web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Featured Story" (Page 12)

Politifact Gets Wrecked After Attempting to “Fact-Check” Claims About an Obama Quote

Westlake Legal Group media.townhall-1-620x317 Politifact Gets Wrecked After Attempting to “Fact-Check” Claims About an Obama Quote WRONG Wrecked Politifact Politics No Power media bias lie immigration Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Fact Checker democrats daca Constitution Barack Obama Allow Media Exception

Fact-checkers gonna fact-check and Politifact is no different. The industry of pretending to be unbiased while operating as total hacks is apparently good for the bottom line.

The most recent example comes courtesy of a claim about DACA and Barack Obama, namely whether he ever admitted he didn’t have the authority to enact such an order. This all came in a snarky reply to, who else, Donald Trump. The President had tweeted out this.

Anyone that’s been around for more than five minutes knows that’s objectively true. Barack Obama said multiple times, publicly, that he did not have the authority to enact DACA and that Congress had to be the ones to act.

Despite these obvious facts, Politifact road in to try to rescue the former president from criticism of his own words.

So much fact checking.

Ironically, a reporter from The Washington Post that stepped in to set them straight.

I now can’t find that post from Seung Min Kim on her timeline, so perhaps she deleted it? Either way, she was right the first time. Obama absolutely said that it’s “just not the case” that he can suspend deportations and he did with DACA.

And just to cap all this off, Politifact’s own site had found the claim that Obama did say that “mostly true” previously.

These fact-checking sites are just absolute dumpster fires.

The post Politifact Gets Wrecked After Attempting to “Fact-Check” Claims About an Obama Quote appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group ap-obama-clinton-dnc-300x208 Politifact Gets Wrecked After Attempting to “Fact-Check” Claims About an Obama Quote WRONG Wrecked Politifact Politics No Power media bias lie immigration Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Fact Checker democrats daca Constitution Barack Obama Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Syria Withdrawal Part IV: Conclusion-Way Ahead

Westlake Legal Group idlib-province-syria-09-2018-620x662 Syria Withdrawal Part IV: Conclusion-Way Ahead Uncategorized Turkey Trump Syria republicans Politics Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story erdogan elections donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception

From BBC https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-45404086

Syria Withdrawal Part IV: Conclusion-Way Ahead

The first three parts of this series outlined President Trump’s decision to quickly and forthrightly disengage from U.S. Military operations in Syria. They also generally described the current situation in this particular area of interest.

Yesterday morning, I had the opportunity to call in to the David Webb show on Sirius XM, where Webb had an interesting guest, Dr. William J. Parker, President and CEO of the East West Institute, a non profit that specializes in international conflict resolution. After a brief introduction by Webb, Dr. Parker gave an outstanding overview of all the players, their objectives and the current situation on the ground. He actually reiterated many of the points covered in Parts I, II & III of this series. He even added one I was holding for today’s piece, the effects of the now 103 year old, Sikes-Picot agreement. The Sikes-Picot agreement, is the post World War I poster boy for the Western Powers’ belief, that drawing a straight line on a map without regard for tribe, nationality or religion, couldn’t possibly have adverse consequences over a century later. More on this further down.

Mr Webb and I had the opportunity for a quick chat after Dr. Parker signed off. After I reviewed the main points of tension, I asked him a direct question:

As President Webb, what do you see as your desired endstate 5 years from now? We have to establish a desired result and then Of course work backwards to produce a plan to get us there.

His answer surprised me:

Nothing. We need to let it play out and react to events as they happen.

Webb went on to say like his guest Dr. Parker, that the last thing we want to do, is emulate Sikes-Picot and start drawing arbitrary lines again. Honestly, I get that and agree. Mr. Webb’s response was clearly focused on the ugly lessons learned from Sikes-Picot—imposing our view of the world on other folks and the ugly results that still cause issues over a century later. Nobody looking at the mess today’s Middle East has become, could possibly argue with that—and I certainly won’t.

However, I’m not sure about a wait then react process. If we cannot imagine what we want the endstate to look like, how can we even dream of getting there? Having said that, we also know in the real world, no matter how altruistic our objective may be and how hard we try, we can likely count on…less.

