web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Featured Story" (Page 15)

The Tomahawks Come Out for Elizabeth Warren From Other Democrats on Health Care

Westlake Legal Group 31-elizabeth-warren.w529.h352.2x-300x200 The Tomahawks Come Out for Elizabeth Warren From Other Democrats on Health Care white house washington D.C. warren Social Media progressives Popular Culture Mitt Romney Michael Bennet Massachusetts Liberal Elitism Hollywood healthcare Health Care Government Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Constitution Conservatives Congress communism Colorado Capitalism biden Bernie Sanders Barack Obama Allow Media Exception 2019

Senator Elizabeth Warren

The faux Indian references never get old.

Yesterday, I wrote about how Sen. Elizabeth Warren FINALLY has gotten around to talking about actually releasing a plan on Medicare for all. READ: FINALLY: Elizabeth Warren Will Unveil Her Medicare For All Plan. We Still Go Broke With It. This plan is full of crap that she can’t actually do. Simply because the system is already broke and taxing all the wealth in the country won’t fix that.

One of her colleagues in the race for the Democratic nomination in 2020 has taken notice and has decided to call her out.

According to Fox News

2020 presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is being dishonest about her health care plan, which would add trillions to the deficit and raise taxes on all Americans, so she can use it as a soundbite, said Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo, on Monday.

“I think she’s not being honest about her plan,” Bennet said on “CNN Newsroom.” “I think her plan, which costs $33 trillion, is the equivalent of 70 percent of all the taxes that the federal government will collect over the next 10 years.

“I mean, it is a massive increase in taxes to this country and it hasn’t been explained to the American people,” he continued.

“It’s a soundbite. And more than that… it’s not based on common sense.”

What tipped you off, Senator, that her lips were moving?

Bennet has actually praised Bernie Sanders on his plan for at least being honest about how he is going to tax people for the luxury of free healthcare. Sanders is going to tax everyone and says it. Elizabeth’s plan, much like Obamacare was, is built upon a premise of “I won’t be around when the crap hits the fan so you guys figure it out.”

As we come up to the 100-day mark before the Iowa caucuses we are going to see that those who are on the bubble or are ticked off that they have not taken off in the polls start taking scalps of the frontrunner. (I CAN’T STOP.)

Warren has a very strained relationship with the truth and it is no surprise that she would put out a plan that other semi-reasonable people would immediately destroy. The last debate showed that when everyone took a shot at her they were letting her know she was full of buffalo chips. Going forward this pounding is only going to get worse.

Elizabeth should just go full Bernie and decide to be absolutely honest and say if you want mediocre health care for all then we have to tax you more than you have ever been taxed before. This is what you want, lemmings, so shut your pie holes and obey.

Maybe then her Senate colleagues also running for President would offer her praise instead of scorn.

Check out my other posts here on Red State and my podcast Bourbon On The Rocks plus like Bourbon On The Rocks on Facebook and follow me on the twitters at IRISHDUKE2 

The post The Tomahawks Come Out for Elizabeth Warren From Other Democrats on Health Care appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 31-elizabeth-warren.w529.h352.2x-300x200 The Tomahawks Come Out for Elizabeth Warren From Other Democrats on Health Care white house washington D.C. warren Social Media progressives Popular Culture Mitt Romney Michael Bennet Massachusetts Liberal Elitism Hollywood healthcare Health Care Government Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Constitution Conservatives Congress communism Colorado Capitalism biden Bernie Sanders Barack Obama Allow Media Exception 2019  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Is the Deep State Coup Headquartered in Salem, Massachusetts

Theory: the Salem witch trials in the early 1690s resulted in the executions of 19 women and men among the 200 accused of “practicing witchcraft.” The Democrats’ pursuit of President Trump is a similar mass psychosis.

Let’s explore this theory further. First, some background on the Salem witch trials:

The Salem witch trials occurred in colonial Massachusetts between 1692 and 1693. More than 200 people were accused of practicing witchcraft—the Devil’s magic—and 20 were executed. Eventually, the colony admitted the trials were a mistake and compensated the families of those convicted. Since then, the story of the trials has become synonymous with paranoia and injustice, and it continues to beguile the popular imagination more than 300 years later.

Several centuries ago, many practicing Christians, and those of other religions, had a strong belief that the Devil could give certain people known as witches the power to harm others in return for their loyalty. A “witchcraft craze” rippled through Europe from the 1300s to the end of the 1600s. Tens of thousands of supposed witches—mostly women—were executed.

