web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Featured Story" (Page 65)

Nancy Pelosi’s Price Of Impeachment

Westlake Legal Group NancyPelosiAPimage-620x317 Nancy Pelosi’s Price Of Impeachment Nancy Pelosi impeachment House Speaker Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats 2020

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., speaks during her weekly media availability on Capitol Hill, Thursday, June 27, 2019, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said something very curious. She said that it doesn’t matter if the Democrats lose the House over impeachment because she is doing what she thinks is right. The way she answered the question, though, is incredibly curious to me.

It’s been obvious from the start that Pelosi didn’t want full-on impeachment. Even now, she has only committed to an impeachment inquiry to satisfy the frothing rank-and-file, but she is selling impeachment in front of cameras. But to acknowledge that, yes, it might hurt the Democrats to follow-through? That doesn’t seem like the path most politicians would take.

One might expect a politician to fire back at the reporter asking about losing the House with a “I believe the American people will support our party doing what is best for the country” or “I think you’ll see the American public is on our side in this.” Something that sounds confident that her party is doing the right thing.

But, it’s been obvious for a while that Pelosi doesn’t think this is the right choice. She is very worried because every bit of polling – especially in swing states – showed the American public largely against it. I think you do see some quick polls shows a change in opinion, but I largely don’t trust polls with that quick a turnover. Time is going to tell whether or not the Democrats are making the right move.

One of the things that has kept most Republicans in Congress silent about their worries is the fact that many of them fully expect the crazed members of the Democratic caucus to overplay their hand. It is something that, frankly, would be so on-brand for the Democrats of the Trump Era to do. Keep in mind, though, that these are Republicans who aren’t necessarily saying “Trump did something bad.” Many are just saying it’s “concerning,” while others appear to be more worried about the fate of the party rather than Trump.

If the Democrats stay on-brand though, then they don’t have to worry. They’ll blow whatever chance they (think they) have and the tide of public opinion will shift again.

Pelosi is a political creature, and an immensely talented one. Her ideas suck, sure, but she knows how to survive. She is very likely already taking all of this into account, and being the sort of endgame person she is, she might already recognize that she can come out of this stronger no matter how it turns out.

If it fails, she can tell her party “I told you. I tried to stop you. Maybe next time you’ll listen to me?”

If it succeeds, she took out a Republican President.

In either of those scenarios, that promise she made that this was her last term as Speaker? That doesn’t matter anymore.

This all assumes, of course, that she doesn’t get swept away with the rest of them if this blows up in their faces.

The post Nancy Pelosi’s Price Of Impeachment appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group NancyPelosiAPimage-300x153 Nancy Pelosi’s Price Of Impeachment Nancy Pelosi impeachment House Speaker Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Schiff’s Staffer Traveled to Ukraine, Trip Was Paid for by Group Funded by Hunter Biden’s Old Firm

Westlake Legal Group schiff-this-week-memo-e1517769294589 Schiff’s Staffer Traveled to Ukraine, Trip Was Paid for by Group Funded by Hunter Biden’s Old Firm Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post Election donald trump democrats Congress

As we look at the origin of the whistleblower complaint, many have raised the question of what did Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) know about the complaint and when did he know it?

Schiff was aware of the complaint from at least August 12 when he allegedly received it from the whistleblower. Yet he didn’t inform his colleagues in Congress until last week. He went on ABC on the Sunday and told George Stephanopoulos that “once he found out about the complaint” he demanded answers and went public right away. But that wasn’t true, he waited a month.

His colleague Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) called him out on it, asking why had he not informed Congress.

Now there’s another strange connection that Schiff has in the case.

As Breitbart notes, one of Schiff’s Congressional staffers, Thomas Eager, took a trip to Ukraine between August 24-31 with other Congressional staffers after the whistleblower complaint was filed. Rep. Adam Schiff approved his staffer’s travel as his signature on the travel request revealed.

That trip was paid for by the Atlantic Council.

