

Promoting hunger strikes? Seriously?

Watch video of her remarks below:

Per Daily Caller, Tlaib’s office clarified her remarks this afternoon:

A spokesman for Tlaib did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation when asked if the congresswoman is planning to engage in a hunger strike, but denied that Tlaib called for supporters to launch one of their own.

“She did not call for a hunger strike,” Tlaib’s office told TheDCNF. “‘She mentioned that she knows of folks who have done hunger strikes. After that, she mentioned folks going to the southern border which she said she plans to do.”

Uh huh.

This reminds me of how Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY-14) went back and forth over the weekend over whether or not she supported organized boycotts of the New York Post over their 9/11 cover from last Thursday. First she said she did, then she said she didn’t, then she said she did.

These women literally don’t know what they’re saying from one minute to the next, probably because they don’t think about what they’re going to say before they say it.

In Tlaib’s case, it’s extremely irresponsible for a sitting member of Congress to encourage supporters to go on hunger strikes – whether she is calling for them or merely amplifying existing efforts. Somebody could die taking her words about hunger strikes to heart. If she had the maturity to understand how her words as an elected official matter, she would have never said them.

But as part of the Three Amigas she believes her words should be immune to criticism because she’s a progressive woman of color and stuff, so I guess we are supposed to just move on or something.

—————————
Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. —

The post Say What? Rashida Tlaib Promotes Hunger Strikes to Protest ICE – But She Won’t Join Them appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group RashidaTlaibMarch2019-300x159 Say What? Rashida Tlaib Promotes Hunger Strikes to Protest ICE – But She Won’t Join Them rashida tlaib Politics North Carolina Michigan immigration illegal immigraiton Ice Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture Congress Campaigns Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Good News America, “Last Man Standing” Is Getting an Eighth Season

Westlake Legal Group lastmanstandingabc-620x349 Good News America, “Last Man Standing” Is Getting an Eighth Season Tim Allen the connors Television right-leaning republicans Last Man Standing Front Page Stories fox Featured Story

Proving that right-leaning comedy does indeed have a place on mainstream television, Tim Allen’s “Last Man Standing” is once again coming back as it has been approved for an eighth season.

According to The Wrap, the show that was once canceled by ABC despite its success was picked up by Fox and debuted to massive viewership. The show has maintained that viewership since.

According to Fox Entertainment President Michael Thorn, renewing the show was something of a no-brainer as he called it “one of television’s most popular comedies”:

“‘Last Man Standing’ roared out of the gate on Fox, and has maintained its ratings dominance ever since,” said Michael Thorn, president, Entertainment for Fox Entertainment. “Much of that credit goes to the incredibly funny and talented Tim Allen, not to mention Nancy, Hector and the rest of the show’s great cast. We’d like to thank Kevin, Matt and the entire crew, along with our partners at 20th Century Fox Television, for overseeing one of television’s most popular comedies. We’d also like to congratulate them all on reaching 150 episodes – a milestone that’s well-deserved.”

The sitcom’s September premiere marked the network’s most-watched comedy in almost seven years, excluding NFL nights, and was the show’s highest-rated episode since the Season 2 premiere on ABC.

Comparatively, The Connors is not doing so well, with actors and crew already being forced to take a pay cut due to the shows flagging audience. The decline began when they fired Roseanne Barr from the show, whom many thought provided the actual laughs, as well as the politically middle of the road stances.

While some networks eliminate right-leaning viewpoints from their networks, Fox embraced the idea and is continuously rewarded for it.

The show that Allen built will now head toward it’s 150th episode, which the show’s Twitter account celebrated with a short clip.

The post Good News America, “Last Man Standing” Is Getting an Eighth Season appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group lastmanstandingabc-300x169 Good News America, “Last Man Standing” Is Getting an Eighth Season Tim Allen the connors Television right-leaning republicans Last Man Standing Front Page Stories fox Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Chuck Todd Makes One of the Dumber Comments on the Mueller Report You’ll See Today

Westlake Legal Group chuck-todd-620x377 Chuck Todd Makes One of the Dumber Comments on the Mueller Report You’ll See Today Russian interference nbc Mueller report Mueller Investigation media bias Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Dumb Take Chuck Todd

This may be the least informed and self-aware hot take on the Mueller report so far. Congrats to Chuck Todd for making it.

Earlier today, he posted this tweet.

Oh, I don’t know Chuck. Maybe because you, your network, and the media at large spent two years pushing wild conspiracy theories about Trump colluding with the Russians. Perhaps that’s why no one had time to focus on being concerned that the Russians “hacked the election.”