Controversy also brewed over Reverend Samuel Parris, who became Salem Village’s first ordained minister in 1689, and was disliked because of his rigid ways and greedy nature. The Puritan villagers believed all the quarreling was the work of the Devil. In January of 1692, Reverend Parris’ daughter Elizabeth, age 9, and niece Abigail Williams, age 11, started having “fits.” They screamed, threw things, uttered peculiar sounds and contorted themselves into strange positions, and a local doctor blamed the supernatural.

Another girl, Ann Putnam, age 11, experienced similar episodes. On February 29, under pressure from magistrates Jonathan Corwin and John Hathorne, the girls blamed three women for afflicting them: Tituba, the Parris’ Caribbean slave; Sarah Good, a homeless beggar; and Sarah Osborne, an elderly impoverished woman. All three women were brought before the local magistrates and interrogated for several days, starting on March 1, 1692. Osborne claimed innocence, as did Good. But Tituba confessed, “The Devil came to me and bid me serve him.” She described elaborate images of black dogs, red cats, yellow birds and a “black man” who wanted her to sign his book. She admitted that she signed the book and said there were several other witches looking to destroy the Puritans. All three women were put in jail.

With the seed of paranoia planted, a stream of accusations followed for the next few months. Charges against Martha Corey, a loyal member of the Church in Salem Village, greatly concerned the community; if she could be a witch, then anyone could. Magistrates even questioned Sarah Good’s 4-year-old daughter, Dorothy, and her timid answers were construed as a confession. The questioning got more serious in April when Deputy Governor Thomas Danforth and his assistants attended the hearings.

Dozens of people from Salem and other Massachusetts villages were brought in for questioning. [R]espected minister Cotton Mather wrote a letter imploring the court not to allow spectral evidence—testimony about dreams and visions. The court largely ignored this request and five people were sentenced and hanged in July, five more in August and eight in September. On October 3, following in his son’s footsteps, Increase Mather, then president of Harvard, denounced the use of spectral evidence: “It were better that ten suspected witches should escape than one innocent person be condemned.”

Read the rest here.

Saner heads eventually prevailed, and the governor of the colony finally put a stop to the trials by prohibiting arrests and squelching the use of “spectral evidence” in the courtroom. It took years to restore the good names of those who escaped execution. But what really cased the hysteria among the people of Salem and the nearby villages? Many historians and psychologists have been fascinated by the events surrounding the witch trials. How could neighbors turn on each other based on the flimsiest coincidental evidence and illogic? How could people come to believe things that were absurd in retrospect? Belief in the supernatural or mass psychosis (“everybody” believed it)?

While there are a lot of potential reasons that have been postulated, I happen to like this particular explanation. Among several possible explanations for the event is this contributing factor: “factionalism, politics and socio-economics,” as explained here:

Salem was very divided due to disagreements between the villagers about local politics, religion and economics. One of the many issues that divided the villagers was who should be the Salem Village minister. Salem Village had gone through three ministers in sixteen years, due to disputes over who was deemed qualified enough to have the position, and at the time of the trials they were arguing about the current minister Samuel Parris. Rivalries between different families in Salem had also begun to sprout up in the town as did land disputes and other disagreements which was all coupled with the fact that many colonists were also uneasy  because the Massachusetts Bay Colony had its charter revoked and then replaced in 1691 with a new charter that gave the crown much more control over the colony. “Predictably enough, the witchcraft accusations of 1692 moved in channels which were determined by years of factional strife in Salem Village.”

Read the rest here. In short, there were significant contention and animosities among a number of the villagers that led to false accusations by people against their neighbors. And the justice system of the time was perverted to support the accusers until saner heads prevailed after people were executed. The lessons-learned helped contribute to eventual changes in U.S. court procedures, including the guarantee of the right to legal representation, the right to cross-examine one’s accuser, and the presumption of innocence rather than of guilt.

Now let’s fast-forward to today’s political events. The Democrats and legacy media have been on what has been characterized by many normal and rational Americans as a “witch hunt” against President Trump for almost three years now. We have seen EXACTLY the same signs among Democrats and their lickspittle media regarding accusations against @POTUS as occurred among the various accusers during the Salem witch trials:

