web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Featured Story" (Page 285)

Democrats are Apoplectic That Trump Would Listen To A Foreigner With Dirt On An Opponent

Westlake Legal Group AP_18271664262015-620x419 Democrats are Apoplectic That Trump Would Listen To A Foreigner With Dirt On An Opponent President Trump Mueller Investigation Impeachment of President Trump Hillary Clinton George Stephanopoulos Front Page Stories Foreign Policy Featured Story donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception 2020

President Donald Trump smiles during a meeting with Chilean president Sebastian Pinera, in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, Sept. 28, 2018, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

 

During a sweeping interview with President Trump on Wednesday, George Stephanopoulos asked, “If foreigners, if Russia, if China, if someone else offers you information on an opponent, should they accept it or should they call the FBI.”

Trump replied, “I think maybe you do both. I think you might want to listen. There’s nothing wrong with listening. If somebody called from a country, Norway, ‘Oh, we have information on your opponent,’ I think I’d want to hear it.” (Relevant portion starts at 1:45 on the video below.)

Trump’s response immediately became red meat for the liberal media who were consumed with self-righteous indignation. Considering that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC paid $12 million to a foreigner to not only dig up dirt on candidate Donald Trump, but to disseminate it among the Washington political community, the Intelligence agencies and then to the media, their reaction was extraordinary indeed.

One of the most amusing of all came from Obama’s DNI Director, James Clapper, who told CBS News’ Anderson Cooper that he was just “stunned.” It is believed that Clapper leaked word to the media that former-FBI Director James Comey had briefed the President-elect on the Steele dossier, which gave them the green light to break the story. (Clapper’s remarks begin at 1:40 in the video below.)

Clapper said:

I’ve run out of adjectives to describe my reaction to this. Incredible, amazing, I think stunning and disturbing, that the President would advocate the use of…accepting information provided by a foreign country, notably a foreign adversary. And in doing so, completely overlooking the fact that this could well be, probably would be disinformation. In other words, completely phony. (Anderson Cooper shudders at the thought of this.) And to endorse that, and in doing so, endorse…undercut the FBI and its Director is just incredible. I can’t get over the duplicity of it. Here, with all the criticism about the…the…infamous dossier, and you know, you can’t use it because it’s not valid, you can’t accept it, and that’s…you know…in this case, it’s okay.

Let me repeat, “I can’t get over the duplicity of it.” Tell me again where Christopher Steele got his dossier material.

MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle asked her guest panel, “Is the president going to be reported as a security threat after that interview?” The panelists responded similarly, all agreeing that Trump was “sending a message to foreign governments that it’s “open season” for them to interfere in U.S. elections.”

The 2020 Democratic candidates, of course, found Trump’s answer equally appalling. Here are some of their tweets:

Joe Biden: “President Trump is once again welcoming foreign interference in our elections. This isn’t about politics. It is a threat to our national security. An American President should not seek their aid and abet those who seek to undermine democracy.”

Corey Booker: “It’s not “oppo research” — it’s foreign interference in US elections. That you would say this is disgraceful. That you would do it from the Oval Office (yet again) proves you’re unfit for the office you hold”.

Elizabeth Warren: “The #MuellerReport made it clear: A foreign government attacked our 2016 elections to support Trump, Trump welcomed that help, and Trump obstructed the investigation. Now, he said he’d do it all over again. It’s time to impeach Donald Trump.”

Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro: “After seeking and receiving the help of our adversaries to to get elected in 2016, Donald Trump is now essentially calling for an open season on our 2020 elections. Once again, he’s putting his interests above our nation’s, and risking and the integrity of our elections.”

Sen. Kamala Harris told the Huffington Post, “I am concerned, and the American public should be concerned. It’s sending a signal to our adversaries around the world ― North Korea, Russia, fill in the blank ― saying, ‘Hey, come on in for 2020.’”

Any one of these candidates would listen to a foreigner who told them they had dirt on Trump in a New York minute.

In February 2018, Adam Schiff was pretty quick to listen to (and engage with) a prankster who called his office to say he had naked pictures of President Trump. He claimed to be Andriy Parubiy, the chairman of the Ukrainian Parliament.” (Audio can be heard here.)

Sean Hannity pointed out that “listening is much different than lying, spying and paying for Russian lies and spreading it through the media by deep state operatives and then using it as the basis of a FISA warrant.”

As Attorney General William Barr’s investigation gets into high gear, Democrats have doubled down on their accusations against the President. They talk about impeachment as if he’s actually committed a crime. Their ability to remain oblivious to reality is breathtaking.

