web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Front Page Stories" (Page 15)

GOP Now Holding Sit-In For Impeachment Transparency, Democrats Having a Meltdown

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-23-at-12.11.18-PM GOP Now Holding Sit-In For Impeachment Transparency, Democrats Having a Meltdown sit-in republicans impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Conservatives Congress Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power

Screenshot from this video

Earlier today, Republicans stormed the closed door impeachment proceeding being held in the Capitol basement.

Democrats were questioning Defense Department official Laura Cooper behind closed doors.

But Republicans decided enough was enough of the lack of transparency in how Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) has been conducting the proceedings and the refusal to hold a formal vote for an impeachment inquiry.

So dozens of them held a press conference in front of the hearing room and then several of them stormed the room, stopping the hearing from proceeding.

But then, they refused to leave until the Democrats came to an agreement with them about transparency.

While they were not allowed to have phones in the SCIF, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) sent out a message in accordance with the rules of a SCIF through a secure line.

But since the hearing was stopped and Schiff had spirited away the witness there was nothing that they would have been violating with phones in any event. The first question they need to ask of the witness when they can is if she was asked by Schiff to say anything or did he try to influence her in any way.

Republicans ordered pizza for the reporters covering the drama outside, telling them they were going to be awhile.

Of course, this made Democrats flip out. Democrats claimed that Republicans were obstructing the process and had violated the SCIF.

Meanwhile, Democrats seem to have forgotten about their sit-in for gun control,which of course the media lauded as proof of their dedication.

Democrats don’t seem to have counted on Republicans fighting back.

The post GOP Now Holding Sit-In For Impeachment Transparency, Democrats Having a Meltdown appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-23-at-12.11.18-PM-300x170 GOP Now Holding Sit-In For Impeachment Transparency, Democrats Having a Meltdown sit-in republicans impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats Conservatives Congress Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Not So Fast, Jussie: Judge Rules Civil Case Against Smollett Can Proceed

Westlake Legal Group Jussie Not So Fast, Jussie: Judge Rules Civil Case Against Smollett Can Proceed Popular Culture police Jussie Smollett Hollywood Front Page Stories Front Page Fake Hate Crimes Entertainment Culture crime Chicago Allow Media Exception

 

Remember Jussie Smollett?  It’s only been 9 short months since everyone was in an uproar over the hate crime (allegedly) perpetrated against him on a cold Chicago sidewalk in the wee hours of the morning.  As the story regarding the incident quickly morphed into questions regarding what actually happened in the reported attack (READ: here and here), the focus of the investigation shifted to Smollett himself.

As detailed last month by RedState’s Brad Slager, the City of Chicago has been seeking reimbursement from Smollett for the roughly $130,000 expended in police overtime and attendant costs incurred while investigating Smollett’s claims. Smollett’s team moved to dismiss that lawsuit, filed in April.

Yesterday, a federal judge denied Smollett’s Motion to Dismiss, paving the way for the suit to proceed. Per CNN,

Tuesday, US District Judge Virginia Kendall denied Smollett’s request to dismiss the lawsuit, allowing the case to proceed to the discovery phase.
William J. Quinlan, an attorney representing Smollett, said Tuesday the court’s decision was not surprising and that his client expects to be “vindicated” once he shares his side of the story.
Mr. Quinlan understandably is being a staunch advocate for his client. I, on the other hand, remain highly skeptical that Jussie will be “vindicated” (not sure why that’s in sneer quotes in the CNN piece – do you suppose they have their doubts, too?) any time in the near future.

Follow me on Twitter @SmoosieQ

Find my RedState archive here.