In the world the United States would like to see, all of our international associates, friends (Great Britain & the rest of the 5 I’s) and allies, long term or of convenience (Turkey & the Kurds) all like each other. However in the real World we live in, we need to settle for something less, like the relationship between Israel and Egypt. For quite some time following the Camp David Accords, their relationship was often described as, “formally correct.” At that time, both sides cordially despised each other, but had come to the realization (Thank You Anwar Sadat) that they could indeed (and needed to) cooperate without killing each other. Today, Egypt-Israel cooperation, although not at the “5 I’s,” level, is far more friendly, especially when dealing with the Muslim Brotherhood. The question then becomes, how to we achieve this kind of relationship between Turkey and the Kurds, PKK, Syrian and Iraqi? What would this endstate look like?

Seemingly opposite of Mr Webb’s “Let it play out” and react as necessary option, Richard Fernandez penned this, emphasis mine

With the Arab Spring and political opposition to OIF ending the hope of “bringing democracy to the Middle East,” some sort of repartition of the region, a redrawing of boundaries, seems the sole alternative.

With Turkey’s entry, we are perhaps witnessing the de facto partition of Syria with Kurdish borders dependent — if any are preserved — on how far the U.S. will pull back and what line they are willing to defend. But a stand-fast solution would require generational political will and boots on the ground. It will entail confronting a NATO ally and it won’t be free. The question is whether the public is willing to pay.

If America midwifes a Kurdistan, it must see it through, for it may only be popular in the first weeks. Kurdistan could be a “future Israel,” whose origin will be America’s eternal crime in future Left-wing history. As Brandon Weichert noted, partitions create centuries-long enmities.

What Fernandez, Weichert and my radio mentor David Webb focus on, is the word, “force.” Fernandez even posits a requirement for American “Boots On The Ground.” Sikes-Picot was all about white Europeans deciding what was good for the “bloody wogs”** and forcing it down their throats, regardless of tribe, religion or familial association. This time around, it could be different—by just removing the element of force and instead, asking for buy in.

Positing an endstate where the Kurds—all three major groups, have a place to call home, is a start. However, Sikes-Picot (and David Webb) has shown us that forcibly carving out territory from other folks’ property is a nonstarter, fostering hate, discontent and violence for decades. The way to go about this, is to involve all the stakeholders…except of course, ISIS, Russia and Iran. And Yes—that means President Bashar Al Assad of Syria. Stupidly wanting to depose him, was what got us into this mess in the first place.

Syria, Turkey, and the 3 major Kurdish groups, with the good offices of the United States, could with some effort and recognition of all parties’ interests, birth a voluntary agreement. This could not only to provide the Kurds an internationally recognized homeland, but also form a regional coalition that could totally defeat ISIS. This might not be as hard as it would appear at first blush. The two actors that would be the least difficult to move on this, would seem to be Iraq and Syria. In Iraq, the Kurds already govern their semi (defacto, totally) autonomous territory. In Syria, President Assad at this point, exerts little to no control over his Northeastern territory and has very little leverage. An agreement that helps keep him in power and lessens his reliance on Russian occupation assistance would almost certainly ease the transfer of some of his territory to help build a Kurdish homeland.

That leaves Turkey. This series began recognizing that Turkey is the key to this entire region for the United States. It will be an especially difficult partner in this effort. The United States needs Turkey as a loyal NATO partner, more than President Erdogan needs the U.S. President Erdogan’s hostile attitude notwithstanding, PKK terrorist operations make it difficult for the 80 percent of the Turkish population who are not Kurds, to support any form of rapprochement.

The keys to moving forward here, are the Iraqi and Syrian Kurd territories. If Erdogan can over a 2-3 year period, be convinced that those territories and their Kurdish populaces are not providing support for the PKK, instead are assisting in running ISIS and other terror groups to ground, then he could possibly be persuaded to negotiate a small Turkish contribution to the new territory of Kurdistan.

Dr. Parker and David Webb are correct. We cannot jam this down anyone’s throat…except perhaps President Assad’s. However, if we can convince the right stakeholders that they could benefit from this, then we might avoid the mistake of Sikes-Picot.

