web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Featured Story" (Page 155)

Stand For the Anthem

Westlake Legal Group american-flag-1478290_1280-620x443 Stand For the Anthem star spangled banner National Anthem independence day honor Front Page Stories Featured Story Culture America 4th of july

Stand for the anthem. Not for how it fails us, but how it has lifted us to unimaginable heights.

Stand for the anthem. Not to salute a leader, but to honor the great citizens that reside within these borders and work every day to serve their families, their neighbors and their nation.

Stand for anthem. Not for its tradition, but for its inspiration – a love song to the resilience of the human spirit and our willingness to push back against the darkness always, even within ourselves.

Stand for anthem. Not because you love the injustices we may struggle with, but because you love that we are free enough and powerful enough to engage in that struggle in the first place.

Stand for the anthem. Not because it is a sign of complete agreement with your fellow Americans, but because it is a sign of the stunning and diverse rainbow of people who gather themselves in this one place, under this one flag.

Stand for the anthem. Not because it celebrates war or violence, but because it celebrates the peace that can only be found by having the fortitude to fight the costly battles; and it spurs us to action when we see unrest even to this day.

Stand for the anthem. Not to prove you love America the most, but simply to respect those who have served this nation, those who serve their neighbors, and those who give everything in the service of something higher – the very essence of the American spirit.

Stand for the anthem. Not because you love everything about this country, but because you are grateful to be free to not love everything about this country when so many around the world will never know that luxury.

Stand for the anthem. Because the people you love dearly live here.

Stand for the anthem. Because it is a symbol of generations of people from all experiences who have sown into you so that you can be who you are, right now.

Stand for the anthem. Because for just that couple of minutes, wherever it is played it is a respite from all the arguing and division. For just that couple of minutes no one is shouting at each other, berating each other or accusing each other of heinous things. For just that couple of minutes any given group of Americans are united in the same tune, singing the same words, enjoying the same soil. There is immeasurable power in that small act.

Stand for your anthem. Not because of where we’ve been but where we have yet to go.

The post Stand For the Anthem appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group American-Flag-300x157 Stand For the Anthem star spangled banner National Anthem independence day honor Front Page Stories Featured Story Culture America 4th of july   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Martha McSally Faces an Electoral Beatdown In 2020

Westlake Legal Group martha-mcsally-620x317 Martha McSally Faces an Electoral Beatdown In 2020 republicans Politics martha mcsally Mark Kelly Front Page Stories Featured Story elections democrats Arizona Allow Media Exception 2020 senate races

During a hearing by the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel about prevention and response to sexual assault in the military, Sen. Martha McSally, R-Ariz., recounts her own experience while serving as a colonel in the Air Force, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 6, 2019. McSally, the first female fighter pilot to fly in combat, says she was raped in the Air Force by a superior officer. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

One thing that both political parties have in common is that the default to nominating dull proven losers because those losers are popular with the party establishments and are very unlikely to cause much trouble or upset too many any apple carts. This is the case of Martha McSally.

McSally is a prime example of a resume masquerading as a candidate. Her qualifications are that she was the first American woman to fly a fighter aircraft (A-10) in a combat zone and she was the first American woman to command a fighter squadron. We don’t know how well she did any of that but she was first and for the Arizona GOP that was enough. In 2012, she ran in the GOP primary for the special election to replace Gabby Giffords (AZ-8) and lost. She turned around, won the GOP nomination in AZ-5 and lost to the Democrat incumbent. Losing two congressional contests in one election cycle is damned impressive, but not so impressive as to keep the AZ GOP from boosting her.

In 2014, a wave year for the GOP, she ran for the House, this time in AZ-2 — if you’re keeping track, this is the third district she’s carpetbagged her way into — and won by 167 votes. She did manage to hold her seat in 2016.

In 2018, she tried to fail upwards and ran to replace Jeff Flake in the US Senate and lost to Kyrsten Sinema, hooker boots and all, while Doug Ducey was boatracing his opponent. So it isn’t like Arizona won’t elect Republicans, it is just very reluctant to elect McSally.

When John McCain died, McSally got the nod to fill the remainder of his term and now will have to defend that seat in 2020.

Her opponent is Gabby Giffords’s husband, former astronaut Mark Kelly. Where McSally seems to think that interacting with voters will give her cooties, Kelly is a dynamic campaigner. Where McSally seems to think she’s owed something, Kelly is willing to work his progressive, gun-grabbing ass off to get it. Check out the first quarter fundraising numbers.

How in the hell can an incumbent senator in what will be a tightly contested race only raise $1.8 million in any quarter, much less going into the general election? How can she have been in office for 18 months and only have $2 million cash-on-hand?

