web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Featured Story" (Page 15)

The Left Needs to Take a Real Good Look at What It’s Become After This Ridiculous “Hey Guys” Video

Westlake Legal Group Untitled-1-2-620x414 The Left Needs to Take a Real Good Look at What It’s Become After This Ridiculous “Hey Guys” Video Video Social Justice Sexism right wing racism progressives Politics Now This Media leftists Hey Guys Front Page Stories Feminism Featured Story donald trump democrats Brandon Morse Allow Media Exception

No doubt that by now you’ve seen the “Now This” video circulating around the internet telling you not to use the phrase “hey guys” because it’s gendered and sexist. If you haven’t, then here it is.

And let’s play a game. Post below in the comments how far you made it before you had to stop. On my initial watch, I made it 17 seconds.

All I could think as I clicked off of it was that if I was on the left, I’d be embarrassed that this is what my side’s concerns boiled down to nowadays and that we’ve become so first-world spoiled that this is a problem that people in a room agreed was worth dedicating resources to.

In fact, I think Bearing Arms editor Cam Edwards put it best in his reply to the video.

“Imagine “hey guys” being one of the Top 10,000 Biggest Problems in your life,” he tweeted.

One of the greatest pieces of advice I can give anyone is that you shouldn’t take yourself so seriously. If you do, you get blinded to how ridiculous you become, and as a fallable human, you’re pretty ridiculous by default already.

The goal of not taking yourself too seriously is to not put yourself into a position where you pressure or force anyone to be as ridiculous as you, and this is a problem too many on the social justice left have. They even call themselves “progressives,” which has become an everyday term now but is kind of a ridiculous thing to call yourself if you really think about it.

I mean, really. How high on your own supply do you have to be to think that everything you do is done to progress humanity toward Utopia? You’re an egotistical ape like the rest of us with zero ability to foresee the future. Hell, many progressives hardly see what they’re doing in the present.

The social justice left loves to proselytize about what is and isn’t good to do or say, and have come up with all sorts of nonsensical ways to live your life “properly.” Oddly enough, a lot of what is “proper” to these “progressives” defies all logic and scientific reasoning. What’s more, they truly believe that what they’re suggesting is the path to a better society.

Right now, their path to a better society is to tell you that using the word “guys” is a weaponized word that is dehumanizing.

Their words, not mine.

If I were on the left, I’d feel pretty embarrassed right now. In fact, I’d be on social media denouncing the holy hell out of this video. Why? Because it’s a clear indication of how emotionally weak my ideological camp is. It’s proof positive that our priorities are in the wrong place and that we’re making mountains out of molehills in an effort to make it seem like we’re doing good in the world.

To be clear, if I wasn’t in the know already, this “Now This” video would make me question the weight of a lot of stances the left takes. It makes me take them less seriously overall and even laugh at them.

There’s even a tinge of anger that is added to it when you consider the fact that the left considers this a problem but refuses to address real problems. They don’t want to talk about the violence in Chicago much. They don’t want to talk about the fact we have a crime problem in minority communities. They don’t want to talk about the full spectrum of racism happening in the U.S., nor do they want to talk about the violence of Antifa. They don’t want to talk about the obvious corruption problems happening within the Democratic party. They don’t want to talk about the demonstrable destructiveness of socialism as we watch it happening in other countries. They don’t want to talk about the cost of all of these entitlements they’re cheering on, nor how it’s going to be paid for, at least in depth.

No, they want to talk about how “hey guys” is going to *checks notes* hurt peoples feelings.

Whose feelings? As Sister Toldjah wrote on the video, the vast majority of women don’t even care about the phrase’s usage. Even in the video itself, the girl notes that it has become a gender-neutral phrase. I’ve even seen women use it to address groups of women on multiple occasions.

This is a bad look. It’s the kind of bad look the left has been making for itself for some time now and it’s making people consider the left to be Monty Python’s Camelot. Just a silly place everyone agrees not to go to. Instead, they choose Trump, because anything is better than this nonsense.

To sum it up, people are laughing at this video and the ideological side that created it, and you can’t blame them. If I was a Democrat, or on the left in general, I’d be mocking this video to kingdom come. Not just because it deserves to be mocked, but because it doesn’t have any business representing a serious idea within my camp.

But, alas, this is what the left has become thanks in part to its embrace of social justice. Years of banging the drum of race, sex, and sexuality has birthed forth this monster that has now taken control and is the face of the left.