One of the senior fellows of the Council is CrowdStrike founder Dmitri Alperovitch. You may recall Crowdstrike is the company that supposedly concluded the Russians were behind the hack of the DNC in 2016 during the campaign. The FBI never had access to the server. Trump asked about Crowdstrike on the call with the Ukrainian president.

According to the transcript, Trump told Zelensky, “I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say CrowdStrike … I guess you have one of your wealthy people…The server, they say Ukraine has it.”

Two prominent names are among the folks who fund the Atlantic Council. One is George Soros’ Open Society Foundation. And the other? Burisma, the company which appointed Hunter Biden to its board and who the subject of the investigation that was allegedly stopped when Biden pressured Ukraine, according to the prosecutor who was fired.

In January 2017, the Atlantic Council and Burisma signed a cooperative agreement, which stated Atlantic Council would develop transatlantic programs with Burisma’s support, focusing on European and international energy security.

So Hunter Biden’s old company Burisma is funding the group paying for Schiff’s staffer’s trip to Ukraine. Once again that raises questions if there was anything said or done in relation to the whistleblower’s case between Schiff or his staff and the Ukrainians.

Who did they talk to when the staffers were in Ukraine and did any of it relate to the complaint or the Bidens and Trump?

Breitbart asked the Atlantic Council what the staffers were doing there. According to the Atlantic Council:

[T]he pre-planned trip was part of the fellowship program, which also includes a full year of round tables and other educational events. She said it was not within her portfolio to comment on issues of funding from Burisma or other donors.

Breitbart said they did not get a response from Eager about the trip.

HT: Diane B

The post Schiff’s Staffer Traveled to Ukraine, Trip Was Paid for by Group Funded by Hunter Biden’s Old Firm appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group schiff-this-week-memo-300x153 Schiff’s Staffer Traveled to Ukraine, Trip Was Paid for by Group Funded by Hunter Biden’s Old Firm Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post Election donald trump democrats Congress   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

The Church of Sweden Declared Greta Thunberg Jesus’s Successor

Westlake Legal Group people-2599550_1280-620x413 The Church of Sweden Declared Greta Thunberg Jesus’s Successor Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

 

 

Don’t blame her — the sequel is never as good as the original.

But still, big shoes…

As resurfaced on social media Monday, in December, the Church of Sweden made an astonishing announcement:

16-year-old Greta Thunberg — who gave a frantically impassioned “We’re all gonna die” speech last week before the United Nations — is a successor to Jesus.

A December 1st post to that tablet of truth, Twitter, proclaimed the following:

“Announcement! Jesus of Nazareth has now appointed one of his successors, Greta Thunberg.”

Hmmm. She’s 16, miserably upset, and only knows what those on the extreme end of a …heated… debate have told her. It seems they may wanna temper their interpretation a bit.

As a reminder, here’s the successor Jesus has supposedly Himself picked out:

She does have a certain holy fire.

But that ain’t exactly the Beatitudes.

To be clear, I don’t think Greta should be attacked. In my opinion, she’s been made miserable by adults who should know better than to crush the hopes of a child by placing unnecessary fear upon her. Maybe that’s what they’d say, too — about grownups other than themselves.

But the Church of Sweden Malmö seems pretty stoked about it all — last week, they revealed via their website they’d ring the church bells in sync with the Greta-fronted Global Climate Strike:

“In conjunction with the Global Climate Strike, church bells ring and we gather for prayer for the future of the earth. We pray that we believe that man is responsible for nurturing and managing Creation so that children are given the opportunity for a future. We pray that we know that climate change affects the most vulnerable — poor, children, and women. We pray that we believe in man’s ability to change and change.”

Does climate change affect everyone but rich men?

Not everybody was on board with Greta’s sequel status, and they made that clear online at the time.

So the church backtracked a wee bit:

“Here you can read more about the word ‘success’ and its different meanings / nuances.”

Well, is she the successor or not?

Perhaps “it depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”

The church soon abandoned the Twitter account. On December 6th, it left the social media world with this:

Dear Twitter,

If we have hurt someone, we apologize.

Our sense has been to talk about Jesus Christ in our own way. Now we leave the arena.

Thank you for your commitment, joy, and debate.