  • Factionalism and politics. Who could argue that the political division in the US is a wide and deep as it’s ever been perhaps since the Civil War? The likes of Hillary Clinton and her sycophants have refused to accept the results of the 2016 election, and the Democrats in Congress have been attempting to stymie ever single policy position and associated legislation put forth by the Administration from the get-go. And they have stimulated crazy actions, including violence, among Democrat rank-and-file and other assorted leftists against Republicans and Trump supporters. No elected Democrats condemn Antifa; in fact, they PRAISE Antifa when it suits them politically to do so.
  • False accusations. How many allegations against @POTUS have proven to be outright lies during the “muh Russia” hoax? All of his accusers jumped on the fake dossier bandwagon and every related conspiracy theory. And the exact same playbook complete with false allegations is being used by Democrats in the Ukraine kerfuffle, too.
  • The accusations become more fantastic over time. In Salem, the allegations made against the innocent started as a trickle and became a deluge against 200 or more people over time. Every little occurrence was blamed on “witches.” Everybody with a grievance piled on. Nowadays, everything is blamed on @POTUS by the Democrats and their media allies, including the incidence of hurricanes! Or how about their insane and continuing accusation that @POTUS is a “Russian agent under Putin’s thumb”? And the accusations continue unabated.
  • A perversion of the justice system. The magistrates assigned in Salem bowed to public pressure and were themselves caught up in the anti-witch fervor of the time. There was no due process involved; instead, summary judgments were rendered based on the “evidence.” Eventually, at least one of the judges in Salem admitted guilt and error in the trials and restitution was paid to some of the accused (albeit a pittance). What we have in the Russia and Ukraine hoaxes is a similar perversion of the justice system in which POTUS was accused and thoroughly investigated for two years without cause and based on manufactured “evidence” just as happened in Salem. The Obama DoJ and FBI illegally surveilled US citizens, spied on the Trump campaign, and manufactured evidence of Russian collusion using paid informants and assets like Josef Mifsud. Hopefully, we’re in the corrective stage in which AG Barr’s DoJ uncovers all of the illegality of the previous administration, and perhaps one of the DoJ/FBI cabal will even publicly recant just as a few of the Salem magistrates did.
  • Use of spectral evidence. In Salem, the “evidence” from dreams and visions was used to “prove” witchcraft. I maintain that the conspiracies being concocted by Democrats accusing POTUS of this and that are pretty much dreamt up by crazies, don’t you? Take the ridiculous claim in the fake dossier that @POTUS supposedly hired Russian prostitutes to urinate in a Moscow hotel bed once slept in by the Obamas. What depraved mind dreams up such nonsense? But worse, think of all the fools on the Left who actually believe it to this very day? If that’s not evidence of a prevailing mass hysteria, then nothing is.

Speaking of mass hysteria, it is almost certain that the people in Salem were caught up in a textbook example. And that is EXACTLY what is going on with Democrats and the legacy media regarding their continuing “get Trump” psychosis:

Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs when a group forms a quick opinion that matches the group consensus, rather than critically evaluating the information. Mass hysteria can be seen as an extreme example of groupthink. Groupthink seems to occur most often when a respected or persuasive leader is present, inspiring members to agree with his or her opinion. Groupthink is sometimes positive but is more often seen in a negative light, particularly in the U.S. and other countries that value individual opinion.

Read the rest here.

The Democrats in Congress, as well as Hillary Clinton and her various acolytes who pop up in the legacy media, have been orchestrating groupthink and a dangerous mass hysteria regarding POTUS for almost three years now. They have led their followers into a cul-de-sac of insanity from which their exit will be emotionally and psychologically very painful. Frankly, I hope most of the public figures involved in the charade are silenced and swept completely from the political scene, only to be seen periodically in public to serve as stark reminders of the foolishness which inhabits the Democrat Party.

And there you have it: the theory is proven. The same features of the Salem witch trials exist in the Democrats’ continuing assault on POTUS. Yes, it is indeed a witch hunt just as President Trump and others have said all along! The Salem groupthink/mass hysteria in 1692-1693 led to the execution of 19 innocent people. We cannot allow the Democrats’ groupthink/mass hysteria in 2019 to lead to a similar result, either figuratively or in actuality. The truth will out if we press for it, and the result will be glorious.

The end.

The post Is the Deep State Coup Headquartered in Salem, Massachusetts appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Witches-300x262 Is the Deep State Coup Headquartered in Salem, Massachusetts Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Former Beauty Pageant Winner Is the Current GOP Fundraising Congressional Frontrunner in Nevada

Westlake Legal Group Capture-9-620x369 Former Beauty Pageant Winner Is the Current GOP Fundraising Congressional Frontrunner in Nevada republicans Politics Nevada Lisa Song Sutton gop Fundraising Front Page Stories Featured Story elections Allow Media Exception

A GOP star is rising and it comes in the form of former Miss Nevada pageant winner Lisa Song Sutton, who is currently leading the pack of six other Republican candidates when it comes to fundraising.

