web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Featured Story" (Page 99)

New York Times Corrects its Kavanaugh Hit Piece and Exposes the Orchestrated Hit By the Democrats and Media

 

Westlake Legal Group d2bf8fb0-122d-4440-9765-867da6293429.v1-620x421 New York Times Corrects its Kavanaugh Hit Piece and Exposes the Orchestrated Hit By the Democrats and Media Supreme Court sexual harassment SCOTUS News New York Times media collusion Media Mainstream Media journalism Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post fake news donald trump democrats Brett Kavanaugh Allow Media Exception

Ironically, as the press ignores a lack of proof, there is ample evidence of Dem/Media collusion today

Sunday the news nets and social media were all aflame with the “news” of breaking Brett Kavanaugh information. The New York Times released excerpts from an upcoming book written by its reporters on the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation affair, and it was a napalm blast that ignited a firestorm of conjecture. It was also completely unfounded, but unfounded speculation has never stopped the media before, and this latest is just an example of ongoing media malpractice.

The new revelation was that a former classmate of Kavanaugh at Yale recalled seeing a rather graphic episode involving forcing the genitalia of Kavanaugh on an unsuspecting and unwilling female victim. There were a number of issues with this revelation, beginning with the fact that it took decades to arrive. Additionally this charge was not lodged by the woman in question, but by a man who claims to have seen the incident, Max Stier. That Stier worked as a lawyer in the Bill Clinton impeachment process is a side note; that he has never said anything about this incident in the past few decades is notable.

The first sign of trouble for the New York Times was pulling down its tweet Saturday night about the penis-thrusting incident.

This of course did little to stem the wave of outrage from our thought leaders. The amazing thing to watch was how many in the press were insisting this was a new revelation, and it somehow cast ALL of the prior speculation into a new light, when instead it was a charge against Kavanaugh that was as baseless as any of the others that have been tossed aside due to lack of evidence. Somehow a claim from a Clinton operative, not the victim, that was never previously reported is now being held as “proof” by journalists. Those are some loosely held ethics.

Then, as the press was in loud concert in declaring “credible” new evidence has been revealed, the Times relied on its now-common practice — the Quiet Correction. All of a sudden, in the middle of all of the tumult, a small detail was revealed by The Paper of Record regarding this new and blazingly significant revelation in its upcoming book: the supposed victim of the Kavanaugh sex crime has no recollection of this event.

Consider the significance of what has taken place now. This means we have the New York Times promoting items from its own book as revelatory and potentially scandalous, that have been completely disproven — by items inside of the very same book. The Times knew this was the case, and yet it pumped out the allegation, allowed the mainstream media to bleat and screech over this, and then subtly corrects itself with a “by the way”-level correction that it had been in possession of the entire time.

And many in the press have gone on screaming about cover-up of the Kavanaugh details, and how the administration has forced through a “guilty” Supreme Court nominee. To further illustrate the coordination look through this list of Democrat politicians and media players who have all come out with a tellingly similar read on the hearing and investigation into the Kavanaugh charges.

Note how many have jumped on board with calling the FBI investigation into the accusers here was all a “Sham”: Sen. Mazie HironoSen. Amy KlobucharHarry Reid’s COS Adam JentlesonRobert Reich — as well as a number of journalists and reporters, and even an actress. All echo the same “sham” messaging.

There is something even more revealing. Note that all of these vaunted names who are energetically lambasting the Federal Bureau of Investigations are in fact violating one of their own previous coordinated outrages. Recall that it was not too long ago the thought of President Trump being critical of the FBI was an affront to our very democracy?

Ah, those shifting moral standards on the left. Who would dare think that their current outrage would be in direct opposition to their past outrages?! Well…anyone who is paying attention.

The post New York Times Corrects its Kavanaugh Hit Piece and Exposes the Orchestrated Hit By the Democrats and Media appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group d2bf8fb0-122d-4440-9765-867da6293429.v1-300x204 New York Times Corrects its Kavanaugh Hit Piece and Exposes the Orchestrated Hit By the Democrats and Media Supreme Court sexual harassment SCOTUS News New York Times media collusion Media Mainstream Media journalism Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post fake news donald trump democrats Brett Kavanaugh Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

The Tolerant Left: Anti-Vaccine Protestor Throws Blood At Lawmakers From Balcony of CA State Capitol Senate Chamber

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-09-16-at-11.59.49-AM-620x463 The Tolerant Left: Anti-Vaccine Protestor Throws Blood At Lawmakers From Balcony of CA State Capitol Senate Chamber Rebecca Lee Dalelio Health Care Front Page Stories Featured Story anti-vaccine protests

Screen Shot: https://twitter.com/adlerben/status/1172665524259450880/photo/1?