And there are other strange things, for instance:

No matter how you cut it, McSally can barely win “gimme” elections. She has a track record of folding like a cheap suit when faced with an actual challenger. If the GOP was interested in keeping this seat, they’d make McSally ambassador to Dumbf***istan or some place and find a real fighter who can campaign and raise money. But they won’t and a seat that we should have retained will be handed to the Democrats.

 

The post Martha McSally Faces an Electoral Beatdown In 2020 appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group martha-mcsally-300x153 Martha McSally Faces an Electoral Beatdown In 2020 republicans Politics martha mcsally Mark Kelly Front Page Stories Featured Story elections democrats Arizona Allow Media Exception 2020 senate races   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

White House Says It Has Had Enough Of Rogue Federal Judges

Westlake Legal Group hogarth-judges-620x512 White House Says It Has Had Enough Of Rogue Federal Judges william barr white house Washington Politics ninth circuit judge marsha pechman immigration Illegal Immigration Government Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Courts attorney general Asylum Claims Allow Media Exception

On Monday, a Clinton-appointed judge in the Ninth Circuit continued the campaign of lawfare against efforts by the Trump administration to enforce immigration laws.

In order to fight the scam whereby illegals make a claim of asylum and are then granted parole until their hearing, for which the majority never show up, the Administration had instituted a policy that required illegals making asylum claims to remain in custody until they received a hearing.

In a written decision that overturns a 2005 policy, Barr directed immigration judges not to release migrants on bail once their cases have been approved for expedited removal proceedings — a status granted only after an applicant successfully establishes “a credible fear of persecution or torture” in the home country.

“I conclude that such aliens remain ineligible for bond, whether they are arriving at the border or are apprehended in the United States” Barr, who has the authority to overturn prior rulings made by immigration courts, wrote.

Instead, asylum-seekers “must be detained until [their] removal proceedings conclude.” Only those people granted parole by the Department of Homeland Security will be eligible for release, according to Barr’s order.

Despite the fact that federal law gives plenary authority over immigration cases, right down to the ability to appoint and assign immigration judges and to review their findings, to the Attorney General, the God-Judge stepped in and decided that there was a constitutional right to bail for people who entered the country illegally.

“The court finds that plaintiffs have established a constitutionally-protected interest in their liberty, a right to due process, which includes a hearing before a neutral decision maker to assess the necessity of their detention and a likelihood of success on the merits of that issue,” Pechman wrote.

In her ruling, Pechman also took issue with an aspect of Barr’s policy that left open the possibility that migrants, still awaiting a hearing, could be re-detained by ICE after being released on bond.

“The Government’s unwillingness to unconditionally assert that Plaintiffs will not be re-detained means that the specter of re-detention looms and these Plaintiffs and many members of their class face the real and imminent threat of bondless and indefinite detention …,” she said.

The White House was not terribly amused by this development.

Yesterday, a single, unelected district judge in Seattle issued an injunction that prevents the government from ensuring the detention of those aliens who cross the border unlawfully until the completion of their immigration court proceedings. The decision ignores an express statutory prohibition on granting class-wide injunctive relief against enforcement of the immigration laws and also holds unconstitutional a statute passed by bipartisan majorities in Congress during the Clinton administration that specifically prohibits the release of certain immigrants on bond.

The district court’s injunction is at war with the rule of law. The decision only incentivizes smugglers and traffickers, which will lead to the further overwhelming of our immigration system by illegal aliens. No single district judge has legitimate authority to impose his or her open borders views on the country. We must restore our democracy and ensure Americans have the voice to which they are entitled under our Constitution.

Strong statement, but now what?

When the GOP controlled the House there was a window, under any Speaker not named Paul Ryan, to start voting bills of impeachment on federal judges who decided that they were the law and not merely a referee. True, the number removed from office would be close to zero, but holding these scofflaws accountable has a value all its own. But we no longer have that option.

At some point the Administration needs to follow the apocryphal quote attributed to Andrew Jackson: Mr. Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it. In this case, the President should declare this ruling null and void for the very reasons that is list here. This judge, and most of the Ninth Circuit, and NeverTrumpers of all political leanings (let’s face it, at this point there is zero difference between Bill Kristol and his gang and the campaign staff of Pete Buttigieg and there hasn’t been for a while) would hold their breath and stamp their feet but you can guarantee that the case would fast track its way to the Supreme Court and they would have to spell out for once and for all what had been traditional practice which was that judges can only decide the matters before them for the parties in that case.