Hopefully, in the not too distant future, they will become the accused.

How should we punish them? Should we send SWAT teams to their homes because they are such dangerous criminals? Bankrupt them with legal fees? Place them in solitary confinement? Or maybe send them to Rikers Island, just because.

The post Democrats are Apoplectic That Trump Would Listen To A Foreigner With Dirt On An Opponent appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AP_18271664262015-300x203 Democrats are Apoplectic That Trump Would Listen To A Foreigner With Dirt On An Opponent President Trump Mueller Investigation Impeachment of President Trump Hillary Clinton George Stephanopoulos Front Page Stories Foreign Policy Featured Story donald trump democrats Allow Media Exception 2020  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Vox “Journalist” Tries to Clown on Trump, Ends Up Exposing How Ignorant He Is

Westlake Legal Group AP_945566433808-620x329 Vox “Journalist” Tries to Clown on Trump, Ends Up Exposing How Ignorant He Is vox Uninformed Tractors Rural Internet Politics media bias Iowa ignorant Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story farmers dumb donald trump democrats CNN Aaron Rupar

The Vox website is displayed on an iPad held by an Associated Press staffer in Los Angeles, on Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2015. Comcast, which became a TV powerhouse by signing up Generation Xers, is investing in online media outlets like BuzzFeed and Vox that attract millenial viewers. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)

Sometimes it’s best to just not say anything. Vox’s Aaron Rupar, purportedly a “journalist,” hasn’t learned that lesson.

Today, Donald Trump gave a speech in Iowa where he hit on some of the struggles that rural Americans are dealing with as they produce much of the food you and I enjoy daily. At one point, Trump starts to discuss improvements to broadband in their areas and how many farms in Iowa don’t have the proper connectivity for their tractors. This extends to 3G/4G wireless internet coverage as well, which is incredibly spotty in the midwest.

This had Rupar thinking he had a solid own of Trump on tap. You see, he said tractors can’t connect to the internet. What a moron, am I right?

His first statement on tariffs is not really correct either. Yes, costs can theoretically be passed onto American consumers if the market will bear it, but it is still a tax on Chinese corporations and does hurt them. There’s a reason Mexico caved to Trump’s recent tariff threats over immigration and it’s not because they just wanted to do him a solid.

But it’s the second tweet that has the video and comment dealing with tractors and internet connectivity. You can watch the clip and see exactly what Trump said, but my description above is an accurate portrayal.

Rupar, being your typical North Eastern bubble dweller calls what Trump says bizarre and tries to play it off as another “omgz, how dumb is Trump” moment.

If you’ve been alive anywhere outside of New York or D.C. in the past ten years though, you know how ill-informed Rupar’s comment is.

In fact, I can remember well over a decade ago going to an Uncles house and checking out some of the new equipment at his neighbor’s farm. At the time, GPS was being used to ensure precision plowing and planting. Today, internet connectivity in tractors at even smaller operations is becoming the norm to run all kinds of new features to keep things moving smoothly.

The lack of broadband and wireless connectivity in the areas where some of these farms are is a real problem and hurts efficiency.

Despite the clear stupidity of Rupar’s comment, the usual suspects still fell for it.

What this shows is just how out of touch many of these press personalities are. They’ve probably never been within 500 feet of tractor, much less do they know about the technological improvements currently in them.

It’s cliched but worth repeating. This is why Trump won.

People are sick of being looked down on by people in a few major cities who have no idea how their avocado toast ends up at their $10 a drink cafe. All over the country, people do different jobs to provide a higher standard of living for all of us and clowns like Rupar think they are superior because they can write a few hundred words a day and snark on Twitter.

Vox is just a joke of an outlet. They are not only biased, but routinely display a level of ignorant arrogance that is only rivaled by some personalities on CNN. Maybe Rupar will think before he tweets next time or at least try google first, but I doubt it.

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

 

The post Vox “Journalist” Tries to Clown on Trump, Ends Up Exposing How Ignorant He Is appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group trump-smirk2-300x200 Vox “Journalist” Tries to Clown on Trump, Ends Up Exposing How Ignorant He Is vox Uninformed Tractors Rural Internet Politics media bias Iowa ignorant Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story farmers dumb donald trump democrats CNN Aaron Rupar  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Video: Rep. Norma Torres (D) Cheapens Abortion Debate on House Floor, Calls Male Pro-Lifers “Sex-Starved”

Westlake Legal Group NormaTorresCA1-620x345 Video: Rep. Norma Torres (D) Cheapens Abortion Debate on House Floor, Calls Male Pro-Lifers “Sex-Starved” washington D.C. Pro-Life Politics North Carolina Norma Torres Front Page Stories Front Page Feminism Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture Congress California Allow Media Exception Abortion

Rep. Norma Torres (D-CA-35) speaks on the floor of the U.S. House – 6/12/19. Screen grab via C-SPAN.