According to TMZ, an anti-vaccine protestor, in the balcony of the California State Capital Senate Chamber, interrupted the session by calling out, “That’s for all the dead babies. She then tossed what was described as a “feminine hygiene device containing what appeared to be blood” onto lawmakers below.

The woman, Rebecca Lee Dalelio, was protesting two new bills the Governor had recently signed into law that will tighten vaccine requirements for students.

TMZ reports:

She chucked the red, blood-like liquid down below from the upstairs balcony area … where she and other anti-vaxxers were watching in silent protest as state senators wrapped up the last day of the legislative year with a vote on some last-minute measures.

The liquid — which eyewitnesses say came from a menstrual cup — splashed a few state senators, including Sen. Melissa Hurtado, as well as some documents and desks.

Dalelio was arrested Friday afternoon inside the chambers of the California State Capitol building.

The Senate session went into recess and concluded in private chambers shortly afterward.

The video also shows a woman — who’s presumed to be Dalelio — being escorted out into the hall by officers, where she continues her rant on dead babies, saying … “Their blood is on your hands.”

At 43:13 in the video below, Dalelio can be heard calling out.

The bills signed by Governor Newsom last Monday state that, if a doctor issues more than five patient waivers (exempting children from vaccination requirements), they will be subject to a review by public health officials. If the vaccination rate at any individual school “falls below a certain level, that school will be subject to scrutiny.”

The left are a tolerant bunch, aren’t they?

The post The Tolerant Left: Anti-Vaccine Protestor Throws Blood At Lawmakers From Balcony of CA State Capitol Senate Chamber appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-09-16-at-11.59.49-AM-300x224 The Tolerant Left: Anti-Vaccine Protestor Throws Blood At Lawmakers From Balcony of CA State Capitol Senate Chamber Rebecca Lee Dalelio Health Care Front Page Stories Featured Story anti-vaccine protests   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Beto O’Rourke Lashes Out After Mayor Pete Adds His Name to Chorus of Dems Criticizing His Gun Grabbing Plan

Westlake Legal Group BetoORourkeDemDebate3APimage-620x317 Beto O’Rourke Lashes Out After Mayor Pete Adds His Name to Chorus of Dems Criticizing His Gun Grabbing Plan Texas Social Media Politics Pete Buttigieg North Carolina Media Mayor Pete Indiana Guns gun rights gun control Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections democrats Culture Campaigns Beto O'Rourke Allow Media Exception 2nd Amendment 2020 Elections 2020

Democratic presidential candidate former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke answers a question Thursday, Sept. 12, 2019, during a Democratic presidential primary debate hosted by ABC at Texas Southern University in Houston. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip)

Beto O’Rourke has been on a mission since the El Paso mass shooting to convince the American people that his gun confiscation plan is the only way to stop mass shootings.

He amplified his position during last week’s Democratic debate when he said “Hell yes” in response to ABC News debate moderator David Muir’s question about whether or not he was going to take away people’s guns:

MUIR: Some of the stage have suggested a voluntary buy-back for guns in this country. You have gone further. You said, quote, “Americans who own AR-15s and AK-47s will have to sell them to the government, all of them. You know that critics call this confiscation. Are you proposing taking away their guns and how would this work?

BETO O’ROURKE: I am, if it’s a weapon that was designed to kill people on a battlefield. If the high impact, high velocity, when it hits your body, shreds everything inside of your body because it was designed to do that so you would bleed to death on a battlefield and not be able to get up and kill one of our soldiers. When we see that being used against children and in Odessa, I met the mother of a 15-year-old girl who was shot by an AR-15 and that mother watched her bleed to death over the course of an hour because so many other people were shot by that AR-15 in Odessa, there weren’t enough ambulances to get to them in time. Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We’re not going to allow it to be used against a fellow American anymore.

Since the debate, a growing number of Democrats have criticized O’Rourke’s remarks, suggesting that 1) it’s not doable and 2) they will hurt Democrats for years to come.

Sen. Chris Coons (DE) is one of several Democrats speaking out against O’Rourke’s debate comments. South Bend Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, also a presidential candidate, is another:

Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Ind., appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union” and agreed with Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., saying the clip of the former O’Rourke’s statement about AR-15s and AK-47s “will be played for years at Second Amendment rallies with organizations that try to scare people by saying Democrats are coming for your guns.”