This is really simple. A judge in Seattle cannot lawfully set immigration policy for the nation. A single judge, or a single federal circuit, cannot make a ruling that goes beyond its own jurisdiction.

The White House has laid down a marker with this statement. Talk is cheap. What do they plan to do?

=========
=========
Like what you see? Then visit my story archive.

I’m on Facebook. Drop by and join the fun there.
=========
=========

The post White House Says It Has Had Enough Of Rogue Federal Judges appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group hogarth-judges-300x248 White House Says It Has Had Enough Of Rogue Federal Judges william barr white house Washington Politics ninth circuit judge marsha pechman immigration Illegal Immigration Government Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Courts attorney general Asylum Claims Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Friday Deadline Set For the Trump Administration to Make a Final Decision on the Citizenship Question in Census 2020

This has been a day of confusion on the subject of the inclusion of a question on the 2020 Census as to the citizenship status of members of households. The administration made a hurried push to include this question. Lawfare ensued with the case making its way to the Supreme Court. In a splintered ruling, the SCOTUS agreed that the administration had the authority to add the question, but, for reasons that remain rather opaque to me…beyond sucking up to the the liberals on the bench…Chief Justice Roberts concluded that the administration needed some reason and the reason they gave just, by gum, wasn’t good enough.

Over the weekend, President Trump made noises about pressing on with the question. Then yesterday, Justice informed the judge overseeing a related case — a judge who, we might add, is an Obama appointee, and yes there are Obama judges — claiming that the citizenship question is racist, that the Administration had folded.

Read my post on that decision, Trump Administration Folds On The Issue Of Counting US Citizens In The 2020 Census.

This morning, President Trump threw the matter into turmoil:

See Bonchie’s coverage of that development BREAKING: Trump Calls Report He’s Surrendering On Census Citizenship Question False.

What followed was a hurried teleconference between the judge, and a couple of attorneys from Justice. These are the highlights:

U.S. District Judge George Hazel: [T]his morning I saw a tweet that got my attention. I don’t know how many federal judges have Twitter accounts, but I happen to be one of them, and I follow the President, and so I saw a tweet that directly contradicted the position that Mr. Gardner had shared with me yesterday.

Josh Gardner, DOJ attorney: Your Honor … I’ve been with the United States Department of Justice for 16 years, through multiple Administrations, and I’ve always endeavored to be as candid as possible with the Court. What I told the Court yesterday was absolutely my best understanding of the state of affairs …

Gardner: The tweet this morning was the first I had heard of the President’s position on this issue, just like the plaintiffs and Your Honor. I do not have a deeper understanding of what that means at this juncture other than what the President has tweeted. But, obviously, as you can imagine, I am doing my absolute best to figure out what’s going on …

Judge Hazel: I assume, although maybe I’m wrong about this, that the parties aren’t suggesting I can enjoin the President of the United States from tweeting things. Maybe you are suggesting that. But I will say my initial reaction to that is to have some concern.

Joseph Hunt, assistant attorney general for the civil division: We at the Department of Justice have been instructed to examine whether there is a path forward, consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision, that would allow us to include the citizenship question on the census. We think there may be a legally available path under the Supreme Court’s decision. We’re examining that, looking at near-term options to see whether that’s viable and possible.

Hunt: And so to the extent we can identify an option for that to work, if we continue to examine the decision and believe that we have a viable path forward to that work, our current plan would be to file a motion in the Supreme Court to request instructions on remand to govern further proceedings in order to simplify and expedite the remaining litigation and provide clarity to the process going forward.

Judge Hazel: If you were Facebook and an attorney for Facebook told me one thing, and then I read a press release from Mark Zuckerberg telling me something else, I would be demanding that Mark Zuckerberg appear in court with you the next time because I would be saying I don’t think you speak for your client anymore.

According to NPR, Judge Hazel is giving the Adminstration until Friday to, as they say, sh** or get off the pot.

U.S. District Judge George Hazel is now giving the administration until Friday to decide whether it will enter into a written agreement that confirms it will no longer pursue including a citizenship question on census forms, plaintiffs’ attorneys Denise Hulett of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and Shankar Duraiswamy of Covington & Burling tell NPR. If the administration does not enter the agreement, the judge is prepared to start reconsidering recently resurrected discrimination and conspiracy allegations against the administration’s decision to add the question.

The formal deadline is 2 p.m.

Read the whole call transcript.

This is all fun and games for the left but the fact of the matter here is that Hazel is not only hostile to what the administration is doing, he’s irrelevant. The only question hanging out there is whether Justice and Commerce can cobble together a plausible rationale that will pass the smell test for 5 justices on the Supreme Court.