This is just one option. There are almost certainly other ideas out there that have a greater likelihood of success. The purpose of this series, is to move our thinking in a different direction than one that requires a continual hemorrhage of American blood and treasure. Ultimately, it comes down to…

“The hardest thing I do, is write letters to parents and spouses of OUR troops killed in combat overseas.”

– President Donald J. Trump

** “wog,” in 1916, when Sikes-Picot was signed, was as commonly used as the “n” word. It was then and even more so now, a racial slur, of the highest order. I used it in this piece, to convey the sheer arrogance and assumed superiority of Sikes-Picot

David Webb Show is on Sirius XM, Channel 125, M-F 9-12:00EST

The below links, provide some detail used to produce this article:

The Fate of the Kurds: Repartition of the Region Seems the Sole Alternative

The Kurd In the Punch Bowl-Brandon Weichert

Whitehouse Statement on Syria

Mike Ford, a retired Infantry Officer, writes on Military, Foreign Affairs and occasionally dabbles in Political and Economic matters.

Follow him on Twitter: @MikeFor10394583

You can find his other Red State work here.

The post Syria Withdrawal Part IV: Conclusion-Way Ahead appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group idlib-province-syria-09-2018-281x300 Syria Withdrawal Part IV: Conclusion-Way Ahead Uncategorized Turkey Trump Syria republicans Politics Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story erdogan elections donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Hilarious: Here’s How Climate Change Gang Is Saving the Planet

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-09-at-7.53.36-PM Hilarious: Here’s How Climate Change Gang Is Saving the Planet Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post environment Culture Climate change activists Climate Angry liberals Allow Media Exception

Screenshot from this video.

The climate change activists of the group “Extinction Rebellion” have been about trying to save the planet over the past few days.

Were they picking up trash? Doing clean up at the ocean?

Nope.

They were throwing a “Climate Strike” in London during which they were doing interpretive dance, yoga and just downright weird things. Daily Wire caught a lot of the action.

Note all the plastic tents used to block the streets and cause cars to spew more carbon emissions into the air.

Check out all the yoga mats made with fossil fuels:

I’m sure people gave up their fossil fuel use after this:

This scared me more than a little:

No idea what’s going on here:

There were diesel generators in vicinity seemingly powering the camps there, although Daily Wire didn’t confirm they were for the group.

But some of the group did make it to McDonald’s. Apparently no one told them about the bad plastic use and the horrible meat eating that contributes to killing the planet.

And how much water was wasted cleaning up this ridiculous stunt? Did they pollute with whatever they used?

But it’s a great racket. According to one account, Extinction Rebellion is raking in close to $50,000 a day.

The post Hilarious: Here’s How Climate Change Gang Is Saving the Planet appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-09-at-7.53.36-PM-300x159 Hilarious: Here’s How Climate Change Gang Is Saving the Planet Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post environment Culture Climate change activists Climate Angry liberals Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Republicans Should Stop Talking Out of Both Sides of Their Mouths On China

Westlake Legal Group ap-trump-xi-press-conference-620x413 Republicans Should Stop Talking Out of Both Sides of Their Mouths On China United States theft The Bulwark Tariffs republicans Politics NBA National Review Morey Geo-Political Enemy Front Page Stories Front Page Free trade Featured Story dangerous corruption consistency conflict China Allow Media Exception

U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping after a joint press conference at the Great Hall of the People, Thursday, Nov. 9, 2017, in Beijing. Trump is on a five-country trip through Asia traveling to Japan, South Korea, China, Vietnam and the Philippines. (AP Photo/Andy Wong)

As tensions with China and the NBA boil over, we’ve seen a remarkable showing of unity among all corners of American life. It seems we’ve finally reached a point where people recognize what China truly is and that the long term dangers of continuing to shovel cash and influence their way outweighs the short term gains.

At the same time, I find myself frustrated by some of the double talk I’m seeing on the issue because my fear is this new, widespread epiphany may not last.