According to the Daily Wire, Sutton, 34, is the daughter of a Vietnam veteran and a Korean immigrant. She entered the race in the third quarter, and in her first 90 days she raised almost $128 million, taking the lead over candidates who had been fundraising for longer.

Currently, the rankings look like this:

  1. Lisa Song Sutton: $127,998.00

  2. Samuel Peters: $111,704.00

  3. Charles Navarro: $80,013.00

  4. Jim Merchant: $58,185.00

  5. Randi Reed: $ 47,595.00

  6. Leo Blundo: $45,398.00

  7. Catherine Prato: $29,585

Sutton describes herself, not as a politician, but as a “business leader,” according to the Daily Wire.

“I’m incredibly grateful for the momentum my campaign has received in the first 90 days,” Sutton said in a statement. “I’m a business leader, not a politician, and I have shown in my first quarter that we can raise the money to build the grassroots political support needed to challenge Steven Horsford in the general election.”

“Our wide base of support shows Nevada’s 4th Congressional District is eager to elect a Republican who is a young, female, minority, business leader to Congress. The community is tired of career politicians running for office in districts they don’t care about,” Sutton continued. “I’m here to show the community, and Washington, that I will outwork career politician Steven Horsford, and take back Nevada’s 4th Congressional district.”

She may just do it too. Reports show that her donations are coming from more than just the traditional Republican base in Nevada.

“Sutton’s support ranges from traditional Nevada Republican donors, to first-time federal campaign donors,” noted Sutton’s campaign. “The average small-dollar online donation was $58. This wide range of support shows her campaign is able to bring new donors to the Republican party. Her ability to expand beyond the traditional base of supporters and win over a majority-minority house district are anchors to Sutton’s success.”

Sutton believes that career politicians have shortchanged communities, and while she never intended to run for office, she found that she had to in the name of restoring Nevada and setting things right. She’ll put the focus on small business, cutting regulations, the U.S. military, immigrant enforcement, border security, and the Second Amendment.

 

 

The post Former Beauty Pageant Winner Is the Current GOP Fundraising Congressional Frontrunner in Nevada appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Capture-9-300x179 Former Beauty Pageant Winner Is the Current GOP Fundraising Congressional Frontrunner in Nevada republicans Politics Nevada Lisa Song Sutton gop Fundraising Front Page Stories Featured Story elections Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

San Francisco Refuses To Do Business With 22 States Over Anti Abortion Laws That Protect Babies.

Westlake Legal Group AP_1602261913331116-300x192 San Francisco Refuses To Do Business With 22 States Over Anti Abortion Laws That Protect Babies. progressives pro-abortion political correctness Patriotism Liberal Elitism Hollywood healthcare Government Gender Issues Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Culture & Faith Courts Conservatives Congress California Allow Media Exception Abortion 2019

A city worker uses a power washer to clean the sidewalk by a tent city along Division Street Friday, Feb. 26, 2016, in San Francisco. Homeless people have until the end of Friday to vacate a rambling tent city along a busy San Francisco street declared a health hazard by city officials earlier this week. The mayor’s office says about 40 tents remain, down from a high of 140 tents this winter. The tents have lined both sides of a street under a freeway overpass for months, drawing complaints from residents and businesses. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)

As you can see from the photo above, San Francisco and California have no other problems to deal with so this state ban does take precedence.

As it has been previously written everywhere, we all know that California and her cities are a bit of a hot mess. San Fran, home of Nancy Pelosi, always makes sure to be one of the cities leading the charge of creating havoc. That, of course, gives them the right to dictate how other cities or states should be run.

Now they want to export their craziness by refusing to spend money in states that they disagree with about abortion. That’s right, states that are moving to protect children shall not benefit from San Francisco and it’s an influence.

How sad.

According to Fox News

City employees in San Francisco are now forbidden to take work trips or do business with companies in 22 states that have “restrictive abortion laws.”

Mayor London Breed and Supervisor Vallie Brown announced the measure last week.

“Every day in this country, women’s reproductive rights are threatened, and we have to fight back. Just as we restricted spending with states that have laws that discriminate against LGBTQ people, we are standing up against states that put women’s health at risk and that are actively working to limit reproductive freedoms,” Breed said in a statement.

She added: “By limiting travel and contracting with certain states, we are sending a clear message to states that disregard the right to abortion.”