No one really cares about the lawsuit in Hazel’s court because he doesn’t have the authority to impose an injunction preventing the mailing of the forms or their processing as that is an enumerated responsibility of the Executive in the Constitution. If he did try to do that, he would be in direct conflict with the Supreme Court which would have already allowed the question into the Census. The only reason his injunction is still in place is because the case in his court was not the one heard by the Supreme Court.

The strategy in Hazel’s court is to try to throw up enough obstacles to the Census going out with the citizenship question in a timely fashion that the Administration will have to fold. If the Administration makes it across the hurdle set by SCOTUS, the odds of a nothingburger case like the one here derailing the Census approaches zero. The single important thing that happened here was that the government was given an immaterial deadline to declare its intentions. If it doesn’t, the only thing happens is that a bunch of lefties get to masturbate to fantasies of Trump getting a comeuppance when the case Hazel is overseeing restarts.

=========
=========
Like what you see? Then visit my story archive.

I’m on Facebook. Drop by and join the fun there.
=========
=========

The post Friday Deadline Set For the Trump Administration to Make a Final Decision on the Citizenship Question in Census 2020 appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group census-questionnaire-300x153 Friday Deadline Set For the Trump Administration to Make a Final Decision on the Citizenship Question in Census 2020 Supreme Court Politics judge george hazel Government Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Courts census 2020 census Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Photos Show Children Laying On Top of a Drag Queen at a Portland Library’s Drag Queen Story Hour

Westlake Legal Group drag-queen-story-hour-AP-620x413 Photos Show Children Laying On Top of a Drag Queen at a Portland Library’s Drag Queen Story Hour Portland Oregon LGBT Front Page Stories Featured Story drag queen story hour children Allow Media Exception

In this Saturday, May 13, 2017 photo, Lil Miss Hot Mess poses for a photo with a child after reading to a group of children during the Feminist Press’ presentation of Drag Queen Story Hour! at the Park Slope Branch of the Brooklyn Public Library, in New York. “Drag queens and children don’t usually get together, which I think is a shame and one of the benefits of a program like this,” Lil Miss Hot Mess said. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

You were told you were a bigot when you raised objections to the increasingly popular “Drag Queen Story Hour” popping up in various libraries throughout the United States. You were told you didn’t have anything to worry about and you were just paranoid because drag queens were just different and you’re not used to different.

Recently released photos from one “Drag Queen Story Hour” at St. John’s Library in Portland Oregon has proven a lot of people’s fears correct as photos have now come out showing children laying on a drag queen named Carla Rossi.

According to LifeSite, the library hosted the event and posted the photos to their Flickr account, but promptly took the photos down once LifeSite reported on the story:

Photo evidence of children having inappropriate contact with drag queen Carla Rossi at Portland, Oregon’s St. John’s Library last October has been brought to the attention of LifeSiteNews. The photos are posted on the Multnomah County Library’s own Flickr account (Note: photos have been removed after LifeSiteNews published this report.

Regardless of their attempts to erase what they did, the internet is forever. I posted them to Twitter where they will now reside until Twitter decides to take action against me.

How this is okay, I’m not sure. If a man put on a dress and wig and asked children to lay on him, police would immediately be investigating him. However, this story doesn’t seem to be getting any traction anywhere except right-leaning sites.

This isn’t the first mention of a drag queen story hour becoming oddly sexual. Recently, a drag queen was seen doing a dance in front of children that involved a measure of stripping to a song that ended in profanity in front of children. At this location, a mother who had come to see the show was forcibly removed by police then threatened by members of Antifa for attempting to expose what was going on there.

This has gone beyond teaching tolerance, and has delved into full blown child sexualization.

 

The post Photos Show Children Laying On Top of a Drag Queen at a Portland Library’s Drag Queen Story Hour appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group drag-queen-story-hour-AP-300x200 Photos Show Children Laying On Top of a Drag Queen at a Portland Library’s Drag Queen Story Hour Portland Oregon LGBT Front Page Stories Featured Story drag queen story hour children Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

“The Truth Sets You Free”: Pastors Push Back After AOC Disputes Their Claims on Border Conditions

Westlake Legal Group AlexandriaOcasioCortez-June2019-620x317 “The Truth Sets You Free”: Pastors Push Back After AOC Disputes Their Claims on Border Conditions washington D.C. Social Media Politics North Carolina New York immigration Illegal Immigration Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture & Faith Culture Congress border crisis AOC Allow Media Exception Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., listens during questioning at a House Oversight and Reform committee hearing on facial recognition technology in government, Tuesday, June 4, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

As Red State‘s Sarah Lee wrote this morning, a group of pastors recently toured detention centers in El Paso County, TX not long after hearing reports from attorneys and human rights advocates of alleged abuses, harassment, and mistreatment of migrants at the border.