Let’s remember, it was just five minutes ago that many Republicans within the beltway and their subsequent media circles were vehemently stumping for unfettered free trade with China. I can’t count how many “Trump is an idiot and will destroy the economy” tweets I’ve seen over the past few years. The consistent message has been to call for a total normalization of trade relations with China, absent any additional tariffs or leverage being used to press them.

Take this example of contradiction at play.

I actually agree with French on that point. But here’s the thing, none of this is new.

We’ve known for a long time that China is a human rights violator. We’ve known they cheat and steal when it comes to trade. It’s well documented that they put people in concentration camps and that they’ve killed minority groups via genocide. Heck, there are stories of them harvesting organs of prisoners.

No offense to Guy, because he’s right to point out what China is doing with Muslim minorities, but at the same time, he and many others like him have found Trump’s trade war with China highly objectionable on economic grounds. But if the Chinese are evil and reprehensible, why would anyone support China being such a large trade partner in the first place? These are questions many Republicans haven’t properly grappled with, instead choosing to illogical compartmentalize them.

Getting back to French, since he knows everything about China’s history of atrocities, why has he spent so much of his time levying critiques such as this?

When you hear Donald Trump claim that he can magically negotiate “winning” trade deals with China or Japan, here’s what it means in the real world: more expensive goods at home as tariffs drive up prices, and less opportunity for exports abroad as trading partners retaliate with import restrictions of their own. We won’t see textile mills spring open across the land — we’ll just pay more for shirts and socks.

Again, French isn’t necessarily wrong in a vacuum, although he was wrong about manufacturing not coming back. It actually has increased over Trump’s presidency, but tariffs do hurt American companies in the short term (they also hurt the Chinese). Yet, if he truly believes China is a tyrannical dictatorship and is a dangerous threat, why exactly would he be stumping for the status quo of enriching them and expanding their influence?

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t stump for unlimited trade with China, allowing them exponential growth to challenge us and our ideals, while at the same time proclaiming how terrible they are and how they are destroying democratic freedoms.

It’s time to choose a side and stick to it, even if there’s a cost.

I’m not writing this to call anyone out. I’m writing this to challenge Republicans to come up with a message on China that’s not a convoluted mess. When Trump started hitting China early in his tenure, the Republican response should have been to steer him into doing it for the right reasons (to blunt Chinese aggression and influence), not castigating him for not retreating and letting China do whatever they want just because it may benefit us financially.

You can’t demand unfettered free trade with China out of one side your mouth and then proclaim the vast, dangerous evils of China out of the other. That is a contradiction that can not be squared and Republicans should stop trying.

It’s good to see some are finally getting the message but they need to keep their eye on the ball going forward. China will be far, far more dangerous 20-30 years from now if we continue to heavily rely on them, passing mountains of cash in their direction along the way. It’s fair to say that I even part ways with the President on this matter. I don’t think we need a “better deal” with China (as Trump wants). I think we need to push American businesses to ween themselves off the communist teat completely. The long term gain and security will far outweigh the short term pain. China is not the only country on earth that can make cheap cloths and electronics, among other things.

In the end, the historic normalization of China was a mistake. I understand the purpose was to blunt the Soviet Union, but all we ended up doing was creating a monster. We’ve got precious little opportunity left to cut them down to size. Right now, the U.S. still holds tremendous financial leverage over them and we should use it.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Republicans Should Stop Talking Out of Both Sides of Their Mouths On China appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group chinese-flag-300x153 Republicans Should Stop Talking Out of Both Sides of Their Mouths On China United States theft The Bulwark Tariffs republicans Politics NBA National Review Morey Geo-Political Enemy Front Page Stories Front Page Free trade Featured Story dangerous corruption consistency conflict China Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Lindsey Graham Warns House Dems: Release the Full Volker Transcript or I Will Have Him Testify Publicly

Westlake Legal Group LindseyGraham-620x317 Lindsey Graham Warns House Dems: Release the Full Volker Transcript or I Will Have Him Testify Publicly washington D.C. south carolina Social Media republicans Politics North Carolina Lindsey Graham Kurt Volker Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Culture Congress Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., pauses while speaking to members of the media outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, after his meeting with President Donald Trump, Sunday, Dec. 30, 2018. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Though Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has been a vocal critic of President Trump’s decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria, which it comes to House Democrats and their show trial impeachment inquiry, Graham remains one of the President’s strongest allies.