You’ve got two options. You can either fight back against the nonsense, regain control of the left, and put a more realistic foot forward…or you can come to the right. We won’t ask you to eat bugs or your pets to save the environment.  Also, we have comedy. You can laugh here.

And believe me. We’re laughing.

The post The Left Needs to Take a Real Good Look at What It’s Become After This Ridiculous “Hey Guys” Video appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Untitled-1-2-300x200 The Left Needs to Take a Real Good Look at What It’s Become After This Ridiculous “Hey Guys” Video Video Social Justice Sexism right wing racism progressives Politics Now This Media leftists Hey Guys Front Page Stories Feminism Featured Story donald trump democrats Brandon Morse Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Watch: Black Trump Fan at NC Rally Explains Why He Bought the Biggest MAGA Hat He Could Find (cc: Debra Messing)

Westlake Legal Group BigMAGAhatTrumpRally-620x348 Watch: Black Trump Fan at NC Rally Explains Why He Bought the Biggest MAGA Hat He Could Find (cc: Debra Messing) Social Media republicans Race Politics North Carolina Media MAGA hats Hollywood Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections donald trump democrats debra messing Dan McCready Dan Bishop Culture Campaigns Bette Midler Allow Media Exception 2020 Elections 2020

Trump supporter Bryson Gray explains why he bought the biggest MAGA hat he could find prior to attending a campaign rally in Fayetteville, NC – 9/9/19. Screen grab via CBS 17.

If you’re black, Hispanic, gay, or a female and happen to support President Donald Trump, life can be tough in the presence of ‘woke’ liberals if you wear your politics on your sleeve. That goes doubly so if you are bold enough to wear a MAGA hat, which to unhinged TDS sufferers symbolizes hate, bigotry, racism, you name it.

For privileged white liberal actresses like Alyssa Milano, the “MAGA hat is the new white hood.” For Bette Midler, black Trump supporters at Trump rallies are a paid part of the “blackground.” Actress Debra Messing is in agreement with those who say “A black vote for Trump is mental illness.”

In other words, how dare black Americans think differently.

With that in mind, let’s turn to Trump’s rally in Fayetteville, NC on Monday evening, where the President campaigned in a show of support for Republican candidate Dan Bishop in the hotly contested Congressional District 9 special election, which is being held today. Bishop’s Democratic opponent is Dan McCready.

Trump supporter Bryson Gray was interviewed by CBS 17 prior to the start of the rally. Gray explained that he went out and bought the biggest MAGA hat he could find in defiance of his friends who he says told him he shouldn’t support Trump because he’s black:

“I have a lot of friends who tell me that I shouldn’t support Donald Trump because I’m black, which is sort of insane because … I can support whoever the hell I want to support. And then also they told me that I shouldn’t wear the MAGA hat, so I bought the biggest MAGA hat. So it makes it double the importance, so that’s why. ”

Watch the interview segment below:

The Trump War Room Twitter account tweeted out a clip of the video, which has gone viral:

I should note that Messing has gotten involved as of late in the Bishop/McCready race in a show of support for McCready (apparently someone just told her there’s a special election in North Carolina, which has only been in the news for months).

Anyway, hats off (no pun intended) to Gray, who clearly walks to the beat of his own drum by way of refusing to march in lockstep with Democrats just because of his skin color.

Flashback –>> MAGA Hat Shame Game Is Not About Racism, It’s About Suppressing Dissent

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Watch: Black Trump Fan at NC Rally Explains Why He Bought the Biggest MAGA Hat He Could Find (cc: Debra Messing) appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group BigMAGAhatTrumpRally-300x168 Watch: Black Trump Fan at NC Rally Explains Why He Bought the Biggest MAGA Hat He Could Find (cc: Debra Messing) Social Media republicans Race Politics North Carolina Media MAGA hats Hollywood Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections donald trump democrats debra messing Dan McCready Dan Bishop Culture Campaigns Bette Midler Allow Media Exception 2020 Elections 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

New York Times Says CNN’s Jim Sciutto’s Report Blaming Trump for the US Losing an Intel Source Is Pure Bunk

Yesterday, CNN’s Jim Sciutto ran with a story that the CIA had been forced to exfiltrate a key asset from within Russia because the CIA, including then-director Mike Pompeo, were afraid that President Trump would reveal the source’s identity. This is how he described it:

In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN.

A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.