A quick recap, via Fox News:

[Rev. Samuel Rodriguez], the president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, the world’s largest Hispanic Christian organization, and senior pastor of New Seasons Christian Worship Center in Sacramento shared his firsthand experience touring a migrant detention center during a press briefing Monday.

“I read the reports, saw the news clips. I just wanted to see what was actually happening in order to better enable our efforts to find a fair and a just solution to our broken immigration system,” Rodriguez, who has advised President Trump and both Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush on immigration reform, noted. “To my surprise, I saw something drastically different from the stories I’ve been hearing in our national discourse. Even as a veteran of immigration advocacy in the U.S., I was shocked at the misinformation of the crisis at the border.”

“We found no soiled diapers, no deplorable conditions and no lack of basic necessities,” Rodriguez remarked, adding he specifically asked border agents if they staged the facility in response to the negative press. “They unequivocally denied it — we were witnessing the identical conditions the attorneys saw when they toured the facility days earlier.”

Ocasio-Cortez fired back after hearing that the pastors, among others like Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), were pushing back on claims of “deplorable” conditions at border detention centers:

The “other members of Congress” have said that some of the migrants told them they were told if they wanted water they’d have to drink it out of the toilets. None of the members of Congress actually witnessed this taking place.

In response to AOC’s tweet saying she and her crew are right and everyone else is wrong, several of the pastors who toured the facilities are clapping back:

“I must be living in a parallel universe somewhere…I did not find soiled diapers. I did not find crying children. I did not find deplorable conditions,” Rodriguez told Fox News host Shannon Bream. “Quite the opposite. I found amazing people on both sides trying to make a very difficult circumstance better. I don’t know where everyone else is visiting! I spoke to border patrol agents, the vast majority of which are Latino and many attended churches that are part of our network, and I asked, ‘Hey guys, did you stage this? Did you flip the script to accommodate people like me?’ And they went ‘Pastor Sam, absolutely not. You are looking at the very thing that existed here for a number of weeks, so it’s not that we shifted because of any deplorable conditions that were discovered.’”

Rodriguez said he found out that the attorneys who reported the original “deplorable” conditions “never, ever walked through the center.”

“They never visited what I visited. They took that information anecdotally to interviews with children, with children mind you, from the age of 2 to the age of 17. The truth sets you free.”

Kevin Wallace, pastor of Redemption to the Nations Church, who joined Rodriguez, slammed Ocasio-Cortez’s allegations as “totally absurd.” Instead, he witnessed “kind, considerate and passionate” Border Patrol agents.

[…]

Ocasio-Cortez described being fearful of the border agents. But Tony Stewart, the pastor of Citylife Church who also toured the center with the delegation of seven pastors, said border agents were in tears about the mischaracterization about them.

The CBP responded to claims made by Ocasio-Cortez by saying her allegations are false. Other witnesses to the border detention centers have disputed some of her claims as well.

—————–
—Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter.–

The post “The Truth Sets You Free”: Pastors Push Back After AOC Disputes Their Claims on Border Conditions appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AlexandriaOcasioCortez-June2019-300x153 “The Truth Sets You Free”: Pastors Push Back After AOC Disputes Their Claims on Border Conditions washington D.C. Social Media Politics North Carolina New York immigration Illegal Immigration Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture & Faith Culture Congress border crisis AOC Allow Media Exception Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

12-Year-Old ‘Drag Kid’ Desmond is Amazing’s Mom Blasts a ‘Convicted Pedophile’ for Sexualizing Her Son

Westlake Legal Group desmond-is-amazing-ketamine-SCREENSHOT-620x351 12-Year-Old ‘Drag Kid’ Desmond is Amazing’s Mom Blasts a ‘Convicted Pedophile’ for Sexualizing Her Son Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

[Screenshot from Twitter, https://twitter.com/tweettruth2me/status/1084332546895368192]

 

 

In 2018, I covered the story of 11-year-old “drag kid” Desmond is Amazing (here).

Information for my article was culled only from Desmond’s official website as well as the official Facebook page for the anti-gun group with which he protests.

Subsequently, a website called what I wrote a “hit piece,” which it was not.

I merely stated what existed. In a colorful way, yes; but with no abject criticism.

As I marveled in March:

We’re living in a bizarre time when things are so strange that simply recognizing their existence can be interpreted as making fun of them.