The only clear message you are sending is that you are griding an ax about states moving to protect the unborn and you look moronic doing it. Do you think the homeless person you are ignoring and letting suffer on the street gives a flying you know what about your moral preening Mayor Breed?

So what states are they planning on banning?

Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

I’m disappointed that Michigan is not on there.

With the technology of saving and improving life in all stages advancing, this is a big problem for the pro-abortion crowd. They yell CHOICE at any cost but frequently it is becoming clear that life inside the womb can also live outside the womb weeks before previously thought.

So why would you snuff out that life at 18 weeks when it can thrive at 24 weeks? This is becoming more and more obvious for people with a conscious that actually care about human life and don’t just pay it lip service like the politicians in San Francisco.

I look forward to the day where these people are only allowed to travel within California and nowhere else. What a glorious day that will be.

Check out my other posts here on Red State and my podcast Bourbon On The Rocks plus like Bourbon On The Rocks on Facebook and follow me on the twitters at IRISHDUKE2 

The post San Francisco Refuses To Do Business With 22 States Over Anti Abortion Laws That Protect Babies. appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AP_1602261913331116-300x192 San Francisco Refuses To Do Business With 22 States Over Anti Abortion Laws That Protect Babies. progressives pro-abortion political correctness Patriotism Liberal Elitism Hollywood healthcare Government Gender Issues Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Culture & Faith Courts Conservatives Congress California Allow Media Exception Abortion 2019  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Watch: AL Congressional Candidate Jessica Taylor Vows to Take on AOC, and Build Squad of Her Own If Elected

Westlake Legal Group JessicaTaylorAL-620x350 Watch: AL Congressional Candidate Jessica Taylor Vows to Take on AOC, and Build Squad of Her Own If Elected The Squad Social Media republicans Politics North Carolina Jessica Taylor Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections democrats Culture Congress Campaigns Allow Media Exception Alabama 2020 Elections 2020

Jessica Taylor, Republican candidate for Alabama’s 2nd Congressional District. Screen grab via her YouTube page.

Back in July, Republican Rep. Martha Roby (AL-02) announced she would be retiring from Congress at the end of her term after serving since 2011.

Since that time, a number of GOP competitors have jumped into the primary race. But on Monday, a new candidate entered the race with a splashy ad that is turning heads and has people wanting to know more about her and what she stands for.

Jessica Taylor threw her hat into the ring, making herself the sixth Republican – and first woman – to declare their intentions for the Congressional seat. She vowed to take on AOC and the rest of the “Squad”, and declared that she is an unapologetic conservative and Trump supporter:

Prattville attorney and businesswoman Jessica Taylor announced her candidacy for Congress in Alabama’s 2nd District Monday, saying she wants to form a “conservative squad” to take on liberal Democrats led by Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-NY.

In a campaign video, Taylor highlighted her rural Alabama roots, business career, and family with former State Sen. Bryan Taylor. But it’s her love of playing on the basketball team that Taylor connects to using teamwork to support President Donald Trump.

“I’m sick of arrogant socialists like AOC, who’ve never even run a lemonade stand, trying to tell us how to live in Alabama and that more government is the answer,” she says in the video.

“I have zero interest in being a professional politician, but conservatives like us need a squad of our own — and I’ll build it.”

Watch her debut ad:

She told “Fox and Friends” in an interview this morning that “We need somebody who can convince my generation and others that more government is not the answer. More government is the problem.”

Indeed.

The 2nd district is reliably Republican, and has been red since 1965, outside of Democrat Bobby Bright’s term from 2009-2011.

The Alabama primary is scheduled for March 3, 2020.

Hat tip: Twitchy

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 16+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Watch: AL Congressional Candidate Jessica Taylor Vows to Take on AOC, and Build Squad of Her Own If Elected appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group JessicaTaylorAL-300x169 Watch: AL Congressional Candidate Jessica Taylor Vows to Take on AOC, and Build Squad of Her Own If Elected The Squad Social Media republicans Politics North Carolina Jessica Taylor Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections democrats Culture Congress Campaigns Allow Media Exception Alabama 2020 Elections 2020  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Texas Father Forced to Put His Child Through Gender Transition Therapy After Losing Custody Battle to Ex-Wife

Westlake Legal Group 6034587785_3e7cef3930_b-620x414 Texas Father Forced to Put His Child Through Gender Transition Therapy After Losing Custody Battle to Ex-Wife transgender Texas Politics LGBT hormones gender dysphoria Front Page Stories Featured Story father dallas Court Battle child Allow Media Exception Activism

Photo by Klesta via Flickr.