Buttigieg said, “Look, right now we have an amazing moment on our hands. We have agreement among the American people not just for universal backgrounds checks, but we have a majority in favor of red-flag laws, high-capacity magazines, banning the new sale of assault weapons. This is a golden moment to finally do something.”

Buttigieg went on to say, “When even this president and even [Senate Majority Leader] Mitch McConnell are at least are pretending to be open to reforms, we know that we have a moment on our hand. Let’s make the most of it and get these things done.”

Watch:

Here’s how O’Rourke responded:

The general consensus I get from moderate liberal commentators and even the Democrats who have criticized Beto’s plan and remarks is that what happened in his hometown of El Paso last month is motivating him to take action and be bold, and that his plan and remarks come from a place of emotion and frustration.

That’s precisely why he belongs nowhere near the White House. Because no matter how passionate, emotional, and personal an issue may be to a candidate, an unconstitutional plan is still unconstitutional.

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Beto O’Rourke Lashes Out After Mayor Pete Adds His Name to Chorus of Dems Criticizing His Gun Grabbing Plan appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group BetoORourkeDemDebate3APimage-300x153 Beto O’Rourke Lashes Out After Mayor Pete Adds His Name to Chorus of Dems Criticizing His Gun Grabbing Plan Texas Social Media Politics Pete Buttigieg North Carolina Media Mayor Pete Indiana Guns gun rights gun control Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post elections democrats Culture Campaigns Beto O'Rourke Allow Media Exception 2nd Amendment 2020 Elections 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Planned Parenthood is Trying to Silence It’s Former President, and That Raises Questions

Westlake Legal Group a4e356e1-adac-401e-8d03-fb5cc0029277-620x317 Planned Parenthood is Trying to Silence It’s Former President, and That Raises Questions Silence Politics planned parenthood LEANA wen gag order Front Page Stories Featured Story Allow Media Exception Abortion

Planned Parenthood is an organization that has shrowded itself and for good reason. As recent events have shown us, not only are many clinics not up to par in terms of cleanliness, even to the point where veterinarian hospitals are less filthy, sting operations have shown Planned Parenthood official taking part in the sale of body parts from aborted babies.

This shadiness gets even shadier when you consider Leana Wen, Planned Parenthood’s ousted former President who took over after the departure of Cecile Richards.

According to the New York Times, a letter by Wen showed that Planned Parenthood was “deeply hypocritical” when it came to transparency. Wen essentially stated that that is working to buy her silence by threatening to take her healthcare away should she speak up about the goings-on behind the scenes at the abortion giant:

In her recent letter, she left open the possibility of legal action. “I have no desire to file claims against Planned Parenthood for defamation, retaliation, or discrimination,” she wrote ominously.

She said that Planned Parenthood was demanding her silence “in exchange for my contractually-guaranteed severance and continued health insurance coverage,” calling the efforts “unjust” and “unethical.”

Dr. Wen went so far as to invoke the recent Trump administration rules to accuse Planned Parenthood’s board of hypocrisy.

“It is deeply hypocritical,” she wrote, that Planned Parenthood, “would attempt to enforce a gag order on its immediate past President/CEO while fighting the Trump administration’s gag rule on Title X providers.”

Wen was fired because she was, apparently, not political enough for the organization. According to Wen, she went into the role with the mind that Planned Parenthood was a medical organization first, not a political player. Odd, since abortion and politics is exactly what Planned Parenthood exists for.

What we do know is that as pro-life sentiments gained traction across the nation, Wen’s strategy was allegedly to make Planned Parenthood out to be a healthcare-focused organization, however, the board wanted more emphasis on abortion. Soon, she found herself kicked out of her position after a secret meeting by board members.

We can speculate as to why Wen’s positions didn’t fit with Planned Parenthood’s powers that be all day, including the idea that Wen’s stances softened on abortion after her miscarriage, which was happened around the same time as her firing. Either way, it probably doesn’t matter. What matters is the fact that Wen and Planned Parenthood apparently didn’t see eye to eye so greatly that they decided she was a liability.

So why is Planned Parenthood so adamant about Wen keeping her silence? What does she know that Planned Parenthood doesn’t want us to know, especially as the organization prides itself on being an open book as suggested by Wen? If it is transparent, why the threats to punish Wen financially?

I don’t want to confuse anyone. There are no good guys in this situation. Wen is an abortionist who likely sees a financial opportunity to gain more money with threats of speaking up, and Planned Parenthood naturally doesn’t want to pay a ridiculous amount for her silence.

But it’s odd that this silence is apparently worth a lot of money and threats. What else is going on that we may not know about?