Nonetheless, following the form of much online journalism, other websites copied the initial, untrue story — RedState writer attacks 11-year-old boy.

But here’s more hoopla surrounding the drag kid situation as of late; or at least, the circumstances of Desmond’s mom, Wendy Napoles.

Last week on Instagram, Wendy slammed a “convicted pedophile” blogger for sexualizing her little boy. Additionally, she condemned “conservative media” for accusing her of “purposely attracting pedophiles.”

Here are some excerpts:

This is extremely disturbing. Convicted pedophile Tom O’Carroll has written a blog post stating that Desmond is hot & feels sexy performing. He also sexualizes fellow drag kid Queen Lactatia. We do not approve of his statements & have written to @wordpressdotcom several times but they have yet to remove it. It is highly inappropriate to speak of minors in this manner.

——–

[T]he Conservative press is currently accusing us of purposely attracting pedophiles & accusing the LGBTQ community of supporting this. What Tom O’Carroll has said is out of our control & we do not know him or associate with him or any other pedophiles or sex offenders. I think if a pedophile wants to act on their urges, NO child is safe.

——–

Desmond came out as gay when he was 11. Although, honestly we knew before then. He got same sex crushes that he would tell me about. Desmond knows the difference between a heterosexual & homosexual. Just because he identifies as gay does not mean he is sexually active or wants to be. He knows what sex is…he’s in middle school and has had sex education class. Apparently, he said all the kids giggled through the whole course. Anyone discussing anything remotely sexual on Desmond’s social media is immediately blocked & reported. We are just appalled at this whole situation – Mom.

So there ya go.

Earlier this year, Child Protective Services visited the Napoles home. The reason: A video appeared online showing Desmond dancing at the 3 Dollar Bill — a gay bar in Brooklyn — while patrons threw cash at him.

Desmond also made headlines due to a video made when he was — at the oldest — 11, wherein he mimicked sniffing a drug with a drag adult:

I’m assuming Wendy Napoles enjoys controversy.

-ALEX

 

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. For iPhone instructions, see the bottom of this page.



 

If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” If it fails to automatically refresh, manually reload the page. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”

The post 12-Year-Old ‘Drag Kid’ Desmond is Amazing’s Mom Blasts a ‘Convicted Pedophile’ for Sexualizing Her Son appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group desmond-is-amazing-ketamine-SCREENSHOT-300x170 12-Year-Old ‘Drag Kid’ Desmond is Amazing’s Mom Blasts a ‘Convicted Pedophile’ for Sexualizing Her Son Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

An Ice Cream Vendor Is Sticking It to Entitled “Influencers” by Charging them Double

Westlake Legal Group selfie-4255887_960_720-620x413 An Ice Cream Vendor Is Sticking It to Entitled “Influencers” by Charging them Double publicity los angeles Internet influencer ice cream Front Page Stories Featured Story exposure Culture California

Being an “influencer” can mean big bucks, and not just for you but for the business you talk about on your social media feeds. Arguably the most popular influencer in the world is Kim Kardashian who charges around $500,000 for a promotional photo on Instagram. It’s a hell of a way to make a living, and she’s leading a slew of people to try to lead the same kind of lives…or at least attempt to.

Many people consider themselves “influencers” and as a result, attempt to exchange their popularity for cash or free stuff. The idea is that their talking about something on their Twitter feed or Instagram will immediately result in more business for the subject being discussed. Truth be told, it actually works, but not everyone is as influential as they think they are.

In fact, they’re really just entitled brats who are more self-important than they are important.

That’s why one ice cream vendor is taking a stand and charging influencers who try to get their ice cream free double the price.

“We’ve decided to make this thing official with signage. We truly don’t care if you’re an Influencer, or how many followers you have. We will never give you a free ice cream in exchange for a post on your social media page. It’s literally a $4 item…well now it’s $8 for you,” said CVT Soft Serve in Los Angeles in an Instagram post.

The stand against “infludencers” has caught national attention and CVT’s declaration has been covered by various news outlets, including People and Newsweek.

The business’s owner, Joe Nicchi told time that he’s inundated with requests by influencers for free product every week.

“I’m truly embarrassed for these people,” Nicchi told People. “I’m not really 100 percent sure what they actually do, and their followers, likes, and comments can all be purchased, so I have trouble looking at them as being reputable.”

“I’m sure there are some legitimate ‘influencers’ out there, but we haven’t come across any at our trucks or through event requests,” he added.

Nicchi told People that he “received a request for an event to comp them 300 servings in exchange for “exposure”…I believe that’s an influencer’s favorite word.”