Jeffrey Younger, a father in Dallas, Texas, lost his court battle for custody of his son on Monday. This custody battle, however, wasn’t like many others. More than just who had control over his son was on the line.

His ex-wife, Dr. Anne Georgulas, aimed to transition Younger’s son into a girl named “Luna” through chemical castration. After a long court battle, Georgulas has won thanks to a nearly unanimous jury who ruled against Younger according to LifeSite News:

A jury has ruled against Jeffrey Younger, the father who is trying to protect his seven-year-old son, James, from chemical castration via a gender “transition.” This means James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, will be able to continue “transitioning” him into “Luna,” and now has full authority to start him on puberty blockers and eventually cross-sex hormones.

The jury’s decision likely means that Mr. Younger will be required to “affirm” James as a girl, despite his religious and moral objections, and will also be forced to take a class on transgenderism.

With a consensus of 11 of the 12 jurors, the jury decided not to grant Mr. Younger Sole Managing Conservatorship over his two twin boys. They voted that the current Joint Managing Conservatorship should be replaced by a Sole Managing Conservatorship, but that Mr. Younger should not be that person. Judge Kim Cooks will read her ruling on possession, child support, and Dr. Georgulas’ other requests at 1:30 p.m. CST on Wednesday.

The tragic result of this court battle comes after Younger attempted to convince the court that his seven-year-old son isn’t actually transgender like his ex-wife claims. When at his home, or in the presence of his friends, James refuses to wear girl’s clothing and partakes in masculine activities. It’s only when the child is in the presence of the pro-transgender mother that James suddenly switches to being “feminine.”

As I wrote previously, this doesn’t sound like a child with gender dysphoria, it sounds like a child who is trying to please his parents.

The wise thing to do would be to hold off on any life-altering chemicals until the child grows up and is fully able to comprehend the nature of what’s going to happen to him. As children grow, they naturally gain and lose interest in things. LifeSite reported that protesters attempted to appeal to Texas lawmakers to pass this kind of law:

On Friday, protesters called on Texas lawmakers to pass legislation making it illegal for anyone under 18 years of age to begin a medical transition. They argued that children cannot fully understand the lifelong consequences of their decisions and parents should not be allowed to make this decision for their children.

Currently, there aren’t any U.S. laws that restrict the use of puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones or outline a minimum age of administration.

LifeSite also listed what kind of permanent things can happen to a child who is put on these hormones:

  • A blood clot in a deep vein (deep vein thrombosis) or in a lung (pulmonary embolism)

  • High triglycerides, a type of fat (lipid) in your blood

  • Gallstones

  • Weight gain

  • Elevated liver function tests

  • Decreased libido

  • Erectile dysfunction

  • Infertility

  • High potassium (hyperkalemia)

  • High blood pressure (hypertension)

  • Type 2 diabetes

  • Cardiovascular disease, when at least two other cardiovascular risk factors are present

  • Excessive prolactin in the blood (hyperprolactinemia) or a condition in which a noncancerous tumor (adenoma) of the pituitary gland in the brain over produces the hormone prolactin (prolactinoma)

With all of these consequences on the line, you would have figured that a doctor and a jury would be far more cautious about injecting hormones into a child. However, it would appear that activism has won over common sense, and the child will now be “transitioned,” and with the father forced to help.

This isn’t just tragic, it’s cruel. A jury has decided to impose state-enforced child abuse.

The post Texas Father Forced to Put His Child Through Gender Transition Therapy After Losing Custody Battle to Ex-Wife appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 6034587785_3e7cef3930_b-300x200 Texas Father Forced to Put His Child Through Gender Transition Therapy After Losing Custody Battle to Ex-Wife transgender Texas Politics LGBT hormones gender dysphoria Front Page Stories Featured Story father dallas Court Battle child Allow Media Exception Activism  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Elizabeth Warren Threatens Israel With a Quid Pro Quo

Westlake Legal Group ElizabethWarrenAPimage-620x317 Elizabeth Warren Threatens Israel With a Quid Pro Quo Ukraine threat terrorists quid pro quo Politics Palestinians negotiate Mick Mulvaney Israel impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Foreign Aid Featured Story Elizabeth Warren donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception 2020

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., speaks about her two-cent tax plan during a campaign event, Monday, Sept. 2, 2019, in Hampton Falls, N.H. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

Oddly enough, the media aren’t describing Warren’s threat as a quid pro quo even though it clearly is. Weird, right?