The decision to carry out the extraction occurred soon after a May 2017 meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump discussed highly classified intelligence with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. The intelligence, concerning ISIS in Syria, had been provided by Israel.

As I noted in my post on the subject, virtually nothing added up to what Sciutto was claiming (read CNN Russian Spy Exfiltration Story Trips All The Bull**** Alarms On Two Continents). The biggest problem was that John Brennan’s CIA had leaked the existence of a spy within Putin’s inner circle to various media outlets as early as December 2016 in order to add credibility to the Russia Hoax then being perpetrated on the American people.

The New York Times covered the same story later yesterday and came to a startling different conclusion.

Decades ago, the C.I.A. recruited and carefully cultivated a midlevel Russian official who began rapidly advancing through the governmental ranks. Eventually, American spies struck gold: The longtime source landed an influential position that came with access to the highest level of the Kremlin.

The decision to extract the informant was driven “in part” because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence, CNN reported. But former intelligence officials said there was no public evidence that Mr. Trump directly endangered the source, and other current American officials insisted that media scrutiny of the agency’s sources alone was the impetus for the extraction.


But the government had indicated that the source existed long before Mr. Trump took office, first in formally accusing Russia of interference in October 2016 and then when intelligence officials declassified parts of their assessment about the interference campaign for public release in January 2017. News agencies, including NBC, began reporting around that time about Mr. Putin’s involvement in the election sabotage and on the C.I.A.’s possible sources for the assessment.

The following month, The Washington Post reported that the C.I.A.’s conclusions relied on “sourcing deep inside the Russian government.” And The New York Times later published articles disclosing details about the source.

The news reporting in the spring and summer of 2017 convinced United States government officials that they had to update and revive their extraction plan, according to people familiar the matter.

So the impetus for the exfiltration was actually numerous news reports, obviously based on CIA leaks, that could compromise the source, not some visceral fear of Trump talking. Here is a great run down.

Despite being called out for wrong reporting, Sciutto was still on the air claiming that the New York Times had vindicated his reporting.

Description:https://twitter.com/AG_Conservative/status/1171214789777006593

The post New York Times Says CNN’s Jim Sciutto’s Report Blaming Trump for the US Losing an Intel Source Is Pure Bunk appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group spy-vs-spy-300x200 New York Times Says CNN’s Jim Sciutto’s Report Blaming Trump for the US Losing an Intel Source Is Pure Bunk Russia Politics New York Times Mike Pompeo Media jim sciutto Front Page Stories Featured Story douchebaggery donald trump democrats CNN cia Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Wilbur Ross Slaps Down Resistance Hurricane Hijinks and the Left Goes Bonkers

Westlake Legal Group AP_17285648923019-620x423 Wilbur Ross Slaps Down Resistance Hurricane Hijinks and the Left Goes Bonkers wilbur ross the resistance Politics noaa National Weather Service Hurricane Dorian Government Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Department of Commerce democrats Allow Media Exception Alabama

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross appears before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to discuss preparing for the 2020 Census, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Oct. 12, 2017. The Trump administration acknowledged on Thursday that billions more dollars are “urgently needed” to ensure a fair and accurate count during the 2020 Census. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Hurricane Dorian has provided one of the stupidest events I believe I’ve ever witnessed. Not only did we get a chance to see the “climate isn’t weather” goons in full bloom after a forecast that Florida was going to be hit within 24 hours turned out to be spectacularly wrong, we got a chance to see our national media at war with President Trump over him merely reiterating a forecast by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

On September 1, President Trump mentioned that Alabama might possibly be hit heavier by Hurricane Dorian than expected.

While the public NOAA forecasts until August 31 showed Alabama in the danger zone of the projected track, by September 1 the projected track had hung a sharp right turn and was paralleling the Eastern Seaboard.

Later that day, the forces of the #Resistance sprang into action

They claim they were being inundated by calls but that doesn’t pass the smell test. There is exactly one reason that a regional NOAA office would interject itself into a presidential conversation, some little Resistance toad taking the opportunity to try to make the President look bad for political reasons. Questions could have been answered by simply repeating the current forecast, if we believe enough people actually knew there is a National Weather Service office in Birmingham, Alabama, to actually make a difference in call volume. Later that day, NOAA headquarters issued a directive that they were not to offer opinions but were to stick with official NOAA forecasts…which, if they’d done that there would have been no controversy.

