web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Front Page Stories" (Page 121)

U.S. Navy Official Confirms UFO Videos Released In 2017, 2018 Are Genuine

Westlake Legal Group chile-navy-ufo-620x338 U.S. Navy Official Confirms UFO Videos Released In 2017, 2018 Are Genuine Uncategorized unauthorized/unidentified aircraft/objects The Black Vault Jr. John Greenewald GoFast Gimbal Front Page Stories FLIR1 Featured Story

 

(Note: Greenewald published his article on September 11. In the last 48 hours, most major media outlets have covered his story including Fox News.)

According to The Black Vault’s John Greenewald, the spokesperson for the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Warfare, Joseph Gradisher, admitted that the videos referred to as the ”FLIR1,” “Gimbal” and “GoFast” were, in fact, “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena” or UAPs. The “FLIR1” and “Gimbal” videos were released by the New York Times and The Stars Academy of Arts & Science (TTSA) in December 2017. The third video, “GoFast” was released in 2018.

Greenewald explains that the Navy uses the UAP as opposed to UFO because it is the “basic descriptor for the sightings/observations of unauthorized/unidentified aircraft/objects that have been observed entering/operating in the airspace of various military-controlled training ranges.”

Moreover, the Navy refers to these videos by the dates they were taken. “[The] dates are 14 November 2004 for ‘FLIR1’ and 21 January 2015 for both “Gimbal” and “GoFast.”

Gradisher said:

The Navy has not publicly released characterizations or descriptions, nor released any hypothesis or conclusions, in regard to the objects contained in the referenced videos.

The Navy considers the phenomena contained/depicted in those 3 videos as unidentified.

The “FLIR1” video was taken off the coast of San Diego. The ‘Gimbal’ and ‘GoFast’ videos were taken off the coast of Virginia during what looks to be the same event.

The “FLIR1” video became known as the “Tic-Tac Incident” and a film entitled the “Nimitz Encounters” was made about it. The producer of this movie, Dave Beaty, a UFO enthusiast, said that knowing the exact dates of these sightings helps determine the location of their occurrence. He told Greenewald:

The fact that we now know the dates of the ‘Gimbal’ and ‘GoFast’ videos helps put one more piece of the puzzle together. The deck logs from the USS Normandy, the cruiser in the USS Roosevelt Strike Group, shows she was in a specific location off the coast of Florida and Georgia. Specifically, a little more than 100 miles east, equidistant between Jacksonville and Savannah. This is the JAX OPAREA. The cruiser stays with the carrier at all times during operations. So now we not only know the date, but the estimated position of the UAP.

Gradisher refused to provide further information to Greenewald.

Greenewald writes:

Although many theories have been proposed on what these UAP encounters are, some believe they may simply be a biproduct of U.S. military training exercises utilizing classified drone or related technology. Unbeknownst to the pilots involved, these classified instruments are utilized in their field of view, captured on infrared cameras, and certain members of the military may not be ‘read in’ to what classified technology they may be witnessing. Although that seems like a plausible explanation for these encounters, these new statements by the Navy labeling the cases as “unidentified aerial phenomena” are making some second guess that theory.

In December 2017, Fox News reported that “the Pentagon had secretly set up a program to investigate UFOs at the request of former Sen. Harry Reid, (D-NV).”

In a June 2019 interview with a Nevada radio station, Reid, expressed his desire for lawmakers to hold public hearings into what the military knows. He said, “They would be surprised how the American public would accept it. People from their individual states would accept it.”

Watch the videos below.

The post U.S. Navy Official Confirms UFO Videos Released In 2017, 2018 Are Genuine appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group chile-navy-ufo-300x164 U.S. Navy Official Confirms UFO Videos Released In 2017, 2018 Are Genuine Uncategorized unauthorized/unidentified aircraft/objects The Black Vault Jr. John Greenewald GoFast Gimbal Front Page Stories FLIR1 Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Nunes: Horowitz Will Likely Find All Four FISA Warrants Against Page Were Illegally Obtained

Westlake Legal Group carter-page-SCREENSHOT-620x350 Nunes: Horowitz Will Likely Find All Four FISA Warrants Against Page Were Illegally Obtained Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz finished his FISA application report and turned it over to Attorney General William Barr on Friday to be scrubbed of any classified information, leading Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) to tell Sean Hannity Tuesday he believes all four FISA warrants used to spy on Carter Page will be found to be illegally obtained. 