God bless you!

Jonas Persson, ward pastor

Man, they really swung in there and got out — you make a claim that the Creator of the Universe has singled out a young teen to take His place, then you just take off.

All in all, Sweden seems like it has a real flair for the dramatic.

And don’t even get me started on this guy:



-ALEX

 

Relevant RedState links in this article: here.

See 3 more pieces from me:

Think You’ve Heard The Stupidest Thing Ever? I Disagree. Witness The Woke’s New Condemnation Of IKEA

The Far Left Is Making Teens Miserable Over The Imminent Destruction Of The World

The Best Among Us Shut Down 22 Intersections In D.C. And Chain Themselves To An Ark To Fight Climate Change

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

The post The Church of Sweden Declared Greta Thunberg Jesus’s Successor appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group people-2599550_1280-300x200 The Church of Sweden Declared Greta Thunberg Jesus’s Successor Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

MSNBC Guest Heftily Insults the Fox News Audience, but How’re They Looking Now?

Westlake Legal Group stupid-1245103_1280-620x465 MSNBC Guest Heftily Insults the Fox News Audience, but How’re They Looking Now? Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

 

 

On Monday, MSNBC contributor Gabe Sherman bounced onto the network stage to share his thoughts on people who watch Fox News.

As it turns out, they’re all morons.

Gabe — a correspondent for Vanity Fair — also wanted to talk about conniving Donald Trump. He summed it up:

“The President of the United States using our foreign policy to leverage a foreign country to take out a rival.”

That’s a simple idea. But how simple?

Tell ’em, Gabe:

“That’s a very simple story that even the Fox audience can understand.”

Yep — it’s that simple.

Gabe was on the right show to suggest such a thing — anti-Trumper and host Joy Reid followed with a “Yeah.”

But she was also affirming this:

“What they’re looking at now is basically trying to distract. … The State Department is still investigating Hillary’s emails. I think they are going to try to say look over here not over here. The problem is this story is so easily understood. I don’t know if that reality distortion field can work.”

Did y’all get that? It was a little more complex than the other thing.

So Fox fans are imbeciles…

Who’s to say who’s watching MSNBC? It’s people all over. And you can’t pigeonhole the entire mix.

But what does the outlet serve up? That discovery is more along the lines of easy peasy.

That’d include panelist Elie Mystal, claiming Bret Kavanaugh’s confirmation may be the beginning of a “thousand-year reich.”

He spoke those exact words — see for yourself:

“In Light Of Kavanaugh, Nut On MSNBC Predicts A Possible ‘Thousand-Year Reich’”

How’s Fox lookin’ now?

But the more the merrier; so how’s about a montage? This is the network Gabe thought was the right launching pad for an insult to viewers of Fox.

Ladies and gentleman, I give you MSNBC:

-ALEX

 

Relevant RedState links in this article: here.

See 3 more pieces from me:

MSNBC Panelist Says He Constantly Fantasizes About Crashing His Car Into Trump Plaza. Maybe He’s Waiting For The 1,000-Year Reich

MSNBC Reporter Cracks The Code: Women Politicians Don’t Have Character Problems

WATCH: News Organization Releases The ‘Best 7 Seconds MSNBC Ever Produced,’ & It’s A Striking Upgrade

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

The post MSNBC Guest Heftily Insults the Fox News Audience, but How’re They Looking Now? appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group stupid-1245103_1280-300x225 MSNBC Guest Heftily Insults the Fox News Audience, but How’re They Looking Now? Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

A Case That Is Being Portrayed as a Win for Religious Freedom Is Actually a Road Map for Our Perpetual Defeat

Westlake Legal Group Freedom-of-religion-stand-up A Case That Is Being Portrayed as a Win for Religious Freedom Is Actually a Road Map for Our Perpetual Defeat religion Politics Michigan Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission LGBT judge robert jonker gay rights Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats dana nessel Culture & Faith Catholic Charities buck vs. gordon bigotry anti-religious left Allow Media Exception adoption

There is a major struggle going on right now over the fate of religious freedom in this country. It is safe to say that the left is actively hostile to religion once it leaves the doors of the church (many are hostile even before then but I’ll give the entire mob of them the benefit of the doubt) and they have adopted FDR’s obscene Freedom of Worship as their catchphrase. The lay of the land isn’t much more favorable elsewhere. Many people who style themselves as conservative are actually worshippers at the idol or “tolerance” and are perfectly willing to see religious freedom made subservient to that goal. Some are even claiming that religion is on par with homosexual marriage and telling us that is a good thing.