Instead of this being the nothingburger that it was, there was a perfect marriage of the climate change dunces who are still all gritty-panties over Trump calling bullsh** on their gravy train and their media enablers. The Alabama tweet became an exhibit in their Trump-is-stupid campaign. Trump dug in and I think on September 4 executed a trolling maneuver that went wrong. My assessment is that Trump and his advisers misread just how freakin stupid and vicious there opposition was and there was this incident:

To me, this is a pretty obvious poke at the controversy. With the White House graphics department available, it would have been child’s play to extend the line of hurricane effects had they intended for anyone to take it seriously. But they hadn’t counted on the sheer nitwittery of the people who hate Trump. By now, there was a range of morons claiming that Trump had broken federal law by issuing a fake weather forecast. In this case, issuing meant that it had never been issued and forecast meant that it was a single map with a Sharpie markings that was four days old.

By Friday, the White House was taking the damage seriously. A national security council staffer, Rear Admiral Peter Brown, issued a statement

The White House circulated a statement on official letterhead from Rear Adm. Peter Brown, a Homeland Security and counterterrorism adviser, who said he briefed Trump multiple times about Dorian as well as models that showed the potential path of the eye of the storm.

“These products showed possible storm impacts well outside the official forecast cone,” Brown said.

“While speaking to the press on Sunday, Sept. 1, the President addressed Hurricane Dorian and its potential impact on multiple states, including Alabama,” he continued. “The president’s comments were based on that morning’s Hurricane Dorian briefing, which included the possibility of tropical storm force winds in southeastern Alabama.”

The statement marked an escalation of the White House’s efforts to defend Trump’s assertion that Alabama would be hit by the storm, despite a National Weather Service tweet stating otherwise. It came days after Trump originally made the claim and as the storm lashed the Carolinas on Thursday with heavy rain, intense wind and tornadoes.

Brown noted that Florida, Puerto Rico and other areas were originally predicted to fall in Dorian’s path, but that the storm shifted track.

He also referenced forecasts from the National Hurricane Center from Aug. 27 through Sept. 2, noting they did show a chance of tropical storm force winds hitting parts of Alabama.

And NOAA issued this statement:

From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama.

Now the story breaks that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross intervened, personally, to un-screw this mess.

The Secretary of Commerce threatened to fire top employees at the federal scientific agency responsible for weather forecasts last Friday after the agency’s Birmingham officecontradicted President Trump’s claim that Hurricane Dorian might hit Alabama, according to three people familiar with the discussion.

You would have thought the world had ended:

Ross’s spokesman denies the story and the Commerce IG is investigating (this is literally a nothingburger beyond throwing a bone to the Resistance), but even if it is true, so f***ing what?

Political appointees are totally at-will employees and can be fired because you don’t like the color of lipstick or the style of shoes. If they don’t want to do what they’ve been told to do, they can quit in protest. Ross was well within his rights to bring the hammer down on a weak and gutless leadership team that not only allowed a field office to actively try to make President Trump look bad but stood by, while in possession of evidence that proved the silliness of the whole matter, and let it dominate a news cycle for a week. The real scandal is that these people are still employed and that the Birmingham NWS office hasn’t felt any negative repercussions for this douchebaggery. The reaction Ross drew is a function of him upping the ante for rogue federal emp

I must admit, I’ve had my doubts about how strong a secretary Ross actually is, but this shows that no matter how slow moving he appears, he can be motivated to crack the whip.

=========
=========
Like what you see? Then visit my story archive.

I’m on Facebook. Drop by and join the fun there.
=========
=========

The post Wilbur Ross Slaps Down Resistance Hurricane Hijinks and the Left Goes Bonkers appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AP_17285648923019-300x205 Wilbur Ross Slaps Down Resistance Hurricane Hijinks and the Left Goes Bonkers wilbur ross the resistance Politics noaa National Weather Service Hurricane Dorian Government Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Department of Commerce democrats Allow Media Exception Alabama   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

The NYTs Wants You to Meet America’s “Rising Drag Stars” That Also Happen to Be Prepubescent Children

Sexualizing prepubescent children seems to be a bit of a fetish now on the left and it’s only becoming more prominent.

We’ve already seen outrageous scenes like an 11 year old mimicing snorting Ketamine with an older man (dressed like a woman) while the media praise him and the authorities do nothing. Meanwhile, outlets like The Huffington Post have lauded this new “movement” as empowering and inspiring, even as underage boys are seen taking nude pictures with adult drag queens.