 

 

The post Planned Parenthood is Trying to Silence It’s Former President, and That Raises Questions appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 5d3f08f6-8c4c-42ca-9f5e-d3b5981362b2-300x153 Planned Parenthood is Trying to Silence It’s Former President, and That Raises Questions Silence Politics planned parenthood LEANA wen gag order Front Page Stories Featured Story Allow Media Exception Abortion   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

If You Believe the Accusations About Brett Kavanaugh and Cheer Attacks On Him, You’re Not the Good Guy

Westlake Legal Group AP_18259666660844-620x414 If You Believe the Accusations About Brett Kavanaugh and Cheer Attacks On Him, You’re Not the Good Guy Supreme Court Social Media sexual harassment Sexual Assault Rape Politics New York Times mob Media Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats Deborah Ramirez court of public opinion christine blasey ford Brett Kavanaugh Allow Media Exception

President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 6, 2018, for the third day of his confirmation to replace retired Justice Anthony Kennedy. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

With Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh back in the crosshairs of the Democratic party, you once again have concerned crusaders against rape and sexual assault charing to the front in some glorified attempt to restore our society to goodness and reinforce the protection of women.

And those that truly think they’re doing good here are playing themselves. In fact, they’re not the good guys, they’re the bad guys. What’s more, I think too many of them know it and put on the show under the full realization that what they’re doing is dishonest and downright evil, but pardon it in the name of politics.

Let’s go over some facts.

I think at this point it’s safe to say Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh never raped anyone, nor did he facilitate rape, nor did he do anything lewd during his high school days. In fact, judging by his character witnesses, his own testimony, and a literal calendar he kept of his every day, he was a model youth.

To this day, every accuser that has come forth has had absolutely nothing in the way of proof to show for it, and even the people who they say can back up their claim have said they have zero idea as to what the accuser is talking about.

Even the most popular accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, was found to be pretty fraudulent after her own lawyer admitted that her quest to have Kavanaugh denied his seat on the Supreme Court was about fighting for abortion. Ford’s own father seems to disbelieve his daughter as he was seen telling Kavanaugh’s father that he’s glad his son got to the Supreme Court.

It was a circus that tore Kavanaugh and this nation apart. The underhanded actions of the Democratic party haunted them well into the 2018 elections and will continue to haunt them into 2020. While Kavanaugh reached the Supreme Court, his life and the life of his family has been damaged forever. Like fellow Justice Clarence Thomas, these accusations will follow him around all his life.

As we can see, the mainstream media has zero problems reawakening these accusations as the New York Times recently demonstrated. The accusation by one Deborah Ramirez was reawakened, which claimed that Kavanaugh exposed himself near her face at a party. No one can corroborate the story, and wouldn’t you know it? It took Democrat attorneys to remind her that it was Kavanaugh after all these decades!

But the NYT published an article about a book surrounding Kavanaugh that states it found a witness that did see Kavanaugh do lewd things and published the article, reigniting a firestorm and giving the 2020 candidates another reason to make headlines by calling for his resignation.

Only it wasn’t real, and to everyone’s complete shock and surprise, the NYT didn’t publish the full context of the tale which states that this “witness” refused to be interviewed and whose friends confirm that she doesn’t even remember it happening.

Suddenly, the story dried up and mainstream outlets are now relatively quiet about it.

But people aren’t. For the populace, this little factoid isn’t paid much attention to. The fact that the press is quietly slinking away from the story is lost on those who now have solid proof that Kavanaugh is the monster they knew he was all along. The damage is done.

Twitter has been on fire with Kavanaugh talk, with many people getting on their soapboxes and showing us that their moral compass is currently pointed due north while we’re told everyone else supports rape culture. It’s been in my own mentions.

I want to make it clear to these people. You’re not the good guy, and everything that I listed above is the reason why. In fact, you’re the villain in this story.

Remember firstly that the motivations behind the attacks on Kavanaugh were political. The left wanted to protect abortion and the Supreme Court, which is now tilted right after Kavanaugh’s confirmation. What’s more, it’s a Justice that was appointed by President Donald Trump which makes it sting all the more.

Furthermore, all the accusations against Kavanaugh have all the substance and weight of shadows. Every accusation has come up empty in terms of evidence and witnesses. In fact, every witness who knew Kavanaugh completely demolished these claims, and even witnesses called on by accusers seem to lend to Kavanaugh’s goodness.

The man is innocent.

If you’re still pushing the idea that he’s a rapist, then you’re doing so in spite of the evidence. You’re not standing bravely in the way of “rape culture,” you’re just one more member of the mob conducting a witch hunt. You’re not helping women who face sexual assault, you’re making their claims seem less weighty. You’re not standing up for justice, you’re promoting social death by the court of public opinion where lack of evidence doesn’t mean a thing.