There’s also the fact that no one actually “hacked the election.” Chuck Todd knows this but he’s a liberal partisan and threw that line in there on purpose, knowing it’s like catnip to his side of the aisle. In reality, no vote totals were changes, no machines were hacked, and nothing done by the Russians could even be logically construed to have changed the outcome of the election. A few hundred thousand dollars spent on Facebook to spread memes of…Jesus arm wrestling Hillary…did not change one vote. The only other aspect of this was the DNC hack and Hillary’s numbers went up after that because the media largely brushed it aside as a nothing-burger. Even still, John Podesta’s emails are not hacking “the election.”

What the Russians tried to do and what they actually did are too different things. Hillary had no one to blame but herself. If she hadn’t illegally setup a private email server and stocked it with classified information, there would have been no Comey letter in October. The Russians didn’t do that. Todd knows this but he’s a political actor, not a journalist, so he must push the Democratic narrative that the election was stolen.

But look, if Todd really felt the above was so crucial, he could have spent a little less time bloviating about crazy Trump/Russia conspiracies and a little more time on the separate issue of Russian interference. No one made him waste all his time on an obvious hoax. That’s on him, despite his lack of self-awareness.

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Chuck Todd Makes One of the Dumber Comments on the Mueller Report You’ll See Today appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group chuck-todd-kevin-mccarthy-300x155 Chuck Todd Makes One of the Dumber Comments on the Mueller Report You’ll See Today Russian interference nbc Mueller report Mueller Investigation media bias Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Dumb Take Chuck Todd   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Democrat Governor Roy Cooper Sides With the Abortion Lobby, Vetoes NC ‘Born Alive’ Bill

Westlake Legal Group coexist_anti_abortion_poster-e1555162133918 Democrat Governor Roy Cooper Sides With the Abortion Lobby, Vetoes NC ‘Born Alive’ Bill roy cooper Pro-Life Politics North Carolina infanticide Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections democrats Culture Campaigns Allow Media Exception Abortion 2020 Elections 2020

As predicted, North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) today has vetoed NC’s proposed Born Alive bill:

Gov. Roy Cooper on Thursday vetoed legislation that would have required doctors to provide the same care to an infant that survives an abortion as they give any other newborn.

“Laws already protect newborn babies, and this bill is an unnecessary interference between doctors and their patients,” Cooper said in his veto statement. “This needless legislation would criminalize doctors and other health care providers for a practice that simply does not exist.”

Brent Woodcox, staff attorney for NC Senate Republicans, explained why this rationale made no sense:

He also took off after Politifact’s North Carolina division over a very misleading and thinly-sourced fact check on a key claim made about the bill:

I countered some of the claims from a related fact check, too. Specifically this one:

Claims about New York’s law have been exaggerated.

The NC House recently passed a resolution in response to a new New York law, known as the “Reproductive Health Act.”

Republicans who wrote the NC resolution described the NY law as “an extreme abortion-on-demand policy that establishes an unfettered right to abortion … the RHA authorized abortion up until the moment of birth.”

A viral Facebook image made a similar claim: that, under the new NY law, it’s legal to “murder” a baby a minute before it would be born. PolitiFact rated it False.

See this also, which I wrote in February:

**NY’s Updated Abortion Law Means Man Won’t Get Charged In Murder Of Unborn Child**

As I noted last week, Cooper is beholden to the abortion lobby and the extreme left in this state, so it wasn’t shocking that he vetoed the bill. But there is the question of the timing of Cooper’s veto. The bill passed two days ago, and he performed his veto just this morning. Alexandra DeSanctis speculates as to why:

An attempt at burying the story in the midst of a super-heavy national news cycle?

What remains to be seen at this point is whether or not Republicans have the votes to override Cooper’s veto. They no longer have a veto-proof majority so they’d have to bring a few Democrats on board to help them with an override. That’s a tall order.

Stay tuned.

————–
Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. —

The post Democrat Governor Roy Cooper Sides With the Abortion Lobby, Vetoes NC ‘Born Alive’ Bill appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group coexist_anti_abortion_poster-300x204 Democrat Governor Roy Cooper Sides With the Abortion Lobby, Vetoes NC ‘Born Alive’ Bill roy cooper Pro-Life Politics North Carolina infanticide Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections democrats Culture Campaigns Allow Media Exception Abortion 2020 Elections 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

WATCH: The Way Venezuela’s People are Being Transported to Hospitals Is Horrific

Westlake Legal Group watch-the-way-venezuelas-people-are-being-transported-to-hospitals-is-horrific WATCH: The Way Venezuela’s People are Being Transported to Hospitals Is Horrific Venezuela socialism hospital Health Care garbage truck Front Page Stories Featured Story

Westlake Legal Group Capture-5-620x352 WATCH: The Way Venezuela’s People are Being Transported to Hospitals Is Horrific Venezuela socialism hospital Health Care garbage truck Front Page Stories Featured Story

If you want to see just how bright the future is under socialism, then Venezuela can show you first and foremost just what the future under the worst economic system has ever seen looks like for those who become sick or injured.