Fox News host Sean Hannity broached the topic with the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee during an interview Tuesday evening, saying, “We keep hearing that the FISA report by the inspector general is going to be devastating. I would assume that he concludes that all four FISA applications and warrants were obtained illegally. Do you see any different conclusion than that?”

“No, I don’t, Sean,” Nunes replied.

The report is said to be circulating among lawmakers on Capitol Hill which may be why, according to the Washington Examiner, Nunes, Hannity, and Former U.S. Attorney Joe diGenova are insisting that the “initial FISA warrant against Page and the three renewals at three-month intervals were illegally obtained.” Those warrants were obtained from October 2016 to June 2017.

The now-discredited Steele dossier is thought to have been used to obtain the warrants, and there is some question as to who within the FBI and Justice Department may have known the allegations contained in the dossier were unverified, and that the dossier was paid for by Donald Trump’s political opponent Hillary Clinton.

Nunes told Hannity the report will be released to lawmakers in the coming weeks who will then figure out how to release it to the public.

“We don’t want to see it all blacked out. We want the American people to see everything,” Nunes said. “In order for that to happen, a lot of the documents that we have been requesting to be declassified have got to be declassified now. I would only add on just one final point on all of this and that is that Durham needs to gather all of the evidence and needs to make sure, whatever he takes, if he’s going to actually do a prosecution of these dirty cops, he needs to have all the evidence. He needs to get it right. Because we want to make sure that justice is definitely served in this case.”

The post Nunes: Horowitz Will Likely Find All Four FISA Warrants Against Page Were Illegally Obtained appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Devin-Nunes-AP-300x169 Nunes: Horowitz Will Likely Find All Four FISA Warrants Against Page Were Illegally Obtained Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Kamala Is All-In On Iowa, Why Won’t She Talk About A Key Issue For Their Voters?

With current polls putting her at around five percent, Kamala Harris is pinning all of her hopes on Iowa.

Politico reports that Harris “is planning to make weekly visits to the state and nearly double the size of her 65-person ground operation” after being absent from the state since her 17-stop bus tour in August.

Then there are completely candid moments  like that that she definitely didn’t expect the press to report on, while being completely aware that their job is to follow her around and report on what she says.

Amazing that the press just happened to catch that, isn’t it? What luck!

If Iowa is her last hope, there’s one big thing missing from her messaging- corn. Iowa is the largest producer of corn in the United States year after year (and the United States is the largest producer of corn in the world). So, why isn’t she talking about ethanol?

She’s in a tough spot.

Ethanol isn’t environmentally friendly and, as such, is very anti-Green New Deal, who was an original co-sponsor of the Sen. Markey’s original legislation. We know that the environment is a huge issue for Democrat party voters- CNN even held a 7-hour townhall on that alone, something they haven’t done for any other single issue.

Harris could court those voters by talking about wind, for example. It’s now more cost-effective than many fossil fuels, and it even matters to Iowa. As one of the largest wind-producing states in America, it is fueling their new tech industry. She’s not talking about that either, though, just going after fossil fuels.

Still, Iowa is farm country, and they rely on corn. She could still win Iowa if she took on a stance that supported free trade, since other countries like Brazil are happy to buy our ethanol. Ted Cruz won Iowa while running against Renewable Fuel Standards (the EPA’s requirement that fuel contain renewable fuels like ethanol) so it’s possible, but you have to stand for something.

Kamala won’t commit to anything, and that’s the real problem here.

The post Kamala Is All-In On Iowa, Why Won’t She Talk About A Key Issue For Their Voters? appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Kamala-Harris-TH-300x153 Kamala Is All-In On Iowa, Why Won’t She Talk About A Key Issue For Their Voters? Uncategorized Iowa Caucuses Iowa Caucus Iowa Front Page Stories Featured Story farm ethanol democratic nomination democrat caucus agriculture 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Kamala Is All-In On Iowa, Why Won’t She Talk About A Key Issue For Their Voters?

With current polls putting her at around five percent, Kamala Harris is pinning all of her hopes on Iowa.

Politico reports that Harris “is planning to make weekly visits to the state and nearly double the size of her 65-person ground operation” after being absent from the state since her 17-stop bus tour in August.

Then there are completely candid moments  like that that she definitely didn’t expect the press to report on, while being completely aware that their job is to follow her around and report on what she says.

Amazing that the press just happened to catch that, isn’t it? What luck!

If Iowa is her last hope, there’s one big thing missing from her messaging- corn. Iowa is the largest producer of corn in the United States year after year (and the United States is the largest producer of corn in the world). So, why isn’t she talking about ethanol?