I thought I’d seen it all when it came to Democrat women infantilizing the abortion debate, but what happened on the floor of the U.S. House today just might take the cake.

Roll Call reports:

A routine House debate nearly exploded Wednesday when California Democrat Norma J. Torres implied her Republican colleagues were “sex-starved males” for opposing abortion.

“Mr. Speaker, it is tiring to hear from so many sex-starved males on this floor talk about a woman’s right to choose,” Torres said as lawmakers debated a rule setting up amendment consideration for a four-bill spending package that includes funding for public health programs.

Torres, one of the newest members of the House Rules Committee, clearly broke House Rules — members cannot personally impugn their colleagues on the floor.

Watch video of Torres speaking on the House floor, and what happened after, below:

Unsurprisingly, Torres is being praised and virtually high-fived on social media by The Usual SuspectsWestlake Legal Group 2122 Video: Rep. Norma Torres (D) Cheapens Abortion Debate on House Floor, Calls Male Pro-Lifers “Sex-Starved” washington D.C. Pro-Life Politics North Carolina Norma Torres Front Page Stories Front Page Feminism Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture Congress California Allow Media Exception Abortion  as a “national hero” for her remarks, but in reality she’s just the latest on a long list of Democratic women (and left-wing media types) who cheapen the debate by taking uncalled-for swipes at men who are pro-life.

Plus, isn’t this kinda like reverse sexism or something? Writer Jeryl Bier made an excellent point in this regard on Twitter earlier:

As I’ve written previously, La. Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) is pro-life for very personal reasons – reasons that have nothing to do with being “sex-starved.”

Not only that, but there are many other pro-life male politicians on both sides of the aisle who are also fathers. Some are brothers, uncles, nephews, cousins. They aren’t pro-life because they want to “control women.” Nor are they pro-life because they are “sex-starved.” They are pro-life because they can’t imagine life without their loved ones.

Democrats and their feminist allies want you to believe these men have “no standing” in the abortion debate. That’s just wrong. All voices matter in this debate.

The irony of it all is that Torres’s belief in abortion on demand benefits “sex-starved” liberal males who support a woman’s “right to choose” because it gets them off the hook.

Don’t look for that inconvenient fact to be mentioned by Torres on the House floor, though. Wouldn’t get her near the applause, “you go, girl!” praises, favorable media mentions, and likes/RTs.

————————
—Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter.–

The post Video: Rep. Norma Torres (D) Cheapens Abortion Debate on House Floor, Calls Male Pro-Lifers “Sex-Starved” appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group NormaTorresCA1-300x167 Video: Rep. Norma Torres (D) Cheapens Abortion Debate on House Floor, Calls Male Pro-Lifers “Sex-Starved” washington D.C. Pro-Life Politics North Carolina Norma Torres Front Page Stories Front Page Feminism Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture Congress California Allow Media Exception Abortion  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Ocasio-Cortez “Literally Ran” from a Republican Contender Who Asked Her to Debate Him

Westlake Legal Group alexandria-ocasio-cortez-turtleneck-SCREENSHOT-620x327 Ocasio-Cortez “Literally Ran” from a Republican Contender Who Asked Her to Debate Him republican Politics New York Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats democrat debate AOC Allow Media Exception Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

The brave New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez bravely fled from a potential debate by a potential Republican contender for her district seat.

According to the New York Post, Talk-radio producer Rich Valdes and Ocasio-Cortez were both marching in the National Puerto Rican Day Parade on Sunday. When Valdes spotted the congresswoman, he approached her to introduce himself and challenge her to a debate on capitalism vs. socialism.

According to the Post, the moment Valdes went to make the introduction, Ocasio-Cortez spotted him and literally ran away:

But Ocasio-Cortez “cut her handshaking short, jerked her hand back and jetted to the other side of the street,” Valdes said.

“She literally ran!” he said.

“I thought this was a good time to try and get a response but I honestly only saw the back of her head as she trotted across the street.”

Guardian Angels founder and radio host Curtis Sliwa also witnessed the exchange and confirmed Valdes’s account.