A video uploaded by Michael Lima Cuadra to YouTube shows an injured person being taken to a hospital to see “Dr. Jesús María Casal Ramos” in Acarigua, located in Venezuela.

People can be seen gathering around the rear of a garbage truck, which had reportedly brought the injured person to the hospital as apparently there are no ambulances in Venezuela.

Within the video, a man can be heard explaining that there are no ambulances in Venezuela.

“Check this out,” says the man recording. “A garbage truck transporting a wounded person. This only happens in Venezuela.”

“This is saddening,” he adds.

Socialism is experiencing something of a popularity boost among the younger crowds in the United States and is only being spurred by the rise of such politicians as Sen. Bernie Sanders, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

However, socialism has never succeeded anywhere it’s been tried, and without a serious reprogramming of the human mind, likely never will. However, it has many workers in its PR department, including many members of the media and many teachers and professors who manage to put a very flowery idea of it in the brains of many of the young.

In an effort to combat this, Republican lawmakers have formed the “Anti-socialism” caucus, which has greatly upset members of the left.

The post WATCH: The Way Venezuela’s People are Being Transported to Hospitals Is Horrific appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 99b987eb-d569-4c37-9357-0cdf854d2794-300x200 WATCH: The Way Venezuela’s People are Being Transported to Hospitals Is Horrific Venezuela socialism hospital Health Care garbage truck Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Schumer and Pelosi Issue Joint Statement: ‘The Differences Are Stark’ Between What Barr And Mueller Said About Obstruction

Westlake Legal Group AP_17249560358621-620x368 Schumer and Pelosi Issue Joint Statement: ‘The Differences Are Stark’ Between What Barr And Mueller Said About Obstruction william barr Special Counsel Robert Mueller Politics Nancy Pelosi Mueller report Mueller Investigation james comey Impeachment of President Trump Front Page Stories Featured Story FBI and DOJ Corruption donald trump democrats corruption Congress collusion Chuck Schumer Andy McCarthy Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power

President Donald Trump meets with, from left, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and other Congressional leaders in the Oval Office of the White House, Wednesday, Sept. 6, 2017, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer issued a joint statement on the Mueller Report at 2 pm. It said:

The differences are stark between what Attorney General Barr said on obstruction and what Special Counsel Mueller have said on obstruction.

As we continue to review the report, one thing is clear: Barr presented a conclusion that the president did not obstruct justice while Mueller’s report appears to undercut that finding,

Yes, that’s it.

Imagine calling the Attorney General a liar and not offering any supporting evidence.

Pelosi and Schumer are signaling that they plan to keep on beating a dead horse. Given that the collusion ship has sailed, they have pivoted to the question of obstruction.

Since they failed to offer us a clue as to what they see as the differences between what Barr and Mueller have said on obstruction, I’ll assume it’s because Mueller and his minions were determined to leave the impression that Trump really did obstruct justice. They simply didn’t have quite enough evidence to prove obstruction beyond a reasonable doubt, so they carefully chose language that would allow the left to keep the door open on this issue. It was their goal to maintain the suspicion which has engulfed the Trump presidency from the beginning.

If there were anything definitive in the report, Pelosi and Schumer would have included it in their statement. “Mueller’s report appears to undercut Barr’s finding because on page 245, he includes…”

The National Review’s Andy McCarthy appeared on Fox News directly following Barr’s press conference and explained that “intent” is the determining factor in an obstruction charge. Did Trump fire FBI Director James Comey to end the counterintelligence investigation into Russia collusion? Obviously, Trump knew the investigation would survive Comey’s firing.

Even if it had been Trump’s intent, as we know, a government appointee serves at the pleasure of the president and can be fired anytime, for any reason. This never should have been an issue.

Pelosi and Schumer see the writing on the wall. The nearly three year long deep state conspiracy is about to be blown wide open and they’re trying to keep the focus on obstruction to steer the conversation away from it.

Time to bring out the big guns, Mr. President.