As a guy who has had businesses request free work in exchange for “exposure,” I can tell you that it really doesn’t pay the bills. The people offering up “exposure” aren’t getting paid in exposure themselves. It’s essentially you doing all the work and them benefiting from it at no cost.

I’ve played Oregon Trail enough to know you can die from exposure.

We currently live in a culture where you can be famous for being famous, and it’s creating a group of people who attempt to utilize their popularity in getting what they want from people who aren’t as popular. This would be like the popular kid in school telling the nerdy kid that they’d hang out with them for an hour for money in order to increase their standing.

Only many of these “popular kids” aren’t as popular as they think they are. In fact, they’re the most annoying people in the cafeteria.

The post An Ice Cream Vendor Is Sticking It to Entitled “Influencers” by Charging them Double appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group selfie-4255887_960_720-300x200 An Ice Cream Vendor Is Sticking It to Entitled “Influencers” by Charging them Double publicity los angeles Internet influencer ice cream Front Page Stories Featured Story exposure Culture California   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

The Twitter Account of Antifa Group that Attacked Andy Ngo Still Active as Twitter Censors the Right

Westlake Legal Group media.townhall-10-620x317 The Twitter Account of Antifa Group that Attacked Andy Ngo Still Active as Twitter Censors the Right twitter Social Media rose city antifa Politics Internet Hypocrisy Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Censorship bias antifa Andy Ngo Allow Media Exception

Andy Ngo was attacked by Portland’s Antifa chapter. That much is undeniable, and in no small part because there’s video evidence of it.

No matter how many times Twitter tries to take the video down, it’s going to pop up somewhere like Fox News where millions of people are going to see it anyway.

Portland’s Antifa chapter has a Twitter account known as “Rose City Antifa.” From there, Antifa releases propaganda and coordinates meetups with various links to its website. Recently, it has been posting various articles and tweets that speak out against Ngo and attempt to deny, downplay, or excuse their physical attack on him.

This is the same Antifa group that has blocked routes to hospitals and committed violence against anyone they deemed to be a “fascist,” which can be anyone at anytime for any reason.

They even turned on one of their own after she was caught giving police information about marching routes. According to Willamette Week, June Davies was an Antifa medic who wanted to let cops know where the medics would be so they wouldn’t get arrested or moved by officers. Upon a “friend” discovering four months worth of texts between she and one of the Portland officers, she was ostracized and received death threats:

It was awful. I woke up and half of my friends were just gone. Everybody was talking about me. I got threats, I got told that I had to leave the city. It wasn’t exactly explicit, but it was implied that bad things would happen to me if I showed up at certain places.

I didn’t leave my house for like a month. I was afraid. The night that everything happened and the next morning, I was suicidal. I’ve had mental problems for a while, but I haven’t had suicidal thoughts that strong since I was 16.

All this to say that Portland Antifa is definitely in the business of doing wrong and their Twitter account helps them coordinate to do it.

Meanwhile, various accounts on the right continue to be suspended or even taken down by Twitter for so much as sneezing in the left’s direction. Meghan Murphy, Alex Jones, Nick Monroe, and more have been permanently banned by Twitter, while countless others have either been temporarily suspended or shadow-banned for a myriad of reasons.

Even President Donald Trump is going to have his tweets marked with warning labels if they “break the rules,” though as we’ve seen, those rules seem to be nebulous.

Meanwhile, Rose City Antifa continues to have an account that’s going strong.

If someone like Jones — whether you like him or not — can have his account removed because of something he did outside of Twitter, shouldn’t Antifa qualify at this point? Why does a group that openly promotes violence get to continue to organize via help of their Twitter account and continue to exist on the platform?

But if the fact that Twitter is choosing which rules to enforce on whom again, then how about the fact that the DHS has labeled Antifa a domestic terrorist group? If the government recognizes them as such, then why is Twitter allowing them to continue to organize and propagandize on its platform while it suspends someone like Erick Erickson for making jokes about Elizabeth Warren?

By the left’s own rules in regards to allowing speech on platforms that equates to violence, Twitter is complicit in every Antifa attack that takes place.