The presumptive (but not necessarily actual) frontrunner of the Democratic party primary went on record yesterday announcing that she’ll withhold aid from Israel unless they do what she wants, which is negotiate and make concessions with terrorists.

Lest we pretend this isn’t to Warren’s political benefit, this is a major, major issue on the left and there’s no logical reason to punish Israel outside of quelling her base. Sticking it to the Jewish state and delivering the goods to the terrorist supporting Palestinian Authority is like crack for liberals.

Andy McCarthy notices the hypocrisy here.

Of course it’s extortion, or more aptly a quid pro quo. She’s quite literally saying that unless Israel does what she wants, she’ll cut off vital military aid (we stopped giving economic aid a while ago). And this is a far more relevant and damaging quid pro quo to U.S. interests than anything to do with Ukraine.

Now, some might say “well, that’s different!” How? How is different than Mulvaney saying we weren’t going to give Ukraine money unless they investigated corruption dealing with 2016? Because I’m pretty sure the media lost their minds and published half a million “Mulvaney Admits to Quid Pro Quo” headlines in response.

The answer is that it is not different. All foreign policy is a quid pro quo. All aid comes with strings attached. The only question involving Ukraine was whether Trump did something that could provably be shown to only be political. Mulvaney clearly said that situation had nothing to do with Biden and only legitimate concerns about corruption, something Joe Biden himself threatened Ukraine over, yet the media still called it an evil “quid pro quo” and feigned outrage.

Even on the legal aspects, this is hypocritical. If Congress appropriates the money for a certain country to receive aid, the President either has power to hold it up or not. With Trump, we are assured it’s impeachable and illegal for him to do so. So why are the media not pointing out what Warren is saying would be impeachable and illegal as well?

What you see here is a prime example of how the left uses language to push their narratives. When Mulvaney points out that all foreign policy has conditions, it’s a quid pro quo and super bad. When Elizabeth Warren threatens to extort one of our closet allies by withholding aid, it’s just her being tough.

Also, note that Warren whined and complained when the Trump administration cut off aid to the Palestinian Authority for not negotiating in good faith, yet she wants to punish Israel. That’s some mighty fine anti-Semitism on display because there’s no other logical reason for her flip-flop on the issue.

In closing, our mainstream media are partisan hypocrites and Elizabeth Warren shows that she toes the typical Israel hating line of her party. We also call that Tuesday.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Elizabeth Warren Threatens Israel With a Quid Pro Quo appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group ElizabethWarrenAPimage-300x153 Elizabeth Warren Threatens Israel With a Quid Pro Quo Ukraine threat terrorists quid pro quo Politics Palestinians negotiate Mick Mulvaney Israel impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Foreign Aid Featured Story Elizabeth Warren donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception 2020  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Random Thoughts On Rep. Katie Hill And Her Thrupple

Westlake Legal Group Katie-Hill-300x141 Random Thoughts On Rep. Katie Hill And Her Thrupple white house washington D.C. TMZ Live Social Media republicans Politics Morning Briefing Media Mainstream Media leaks Hollywood Harvey Levin Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats corruption Conservatives Congress comedy Campaigns California Brett Bair Bill Clinton Allow Media Exception Academia Abuse of Power 2019

I was involved in a Thupple? Is that on Google?

Ahhhhhh just when you think that you have seen it all in the world of entertainment and politics, along comes a freshman Congresswoman from California and her “Thrupple” that says “I can do better, hold my hairbrush.”

Miracles truly, never do cease.

After reading the excellent work done by my colleague Jennifer Van Laar on Rep. Katie Hill D-CA and her inappropriate relationship with her staffers CA Rep. Katie Hill Allegedly Involved Female Staffer In 2-Yr ‘Throuple’ Relationship, I sat down and jotted a few random thoughts down about this story.

Here they are…

*According to Jenn’s story, Katie Hill was married for 15 years and had a female staffer that she and the hubby were involved with.

Photographs and text messages obtained by RedState show that Rep. Hill was involved in a long-term sexual relationship with a female campaign staffer. The woman, whose name is not being released, was hired by Hill in late 2017 and quickly became involved in a “throuple” relationship with Hill and her estranged husband, Kenny Heslep.

Heslep and the staffer, according to text messages provided to RedState, believed the polyamorous arrangement to be a long-term, committed relationship. The trio took multiple vacations together, including to Alaska, where this photograph was taken.

So Katie and the hubby start off as a couple and then bring the third girl into the mix. So this part I understand being I watch HBO shows based in California and have seen crazier things. However, being I am not steeped in the rules for “Thrupples” my first questions are these.