The post Schumer and Pelosi Issue Joint Statement: ‘The Differences Are Stark’ Between What Barr And Mueller Said About Obstruction appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group chuck-schumer-and-nancy-pelosi-responding-to-trum-2-23931-1547040396-4_dblbig-300x199 Schumer and Pelosi Issue Joint Statement: ‘The Differences Are Stark’ Between What Barr And Mueller Said About Obstruction william barr Special Counsel Robert Mueller Politics Nancy Pelosi Mueller report Mueller Investigation james comey Impeachment of President Trump Front Page Stories Featured Story FBI and DOJ Corruption donald trump democrats corruption Congress collusion Chuck Schumer Andy McCarthy Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim

Westlake Legal Group watch-heres-a-helpful-video-to-counter-msnbcs-only-trump-uses-the-collusion-term-claim WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim william barr Politics Mueller Investigation MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats collusion Allow Media Exception

Westlake Legal Group WTF-face-620x344 WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim william barr Politics Mueller Investigation MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats collusion Allow Media Exception

The meltdown on the left has manifested some very bizarre claims by various talking heads in their desperate attempts to make anything — and I mean anything — look like a chink in the Mueller report’s armor.

Take, for instance, this panel on MSNBC where Neal Katyal, former acting solicitor general and current SCOTUS lawyer, literally tries to explain that lawyers don’t use the term “collusion,” which he claims is a term only used by President Donald Trump.

Thus, suggests Katyal, Attorney General William Barr is somehow in Trump’s back pocket.

It’s not exactly difficult to look back and find all the times that the term “collusion” was used by everyone in the media to paint Trump as a Russian operative. This is something Matt Wolking posted in a fun music video featuring everyone in the media, politicians, and their grandmothers using the term.

Even a quick search result on various news websites shows just how often the term “collusion” was thrown around by nearly everyone.

At CNN we get 2,044 results when the term is searched for.

Westlake Legal Group Capture-1-620x313 WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim william barr Politics Mueller Investigation MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats collusion Allow Media Exception

Here are 500 stories on MSNBC itself when the word is searched for.

Westlake Legal Group Capture-2-620x314 WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim william barr Politics Mueller Investigation MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats collusion Allow Media Exception

Here’s Vox…

Westlake Legal Group Capture-3-620x329 WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim william barr Politics Mueller Investigation MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats collusion Allow Media Exception

Just for fun, let’s head over to NBC.

Westlake Legal Group Capture-4-620x284 WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim william barr Politics Mueller Investigation MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats collusion Allow Media Exception

Even if many of these articles containing the word have nothing to do with Trump, there are enough about Trump to signify that the term was used ad nauseam by anyone trying to put Trump in Russia with the candlestick. For the past few years, we couldn’t escape hearing the word. I’m pretty sure some in the media were saying it in their sleep that they used it so often.

That said, I can’t necessarily blame the leftist media for making such bizarre and outrageous claims as the one Katyal made earlier today. For the longest time, they pinned all their hopes on the notion that Trump’s defeat would come at the hands of the Russian collusion narrative. Now that there is definitively no collusion, they’re rudderless.

The post WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group MSNBC-racism-300x152 WATCH: Here’s a Helpful Video to Counter MSNBC’s “Only Trump Uses the Collusion Term” Claim william barr Politics Mueller Investigation MSNBC Media Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats collusion Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

‘Only Trump Uses That Term’ — The Media is Redefining The Mueller Investigation in Real Time

Westlake Legal Group only-trump-uses-that-term-the-media-is-redefining-the-mueller-investigation-in-real-time ‘Only Trump Uses That Term’ — The Media is Redefining The Mueller Investigation in Real Time Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

Westlake Legal Group CNN-Breakdown ‘Only Trump Uses That Term’ — The Media is Redefining The Mueller Investigation in Real Time Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

Watching the stammering, straining, struggling dialogue on the news nets today in responding to having the full Robert Mueller investigation report is all the evidence needed that our contemporary media complex is incapable of objective news reporting. CNN, by way of example, has dispatched a full 9 person panel today to cover the release. That all nine were in chorus in looking into this for ANY proof of wrongdoing by President Trump is of little surprise.

MSNBC also trotted out its revolving door of experts, telling us the important details are those not found in the report. (A notable absence has been the fully discredited John Brennan).One guest provided the most audacious reinterpretation of events. In taking gaslighting to new depths legal expert Neal Katyal insists that only one person has ever used the term “collusion”.

“Only Trump uses that term”. You heard him, trying to claim that for the past two and a half years only the President has used that term. That comes as a sure surprise, especially considering this is a rather easily researched claim. Matt Wolking wasted little time rebutting this statement — he only had to look into the Mueller report for context: “the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation,” says Mueller’s document.