Earlier this afternoon, Graham tweeted out a warning for House Democrats to release the full transcript of former Ambassador Kurt Volker’s testimony from last Thursday. If they continue to stall, Graham made it clear he’d use his power as Senate Judiciary Chair to have him questioned publicly:

Graham’s second tweet linked to an interview Fox News did with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), who is the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee. Jordan said during the segment that Volker testified for nine hours, and that Democrats should release the full transcript in the interest of transparency:

“Release the transcript so they can see what Ambassador Volker spent nine hours telling us,” Jordan said. “Where he said there was no quid pro quo, there was no linkage… between security assistance dollars for Ukraine and any type of investigation into anyone in Ukraine or any investigation into the Bidens.

“He was clear about that [and] reinforced exactly what President [Volodymyr] Zelensky said when he said, ‘I was not pushed by the administration,’” he continued. “Adam Schiff won’t release that. Instead, there were 67 pages of text messages. Adam Schiff took a few of those text messages and released them. Release them all.”
[…]
“The president was willing to release the transcript of the call with President Zelensky. Why won’t Adam Schiff release the transcript of the special envoy who testified for nine hours?”

Watch Jordan discuss Schiff’s actions below

Jordan’s comments echo what Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) said to journalists on Tuesday morning in a fiery statement about what he described as a “clown show” impeachment inquiry:

Maybe you should ask what was said inside of Volker’s deposition during his transcribed interview with regards to Adam Schiff’s fairy tale quid pro quo charge, that aid from the United States to the Ukraine was being linked to an investigation into the Bidens. Why don’t you ask what did Ambassador Volker say about that?”
[…]
“…if we weren’t there last Thursday, you would have no idea of everything that Ambassador Volker said to obliterate Adam Schiff’s fairy-tale quid pro quo charge. You’d have no idea.

Schiff and company have held up Volker as a trustworthy, credible witness for their side in these sham proceedings so far. That they continue to refuse to release the full transcript of his testimony is a strong indicator that what Republicans like Zeldin and Jordan are saying about Volker’s testimony are true, that what he said during the course of his hours-long questioning undermined the so-called impeachment case against Trump.

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Lindsey Graham Warns House Dems: Release the Full Volker Transcript or I Will Have Him Testify Publicly appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group LindseyGraham-300x153 Lindsey Graham Warns House Dems: Release the Full Volker Transcript or I Will Have Him Testify Publicly washington D.C. south carolina Social Media republicans Politics North Carolina Lindsey Graham Kurt Volker Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Culture Congress Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Jon Voight Tells ‘The Hollywood Reporter’ Democrats Have Left America, but They May Have Left a Lot More than That

Westlake Legal Group jon-voight-with-michele-bachman-AP Jon Voight Tells ‘The Hollywood Reporter’ Democrats Have Left America, but They May Have Left a Lot More than That Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

Actor Jon Voight speaks with Rep. Michele Bachmann R-Minn., at Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009, during a Republican health care news conference.(AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

 

 

Oscar winner and 4-time nominee Jon Voight is at it again, saying things entirely out of step with much of Hollywood.

In the recent past, he’s surely swollen some Tinseltown veins by declaring Donald Trump “the greatest president of this century” and “the greatest president since Abraham Lincoln.”

And in a new interview with The Hollywood Reporter — at the premiere of daughter Angelina’s Disney biggie Maleficent: Mistress of Evil — he gives Trump the “higher, higher” treatment accompanied by a big “lower, lower” to Democrats.

In fact, he believes Dems have totally left America:

“I’m a big supporter of our president, and I feel that what has happened with the Democratic party is something that I’d never thought I’d see happen. This is not the Democratic party of John Kennedy, who I was in support of. They had many heroes in the Democratic party. They have no heroes today. There’s a lot of slander and name-calling and lying that’s going on and passing itself off as news. This is my opinion. That’s where I stand, and I don’t like it. Somebody has to stand up and say that and punch back at that nonsense. This is not America. The Democratic Party doesn’t represent America anymore.”