“As soon as she saw him, she did a pirouette — a spin — and she ran north on Fifth Avenue, ahead of her delegation, just to get away from Rich,” he said.

“I heard Rich yelling after her, ‘OK, AOC. You can run — but you can’t hide!’”

Nancy Sliwa, wife of Curtis, nabbed pictures of it happening just to be sure that the story couldn’t be denied later.

And deny it she did. AOC’s spokesman Corbin Trent said Ocasio-Cortez wasn’t trying to get away, she was just moving forward quickly with the parade.

“She kept walking! The parade moved! It’s a procession! Give me a break,” he said.

Trent went on to say that Ocasio-Cortez doesn’t owe anybody a debate and that if he does want to debate her then he should run for office. She’ll only debate him then. This is exactly what Valdes plans to do, but Trent said he wishes Valdes good luck against her because she has over 4 million Twitter followers.

It’s unlikely that Ocasio-Cortez will accept any kind of debate, and has denigrated any who have asked her to one in a high-profile way. She accused Ben Shapiro of “catcalling” her when he offered her to debate him.

She also told 2020 presidential hopeful John Delaney to “sashay away” after he challenged her to a debate on the merits of healthcare for all.

Ocasio-Cortez is content to lob Twitter bombs behind the safety of her phone, but will not go so far as to risk her narrative with direct debate. Generally, anyone who is unwilling to expose their ideas to direct criticism is holding beliefs and stances they know to be shaky.

So her physically running from Valdes isn’t at all unbelievable. She does a good deal of figuratively running from other debates as is.

The post Ocasio-Cortez “Literally Ran” from a Republican Contender Who Asked Her to Debate Him appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group alexandria-ocasio-cortez-turtleneck-SCREENSHOT-300x158 Ocasio-Cortez “Literally Ran” from a Republican Contender Who Asked Her to Debate Him republican Politics New York Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats democrat debate AOC Allow Media Exception Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Joe Biden Promises To Cure Cancer

Westlake Legal Group Joe-Biden-620x410 Joe Biden Promises To Cure Cancer Uncategorized republicans primary Politics Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats cancer biden Allow Media Exception 2020

Joe Biden Promises To Cure Cancer

I was up early this morning listening to different news programs. I just barely caught the end of a segment on Breitbart News daily. Host Alex Marlowe referred to former. Vice President Joe Biden said that if elected we would cure cancer. I wasn’t sure I heard right, but I was actually able to confirm the statement. From Fox News

Former Vice President Joe Biden made a bold promise on Tuesday to “cure cancer” if he is elected president in 2020

“That’s why I’ve worked so hard in my career to make sure that… I promise you if I’m elected president, you’re going to see the single most important thing that changes America, we’re gonna cure cancer,” Biden declared.

I’m not sure which way to take this one. On one hand, it smacks of using his dead son (who died of cancer) to score political points. Another side could be that he is just incredibly stupid. As any oncologist will tell you, cancer isn’t just one disease. It covers a whole range off afflictions. I’m not sure that we could cure (all) cancer, even if we put the entire Federal budget towards the effort.

Some of the talk show discussions I heard had conservatives demanding that the Democrats toss him from the Democrat Primary Race. Personally, I think that’s a bad idea. The last thing we want, is Biden to shut up. Let him talk…all the way to second place in 2020.

Mike Ford is a retired Infantry Officer who writes on Military, Foreign Affairs and occasionally dabbles in Political and Economic matters.

Follow him on Twitter: @MikeFor10394583

You can find his other Red State work here.

The post Joe Biden Promises To Cure Cancer appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Joe-Biden-300x198 Joe Biden Promises To Cure Cancer Uncategorized republicans primary Politics Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections donald trump democrats cancer biden Allow Media Exception 2020  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

A Whistle Blowing Dallas PD Officer Is Coming Forward Against His Chief as Dallas Falls Deeper Into Crime and Murder

Westlake Legal Group AP_16190332494608-620x394 A Whistle Blowing Dallas PD Officer Is Coming Forward Against His Chief as Dallas Falls Deeper Into Crime and Murder Texas Renee Hall Politics police Nick Novello murder homicide Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats dallas crime corruption Allow Media Exception

Veteran Dallas Police Officer Nick Novello has been speaking out against the mismanagement and incompetence displayed by the department’s police chief U. Renee Hall for years, and as Dallas approaches unprecedented murder and crime rates, Novello is once again sounding the alarm.