On Thursday, US District Court Judge Robert Jonker (a Bush appointee) ruled that Catholic Charities could not be barred from acting as an adoption agency in Michigan because it refused to place children in homes of homosexual couples. The decision did not look at the suitability of homosexuals to be adoptive parents, but rather on the process that was used to exclude Catholic Charities and the actions of rabidly anti-Christian Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel who has made a career out of castigating orthodox Christians as hatemongers. Here’s how she described the Trump administration policy which shields Catholic hospitals from performing abortions, assisted suicides, and genital mutilations…I’m sorry, I meant “gender reassignment surgery.”

“This display of contempt for the doctrine of separation between church and state is alarming and terrifying,” said Nessel. “According to our federal government, healthcare providers, from doctors to clerical staff, can decide who deserves medical care ranging from the most routine check-ups to lifesaving medical treatment – all based upon the purported religious, moral, or ethical beliefs of the provider. Healthcare treatment should be dictated by approved medical standards and a patient’s decisions about the type of care he or she wishes to receive, not the personal beliefs of those who hold themselves out as medical professionals. The imposition of this rule catapults our nation further toward America devolving into a virtual theocracy.”

The state social services agency tried to have any mention of Nessel removed from the case on the grounds that they, not the state attorney general, made the decision to bar Catholic Charities. Judge Jonker called bullsh** on this ploy. This is from Judge Jonker’s ruling:

The State Defendants seek dismissal of Defendant Nessel from the case. They contend that she is simply the State’s chief legal counsel, is not responsible for Michigan’s change in policy, and does not belong in the case. The record undercuts the claim. Based on the record to date, Defendant Nessel is at the very heart of the case. She referred to proponents of the 2015 law as hate-mongers” and said the only purpose of the 2015 law was “discriminatory animus.” She described the 2015 law as “indefensible” during her campaign. These statements raise a strong inference of a hostility toward a religious viewpoint. Based on the present record, she was also a pivotal player in the State’s total reversal of position in the Dumont litigation. It was her assessment of risk that led the State to move from defending St. Vincent’s position to abandoning it in the first month of her term – and this despite the 2015 law, the language of the contracts, and well- established practice. All of this supports a strong inference that St. Vincent was targeted based on its religious belief, and that it was Defendant Nessel who targeted it. See Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm’n, 138 S. Ct. 1719, 1729-31 (2018) (detailing disparaging statements of government decision-makers regarding particular religious beliefs and emphasizing the “State’s duty under the First Amendment not to base laws or regulations on hostility to a religion or religious viewpoint”). On this record, dismissal of Defendant Nessel from the case is not warranted.

In other words, just like in the Masterpiece Cakeshop ruling, the case was decided on the overt record of animus both the Colorado Civil Rights Commission and the Michigan attorney general had shown towards religious people and organizations.

This is how National Review’s David French describes the ruling:

The last point is key. As stated above, there was no evidence that St. Vincent prevented any qualified couple from adopting. In fact, if the state forced St. Vincent’s to choose between upholding the teachings of its faith or maintaining its contractual relationship with the state, then it risked shrinking the available foster or adoption options in the state of Michigan. The state demonstrated that it was more interested in taking punitive action against people of faith than it was in maintaining broader access to foster and adoption services for its most vulnerable citizens.

The judge rightly called the state’s actions a “targeted attack on a sincerely held religious belief.” Once again, Masterpiece Cakeshop pays religious-liberty dividends. Once again, a court declares — in no uncertain terms — that in the conflict between private faith and public bigotry, religious liberty will prevail.