I was just saying something similar last week — JFK was a man with a lot to say. He was a leader with a vision, full of ideas he believed would better the nation. And he went to bat for those.

It seems the party has devolved into little more than a collection of breathtakingly absurd jabs at Donald Trump. For what do they stand? What are their superior ideals? Why aren’t they trying to sell them?

Thanks to the above, they’re destined for a 2020 loss.

Jon thinks so, too:

“Donald Trump is going to win the presidency once again, and this is going to be proven to be nonsense just as the two years with [the Mueller Report] and millions of dollars wasted and has taken those people in the House who are Democrats away from doing the business of the people.”

The legendary actor also discussed last month’s controversy involving Eric McCormack and Debra Messing, who appeared to champion a blacklisting of Trump supporters in entertainment (here, here, and here):

“The Left was so concerned about the Hollywood Ten during the ‘50s, but they are not at all concerned with the blacklist today and people losing jobs.”

He wants to see some within the party resist the tide and save it from irrelevance:

“They are very outspoken about it, and they attack anybody who is for Trump or who is for the Republican Party. The Democratic Party has been undermined and overtaken, and I wish it could recoup itself and that there could be people who would stand up for the Democratic Party that we have known and we have counted on, and there are not anybody in that group who is standing up and protecting it. They are falling in.”

I must admit, I’m baffled by the Dems’ apparent lack of attention to 2020. It looks as if they’ve all but given up the presidency for at least another 5 years, in exchange for hope of ousting The Donald via other means. But if they succeed with impeachment, what does that get them? President Mike Pence?? And his face-off with a weak opponent for the next term, in front of a voter base that’s been galvanized by a partisan eviction of the guy they elected?

Have they left America? Irrespective of that, they seem to have left governance.

-ALEX

 

elevant RedState links in this article: here, herehere, here, and here.

See 3 more pieces from me:

Action Star Promises His Upcoming Movie Will ‘Constantly’ Address Toxic Masculinity

Kanye West Professes His ‘Radical Obedience’ To Jesus Christ

As Mayors In LA & NYC Promise To #Resist Immigration Enforcement, A Mom & Her Young Children Are Murdered By A Twice-Deported Criminal

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

The post Jon Voight Tells ‘The Hollywood Reporter’ Democrats Have Left America, but They May Have Left a Lot More than That appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group jon-voight-with-michele-bachman-AP-300x199 Jon Voight Tells ‘The Hollywood Reporter’ Democrats Have Left America, but They May Have Left a Lot More than That Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Arkansas Woman Tells Cops She Had No Idea Her Hair Bow was a Bag of Crystal Meth: ‘I Didn’t Know That was There’

Westlake Legal Group jessica-kropp-mug-shot-SCREENSHOT-620x322 Arkansas Woman Tells Cops She Had No Idea Her Hair Bow was a Bag of Crystal Meth: ‘I Didn’t Know That was There’ Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

[Screenshot from WPMT Fox43, https://twitter.com/fox43/status/1181765539053625344]

 

Ever had gum in your hair? It’s hard to get out.

The same is true of crystal meth.

At least, I assume.

That would explain why 38-year-old Jessic Kropp kept hers in, despite the fact that she’d just been pulled over by the cops.

According to the arrest affidavit, Jessica’s tag had expired. Hence the traffic stop.

She had ample time to remove her illegal accessory — rather than pulling over when the blue lights filled her rearview, she went ahead and cruised through a neighborhood first.

Perhaps she wanted make sure she was presentable.

A few checks in the mirror. “Anything in my teeth?”

She was certainly gussied — her bleached blonde ‘do was pulled up and to the side, sorority-girl style, via a spunky pink scrunchy.

But the bit of detail that really niced her up was the adorable bow — white, to match her tie-dyed shirt, and middled by a sassy pink tie to go with the binding of her pony.

Cute.

Patrol Officer Kenneth Looney asked for her drivers license. She laid it out for him: Her DL was suspended, she didn’t have insurance, the car was borrowed, and she had no idea where the registration was.