Enter The New York Times, who apparently wasn’t happy sitting on the sidelines.

“I’m excited!” screamed Desmond Napoles, a 12-year-old drag star who performs as Desmond is Amazing, punctuating his enthusiasm with mild profanity. His eyes darted to his phone. Then he backtracked. “Don’t put that in. Don’t put that in.” He would soon be grounded from Snapchat by his mother for what she called “sass.”

Desmond and his mother would still make it to the object of Desmond’s excitement: DragCon, the convention hosted by RuPaul in New York City in early September. It would be Desmond’s third year in a row. He isn’t a different person in drag so much as a more outgoing version of himself, he said. “I’m always fierce, fabulous and not playing video games,” he said. “I’m being AH-MA-zing.”

Such hard hitting journalism. Nowhere in this article do you find any skepticism of how healthy this is. They don’t mention any of controversies surrounding these kids, and there have been several, including runs in with a pedophile. It’s all just fluff writing and celebration.

Meanwhile, you can see cracks in the public personas being bandied about.

Desmond has since pulled back on performing, though he will attend DragCon. Even there, among fans, he is not particularly looking forward to the crowds. When fans yell his name and swarm him for hugs, “it makes me anxious,” he said. He dreams of being an ornithologist when he grows up, he said, or a roller-coaster engineer.

Of course it makes him anxious. 12 year old boys twerking and performing like a stripper for older, mentally ill men is not something a kid should be doing and it’s only natural that the attention is going to affect him in a negative light. None of this is normal but we live in a society that is so obsessed with being “inclusive” that everyone is scared to call bad behavior bad now. It’s one thing when you are dealing with adults. I’m fairly libertarian there. Go do whatever you want as far as the government is concerned. But what’s happening to these kids is child abuse and there will be dire consequences for them as they grow older.

For now though, their parents seem to enjoy the notoriety and media attention. The sexualization and using of children in this way is just another black mark on our civilization.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post The NYTs Wants You to Meet America’s “Rising Drag Stars” That Also Happen to Be Prepubescent Children appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Untitled-3-300x147 The NYTs Wants You to Meet America’s “Rising Drag Stars” That Also Happen to Be Prepubescent Children The New York Times Politics media bias Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story DragCon Drag Kids desmond is amazing democrats Crazy child abuse   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Not Again! Arctic Tour Ship With 16 Climate Change Warriors Aboard Gets Stuck In Ice, CCWs Airlifted To Safety

 

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-09-10-at-6.53.04-AM-620x369 Not Again! Arctic Tour Ship With 16 Climate Change Warriors Aboard Gets Stuck In Ice, CCWs Airlifted To Safety Media global warming hoax Global Warming Front Page Stories Featured Story environment Allow Media Exception

Photo Credit: University of Washington Arctic Law and Policy Institute’s twitter photo from Maritime.net Arctic Tours ship MS MALMO, IMO 8667579, dwt 466, built 1943, refurbished in 2014, Flag: Sweden. https://twitter.com/UWLaw_Arctic/status/1171063753913204737?

 

Maritime.net reports that an Arctic tour ship carrying a Climate Change documentary film team and several tourists, ran into some ice last week. They had been shooting a documentary about climate change and melting Arctic ice. Yes, really.

The MS MALMO, a Swedish-flagged ship, was cruising off Longyearbyen, Svalbard Archipelago, halfway between Norway and the North Pole when it got stuck in ice. The vessel’s sixteen passengers had to be airlifted to safety under “challenging” conditions. According to Maritime.net, seven crew members remained aboard the ship as they awaited assistance from the Coast Guard.

This is not the first time a ship carrying climate change activists has run into trouble in polar ice floes. In the CNN video below, a ten thousand ton Chinese icebreaker, the Snow Dragon, became trapped by antarctic ice on its way to rescue a Russian vessel, the Academic Shokalskiy. The ship was carrying a team of global warming scientists and had become stuck in the ice floes several days earlier. The team’s mission?  To gauge the effects of climate change on the region.

Aysor.am reported that the Snow Dragon requested assistance from a nearby French ice breaker. And a third ice breaker from Australia was eventually called in.

This incident occurred in late December 2013, which is the middle of the summer in the southern hemisphere.