She’s in a tough spot.

Ethanol isn’t environmentally friendly and, as such, is very anti-Green New Deal, who was an original co-sponsor of the Sen. Markey’s original legislation. We know that the environment is a huge issue for Democrat party voters- CNN even held a 7-hour townhall on that alone, something they haven’t done for any other single issue.

Harris could court those voters by talking about wind, for example. It’s now more cost-effective than many fossil fuels, and it even matters to Iowa. As one of the largest wind-producing states in America, it is fueling their new tech industry. She’s not talking about that either, though, just going after fossil fuels.

Still, Iowa is farm country, and they rely on corn. She could still win Iowa if she took on a stance that supported free trade, since other countries like Brazil are happy to buy our ethanol. Ted Cruz won Iowa while running against Renewable Fuel Standards (the EPA’s requirement that fuel contain renewable fuels like ethanol) so it’s possible, but you have to stand for something.

Kamala won’t commit to anything, and that’s the real problem here.

The post Kamala Is All-In On Iowa, Why Won’t She Talk About A Key Issue For Their Voters? appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Kamala-Harris-TH-300x153 Kamala Is All-In On Iowa, Why Won’t She Talk About A Key Issue For Their Voters? Uncategorized kamala harris Kamala Iowa Caucuses Iowa Caucus Iowa Front Page Stories Featured Story farm ethanol democratic nomination democrat caucus agriculture 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Zing: Joe Manchin Channels Charlton Heston in Fiery Response to Beto’s Gun Confiscation Plan

Westlake Legal Group JoeManchinAPimage-620x317 Zing: Joe Manchin Channels Charlton Heston in Fiery Response to Beto’s Gun Confiscation Plan west virginia washington D.C. Social Media Politics North Carolina Media Joe Manchin Guns gun rights gun control Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture Congress Beto O'Rourke beto Allow Media Exception 2nd Amendment 2A

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., speaks at a roundtable on the opioid epidemic at Cabell-Huntington Health Center in Huntington, WVa., Monday, July 8, 2019. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Most high-profile Democrats who have criticized Beto O’Rourke’s gun confiscation plan have done so from the perspective that they believe it’ll hurt the party in years to come, and that it’s undoable.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), however, is a different kind of Democrat with a different kind of perspective when it comes to the issue of gun rights. He was asked about O’Rourke’s gun control position on Thursday and gave a response reminiscent of the late actor Charlton Heston’s “cold, dead hands” 2000 NRA convention speech:

Manchin told a Wall Street Journal reporter that the former Texas representative did not speak for all Democrats when vowing to complete mandatory buybacks for certain high-powered rifles.

“Beto’s one human being,” Manchin said, according to a Journal reporter. “He gave his own opinion, OK? I think it was very harmful to make it look like all the Democrats. I can tell you one thing: Beto O’Rourke’s not taking my guns away from me. You tell Beto that OK?”

However, Manchin’s office reportedly told NBC news the senator does not own an AR-style gun.

At last Thursday’s Democratic presidential debate, O’Rourke said “Hell yes” in response to ABC News debate moderator David Muir’s question about whether or not he was going to take away people’s guns if elected president:

MUIR: Some of the stage have suggested a voluntary buy-back for guns in this country. You have gone further. You said, quote, “Americans who own AR-15s and AK-47s will have to sell them to the government, all of them. You know that critics call this confiscation. Are you proposing taking away their guns and how would this work?

BETO O’ROURKE: I am, if it’s a weapon that was designed to kill people on a battlefield. If the high impact, high velocity, when it hits your body, shreds everything inside of your body because it was designed to do that so you would bleed to death on a battlefield and not be able to get up and kill one of our soldiers. When we see that being used against children and in Odessa, I met the mother of a 15-year-old girl who was shot by an AR-15 and that mother watched her bleed to death over the course of an hour because so many other people were shot by that AR-15 in Odessa, there weren’t enough ambulances to get to them in time. Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We’re not going to allow it to be used against a fellow American anymore.

President Donald Trump also lashed out at Beto Thursday, noting on Twitter that “Dummy Beto’s” debate declaration on taking guns had “made it much harder to make a deal” in Congress on a compromise gun control bill by basically confirming what gun rights activists have been saying about Democrats for years: They’re coming for your guns.