This is the kind of whistling past the graveyard that drives me nuts. This decision was not a victory for religious liberty, rather it simply ratified a roadmap for zealous anti-Christians to stamp out religious liberty. A better ruling would have hammered home that an organization cannot be forced from the public square because of its beliefs. What this ruling did was put the bigots on notice that they have to find other reasons, that they have to keep their meetings private with no minutes taken, that they can’t actively appeal to anti-religious bias.

Rod Dreher covers the story in a story called Why Federal Judges Matter. They do. It would have been horrible to lose a ruling such as this. But timid, half-measures judges don’t make things better. They just delay the reckoning.

In short, rulings like this simply point people like Nessel to how white politicians in the South after Brown vs. Board of Education worked to keep black Americans from voting, from holding jobs in certain professions, and to keep schools segregated despite the Supreme Court rulings. We’re not done here. Not by a long damned shot. We’ll have to fight this battle again and again and eventually we’ll face people who aren’t idiots and judge who isn’t sympathetic.

=========
=========
Like what you see? Then visit my story archive.

I’m on Facebook. Drop by and join the fun there.
=========
=========

The post A Case That Is Being Portrayed as a Win for Religious Freedom Is Actually a Road Map for Our Perpetual Defeat appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Freedom-of-religion-stand-up-300x164 A Case That Is Being Portrayed as a Win for Religious Freedom Is Actually a Road Map for Our Perpetual Defeat religion Politics Michigan Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission LGBT judge robert jonker gay rights Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats dana nessel Culture & Faith Catholic Charities buck vs. gordon bigotry anti-religious left Allow Media Exception adoption   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Video: Hillary Clinton Accidentally Admits Male Democrats Are Exempt From #BelieveWomen Because Orange Man Bad

Westlake Legal Group JoeBidenHillaryClinton1 Video: Hillary Clinton Accidentally Admits Male Democrats Are Exempt From #BelieveWomen Because Orange Man Bad washington D.C. sexual misconduct sexual harassment Sexual Assault Politics People Magazine North Carolina Media Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections donald trump democrats delaware Culture Campaigns campaign Bill Clinton biden Allow Media Exception 2020 Elections 2020 #metoo

Joe Biden gives Hillary Clinton a long hug. Aug. 2016. Screen grab via CNN.

Whether it’s making excuses for her husband’s lecherous, adulterous, and deplorable behavior when he was POTUS, being actively involved in smearing his accusers, or declaring 20 years later that we must believe all women who accuse men of sexual misconduct, Hillary Clinton is a woman of many, many faces.

She proved it again in an interview she and her daughter Chelsea Clinton, an author, recently did with People Magazine.

Clinton was asked her thoughts about the 2020 Democratic candidates for president, and she noted she was “staying out of it” and planned to support whoever won the nomination.

But when asked about frontrunner Joe Biden and his well-documented overly handsy approach when it comes to women, Clinton rushed to his defense, characterizing his inappropriate touching as “a little annoying habit”:

She said that Biden, 76, who is a leading contender to challenge President Donald Trump in next year’s election, “is a thoroughly decent human being who has served our country honorably and well for decades.”

“You could take any person who sticks their little head above the parapet and says, ‘I’m going to run for president,’ and find something that … a little annoying habit or other kind of behavior that people are going to pick apart and disagree with,” she continued.

Why was Hillary so eager to sing Biden’s praises in spite of the numerous allegations of inappropriate touching and invasions of women’s private spaces? Because Orange Man Bad, of course:

“This man must be defeated,” Clinton told PEOPLE. “People who are putting themselves forward, which believe me, is a really difficult process to undergo, should be judged on the totality of their lives and their service.”

Voters must “get over it” and “vote for anybody” to get Trump out of office, even if that “anybody” likes to brush up behind women when they’re not looking and smell their hair, hug women a little too tightly for a little too long, and kiss women supporters full on the mouth:

“We can pick apart anybody. I mean, that’s a great spectator sport. But this man who’s there in the Oval Office right now poses a clear and present danger to the future of the United States. So get over it,” Clinton said. “Look at the candidates, look at what they’ve accomplished, look at what they have fought for — and vote for anybody to get rid of Donald Trump.”