I pray that you or your loved ones never wind up in a situation where a false accusation causes so much upheaval in your lives that you never come back from it. However, if you support the figurative crucifixion of an innocent man because his politics differ from yours then you’re making that scenario all the more likely.

No matter what you say or do, you won’t be able to stop it. No matter what evidence you put forth, it won’t mean a thing. You’ve been deemed guilty and so you are.

And should that day come, you can reflect back to when you yourself cheering on as it happened to someone else.

The post If You Believe the Accusations About Brett Kavanaugh and Cheer Attacks On Him, You’re Not the Good Guy appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AP_18259666660844-300x200 If You Believe the Accusations About Brett Kavanaugh and Cheer Attacks On Him, You’re Not the Good Guy Supreme Court Social Media sexual harassment Sexual Assault Rape Politics New York Times mob Media Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats Deborah Ramirez court of public opinion christine blasey ford Brett Kavanaugh Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Here’s Just How Much of a Dumpster Fire That New Kavanaugh Hit Piece Is

Westlake Legal Group AP_18270600549853-620x414 Here’s Just How Much of a Dumpster Fire That New Kavanaugh Hit Piece Is The New York Times The Federalist Supreme Court Sexual Assault Sean Davis Politics Mollie Hemingway media bias Max Stier journalisming Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story dumpster fire democrats christine blasey ford Brett Kavanaugh Bad Reporting

Christine Blasey Ford listens to her attorney Michael Bromwich as she testifies to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 27, 2018. (Saul Loeb/Pool Photo via AP)

As you’ve probably heard over the weekend, The New York Times covered itself in glory and released excerpts from a supposed well-researched book focused on destroying Brett Kavanaugh. The “revelations” have led to major Democrats rushing to social media to proclaim the current Supreme Court Justice should be impeached. On what grounds? There are none, but they just know it should be done.

The problem is that this hit piece is a dumpster fire of terrible journalism and partisan garbage.

First, The New York Times put this tweet out, embarrassing themselves and later having to delete it.

But the issues go beyond badly worded tweets for the media and Democrats pushing this.

The main “witness” of this new allegation is a man named Max Stier. The hit piece itself offers no background about who Stier is, and once you find out, it’s obvious why.

We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier; the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the episode.

So who is Stier? He just happens to be Bill Clinton’s former lawyer, who defended him from accusations of sexual misconduct in the Paula Jones case.

The idea that Stier is a reliable, unbiased source is laughable. Yet, the media are running with his accusation without even disclosing who he is. It’s extremely relevant that he has direct ties to the Clintons and that he’s ensconced in Democratic party politics. This would be like Trump’s personal lawyer coming out and saying he saw Joe Biden sexually assault someone. Anyone think the media wouldn’t question his motive and story? Of course they would.

Mollie Hemingway, who wrote a best selling book on the Kavanaugh attacks, takes this apart in a new piece at The Federalist.

The reporters, who describe Democrats in glowing terms and Republicans otherwise, say that Stier is a “respected thought leader” in the defense of the federal bureaucracy. They don’t mention his history of working for the Clintons.

Remember when Kavanaugh said the allegations against him were revenge on behalf of the Clintons? This was likely the allegation he was citing. It was actually known about at the time by Kavanaugh and the Congressional committee investigating. In the end, it was not pursued.

But if that’s all there was, perhaps you could brush it aside. Being partisan doesn’t necessarily mean you’re lying right?

Well, it actually gets much, much worse for the Times.

As for the victim? They say she “has refused to discuss the incident, though several of her friends said she does not recall it.”

To repeat: Several of her friends said she does not recall it.

So to summarize, the only new claim in the new book is that a Democratic attorney told two senators that he saw an incident where a third party allegedly did something to Kavanaugh and the young woman. In their book, the authors are upset that this claim didn’t lead to a massive FBI investigation, although they don’t explain why they think it should have.

Pogebrin and Kelly left the victim’s denial out of their New York Times story. It is unclear why the reporters and editors allowed the story to be published without this salient fact that they conceded, albeit briefly, in their own book.

The supposed victim herself hasn’t gone on record to confirm this happened. Her friends say she doesn’t even recall the incident. In short, what we have here is a highly partisan actor in Stier making a claim which holds up to no scrutiny at all.

Despite all that, The New York Times published a piece from a biased, unreliable book which left out key details, including who Stier was and the position of the actual alleged victim, who appears to have not been a victim at all.

Let’s get a hand clap for journalism.