——-
— Based in North Carolina, Sister Toldjah is a former liberal and a 15+ year veteran of blogging with an emphasis on media bias, social issues, and the culture wars. Read her Red State archives here. Connect with her on Twitter. –

The post Zing: Joe Manchin Channels Charlton Heston in Fiery Response to Beto’s Gun Confiscation Plan appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group JoeManchinAPimage-300x153 Zing: Joe Manchin Channels Charlton Heston in Fiery Response to Beto’s Gun Confiscation Plan west virginia washington D.C. Social Media Politics North Carolina Media Joe Manchin Guns gun rights gun control Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post democrats Culture Congress Beto O'Rourke beto Allow Media Exception 2nd Amendment 2A   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Newest Claim By Authors of Kavanaugh Book Is The Most Farfetched Of Them All

Westlake Legal Group kavanaugh-620x349 Newest Claim By Authors of Kavanaugh Book Is The Most Farfetched Of Them All The Education of Supreme Court Robin Pogrebin Politics Mainstream Media Liberal Elitism Kate Kelly Justice Brett Kavanaugh journalism Huffington Post Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats Allow Media Exception 2020

 

On Wednesday evening, New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, co-authors of the hit piece about Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, attended a National Press Club event in Washington, D.C. The president of the club, Alison Kodjak, later tweeted that the women told fellow guests that Kavanaugh had agreed to be interviewed “for their book – If they wrote that they didn’t talk with him.” She wrote that they refused to this condition and “walked away from the interview.”

Fox News’ reported they had contacted Kavanaugh’s office, but did not receive an immediate response.

Call me skeptical, but I can’t imagine Kavanaugh even entertaining an interview with hostile reporters knowing there was a 100% chance that his words would be twisted to fit their narrative.

Nor do I find it conceivable that Kavanaugh would take the risk of putting himself into the very situation that he now finds himself – the women reporting ‘Kavanaugh told us that if we lied and said he didn’t meet with us, he would meet with us.’

The Huffington Post reported the story with this headline, “NY Times Reporters Say Kavanaugh Asked Them To Lie In Exchange For An Interview.” And this was their lede: “New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly said that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed to let them interview him for their upcoming book ― as long as they would publicly lie about it.”

According to the Huffington Post, “Kelly and Pogrebin said they couldn’t agree to the justice’s terms, so they couldn’t conduct the interview.” The article includes tweets from the Washingtonian’s Andrew Beaujon writing that Kavanaugh “wanted a line in there saying he had declined an interview. They were on their way to Washington to interview him.” This implies something even worse, that Kavanaugh had initially agreed to an interview, then once they were on their way, he altered the conditions.

But, in the end, Beaujon implies that Kelly and Pogrebin had too much integrity to agree to those terms. Please.

It sounds too much like the fable of the crocodile who convinces a frog he will transport him safely across a fast moving river and, of course, eats him before they reach the other side. Why? Because it is in the crocodile’s nature.

Pogrebin and Kelly will go on dropping incendiary soundbites to keep the Kavanaugh story alive and to sell books. Because it is in their nature.

Note: I will update this post if Kavanaugh’s office issues a comment.

The post Newest Claim By Authors of Kavanaugh Book Is The Most Farfetched Of Them All appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group kavanaugh-300x169 Newest Claim By Authors of Kavanaugh Book Is The Most Farfetched Of Them All The Education of Supreme Court Robin Pogrebin Politics Mainstream Media Liberal Elitism Kate Kelly Justice Brett Kavanaugh journalism Huffington Post Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats Allow Media Exception 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Canadian PM Justin Trudeau Wearing “Brownface” Is the Scandal We All Need Right Now

Westlake Legal Group Trump-Trudeau-G7-AP-620x413 Canadian PM Justin Trudeau Wearing “Brownface” Is the Scandal We All Need Right Now scandal rashida tlaib Politics Justin Trudeau Ilhan Omar Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story false equivalency Canada Brownface blackface Arabian Nights appropriation aladdin

President Donald Trump meets with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during the G-7 summit, Friday, June 8, 2018, in Charlevoix, Canada. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Canadian Prime Minister Justin has gone and done it. The famously liberal and weak kneed leader from the North has been caught in a scandal involving his wearing of “brownface” back in 2001. Yes, this happened in this century. TIME magazine uncovered the picture in a yearbook.

Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, wore brownface makeup to a party at the private school where he was teaching in the spring of 2001. TIME has obtained a photograph of the incident.

The photograph has not been previously reported. The picture was taken at an “Arabian Nights”-themed gala. It shows Trudeau, then the 29-year-old son of the late former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, wearing a turban and robes with his face, neck and hands completely darkened. The photograph appears in the 2000-2001 yearbook of West Point Grey Academy, a private day school where Trudeau was a teacher.