Recently, Hall appeared in the hot seat before the Dallas city council where she was raked over the coals for how horribly the department has managed both itself and crime within the city. As of now, Dallas is set to hit a decade high in homicide rates with a projected 228 deaths by the end of the year.

Now rumors are swirling that Hall is about to get the boot, and Novello plans to deliver a letter to Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson that may just seal the deal as it details just how bad things are behind the scenes at the Dallas PD. It’s a letter that he has allowed RedState to see before it’s delivered.

What is contained in the letter is nothing short of shocking.

Among the facts is the revelation that there are less than 1,200 officers attempting to patrol a city filled with 1.4 million people. Novello also reveals that as the murder rate spikes, Dallas detectives are short-staffed by 40 to 60 percent. He also reveals that emergency calls that go unanswered by police due to a lack of officers present.

“I work the slowest watch in the city and I am in possession of hundreds of emergency calls with the same language, “supervisor notified, call expired, no elements or officers available,” wrote Novello. “Now if calls for police service go largely unanswered in a timely manner at central, what do you suppose is happening across the city, particularly during busy periods or when one emergency ties up scarce resources?”

Novello also mentions that in response, Hall has told her officers to handle calls with a “triaging” methodology. Novello points out that this is more revealing to the department’s problems than some may believe:

In a medical context, triage means that one will determine the severity of the injury in question, and treat based on a hierarchical order, depending on who needs medical attention the most. It is understood that scarce medical resources necessitate the triage methodology being utilized. In using the term “triaging” in a police context, are we telling the citizens of Dallas that their needs are going to be assessed based on the immediacy of the threat or injury extant in a scenario? I must insist that using this triaging language, is no less than a mea culpa, and speaks to DPD’s inability to perform it’s functions. In the context of policing, admitting that we are going to triaging is nothing short of admitting that we are no longer capable of servicing the citizens of this city in totality.

In other words, if your house has been broken into and a robbery has occurred, the police may not show up to your door for hours as the scarcely available units are busy with what may be a more pressing crime happening that moment. Some calls, as Novello points out in his letter, aren’t getting responded to at all, and in large number.

“Officers at other stations tell me, calls at times are backed up 40-50 at a time; many emergency calls holding for hours due to the staffing crisis,” Novello tells the Mayor. “I suspect you know nothing of this miasma. Now you do.”

As Novello plans to release this letter to Mayor Johnson, multiple Dallas policing groups have also come forward and revealed that its members have voted that they have no confidence in Hall and that they do not believe that she has the ability to turn the department around.

How Hall continues with her job intact without a miracle is anyone’s guess. If she does, Dallas may watch as its crime problem continues to worsen as officers abandon the department for greener pastures, and fewer officers are there to answer calls for help by Dallas citizens.

In the meantime, Dallas is definitely in a quiet crisis due to the consistent mismanagement of Hall who seems more focused on a social justice laden approach to fighting crime than actually fighting crime and securing the best she can for her officers who have accused her of ruining careers and using her position to punish her opposition.

The post A Whistle Blowing Dallas PD Officer Is Coming Forward Against His Chief as Dallas Falls Deeper Into Crime and Murder appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AP_16190332494608-300x190 A Whistle Blowing Dallas PD Officer Is Coming Forward Against His Chief as Dallas Falls Deeper Into Crime and Murder Texas Renee Hall Politics police Nick Novello murder homicide Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats dallas crime corruption Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Poll: Democrats Want La. Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) Primaried – Because He’s Pro-Life

Westlake Legal Group DonnaJohnBelEdwards1-620x339 Poll: Democrats Want La. Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) Primaried – Because He’s Pro-Life Pro-Life Politics North Carolina Louisiana John Bel Edwards Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections democrats Culture Campaigns Abortion 2019 Elections 2019

Louisiana’s Donna and Gov. John Bel Edwards (D). Screen grab via a 2015 Edwards campaign ad.

The Democrat purging of pro-life liberals continues.

The latest example comes from Louisiana, where a recent poll shows that young Democrats in the state want their Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards primaried – because he’s pro-life.

The Free Beacon reports:

A poll of registered Democratic voters conducted by We Ask America just days after the [fetal heartbeat] bill was signed into law found that 81 percent of respondents were already aware of Edwards’s decision, with a whopping 92 percent of young registered voters saying they knew about the legislation. Unsurprisingly, 60 percent of respondents said they opposed his abortion stance, including 80 percent of young voters.

Many are so displeased with Edwards that they want him to pay for his abortion stance with a primary challenge, the poll found. Forty-two percent of Democrats and 64 percent of young Democrats said they would like another Democratic candidate to be on the ballot in October.