 

The post Not Again! Arctic Tour Ship With 16 Climate Change Warriors Aboard Gets Stuck In Ice, CCWs Airlifted To Safety appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-09-10-at-6.53.04-AM-300x179 Not Again! Arctic Tour Ship With 16 Climate Change Warriors Aboard Gets Stuck In Ice, CCWs Airlifted To Safety Media global warming hoax Global Warming Front Page Stories Featured Story environment Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Primarying Trump is a Futile, Self-Defeating Exercise, So Naturally Some On the Right Support It

Westlake Legal Group DonaldTrumpAPphoto-620x317 Primarying Trump is a Futile, Self-Defeating Exercise, So Naturally Some On the Right Support It Self Defeating republicans primary Politics Mark Sanford Joe Walsh Futile Front Page Stories fox news Featured Story Election donald trump 2020

President Donald Trump speaks during a Made in America showcase event on the South Lawn of the White House, Monday, July 15, 2019, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

I’m going to do dissent from some people that I generally don’t disagree with on most issues, but I feel I’ve got to.

With Mark Sanford jumping into the primary race against Trump, we’ve gotten a new shot of energy among some on the right. The idea is that he’s a credible candidate who can push Trump on the issues has been floating around on social media.

I have a couple of problems with this.

One, there is no path to beating Trump in the primary that doesn’t lead to the Democrat winning in 2020. Right now, Elizabeth Warren is setting herself up to win some of the early states and possibly be in position to rocket ahead after New Hampshire. It is extremely possible she could be the nominee. A socialist, pro-abort, wealth tax supporting liberal that wants government to control nearly every aspect of your life. The point is that the stakes are not low here.

Let’s assume that the ghost of Reagan enters the race and narrowly beats Trump in the primary. Then what? Does anyone think an incumbent President Trump is gong to say “welp, I’ll head back to Trump Tower.” Of course not. He’ll take his 30-40% of the vote or whatever it is in this hypothetical (pretty much impossible) scenario and the Democrat will win.

So what’s the point? What is being accomplished by this except weakening the incumbent to help the Democrat? Yes, there’s some value to being battle tested and taking some shots, but there’s much, much more value (as shown historically) in being an incumbent sitting on the sidelines and not having to contend in a primary.

Here’s my other problem. Because the above is undoubtedly true, all this does is reinforce the idea that more traditional, establishment Republicans are still perfectly happy to lose gracefully rather than doing what it takes to win. When Trump leaves, perhaps they’ll be some return to normalcy as far as the next nominee’s style. What the Republican voters won’t tolerate is a return to the Mitt Romneys of the world who’d rather take a beating with a smile than fight back. It seems some still haven’t learned that lesson.

Listen to some of this interview with Mark Sanford. The platitudes, the political speak, the moral preening. It’s the same stuff the party soundly rejected by electing Trump. Those that think we are going back to this need a reality check. It’s not happening and you are only hurting your own party by not realizing that.

Trying to primary Trump is an exercise in self-defeat. It holds no value except to help Democrats in 2020 and it’s why no Republican should be supporting it. If you don’t like Trump, you will get your shot in 2024. Go out and make the case when the time comes while supporting people who can win in the modern Republican party. There are no short cuts.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Primarying Trump is a Futile, Self-Defeating Exercise, So Naturally Some On the Right Support It appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group facepalm-bear-300x157 Primarying Trump is a Futile, Self-Defeating Exercise, So Naturally Some On the Right Support It Self Defeating republicans primary Politics Mark Sanford Joe Walsh Futile Front Page Stories fox news Featured Story Election donald trump 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

If Global Warming is Eating at You, Boy Does a Swedish Professor Have a Recipe for Relief

Westlake Legal Group save-4077270_1280-620x396 If Global Warming is Eating at You, Boy Does a Swedish Professor Have a Recipe for Relief Uncategorized stockhol school of economics magnus soderlund Global Warming gastro summit Front Page Stories Featured Story environmentalism environment democrats Culture Climate Allow Media Exception

 

 

Have you ever wished you could do more to save the doomed world? Do you believe people belong to the earth, rather than the other way around?

Do you consider extreme environmentalism delicious?

Boy, have I got a diet plan for you.

At the Gastro Summit last week, Stockholm School of Economics professor Magnus Soderlund floated an idea of how to fight global climate change: You are what you eat, so just be human.

As reported by The Epoch Times, during a panel discussion titled “Can You Imagine Eating Human Flesh,” Magnus asserted we could toss away the taboos of cannibalism if only we try.