Tell me you didn’t read that and the theme song from Aladdin didn’t pop into your head?

TIME assures me this is really serious. Here’s a picture of the incident.

Look, I’ve got to give the guy props. If he dressed like that and still managed the accompaniment of the female sex, dude must have game, right? Although, I’m not sure what’s up with him trying to choke her out as the photo is taken. Must be a Canadian thing.

Here was Trudeau’s hilarious comment.

He’s citing another picture that also caused an uproar several years back in which his family dressed up in traditional Indian garb.

This guy has the cultural awareness of Jerry Nadler at a Chinese buffet.

But seriously, let’s talk about this. Can anyone tell me what the heck “brownface” is? Has anyone ever even heard that term before Trudeau’s latest fashion faux paux? I’ve been under the impression that the entire reason blackface is offensive is because of its history of being used in the mockery of African-Americans, especially during times of oppression? In the context of minstrel shows, slavery, and the later Jim Crow era, it certainly makes sense that blackface would be seen as something to avoid and I’ve got no problem being sensitive to that.

Here’s the thing though, Arabs aren’t oppressed, at least not outside of their own Arab leadership. In fact, the history of the Middle Eastern civilization is one of aggression, invasion, and conquering others into submission. At what point did we decide dressing up like Aladdin is actually mocking an oppressed class, because I’m pretty sure it’s not. This is the same appropriation we see from certain Democrats like Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Rashida Tlaib, who want to pretend their backgrounds are in anyway comparable to the African-American struggle in American history by labeling themselves “women of color.”

As my colleague Kira Davis wrote earlier this year, the struggle of being black in America is unique and should be respected as such. It’s not something to be hi-jacked by everyone with pigmentation levels below your average Italian. This entire ordeal is just dumb. There’s nothing inherently racist or wrong about dressing up like Aladdin for a costume party and it is not the same thing as dressing up like a African-American, who’s history includes systematic oppression and mockery.

Trudeau should laugh this off. But he’s gonna bow before the woke mob because that’s all the left knows how to do these days.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Canadian PM Justin Trudeau Wearing “Brownface” Is the Scandal We All Need Right Now appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Untitled-4-300x232 Canadian PM Justin Trudeau Wearing “Brownface” Is the Scandal We All Need Right Now scandal rashida tlaib Politics Justin Trudeau Ilhan Omar Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story false equivalency Canada Brownface blackface Arabian Nights appropriation aladdin   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Ed Buck Nearly Kills a Third Man; LA District Attorney Finally Files Criminal Charges

On September 4, a man only known as Joe Doe went to infamous Democrat donor Ed Buck’s West Hollywood apartment, where Buck “‘personally and deliberately’ administered a large dose of methamphetamine.” Doe became afraid he was suffering an overdose and left the apartment to seek medical help.

On September 11 he returned to Buck’s apartment, and Buck administered an even larger dose of methamphetamine. This time, though, Buck attempted to block the man from leaving the apartment and seeking medical attention. Doe fled the apartment and called 911 from a nearby gas station, then was taken to the hospital for treatment.

Doe was lucky. Two other men, Gemmel Moore and Timothy Dean, died of drug overdoses in Buck’s home within the past two and a half years.

Buck was arrested September 17 and charged with operating a drug house, but in a court filing arguing for high bail prosecutors said that “the full scope of his malicious behavior is unknown” and characterized him as “a violent sexual predator who preys on men struggling with addiction and homelessness.”

“From his home, in a position of power, Buck manipulates his victims into participating in his sexual fetishes. These fetishes include supplying and personally administering dangerously large doses of narcotics to his victims….Not deterred by the senseless deaths of Moore and Dean, the defendant nearly killed a third victim last week.”

While searching Buck’s residence, authorities discovered hundreds of photos of men in compromising positions.

Rep. Karen Bass, a Democrat who represents an adjacent district, said in a statement to the Associated Press:

“It’s incomprehensible to me that it took a third black gay man to be attacked and almost die to finally dissolve the unconscionable apathy that has allowed Ed Buck, a racist sexual predator, to roam free. Everyone knew that he preyed on young black men. … The inaction in response had a message that was loud and clear: Black gay lives obviously didn’t matter.”

It sure seemed they didn’t, especially after District Attorney Jackie Lacey decided to not press any charges against Buck after an investigation by the LA County Sheriff’s Department into Moore’s death or after an earlier report that he was “drugging black men.”