Let the clean up begin.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Here’s Just How Much of a Dumpster Fire That New Kavanaugh Hit Piece Is appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AP_18270696540839-300x200 Here’s Just How Much of a Dumpster Fire That New Kavanaugh Hit Piece Is The New York Times The Federalist Supreme Court Sexual Assault Sean Davis Politics Mollie Hemingway media bias Max Stier journalisming Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story dumpster fire democrats christine blasey ford Brett Kavanaugh Bad Reporting   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

The Normalization of Pedophilia is Underway, and a California University Is Already Trying to Push It On Students

Westlake Legal Group siblings-817369_1280-620x433 The Normalization of Pedophilia is Underway, and a California University Is Already Trying to Push It On Students university Politics pedophilia Media Mainstream Media LGBT kids Front Page Stories Featured Story Drag Kids California Allow Media Exception

The social justice left has been trying to normalize pedophilia for some time.

Articles would appear in places like Salon.com, which were then quietly unpublished a couple of years later. However, the BBC then picked up the torch by trying to soften people’s look at pedophiles. Not long ago, the sexualization of children continued with the push for child drag queens in a video that sexualized young boys. Young boys in drag would go on to appear in photos next to naked men, which were openly passed around Twitter with zero reaction from the network.

I could go on, but you get the idea. The sexualization of children is well underway, and now they’re trying to teach it in colleges.

According to a tweet by Alex Mazzara, a student in San Diego, the topic of pedophilia as a sexual orientation was being brought up. According to Mazzara, his class began discussing this as a topic after they were put through watching an eight-minute video from Vice News that featured a “showcasing” of “self-identified pedophiles.”

“An actual topic we discussed in class today at a State University after watching an 8 minute Vice News video showcasing self identified pedophiles. This is going to be mainstreamed,” tweeted Mazzara.

Mazzara went on to say how some of the students described pedophilia in class.

“Some people agreed that it was a sexual orientation because they “were born that way and can’t help it” others disagreed only because they feared that labeling pedophilia a sexual orientation would harm gays and lesbians because they would then be on the same level,” he responded.

Mazzara also tweeted that his tweet attracted the anger of a lot of pedophiles, who had been dominating his mentions since the tweet went out.

“I’ve had out and proud pedophiles in my mentions for 2 days now. There are entire communities of these people who promote their filth publicly. Sadly I’d predict this is going mainstream in the next 10 years,” said Mazzara.

The frightening thing is that I predict the same. With the mainstream media and colleges now attempting to push pedophilia as a “sexual orientation,” I imagine it won’t be long until people begin to openly declare themselves pedophiles and their community becomes defended as part of the LGBT community.

What is being overlooked is that our children will become more in danger than they ever were. Pedophilia is not a sexual orientation, it’s a predatory sickness. Normalizing it is to normalize rape and abuse.

While I do think pedophilia is evil, those who are pedophiles need to be studied and profiled in the same way we did with serial killers. They’re definitely sick, and their desires need to be treated as a sickness, not just another sexual preference.

The post The Normalization of Pedophilia is Underway, and a California University Is Already Trying to Push It On Students appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group siblings-817369_1280-300x209 The Normalization of Pedophilia is Underway, and a California University Is Already Trying to Push It On Students university Politics pedophilia Media Mainstream Media LGBT kids Front Page Stories Featured Story Drag Kids California Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Always The Bridesmaid, Never The Bride

Westlake Legal Group media.townhall-11-620x317 Always The Bridesmaid, Never The Bride primary Joe Biden Front Page Stories Featured Story Elizabeth Warren democrats Bernie Sanders Allow Media Exception 2020

Democratic Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders speaks at rally in Fort Worth, Texas, Thursday, April 25, 2019. (AP Photo/Michael Ainsworth)

In all likelihood, it’s going to come down to Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren as the two Democrats vying for the 2020 nomination.

Right now, it’s Biden’s race to lose. He has sizable support from the more moderate Democratic voters, a group that is more unified than the far left voters of the Democratic base. His biggest threat, however, is Warren, who appears to be shoring up a good chunk of the far left base.

However, Warren’s biggest threat is not Biden. Her biggest threat is Sanders and the crowd of Senators behind him.

Sanders is probably the best example of “Always the bridesmaid, never the bride” in modern politics. Even Hillary Clinton was able to win the nomination once. Sanders can’t.

But still he runs, and in running he is twice now dividing the party he’s not even a member of in order to fail to win their nomination for president.

Not that I mind all this, to be honest. Each and every one of the Democrats running is out of their minds with Trump Derangement, and their campaigns are reflections of that. But, Sanders in particular is a great case of selfishness and vanity disguised as activism.