The post The Twitter Account of Antifa Group that Attacked Andy Ngo Still Active as Twitter Censors the Right appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group antifa-riot-dc-300x225 The Twitter Account of Antifa Group that Attacked Andy Ngo Still Active as Twitter Censors the Right twitter Social Media rose city antifa Politics Internet Hypocrisy Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Censorship bias antifa Andy Ngo Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

As We Prepare to Celebrate Independece Day with a Salute to America the MSM Focus on More Negativity

Westlake Legal Group Gulf-War-Parade-620x412-620x412 As We Prepare to Celebrate Independece Day with a Salute to America the MSM Focus on More Negativity washington D.C. Salute to America Military Parades journalism independence day Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Allow Media Exception

Troops march over the Memorial Bridge in Washington, D.C., as they head towards the Pentagon during the National Victory Day Parade on Saturday, June 8, 1991. The celebration to honor Gulf War troops drew an estimated 800,000 spectators. The Lincoln Memorial is visible in background. (AP Photo/Doug Mills)

President Donald J. Trump touted his plans for the “Salute to America” celebration in Washington on the Fourth of July in a tweet: n a tweet on  Tuesday morning:

I have supported the president’s efforts to celebrate Independence Day with a military parade here at RedState, first in 2017 and again last year — a portion of which was published in USA Today.

Coverage of President Trump’s Salute to America plans by the biased media wing of the Democrats’ Party — the new nattering nabobs of negativism, is largely negative. Most of the coverage focuses on critics’ concerns about the cost of the event and false claims that President Trump is turning the Independence Day celebration into a partisan, political event.

Hallie Jackson complained on NBC’s Today that “critics worry the President is taking the focus away from patriotism and putting it on partisanship.”

On NBC Nightly News, Lester Holt said that “some Democrats are accusing him [President Trump] of exploiting the annual celebration.” On ABC World News Tonight, Cecilia Vega complained of a “growing backlash over President Trump’s Fourth of July plans.” Vega added that “there are questions about just how much it will cost, and whether his speech from the Lincoln Memorial will turn the holiday into a partisan event.”

Kaitlan Collins said on CNN’s Situation Room, “The President is setting himself up for a clash with his critics who say he’s turning the patriotic celebration into a partisan one.”

USA Today says Trump’s “‘Salute to America’ already is eliciting strong opinions over whether a president revered by supporters and reviled by opponents was injecting politics in an event above the partisan fray that enjoys national appeal.”

Major Garrett said on the CBS Evening News that the “Fourth of July on the National Mall has been a tribute to universal American themes, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, a star-spangled civic hymn. This year by design, it will be much more about” Trump.

Ryan Lizza said on CNN’s Situation Room the event will be “classic Trump, where this will be a lot about him and he will push the envelope on sort of the nationalist view that he has.”

The Associated Press complains that “Trump is politicizing what traditionally has been a nonpartisan celebration.”

Reuters cites “questions about the cost and tone of the celebration.” Congressional Democrats “have questioned whether Trump will turn a nonpartisan patriotic celebration into a taxpayer-funded campaign rally.”

The Associated Press reports at least two Army tanks have arrived in Washington ahead of the celebration. The New York Times says tanks’ presence “suggests that Mr. Trump has largely succeeded in turning the city’s annual Independence Day festivities into a salute to the American military.” Streif has shot down this complaint.

I don’t understand the opposition to honoring the military with a parade in Washington, D.C. on Independence Day.  What’s the big deal? There have been Fourth of July military parades in the nation’s capital before.

President John Adams reviewed a handful of military companies in Philadelphia on Independence Day in 1798, and Thomas Jefferson attended a military parade in Washington, D.C. In 1803 and 1804. On July 4, 1861, Abraham Lincoln reviewed  30,000 federal troops assembled for the defense of Washington. Parades celebrating victory in the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II and the first Gulf War — Operation Deseret Storm were also held in D.C. Military units march in the annual National Independence Day Parade which takes place on July 4 down Constitution Avenue.

The Washington Post complains that the White House is giving tickets to the President’s Fourth of July speech on the Mall “to Republican donors and political appointees, prompting Democratic lawmakers to question whether the administration’s planned celebration violates federal ethics rules.” Maybe the Democrats will finally pull the trigger on their constant threats impeach President Trump over this alleged ehtics complaint.

The so-called news media’s constant negativism about any and all things Trump has continued the loss of respect for the media that began with growing mistrust of the mainstream media in the late 1960s and early 1970s and has grown over two generations into a form of visceral hatred of the “fake news enemies” of the people.

In rebuttal to all the negative media coverage of the idea of a military parade in which Americans can show their appreciation of the military, I continue to support President Trump’s “Salute to America” which seeks to draw the attention of Americans to the real meaning for the holiday. It is a patriotic, flag-waving, red white and blue celebration of America’s birthday. Happy Independence Day

The post As We Prepare to Celebrate Independece Day with a Salute to America the MSM Focus on More Negativity appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Gulf-War-Parade-620x412-300x199 As We Prepare to Celebrate Independece Day with a Salute to America the MSM Focus on More Negativity washington D.C. Salute to America Military Parades journalism independence day Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com