[…]

The Free Beacon reported last week that Democrats in the state legislature are aware of the political problem the abortion issue causes Edwards and made a “strategic decision” to delay a major abortion ballot initiative.

It’s unclear how many of those same Democrats know the reason why Edwards is pro-life:

The Democrat’s anti-abortion stance stems from his wife’s pregnancy nearly 30 years ago. A doctor discovered their daughter, Samantha, had spina bifida and encouraged an abortion, but the couple refused.

Samantha is now married and works as a school counselor, according to the outlet.

“In eight years in the legislature, I was a pro-life legislator, 100 percent with the Louisiana Right to Life,” Edwards said during a Thursday press conference. “When I ran for governor, I said I was pro-life and so that’s something that’s consistent.”

Per Wikipedia, the Louisiana gubernatorial primary will be held on October 12, 2019 under what’s called a “jungle primary” system:

Under Louisiana’s jungle primary system, all candidates appear on the same ballot, regardless of party, and voters may vote for any candidate, regardless of their party affiliation. If no candidate receives a majority of the vote during the primary election on October 12, 2019, a runoff election will be held on November 16, 2019, between the top two candidates in the primary.[1]

Polling from a month ago showed Edwards well ahead of the two Republicans challenging him, but per The Hill “[Edwards] has not yet secured a threshold that would allow him to avoid a runoff.”

That poll was also taken before Edwards signed the fetal heartbeat bill into law.

————————
—Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter.–

The post Poll: Democrats Want La. Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) Primaried – Because He’s Pro-Life appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group DonnaJohnBelEdwards1-300x164 Poll: Democrats Want La. Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) Primaried – Because He’s Pro-Life Pro-Life Politics North Carolina Louisiana John Bel Edwards Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections democrats Culture Campaigns Abortion 2019 Elections 2019  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

What About ‘Double Jeopardy?’ Why are House Dems Allowed to Try President Trump For The Same Offense For the Fifth Time?

Westlake Legal Group ap-adam-schiff-620x413 What About ‘Double Jeopardy?’ Why are House Dems Allowed to Try President Trump For The Same Offense For the Fifth Time? Robert Mueller New House investigations of Trump Mueller Investigation Lessons Learned from Mueller Report Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats corruption Congress Allow Media Exception adam schiff Abuse of Power 2020

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, speaks after a closed meeting on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, June 6, 2017, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

 

Last I knew, this was the United States of America. We lived by a Constitution which guaranteed a set of protections against tyranny for our citizens.

One of those protections is a guarantee that a person accused of a crime cannot be “twice put in jeopardy” for the same crime. This is called double jeopardy.

The text book definition of double jeopardy is as follows: “A procedural defense which prevents an accused person from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges and on the same facts, following a valid acquittal or conviction.”

President Trump was the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation which officially began in July 2016, although there is evidence that the FBI had been spying on his campaign before that time. The FBI investigation ended when the Special Counsel investigation was initiated in May 2017. FBI lawyer Lisa Page testified under oath that ten months into their investigation, there was still no evidence that Trump had colluded with the Russians to win the presidency.

After 22 months of intense examination, a highly partisan group of Democratic donors with unlimited resources at their disposal were still unable to find sufficient evidence that Trump had colluded with the Russians.

And boy did they try? We’ve already uncovered three instances in the Mueller report where members of his team manipulated information to misrepresent the facts.

First, they omitted a crucial sentence from a voicemail left by Trump’s attorney, John Dowd, to Michael Flynn’s attorney, Robert Kelner, which made it appear as if Dowd had obstructed justice. My colleague, Bonchie wrote about that here.

Last week, The Hill’s John Solomon learned that the Mueller team completely mischaracterized the role of Konstantin Kilimnik. They identified him as a Russian asset when in reality, Kilimnik was a top informant for the U.S. State Department and other Western intelligence agencies as well. I wrote about that here.

Finally, both the FBI and the Mueller team claim that the FBI began surveilling General Michael Flynn after they had recorded a phone call between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak in December 2016. The reality is that the FBI began spying on Flynn shortly after he had called Kislyak in early January 2016 to express his condolences upon hearing of the death of former GRU Director Igor Sergun, who had died on Jan. 3, 2016. This has been proven by a recent DOJ court filing. I wrote about this here.

Mueller and his team have had their thumb on the scale for Democrats and still weren’t able to find sufficient evidence to recommend a Trump indictment.