The officer ran a quick check which revealed five outstanding warrants, four failure to appears, and one failure to pay fines warrant.

More importantly, Kenneth did something many a man has failed to do when a woman most deserved it: He noticed what she’d done with her hair.

The policeman explained to Fox:

“As I was detaining [her], I observed what appeared to be a bow in her hair.”

Yes, man! Women want you to notice the ways they spruce up.

He apparently has an eye for detail:

“The bow appeared to be a small, zip-locked bag containing a white crystal-like substance of suspected methamphetamine.”

From Fox LA:

Looney described the bag as having a small rubber band around the middle, “giving it a bow shape,” and added that it was attached to a bobby pin. He said it was placed on the right side of Kropp’s head, attached to her hair.

Like I said.

Kenneth: Are you serious?

Jessica: What?

Kenneth: You have a bow in your hair made from a bag of meth.

Jessica played coy. A bit of, “What — this old thing?”

“[Expletive], I didn’t know that was there, someone else put that there and I didn’t know what it was.’”

Ladies, never let a stranger do your hair. Only trust your regular stylist.

Perhaps not merely coincidentally, a search of the car turned up more bags of white hair product.

Jessica was charged with:

  • possession of meth with the intent to deliver
  • possession of drug paraphernalia
  • driving on a suspended license
  • no liability insurance

She was taken to the Marion County jail, where she’s being held to the tune of $22,530.

All because of a doggone Breaking Bad barrette.

Don’t get too down and out, Jessica — you’re not alone.

If only she’d been in Louisiana, rather than Arkansas. She could’ve bonded with 23-year-old Ashely Beth Rolland, who got inserted into a Bayou State clink in August because cops also discovered a bag of crystal she had no idea was there — in her vagina.

-ALEX

 

 

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

The post Arkansas Woman Tells Cops She Had No Idea Her Hair Bow was a Bag of Crystal Meth: ‘I Didn’t Know That was There’ appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group jessica-kropp-mug-shot-SCREENSHOT-300x156 Arkansas Woman Tells Cops She Had No Idea Her Hair Bow was a Bag of Crystal Meth: ‘I Didn’t Know That was There’ Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

In Break With Pelosi and Schiff, House Democrat Calls for Floor Vote on Impeachment Inquiry (So Does Beto)

Westlake Legal Group BetoORourkeAPimage-1-620x317 In Break With Pelosi and Schiff, House Democrat Calls for Floor Vote on Impeachment Inquiry (So Does Beto) washington D.C. Texas Politics North Carolina Nancy Pelosi john garamendi Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections donald trump democrats Culture Congress Campaigns California Beto O'Rourke beto Allow Media Exception 2020 Elections 2020

Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke speaks at the Iowa Federation of Labor convention, Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2019, in Altoona, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

Ever since House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared an impeachment inquiry two weeks ago, she has said in interviews and elsewhere that calling for a floor vote in the U.S. House on the issue was not a Constitutional requirement.

While she’s technically correct, not calling for such a vote gives off the appearance of not having confidence that your caucus will carry through with their stated support of either an inquiry or impeachment itself. It’s also an indicator Pelosi doesn’t want to put some vulnerable House Democrats on the hot seat in a crucial election year.

Plus, as a fired up Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) noted Tuesday, Pelosi’s refusal to do so has hamstrung House Republicans and Trump’s legal team:

… because there has not been a vote to launch an impeachment inquiry, because the minority does not have any rights for subpoenas, because the president doesn’t have the right to have council present to ask questions for subpoena power, to present evidence.

Earlier today, House Democrat John Garamendi broke with fellow California Reps. (and impeachment circus ringleaders) Pelosi and Adam Schiff, telling CNN it’s time to hold a vote on the issue:

“I think it’s time for us to put a vote on the floor, a resolution for the inquiry structured in such a way that it can move forward with full power of the Congress behind it,” Garamendi said in an interview on “CNN Newsroom.”

“That will further strengthen Congress’s hand,” he added.

“They want a fight, OK,” Garamendi said of the White House. “Then let us arm ourselves completely and totally with the full power of Congress.”