Watch video of Clinton talking about Biden below:

Hillary Clinton defends yet another handsy Democratic male from criticism over his unseemly behavior. Who coulda predicted that?

Flashback –>> Andrea Mitchell lovingly narrates a clip of then Vice President Biden giving Hillary a looong hug, and notes he’s the touchy feely type (“nothing pervy here”, she states) – but that it’s no big deal because it’s just Joe Biden:

——
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Video: Hillary Clinton Accidentally Admits Male Democrats Are Exempt From #BelieveWomen Because Orange Man Bad appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group JoeBidenHillaryClinton1-300x171 Video: Hillary Clinton Accidentally Admits Male Democrats Are Exempt From #BelieveWomen Because Orange Man Bad washington D.C. sexual misconduct sexual harassment Sexual Assault Politics People Magazine North Carolina Media Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections donald trump democrats delaware Culture Campaigns campaign Bill Clinton biden Allow Media Exception 2020 Elections 2020 #metoo   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Alabama Sen. Doug Jones Breaks from the Party and Stands Up for Justice: You Don’t Pursue Impeachment Based on Hearsay

Westlake Legal Group AP_17318719008277-620x334 Alabama Sen. Doug Jones Breaks from the Party and Stands Up for Justice: You Don’t Pursue Impeachment Based on Hearsay washington D.C. Uncategorized Proof Lindsey Graham kasie dc Impeachment of President Trump impeachment hearsay Front Page Stories Featured Story face the nation doug jones donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception

Alabama Democrat Senate candidate Doug Jones gets into his car after speaking to the media, Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017, in Birmingham, Ala. Jones runs against former judge Roy Moore. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)

 

 

The controversial runoff between Doug Jones and Roy Moore in Alabama seemed a bit of ugliness in the Heart of Dixie.

In the end, the Democrat won.

And now, that man is playing outside the lines of partisan politics in order to oppose another bit of ugliness: attacks based on hearsay.

Appearing on MSNBC’s Kasie DC Sunday, the senator insisted a great deal of the Ukraine whistleblower complaint relies on the H word.

And that’s not enough for impeachment.

You don’t remove a sitting president based on such second-hand intel:

“A lot of that allegation, a lot of the whistleblower complaint is in fact hearsay. It is what other people have told him. That is clear on its face. I think Senator Graham was right, you don’t impeach somebody based on hearsay.”

The aforementioned Lindsey slammed the complaint Sunday on CBS’s Face the Nation:

“This seems to me like a political setup. It’s all hearsay. You can’t get a parking ticket conviction based on hearsay. The whistleblower didn’t hear the phone call.”

He said the whole hubbub of Trump allegedly attempting to make moves against Joe Biden in order to internationally prevent an American Democratic win in 2020 smells like dung:

“This whole thing is a sham. … Who is this whistleblower? What bias do they have? Why did they pick this whistleblower to tell a hearsay story? The transcript does not match the complaint. … [T]his thing stinks.”

In case you’ve been away waterskiing, here’s a reeeeal quick summary of the complaint, compliments of USA Today:

The complaint appears related to President Donald Trump’s July 25 call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump released a five-page summary of the call Wednesday, which revealed the president asking Zelensky to investigate political rival Joe Biden while the president withheld hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid to that country.

Back to Doug, the former prosecutor pointed out that there are still a lot of missing facts. And impeachment should only be determined on the other side of their discovery:

“[W]e still don’t have all the facts. We need to get the facts. Whenever you get to an impeachment vote if it gets there, it needs to be based on facts. It doesn’t need to be based on mere allegations and one transcript.”

Good call.