Now that Hill has jumped ship to her finance director, do the hubby and the female staffer continue on? Do they find a third wheel to replace Hill? Do they maybe include the finance director and would that be a quadruple?

I’m a newbie and I have questions people.

* In this EXCLUSIVE photo (listed below) from Jenn’s article, it is shown that Rep. Hill is naked while brushing the third wheels hair while sitting on a chair in what looks to be a hotel room.

My question and or thought here is, did anyone alert housekeeping that the cushion NEEDED TO BE CLEANED? Having congresspersons bare A$$ on a cushion in a hotel room that the next patron uses also when it was not cleaned is GROSS.

When did the Thrupple community become such savages?

Click to view image — Warning: Explicit Image

 

*When does this story become a Jeopardy question?

Question: This Freshman Congresswoman from California was married to a guy but they both had the same girlfriend and were alleged to be in a what?

Answer: What is a THRUPPLE Alex!

*When are any of the mainstream media or entertainment outlets going to pick up this excellent reporting by Jenn?

Here we have a story about an allegation of clear abuse of power. You are not supposed to be playing any type of intimate relations game with people that WORK FOR YOU ( on the taxpayers’ dime ) when you are an elected official. This is about as unethical as it gets.

How has this tale about Thrupple sex and a clear abuse of power not made Special Report With Bret Baier or even TMZ for cripes sake? Cmon Harvey, you’re better than this. I have been looking forward to you and Charles covering this for TMZ Live and then watch you shake your head while looking at the ground like you do when you’re flabbergasted.

I’m sure if it were a Republican this would be getting the same treatment of nonchalant yawns from the mainstream media. I’m sorry, I couldn’t even type that without laughing aloud.

Once again, great work by my colleague Jennifer Van Laar on this. She has been doxxed and threatened over this, which I don’t understand why. She introduced a new word to all of us non-heathens and heathens alike and you should be thankful, not ticked off.

Check out all of Jenn’s work RIGHT HERE

Check out my other posts here on Red State and my podcast Bourbon On The Rocks plus like Bourbon On The Rocks on Facebook and follow me on the twitters at IRISHDUKE2 

The post Random Thoughts On Rep. Katie Hill And Her Thrupple appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Katie-Hill-300x141 Random Thoughts On Rep. Katie Hill And Her Thrupple white house washington D.C. TMZ Live Social Media republicans Politics Morning Briefing Media Mainstream Media leaks Hollywood Harvey Levin Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats corruption Conservatives Congress comedy Campaigns California Brett Bair Bill Clinton Allow Media Exception Academia Abuse of Power 2019  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Journalists are Amused by the Irony of Canadian PM ‘Jussie Trudeau’ Winning a Minority Government

Westlake Legal Group Untitled-4 Journalists are Amused by the Irony of Canadian PM ‘Jussie Trudeau’ Winning a Minority Government racism Race Justin Trudeau Front Page Stories Featured Story elections Culture Canada Andrew Scheer Allow Media Exception

 

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau managed to squeak out a narrow victory on Monday night, winning a minority government. Trudeau prevailed over his Conservative rival, Andrew Scheer, to win a second term. Late polls showed a very tight race.

Given the numerous photos and videos showing Trudeau in black and brown face that surfaced in the months leading up to the election, many journalists are having a little fun with the fact that he has won a minority government.

Conservative icon Michelle Malkin, who refers to the Prime Minister as “Jussie Trudeau,” tweeted that “Jussie Trudeau is now a real minority — and he doesn’t have to wear blackface!”

Twitchy points out that the New York Times‘ headline states that Trudeau’s party will lose its House of Commons majority, rather than saying Trudeau won a minority government.

Other media outlets, such as CP24 (above) and AFP News relished the irony of it all and couldn’t resist.

Here are some responses to the news by twitter users (via Twitchy):

Someone explain to Justin that minority here does not mean he has to go shoe polish shopping

Trudeau finally gets to be a real minority.

Congrats to Canada for re-electing its first black PM.

I see what you did there…

For those who may have missed the photos.

And finally, “That face when you’re ’bout to form a minority gov.”

Can you imagine if even a single photo emerged of President Trump wearing black face?

The post Journalists are Amused by the Irony of Canadian PM ‘Jussie Trudeau’ Winning a Minority Government appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Untitled-4-300x232 Journalists are Amused by the Irony of Canadian PM ‘Jussie Trudeau’ Winning a Minority Government racism Race Justin Trudeau Front Page Stories Featured Story elections Culture Canada Andrew Scheer Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com