From the article by Celia Farber:

[Magnus] refers to the taboos against it as “conservative” and discusses people’s resistance to it as a problem that could be overcome, little by little, beginning with persuading people to just taste it. He can be seen in his video presentation and on Swedish channel TV4 saying that since food sources will be scarce in the future, people must be introduced to eating things they have thus far considered disgusting—among them, human flesh.

Food will be scarce?? Are we to believe dystopia will take away our beloved Vienna Fingers??

At least we’ll have each others’. And perhaps the old adage is true: Maybe planetary salvation tastes like chicken.

Don’t be offended — people eating you isn’t personal; it’s just business. Yet “business” doesn’t seem something for which Magnus has much respect: Part of his plan is to eat away at capitalism.

Conflating resistance to eating human flesh with capitalist selfishness, the seminar’s talking points ask:

“Are we humans too selfish to live sustainably?

“Is cannibalism the solution to food sustainability in the future? Does Generation Z have the answers to our food challenges? Can consumers be tricked into making the right decisions? At GastroSummit, you will get some answers to these questions—and also partake in the latest scientific findings and get to meet the leading experts.”

The author points out, however, that cannibalism can bring about disease and brain damage (I’ll leave it at that).

But Magnus is free from the unwieldy confines of a limited palette. When asked by TV4 if he’d personally give it a go, he preferred being a Flying Purple People Eater — minus the lavender wings — over coming across as a plain ol’ stick in the mud:

“I feel somewhat hesitant, but to not appear overly conservative…I’d have to say…I’d be open to at least tasting it.”

Open indeed.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has assured us all: We’ll be but a memory of the cosmos in 12 years (here). If you dare to believe we may stave off that promised fate, Magnus Soderlund’s got you covered. As well as scattered, chunked, and diced. And to get there, maybe also smothered or capped.

#EnvironMENTAL

-ALEX

 

Relevant RedState links in this article: here

See 3 more pieces from me:

Julian Castro Saves The World, One Psychotic Problem At A Time. Previously: Pregnant Men; This Week: Racist White Weather

In An Effort To Force Congress To Save The Earth, Radicals Superglue Themselves To Walls In Washington. Yeah — That’ll Do It

In Order To Save The Planet, President Jair Bolsonaro Asks Brazilians To Hold In Every Bowel Movement For Two Days

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” If it fails to automatically refresh, manually reload the page. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”

The post If Global Warming is Eating at You, Boy Does a Swedish Professor Have a Recipe for Relief appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group save-4077270_1280-300x191 If Global Warming is Eating at You, Boy Does a Swedish Professor Have a Recipe for Relief Uncategorized stockhol school of economics magnus soderlund Global Warming gastro summit Front Page Stories Featured Story environmentalism environment democrats Culture Climate Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Trump Eyes a New Program to Detect Warning Signs of Mass Murder Among the Mentally Ill. But How Slippery’s That Slope?

Westlake Legal Group camera-4277525_1280-620x413 Trump Eyes a New Program to Detect Warning Signs of Mass Murder Among the Mentally Ill. But How Slippery’s That Slope? white house washington D.C. Uncategorized safehome mental illness mental health mass shootings healthcare harpa Guns gun control geoffrey ling Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump DARPA crime bob wright Allow Media Exception

 

 

The Trump administration is peering into a proposal wresting mental illness’s role in mass shootings.

During a speech following the El Paso and Dayton murders, the President touted “reform[ing] our mental health laws to better identify mentally disturbed individuals who may commit acts of violence, and mak[ing] sure those people not only get treatment, but when necessary, involuntary confinement.”

The Commander-in-Chief pointed to a comparative irrelevancy of firepower when it comes to the slaying of innocents:

“Mental illness and hatred pulls the trigger, not the gun.”

As reported by The Washington Post, now the White House is contemplating the creation of a new agency to study how such atrocities may be averted via the signs of mental disturbance:

The White House is considering a controversial proposal to study whether mass shootings could be prevented by monitoring mentally ill people for small changes that might foretell violence.

Former NBC chairman Bob Wright, a longtime friend and associate of President Trump’s, has briefed top officials, including the President, the Vice President and Ivanka Trump, on a proposal to create a new research arm called the Health Advanced Research Projects Agency (HARPA) to come up with out-of-the-box ways to tackle health problems, much like the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) does for the military, according to several people who have been briefed.