-ALEX

 

See 3 more pieces from me:

Trump Administration Threatens To Pull Funding From Duke University Program For Promoting Islam While Ignoring Christianity

MSNBC Panelist Says He Constantly Fantasizes About Crashing His Car Into Trump Plaza. Maybe He’s Waiting For The 1,000-Year Reich

Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Crushes Beto – The ‘Radical Looney’ Will ‘Never Be A Threat To Texas Politics Again’

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 



 

 

The post Alabama Sen. Doug Jones Breaks from the Party and Stands Up for Justice: You Don’t Pursue Impeachment Based on Hearsay appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AP_17318719008277-300x161 Alabama Sen. Doug Jones Breaks from the Party and Stands Up for Justice: You Don’t Pursue Impeachment Based on Hearsay washington D.C. Uncategorized Proof Lindsey Graham kasie dc Impeachment of President Trump impeachment hearsay Front Page Stories Featured Story face the nation doug jones donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Actress Stands Up for Trump: ‘ANYONE has the right to face their accuser. This anonymous S**t is S**t’

Westlake Legal Group hollywood-sign-1598473_1280-620x413 Actress Stands Up for Trump: ‘ANYONE has the right to face their accuser. This anonymous S**t is S**t’ President Trump Kirstie Alley Hollywood Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats corruption Congress christine blasey ford Brett Kavanaugh Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power 2020

 

On Sunday, President Trump rightly said he deserved to meet his accuser. When a group of Democrats an individual tries to bring down the President of the United States by filing a dishonest and inaccurate account of an event they didn’t witness, they waive their right to anonymity. This individual was not a whistleblower and is not entitled to protection.

Of course the President wants to meet his accuser. Every American wants to meet the individual who filed this report. We want to know who was involved in preparing this document and who this individual’s sources were.

In the summer of 2018, when Dianne Feinstein first announced that a woman had come forward to accuse then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her in the 1980’s, she requested that Christine Blasey-Ford remain anonymous.

Similarly, the so-called whistleblower filed a complaint which ignited the impeachment of the President. This person has upended the lives of President Trump and his family, and has created turmoil in our government. If private citizens were able to do this so easily and remain anonymous, we would have anarchy.

President Trump has received support from an unlikely source. Actress Kirstie Alley has his back. She tweeted, “I wanna know who the “whistle blower is” … I think ANYONE has the right to face their accuser.. ANYONE…this anonymous s**t is s**t. anonymous whistle blower “recounting” what was said…f*** we might as well play gossip with ghosts.

The responses to her post were as you would expect. But it’s heartening to know that Alley was brave enough and compassionate enough to speak up about the latest attack on the President.

The post Actress Stands Up for Trump: ‘ANYONE has the right to face their accuser. This anonymous S**t is S**t’ appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group hollywood-sign-1598473_1280-300x200 Actress Stands Up for Trump: ‘ANYONE has the right to face their accuser. This anonymous S**t is S**t’ President Trump Kirstie Alley Hollywood Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats corruption Congress christine blasey ford Brett Kavanaugh Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Obama’s AG on 2020: Republicans are ‘Going to Cheat’ in a ‘Whole Variety’ of Ways, and Trump May Refuse to Leave the White House When He Loses

Westlake Legal Group krampus-3859444_1280-620x413 Obama’s AG on 2020: Republicans are ‘Going to Cheat’ in a ‘Whole Variety’ of Ways, and Trump May Refuse to Leave the White House When He Loses Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

 

 

Can Trump get re-elected in 2020? Apparently, the answer is Most Certainly — after all, Republicans are going to cheat.

So insists former attorney general Eric Holder.



Appearing on hit urban radio show The Breakfast Club Monday, the Obama era’s top lawyer said Democrats have a definite chance this time around.

Host Charlamagne tha God wasn’t so sure.

Eric admitted — it’ll definitely be tough, what with the bamboozlin’ and all:

“It’s going to be hard because the reality is that Republicans are going to cheat. They’re going to try to keep people away from the polls. They’re going to move polling places. They’re going to do a whole variety of things.”

A whole variety! Like a show where you’ve got everything from spinning plates to Elvis. Or like a box of instant oat meal featuring not only strawberries and cream, but also maple & brown sugar and cinnamon and spice.

But the upcoming trickery ain’t so appetizin’.