Over on CNN Wolf Blitzer, holding up a binder of the printed out report, declared to the cameras, “We’re going through this very, very thoroughly.” That statement is more revealing than he intended because if the report itself had the ironclad proof of collusion and/or obstruction of justice there would not be a need to filter through the hundreds of pages to look for something objectionable. Noteworthy too is that the networks had little-to-no voices of differing interpretations. All were delving deeply to find their own segments to find proof of…something.

Chuck Todd seems strained to keep facts straight in this maelstrom of data that has been dumped, and dampened expectations. He puts out an old claim that has been long proven been false, but a need to revert is somewhat understandable.

Uh, “hacked, Chuck? No, that never took place. As for those cheering, Bill Barr this morning declared that Americans should be cheering that it has been proven that no cooperation with a foreign power to deride our election took place. The press, all the while, is cheering for some proof of nefarious behavior to emerge. Put those pom-poms away, Chuck – it’s unseemly.

The chyron left on the screen at CNN reads that Mueller was “unable to conclude that no criminal conduct occurred”. the This is to be interpreted that Mueller was unable to disprove a negative, so there can be that glimmer of hope. Not being explained by this glut of experts is that after two years nothing conclusive was found. That despite the fact Mueller requested an expansion of the scope of his investigation nothing tangible is found. And not one is even mentioning that the original thrust to look into collusion is completely brushed aside.

Panelist Jeffrey Toobin found his personal diamond in the exoneration. He leaned entirely on one sentence — in the hundreds of pages following years of investigations, hundreds of warrants, and thousands of subpoenas there was one sentence that had him holding out hope. In it, Mueller simply declared that Congress still retained the ability to impeach to explore possible obstruction. This is hardly revelatory, given that is a constitutional authority, and that Democrats have been bleating about impeachment for years already.

Yet these hopes ignore the core truth: if obstruction is such a slam dunk then it would have been declared in the report. Mueller has simply left enough of a window open for it to be explored by a zealot-driven political hunt. As today’s coverage has shown the zealotry is all set to race forward with their narrative.

The post ‘Only Trump Uses That Term’ — The Media is Redefining The Mueller Investigation in Real Time appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group CNN-Breakdown-300x156 ‘Only Trump Uses That Term’ — The Media is Redefining The Mueller Investigation in Real Time Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Twitter Kicked SPLC to the Curb, No Longer On Trust and Safety Council

Westlake Legal Group twitter-kicked-splc-to-the-curb-no-longer-on-trust-and-safety-council Twitter Kicked SPLC to the Curb, No Longer On Trust and Safety Council twitter trust and safety splc Social Media racism Politics Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power

Westlake Legal Group FB-Tw-620x413 Twitter Kicked SPLC to the Curb, No Longer On Trust and Safety Council twitter trust and safety splc Social Media racism Politics Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power

As the situation continues to devolve for the Southern Poverty Law Center, more bad news continues to plague the organization as even the left-leaning social media network Twitter has now abandoned the SPLC and no longer relies on it to tell the network what is and isn’t acceptable.

According to the Daily Caller, Twitter is one of the few big tech companies to divorce itself from the SPLC, and did so over the fact that it ignores racial harassment while taking in donor dollars:

Twitter appears to be one of the only big tech companies in Silicon Valley to completely divorce itself from the SPLC, an Alabama-based group that got slammed in March following reports it takes donors’ money while ignoring racial harassment. Facebook has not responded to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s repeated requests for comment about its affiliation with the SPLC.

“The SPLC is not a member of Twitter’s Trust and Safety Council or a partner the company has worked with recently,” a source within Twitter told TheDCNF on the condition of anonymity. The company listed the SPLC as a “safety partner” working to combat “hateful conduct and harassment,” according to a June 2018 DCNF report.

Twitter also included the Trust and Safety Council, which “provides input on our safety products, policies, and programs,” the company’s policy page noted at the time. Twitter’s page no longer includes SPLC as a member helping to govern certain types of conduct. Facebook’s involvement with the group was apparently more intimate.

The Daily Caller has reported that the SPLC is still working with Facebook and Amazon, and Google utilized the organization to assist in ruling on who and what to censor on YouTube last year.

The SPLC has found itself in hot water after utilizing its often looked to platform by the left to label nearly anyone who disagrees with them as a “hate group.” This ended with Quilliam Foundation founder Maajid Nawaz winning a lawsuit against the group for labeling him, a Muslim reformist, as an anti-Muslim extremist.

After that occurred, many began bringing lawsuits against the SPLC.

The post Twitter Kicked SPLC to the Curb, No Longer On Trust and Safety Council appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group FB-Tw-300x200 Twitter Kicked SPLC to the Curb, No Longer On Trust and Safety Council twitter trust and safety splc Social Media racism Politics Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com