He doesn’t stand a chance of winning, yet here he is, keeping Warren from being able to shore up enough of the base to properly challenge Biden’s lead.

And, let’s be clear: Sanders and Warren have the same base. They have the same ideology, the same ideas, and the same unending hatred of all things capitalist. As much as people feared Barack Obama’s promise to “fundamentally change” America, his policies are nothing compared to what Sanders and Warren want to do.

But Sanders looks and sounds old, comes across as crazy and bitter, and scares the hell out of anyone who isn’t as dogmatic as he is.

Warren, on the other hand, looks and sounds younger, is more energetic (in a good way), and has the ability to better connect with more than just the far left.

Even if you keep Kamala Harris, Corey Booker, and the other candidates in the equation, Sanders is far and away the biggest problem with Warren’s run. He can’t overcome her, but he can keep enough of the vote to himself that Warren may never catch up to Biden.

He is forever the political bridesmaid, and it seems like he’s become bitter over that fact, and wants to destroy the happiness of the other candidates.

Again, not that I mind.

The post Always The Bridesmaid, Never The Bride appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group media.townhall-11-300x153 Always The Bridesmaid, Never The Bride primary Joe Biden Front Page Stories Featured Story Elizabeth Warren democrats Bernie Sanders Allow Media Exception 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Tells Bill Maher the Network’s Trump Insanity Has Damaged the Democratic Party

Westlake Legal Group krystal-ball-real-time-SCREENSHOT-620x330 MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Tells Bill Maher the Network’s Trump Insanity Has Damaged the Democratic Party Uncategorized Russia MSNBC Media krystal ball Front Page Stories Featured Story fake news donald trump democrats collusion Bill Maher Allow Media Exception

 

 

On Friday’s installment of Real Time with Bill Maher, erstwhile MSNBC host Krystal Ball delivered a message that would’ve been at home on RedState: Her former network’s coverage of President Trump has only served to hurt Democrats.

Bill asked:

“Do you feel [that] networks like MSNBC, which you used to work for…help or hurt progressive causes?”

Krystal was crystal:

“Overall, I think MSNBC in the Trump era has done real damage to the Left, and I’ll tell you why.”



 

Yes! She’ll tell us why! Here we go:

“And I say that with love. I mean, these are my former colleagues, friends. Look, the Russia story and what happened there was important, but it was not all-important. And they went so far in the realm of conspiracy theorizing – I mean, they had Jonathan Chait on…”

Bill confirmed, “Well, it was a conspiracy.”

Krystal said it got downright absurd:

“They had Jonathan Chait on to talk about how Trump may have been a Russian plant since 1987. This is ridiculous, okay? This is way out from what journalistic facts said, and it’s to the exclusion of other stories that people actually care about – about health care, about trade, about the future of their lives, automation.

Hmmm…ridiculous? Does MSNBC partake in such? Let’s test her claim:



Yeah. Yeah, I’d say she’s good.

Krystal claimed her former employer overshot it:

“These things are real, and they don’t get focus when you only look at one thing. So yeah, they built up expectations so much that when the report came out, people were like, ‘Oh, it was no big deal,’ when it was a big deal.

Ya know how I said her message was RedState-ish? Cancel that. Krystal inferred Mueller was a giant cause of the whole Russian collusion disappointment — after all, the guy was a you-know-what:

“Why did we put our faith in a Republican? He’s a Republican; he’s a lifelong Republican. What [did] we think?”

Why indeed. Although, if I recall correctly, the mainstream media was willing to put its faith in anything and everything that opposed President Trump.

Just look to the video above, in which Nicolle Wallace schooled us all:

“People would be foolish to underestimate Michael Avenatti.”

Foolish indeed.

-ALEX

 

Relevant RedState links in this article: here.

See 3 more pieces from me:

MSNBC Talks Trump Removal Due To His Mental State From Alzheimer’s, But I’ve Got Something More Serious For You

MSNBC: With His Dictator-Style Parade, Donald Trump Turned The 4th Of July Into Something Divisive & Vile

Michael Avenatti Touts Earth-Shattering Kavanaugh Accusation To Rachel Maddow, Backs Off On Twitter

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” If it fails to automatically refresh, manually reload the page. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”

The post MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Tells Bill Maher the Network’s Trump Insanity Has Damaged the Democratic Party appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group krystal-ball-real-time-SCREENSHOT-300x160 MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Tells Bill Maher the Network’s Trump Insanity Has Damaged the Democratic Party Uncategorized Russia MSNBC Media krystal ball Front Page Stories Featured Story fake news donald trump democrats collusion Bill Maher Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

A Prominent Left-Wing Publication Mocked My Suggestion that the Left Wants Confiscation. How’re We Lookin’ Now?