In fact, Charlemagne said he doubted Trump would willingly exit the White House, even if his challenger won. He’d likely be carted off to prison.

Eric thought maybe so, too. But he used ta not:

“I thought to myself, ‘that’s ridiculous.’ But as I’ve thought about it, this guy with all the norms he breaks through — I think, he loses, and then it will be interesting between, say, November and January, when he would have to start packing.”

Sounds like Trump’s there to stay. Maybe it’s all part of what MSNBC contributor Elie Mystal told the world is absolutely, definitely possible: the rule of an evil GOP for a “thousand-year reich” (here and here).

That’d be less than great for Eric — as pointed out by to The Washington Free Beacon, he’s still very much active in the Democratic Party:

Since leaving the Obama administration, Holder has taken up the issues of gerrymandering and voting rights. He chairs the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which aims to support Democratic candidates in state races to help in redistricting after the 2020 census.

In fact, when Stacey Abrams lost the 2018 gubernatorial election, Eric demanded she’d actually won.

Will the same occur in 2020?

Could be; the Republicans will be cheating.

-ALEX

 

Relevant RedState links in this article: here and here.

See 3 more pieces from me:

Former NFL Player Allegedly Attempts To Frame Trump Supporters By Wrecking His Own Restaurant

Pro-Communist ‘Revolution Club’ Protests Trump’s Visit By Burning An American Flag In Front Of The Beverly Hills Hotel. Why?

Julian ‘Men Can Get Pregnant And Tornadoes Are Racist’ Castro Slams Trump – The President’s ‘Bizarre’

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” If it fails to automatically refresh, manually reload the page. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”

The post Obama’s AG on 2020: Republicans are ‘Going to Cheat’ in a ‘Whole Variety’ of Ways, and Trump May Refuse to Leave the White House When He Loses appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group krampus-3859444_1280-300x200 Obama’s AG on 2020: Republicans are ‘Going to Cheat’ in a ‘Whole Variety’ of Ways, and Trump May Refuse to Leave the White House When He Loses Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Actress Stands Up for Trump: ‘ANYONE has the right to face their accuser. This anonymous S**t is S**t’

Westlake Legal Group hollywood-sign-1598473_1280-620x413 Actress Stands Up for Trump: ‘ANYONE has the right to face their accuser. This anonymous S**t is S**t’ President Trump Kirstie Alley Hollywood Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats corruption Congress christine blasey ford Brett Kavanaugh Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power 2020

 

On Sunday, President Trump rightly said he deserved to meet his accuser. When a group of Democrats an individual tries to bring down the President of the United States by filing a dishonest and inaccurate account of an event they didn’t witness, they waive their right to anonymity. This individual was not a whistleblower and is not entitled to protection.

Of course the President wants to meet his accuser. Every American wants to meet the individual who filed this report. We want to know who was involved in preparing this document and who this individual’s sources were.

In the summer of 2018, when Dianne Feinstein first announced that a woman had come forward to accuse then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her in the 1980’s, she requested that Christine Blasey-Ford remain anonymous.

Similarly, the so-called whistleblower filed a complaint which ignited the impeachment of the President. This person has upended the lives of President Trump and his family, and has created turmoil in our government. If private citizens were able to do this so easily and remain anonymous, we would have anarchy.

President Trump has received support from an unlikely source. Actress Kirstie Alley has his back. She tweeted, “I wanna know who the “whistle blower is” … I think ANYONE has the right to face their accuser.. ANYONE…this anonymous s**t is s**t. anonymous whistle blower “recounting” what was said…f*** we might as well play gossip with ghosts.

The responses to her post were as you would expect. But it’s heartening to know that Alley was brave enough and compassionate enough to speak up about the latest attack on the President.

The post Actress Stands Up for Trump: ‘ANYONE has the right to face their accuser. This anonymous S**t is S**t’ appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group hollywood-sign-1598473_1280-300x200 Actress Stands Up for Trump: ‘ANYONE has the right to face their accuser. This anonymous S**t is S**t’ President Trump Kirstie Alley Hollywood Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats corruption Congress christine blasey ford Brett Kavanaugh Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com