On July 4 of 2017, 23 days before Moore died, an escort reported Buck to authorities for drugging Black men, but nothing was done. After Moore died, Buck’s apartment was searched. Law enforcement allegedly “found the following items in Buck’s two-bedroom apartment: 24 syringes with brown residue, five glass pipes with white residue and burn marks, a plastic straw with possible white residue, clear plastic bags with white powdery residue and a clear plastic bag with a ‘piece of crystal-like substance.’”

Moore’s mother filed a suit earlier this year against Buck, Lacey, and one of Lacey’s subordinates in federal court for wrongful death and a civil rights violation pertaining to the failure to prosecute. On September 11 the judge in that case denied Motions to Dismiss filed by Buck and the County of Los Angeles – the same day Doe nearly lost his life in Buck’s apartment. It’s rare for a plaintiff to prevail on such a motion against a prosecutor, so Lacey must have been stunned. Could that ruling have been the impetus for Lacey’s decision to file charges in this case and to speak so forcefully about Buck’s evil and disgusting “fetish”?

Hussein Turk, who represents Nixon, said in a press release:

“The Court’s ruling on the County’s and Ed Buck’s Motions to Dismiss is a huge victory….The Court generously ruled that Ms. Nixon may rewrite portions of her claims against the County so that they more clearly describe the constitutional civil rights laws that the County violated when it failed to properly investigate Gemmel Moore’s death because of his race.”

“This is a victory because the Court could have — and with these types of cases historically has — thrown out all of Ms. Nixon’s claims against the County without giving her a chance to revise it. This is a victory because it means that the County, District Attorney Jackie Lacey, and Assistant District Attorney Craig Hum are all still very much on the hook for the intentional and discriminatory botched investigation of Gemmel Moore’s death.”

Lacey credited Doe with bringing forward “new evidence” against Buck.

“With this new evidence, I authorized the filing of criminal charges against Ed Buck,” Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Jackie Lacey said in a statement, adding that she is deeply concerned for those whose life circumstances make them vulnerable to predators.

Buck’s first court appearance is scheduled for Thursday morning in downtown Los Angeles.

The post Ed Buck Nearly Kills a Third Man; LA District Attorney Finally Files Criminal Charges appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Ed-Buck-300x193 Ed Buck Nearly Kills a Third Man; LA District Attorney Finally Files Criminal Charges west hollywood LGBTQ Karen Bass Jackie Lacey Hilary Clinton Gemmel Moore Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Post Ed Buck Democrat Donor Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Mocking NBC News on #ClimateChange

=========
=========
Promoted from the diaries by streiff. Promotion does not imply endorsement.
=========
=========

As the Democratic presidential candidates all line up to tell us how horrible we other people are for using fossil fuels, NBC News has been trying everything they can to push the meme. Now you can even confess your global warming climate change sins, online!

Even those who care deeply about the planet’s future can slip up now and then. Tell us: Where do you fall short in preventing climate change? Do you blast the A/C? Throw out half your lunch? Grill a steak every week? Share your anonymous confession with NBC News.

Here are a few of them:

  • I run my AC 24/7. I’m not going to sweat to appease this climate religion
  • I travel often to conferences (flying). I think about the emissions + try to justify it with, “the plane is going there anyway.”
  • I drive 80 miles to and from work everyday.
  • I eat meat every day. And won’t stop, because it’s good.
  • k-cups!!!! They are just to easy to use. I do use a reusable mug, however.
  • I loathe public transport! But I drive a very small, efficient car!
  • I drive my gas powered car to work every day by myself. My commute is less than 4 miles, and public transportation is available.

It’s actually pretty funny, as the ‘confessions’ seem to have been taken over by those engaged in mockery. I went ahead and added my confession:

  • I vote Republican! On election day, I will proudly vote for Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell.

That, of course, is the greatest climate sin of all!

Now, there are things I do to conserve, not due to global warming climate change, but just to save money. We have the room, so I erected a clothesline solar and wind powered clothes dryer, which I use when the weather is good. Why? Because my wife thinks that our clothes and bedding smell better when dried on the line. I don’t run the air conditioner when my wife isn’t home, because the heat doesn’t bother me.

At any rate, have fun, and hit up the NBC site, to confess your climate sins! Mock them all that you can!

The post Mocking NBC News on #ClimateChange appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group confession-300x200 Mocking NBC News on #ClimateChange Uncategorized Front Page Stories   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com