According to The Hill, Garamendi “does not serve on any of the main committees leading the impeachment inquiry.” But just in case you think Garamendi might be one of the more tame Democrats in the House, think again. In the same interview, he said those who do not cooperate with the House’ investigation should be carted off to jail.

Garamendi is not the only Democrat who came out today calling for a formal vote on the House floor for an impeachment inquiry. So did 2020 presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke:

“I don’t want to question the speaker’s wisdom and I’m sure she has a very good reason for proceeding in the way that she has,” the 2020 hopeful told MSNBC. “But to your question, I’d love to remove that as a talking point or a reason for the kind of obstruction that you’re seeing from the president.”

MSNBC host Hallie Jackson had asked O’Rourke whether he thought House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., should act to take away the administration’s legal argument for not cooperating with her inquiry.

It’s not really a “talking point” but I wouldn’t expect him to characterize it any other way.

Pelosi should hold that vote on an impeachment inquiry. On one hand, not doing it protects vulnerable incumbents for the time being and gives Republicans and the White House few legal options.
On the other hand, the longer she refuses to, the more it adds credence to Republican and White House claims that this is all nothing but a giant sham a la the Russia collusion hoax.

She’s apparently decided the risk that this will be viewed as a sham over the long term is worth the risk, which is one reason why Pence is traveling this week to key House districts – to remind voters that elections, not impeachment, are how we settle political differences.

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post In Break With Pelosi and Schiff, House Democrat Calls for Floor Vote on Impeachment Inquiry (So Does Beto) appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group BetoORourkeAPimage-1-300x153 In Break With Pelosi and Schiff, House Democrat Calls for Floor Vote on Impeachment Inquiry (So Does Beto) washington D.C. Texas Politics North Carolina Nancy Pelosi john garamendi Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections donald trump democrats Culture Congress Campaigns California Beto O'Rourke beto Allow Media Exception 2020 Elections 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

The DOJ Finally Decides to Prosecute a Federal Official For Leaking

Westlake Legal Group handcuffs-2102488_1280-1-620x349 The DOJ Finally Decides to Prosecute a Federal Official For Leaking Politics partisan NBC News National Security media bias leaker Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story DIA democrats democrat CNBC bill barr Allow Media Exception

A bit of news broke the afternoon involving the arrest of a federal official.

Henry K. Frese, a DIA official, was charged with leaking classified information to two different journalists, one of which he was apparently sleeping with. Remember that the next time the media tell you are virtuous and upstanding they are.

Here’s the report via The Federalist.

An employee at the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency was arrested Wednesday on federal charges of leaking top-secret classified information to two reporters.

Henry Kyle Frese, a 30-year-old counter-terrorism analyst at the DIA, allegedly leaked classified information to two reporters whose identities were not unveiled by authorities in 2018 and this year, one of which Frese was romantically involved with, according to the indictment.

Federal authorities say one reporter wrote eight articles stemming from at least five leaks from Frese.

While that linked article doesn’t rely the names of the reporters in question, we know who they are. One of them is CNBC’s Amanda Macias, who was in the romantic relationship with Frese. The other was an NBC reporter named Courtney Kube.

Much of what was leaked involved intelligence on foreign weapons capabilities and tests, including Russia and China.

CNBC has already suspended Macias.

We should probably go ahead and congratulate her on her new gig at The New York Times. You know it’s coming.

You also won’t be surprised to learn that Frese’s social media showed him to be rabidly anti-Trump.

I’d assume we are less than a day away from this guy being turned into a #resistance hero and Trump being accused of targeting him for his political views.

While this leaker isn’t directly related to the Trump-Russia fiasco, it does at least show a willingness by the DOJ to pursue these cases when they feel they have enough evidence. This appears to be an open and shut case. Hopefully, there are many more to come in the near future.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post The DOJ Finally Decides to Prosecute a Federal Official For Leaking appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 300e3a-300x146 The DOJ Finally Decides to Prosecute a Federal Official For Leaking Politics partisan NBC News National Security media bias leaker Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story DIA democrats democrat CNBC bill barr Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com