While Mueller’s investigation was proceeding, the Senate and the House each opened investigations of their own and neither came up with evidence of collusion.

President Trump has now been investigated for the same offense four times.

Now House Democrats, led by the poisonous, repulsive, snake-like Adam Schiff and the buffoonish, fat, repellent Jerrold Nadler want to try the President for the fifth time.

Below is a video of the entire House Intelligence Committee hearing on “The Mueller Report: Lessons Learned.” Schiff’s opening statement begins at 8:15. Watch it if you can. It will make your blood boil and your stomach churn.

Schiff said, “Volume one of the report outlines a sweeping and systemic effort by Russia to interfere in the 2016 election for the benefit of Donald Trump. It establishes that the Trump campaign welcomed the Russian interference because it expected to benefit electorally from the information stolen and released through the Russian effort.”

Contrary to the president’s often-repeated mantra and many misrepresentations of the attorney general, the special counsel reached no conclusion as to whether the Trump campaign’s many Russian contacts constituted collusion since that term is not defined in criminal law.”

Schiff is using the fact that the term “collusion” is not defined in criminal law as his excuse to continue what can only be described as a farce.

House Republicans described today’s proceedings as a “grotesque spectacle.”

The National Review’s Andrew McCarthy, a former U.S. attorney, tried to inject some sanity during his testimony. “McCarthy told the panel that Russia wasn’t backing Trump per se in the 2016 campaign, and was rather supporting the candidate seen at the time as most likely to lose.” He explained:

[Russian President Vladimir] Putin tends to back the candidates he believes will lose on the theory that an alienated losing faction will make it harder for the winning faction to govern…It is a mistake, I respectfully submit, to allow him to divide us by portraying him as on one side or another. He’s against all of us.

Attorney General Barr and prosecutor John Durham are investigating the genesis of this hoax and I feel confident that they will sort it all out.

Last weekend, Rep. Mark Meadows told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo there would be a delay in DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’ report because he had received some new information.

Unfortunately, until their job is complete, Democrats will continue with “Take Five” of the Russia collusion investigation, trampling all over President Trump’s Constitutional rights and this travesty will continue.

Pretty soon, many Democrats will find themselves in jeopardy. Will they expect their own rights to be honored?

The post What About ‘Double Jeopardy?’ Why are House Dems Allowed to Try President Trump For The Same Offense For the Fifth Time? appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group ap-adam-schiff-300x200 What About ‘Double Jeopardy?’ Why are House Dems Allowed to Try President Trump For The Same Offense For the Fifth Time? Robert Mueller New House investigations of Trump Mueller Investigation Lessons Learned from Mueller Report Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats corruption Congress Allow Media Exception adam schiff Abuse of Power 2020  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

How Long Can the Media Ignore the Fact That a Senior House Democrat Is Married to a Fraudster

So far the media has managed to avert its eyes and studiously ignore a major story of corruption and malfeasance in Congress because to cover said story would totally destroy a narrative and expose them to allegations that they are racist.

At the epicenter of this tale is the pustulent and rather dim Elijah Cummings from my current state of residence. Cummings is your typical product of the Maryland Democrat machine. The reek of corruption is always near him but never quite attaches to him because he is, as I said, the product of the Maryland Democrat machine and therefore bulletproof. Now all of that may be getting ready to change.

In late May, the National Legal and Policy Center filed an IRS complaint against Maya Rockeymoore Cummings, who is the wife of Elijah Cummings.

The Complaint describes a score of apparent Internal Revenue Code violations, including prohibited private benefit and inurement of the Cummings. CGPS has received millions in grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and, in late 2017, was granted a million-dollar contract from the General Services Administration. The funds were purportedly provided to fight childhood obesity. The Complaint asks the IRS to investigate whether “its organizers are getting fat off the grants.”

At the same time she heads CGPS, Mrs. Cummings heads a for-profit consulting firm called Global Policy Solutions, LLC, whose operations appear to have been indistinguishable from those of CGPS. The two entities have shared office space, telephones, etc., all of which are flagrant violations of the Internal Revenue Code.

With a Republican, the Washington Post would have been all over this, in this case, the Post sent out a stenographer to take down the denial:

“It appears a conservative front group and a news outlet . . . are pushing a hit piece filled with faulty research, lies and innuendo in an attempt to tarnish my personal reputation, professional work and public service as well as that of my spouse,” Rockeymoore Cummings said in a statement, calling the effort a “distasteful attempt to intimidate my family into silence at such a pivotal moment in our nation’s history.”
She declined to answer follow-up questions about her nonprofit’s work, donors and contracts.