The Daily Wire notes that a three-page proposal — sent to Health and Human Services Sec. Alex Azar among other officials — rolled out a plan called “SAFEHOME” (Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping Overcome Mental Extremes). The initiative would determine how technology could pinpoint warning signs. Cell phone data would be included in that implementation.

For those interested in the slipperiness of a slope, the proposition emphasizes that participation would be on a volunteer basis. There would, as stated, be no “profiling of any kind.”

How many would-be murderers would say, “You’re right; I’m probably gonna try to kill everybody; here’s my consent so you can stop me”?

Among the mentally ill, there surely might be some; but a lot?

As the Post relayed, Geoffrey Ling — HARPA’s lead researcher — defended the program with maybe not the most convincing sales pitch:

“To those who say this is a half-baked idea, I would say, ‘What’s your idea? What are you doing about this? … The worst you can do is fail, and failing is where we are already. You need to find where the edge is so you can push on that edge.”

The FBI indicates a quarter of mass shooters have been diagnosed with a mental illness.

So we’d be looking at volunteers among that 25%, and then the government’s ability to effectively discern and extinguish impending evil?

How slick is that incline again?

What are your thoughts on the program? Let us all know in the Comments section.

-ALEX

 

See 3 more pieces from me:

A Television Icon Laments America’s Divide, But There’s A Greater Lesson – A Forgotten One We Learned Long Ago

Pioneer David Hogg Changes His Tune – The Cause Of Violence In America Is No Longer Guns

The NRA Pulls No Punches In Its Strike Against Walmart’s New Anti-Gun Policy

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below.

If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” If it fails to automatically refresh, manually reload the page. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”

The post Trump Eyes a New Program to Detect Warning Signs of Mass Murder Among the Mentally Ill. But How Slippery’s That Slope? appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group camera-4277525_1280-300x200 Trump Eyes a New Program to Detect Warning Signs of Mass Murder Among the Mentally Ill. But How Slippery’s That Slope? white house washington D.C. Uncategorized safehome mental illness mental health mass shootings healthcare harpa Guns gun control geoffrey ling Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump DARPA crime bob wright Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Watch: Jim Mattis Leaves Andrew Mitchel at a Loss for Words After Torpedoing Her Anti-Trump Narrative

Westlake Legal Group 2b066136-6b8b-45e5-b62d-00b82c129d06-620x357 Watch: Jim Mattis Leaves Andrew Mitchel at a Loss for Words After Torpedoing Her Anti-Trump Narrative Politics NATO MSNBC Media James Mattis Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Andrea Mitchell Allow Media Exception

And here it is, your moment of zen.

While appearing on MSNBC with Andrea Mitchell, former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis was asked about the damage President Donald Trump was doing to the NATO alliance.

“In the last two years we’ve seen our alliances weaken in NATO, specifically in Asia and in Europe,” said Mitchell.

Mattis responded by pointing out that what we always see is the tensions, “because that’s what always grabs your attention.”

“However, right now you see a NATO – I think we’re in the fourth or fifth straight year – of the nations…increasing their defense budgets,” said Mattis.

“I can say quantitatively NATO’s actually stronger today,” he continued.

Mattis said that the tensions seen between countries in NATO have always been there, and said he can trace every President back to Clinton saying that NATO allies need to pay more. What’s more, Mattis has told these nations personally that the American people will never care about the lives of their children more than they do, and that it’s up to them to provide more to their defense.

For a few seconds, Mitchell seemed rudderless. She began to speak as if to counter Mattis, but immediately pivoted to his resignation letter in order to change the subject.

It’s always fun to watch the mainstream media get its narrative’s teeth figuratively kicked in as we learn the truth. Mattis has never been one to shy away from reality, and the fact that he’s bringing it onto shows where they were hoping there’d be something damning to attack Trump with is just hilarious.

Mattis is currently making the rounds to promote his new book Call Sign Chaos: Learning to Lead. While many seemed to think it’d be an anti-Trump screed, Mattis is disappointing a lot of people.

 

The post Watch: Jim Mattis Leaves Andrew Mitchel at a Loss for Words After Torpedoing Her Anti-Trump Narrative appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 2b066136-6b8b-45e5-b62d-00b82c129d06-300x173 Watch: Jim Mattis Leaves Andrew Mitchel at a Loss for Words After Torpedoing Her Anti-Trump Narrative Politics NATO MSNBC Media James Mattis Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Andrea Mitchell Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com