Westlake Legal Group bonfire-1867275_1280-620x413 A Prominent Left-Wing Publication Mocked My Suggestion that the Left Wants Confiscation. How’re We Lookin’ Now? Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

 

 

The world’s spinnin’ fast, folks.

A portion of Democrats seem to have gone quickly from “Take your guns? That’s silly” to a proud-as-a-peacock clap for confiscation.

In May of 2018, I wrote an article titled “Santa Fe Tragedy And The Mind Of The Left: A Primer.”

Here’s some of what I had to say:

The Left want your guns, and they want them now.

The Left want your guns, and they want them now.

The Left want your guns, and they want them now.

That is the overwhelming conclusion from the media coverage of Fridays’ shooting in Texas. Horribly, ten were killed at Santa Fe High School; immediately, the Left — in the political, news, and entertainment realms — began their quest for your guns.

They want your guns.

I explained:

[T]o some people walking around at this very moment, the way to solve the problem of one bad guy with a gun who is willing to break the law by murdering the masses…is to disarm all good people with guns who are willing to follow the law and capable of defending themselves.

A writer at the famed Village Voice, just 3 days later, published the piece “After Santa Fe Shooting, Have Conservatives Shot Their Wads?

The author seemed to have composed a rather detailed emotional narrative of all the thoughts, fears, desires, and treachery lurking in the minds of those on the Right:

Several gun massacres ago, when Sandy Hook happened, conservatives seemed at first stunned — not at the deaths of twenty children and six adults, but at the unprecedented bad publicity this meant for their NRA donors. But they quickly recovered and bravely fought for the right of every crackpot and psychopath to have as many killing sticks as he could pay for.

That obviously worked, and the brethren cruised untouchably through a number of other such slaughters — at Santa Barbara, Umpqua, Orlando, Colorado Springs, Sutherland Springs, and so on and on — under a cloud cover of Thoughts and Prayers, always focused on the real victims (themselves, as law-abiding People of the Gun persecuted by “prayer-shaming” liberals) and never giving an inch.

But then the Parkland massacre happened, and the fierce response of those kids threw conservatives off balance. And it seems to have them wrong-footed still, judging by their clumsy response to last week’s school shooting in Santa Fe, Texas.

Geez.

The article even referred to “NRA deputy Riefenstahl Dana Loesch,” apparently referring to Nazi propaganda film director Leni Riefenstahl.

Lots and lots of incendiary language mixed with a few truckloads of assumptions. But wait — there’s more.

Among mentions of Sean Hannity and National Review’s David French, the author took aim at Yours Truly.

Accordingly — if I understood correctly — I was a weirdo around a campfire, telling spooky and ridiculous stories to get everybody riled up over phony nonsense.

Oh — and, apparently, I’m a hardcore firearms-phile. When did this dude get to know me?

Here we go:

While these guys wrote alibis for their precious equalizers, hardcore firearm-philes held flashlights under their chins at the campfire and retold their Gun Grabber ghost story greatest hits.

“The Left wants your guns, and they want them now,” wrote Alex Parker of RedState. “The Left wants your guns, and they want them now. The Left wants your guns, and they want them now.” See the pattern? “Horribly, ten were killed at Santa Fe High School,” Parker went on; “immediately, the Left — in the political, news, and entertainment realms — began their quest for your guns. They want your guns…” You get the idea. (Final line: “They. Want. Your. Guns.” Why fool with a winning formula?)

Sounds as if I’m a real nut, pushing the completely absurd idea that the left wing of politics would like to take guns from non-criminal Americans.

Well, how’re we lookin’ now:

That would be, the most popular hunting rifle in America, rarely used in violent crime.

As for the video, above, note the uproarious applause.

Anyway, I’ve to go — the flashlight needs new batteries, and the campfire’s already gettin’ dim. Tonight’s totally-made-up ghost story: Democratic candidates’ support for late-term abortion.

-ALEX

 

Relevant RedState links in this article: here and here.

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below.

If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” If it fails to automatically refresh, manually reload the page. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”

The post A Prominent Left-Wing Publication Mocked My Suggestion that the Left Wants Confiscation. How’re We Lookin’ Now? appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group bonfire-1867275_1280-300x200 A Prominent Left-Wing Publication Mocked My Suggestion that the Left Wants Confiscation. How’re We Lookin’ Now? Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com