And the Post, doing what it does best when dealing with favored and powerful Democrats, just let it drop.
Earlier this month, the NLPC released more details:

The amended complaint states that Rockeymoore Cummings “appears to have been paid twice for the same services,” noting that she collects a “substantial full-time salary” from her charity on top of the 5% management fee it pays her for-profit venture.

For example, Rockeymoore Cummings earned a salary of $152,155 from her charity in 2015, according to its Form 990 tax return that year. Also in 2015, her charity paid her consulting firm $78,178 in “management fees,” according to its audited financial statements.

Crickets.

Today, however, things took a turn for the better. Both the Trump Campaign and Donald Trump, Jr. spoke on the subject:

Is it even mildly plausible that Cummings didn’t know the grift that his wife was running? Not very likely. Will the IRS get involved? They may end up not having any choice.

The media will ignore this as long as it can. But, if history serves as any guide, neither of these are going to forget something as juicy and useful as this story is. Then the media and Nancy Pelosi will have some tough decisions to make and they will have to make them in an election year.

 
=========
=========
Like what you see? Then visit my story archive.

I’m on Facebook. Drop by and join the fun there.
=========
=========

The post How Long Can the Media Ignore the Fact That a Senior House Democrat Is Married to a Fraudster appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group elijah-cummings-pointing-300x200 How Long Can the Media Ignore the Fact That a Senior House Democrat Is Married to a Fraudster Washington Post tax fraud Politics Nancy Pelosi Media maya rockeymoore cummings IRS Front Page Stories Featured Story elijah cummings democrats Congress Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Facebook’s Fake Video Policy Put to the Test After Someone Makes One of Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook made headlines recently when it declined to remove a video of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) that was altered to make her voice sound like she was intoxicated, choosing instead to “de-prioritize” the misleading video, and post it alongside third-party fact checker content. Now, a fake video of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has been created and uploaded to Facebook-owned Instagram, putting the policy to the test.

According to Motherboard, the video was created by artists Bill Posters and Daniel Howe, working with advertising company Canny, using a type of video dialogue replacement (VDR) technology that Canny developed. The videos created by this type of technology are sometimes referred to as “deepfake” videos, because they adapt real footage combined with faked dialogue in order to fool the viewer.

The video, still viewable directly on Instagram at the time this article was written, features Zuckerberg sitting at a desk speaking about Facebook’s power and control over users’ data, as chyrons that say “We’re increasing transparency on ads” are displayed on the screen. The chyrons and professional-looking set up of the video, plus Zuckerberg’s recognizable face, make the video seem official at first glance.

The video footage was originally pulled from comments Zuckerberg made in September 2017 about Russian election interference on Facebook. The deepfake video shows Zuckerberg bragging about being “one man, with total control of billions of people’s stolen data, all their secrets, their lives, their futures.”

It’s sinister and creepy, and completely fake — but in a way that directly hits at many people’s fears about Facebook and how they manage the immense amount of private user data they gather.

When the controversy erupted over the altered Pelosi video, Facebook director of public policy Neil Potts had said that they would treat a similarly doctored video of Zuckerberg, they would treat it in the same manner: allow the video to remain posted, but minimize its promotion and provide fact checking context.

So far, the Zuckerberg video remains up, the original along with several repostings by other accounts. An Instagram spokesperson told Motherboard that the video would be treated “the same way we treat all misinformation on Instagram…If third-party fact-checkers mark it as false, we will filter it from Instagram’s recommendation surfaces like Explore and hashtag pages.”

I was able to find the video and several reposts of it by searching directly for some of the hashtags in the original video caption, and there is no warning label directly on the original post by the Bill Posters account.

This video directly included several labels indicating it was not accurate content, including #deepfake, so it’s arguably not as misleading as the Pelosi video, which was presented as an accurate rendering of her speech. Facebook’s willingness to tolerate deepfake videos may not be as lenient if future misrepresentations of their founder are not so clearly labeled as fake.

Read my RedState article archive here.

Follow Sarah Rumpf on Twitter: @rumpfshaker.

The post Facebook’s Fake Video Policy Put to the Test After Someone Makes One of Mark Zuckerberg appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AP_18100671669782-300x184 Facebook’s Fake Video Policy Put to the Test After Someone Makes One of Mark Zuckerberg Social Media Mark Zuckerberg Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post fake news facebook Allow Media Exception  Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com