 

 

The post Not So Fast, Jussie: Judge Rules Civil Case Against Smollett Can Proceed appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 65502399-8012-4cc6-ad5d-0facb03ad64d-300x154 Not So Fast, Jussie: Judge Rules Civil Case Against Smollett Can Proceed Popular Culture police Jussie Smollett Hollywood Front Page Stories Front Page Fake Hate Crimes Entertainment Culture crime Chicago Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

It All Comes Together: Anti-Gun Dick Sporting Goods CEO Floats Idea of Third-Party Presidential Run

Westlake Legal Group Untitled-1-620x317 It All Comes Together: Anti-Gun Dick Sporting Goods CEO Floats Idea of Third-Party Presidential Run Third Party Run second amendment Politics gun control Front Page Stories Featured Story elections Ed Stack Dick's Sporting Goods Allow Media Exception 2020

FILE – This Thursday, March 1, 2018, file photo shows a Dick’s Sporting Goods sign at one of their stores. A 20-year-old man in southern Oregon has filed a lawsuit against Dick’s Sporting Goods and Walmart after he says they refused to sell him a rifle. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis, File)

If you’ve been watching the saga of Dick’s Sporting Goods, you’d know that since the Parkland shooting, the company has been losing money hand over fist thanks to its CEO deciding to take an anti-gun stance, as well as engage in activist work to limit 2nd Amendment rights.

The move by Dick’s CEO, Ed Stack, cost the company somewhere in the ballpark of a quarter of a billion dollars according to Stack himself. Despite his actions losing his company millions, he expressed that he had no regrets for his actions.

(READ: Dick’s Sporting Goods CEO Says His Anti-Gun Crusade Has Cost The Company A Quarter Billion Dollars)

It was an odd thing for a CEO to say. Losing that much money isn’t exactly something to be proud of. Even if you are proud of the work you’ve done, it’s not exactly something investors and possibly board members enjoy hearing.

Now, however, it all seems to make sense as reports are now coming in that Stack is weighing a run for the Oval Office as a third-party candidate. As reported by Politico, focus groups are being asked interesting questions about the 2020 lineup, and whether or not he’d do well in the political ring:

Various messages were presented to a focus group in southern Wisconsin this week centering on the billionaire businessman, along with possible three-way match-ups against Donald Trump and Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren.

The focus group, according to a source who took part in the testing, ran through varying themes involving Stack and heavily focused on his example of “showing leadership” by halting the sale of assault-style rifles at all of Dick’s Sporting Goods stores in the wake of the high school massacre in Parkland, Fla.

A source familiar with Stack denied that the CEO has any intentions to run for office, but as Politico notes, that seems unlikely, given the questions being asked of focus groups. Politico also predicted that Stack’s inclusion into the race as a third-party candidate would have a wide-ranging effect on it.

I disagree.

For one, it’s clear that Stack will enter the race with a platform focused on gun control. A Democrat did that as well and was the first one shown to the door. Given, Rep. Eric Swalwell wasn’t exactly the most choosable candidate, but his platform was already one that Democrats constantly lose on.

Secondly, despite Stack being a self-professed “Republican,” it’s unlikely that he’s going to attract any votes from the right. His anti-gun stance has clearly alienated many right-leaning voters, and he’s definitely not going to attract any by maintaining that. If anything, he may attract a few Democrats who want something other than an extremist like Warren or Sanders, thus splitting the Democrat party and handing Trump an even bigger win than he’s likely going to get already.

What’s more, I’m not sure many in the business community would have faith in him either. He’s already proved he’s willing to sacrifice massive sums of money in order to virtue signal. Business leaders would have to ask themselves how Stack would cripple them in order to enact his vision of America. How many workers are going to feel safe in their jobs?

In short, the funding for his campaign wouldn’t exactly be impressive. Not from big or small donors.

Stack is testing the waters to see if it’s a good idea for him to wade into the 2020 pool, but let me save him some time…

The answer is “no, it’s not.”

 

The post It All Comes Together: Anti-Gun Dick Sporting Goods CEO Floats Idea of Third-Party Presidential Run appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group cf1cbbd2-3018-4d8a-aa83-abc9e0481298-300x153 It All Comes Together: Anti-Gun Dick Sporting Goods CEO Floats Idea of Third-Party Presidential Run Third Party Run second amendment Politics gun control Front Page Stories Featured Story elections Ed Stack Dick's Sporting Goods Allow Media Exception 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

UPDATE: Here’s an Even Hilariously Larger Number of Democrats Claiming the Clinton Impeachment Was a “Lynching”

Westlake Legal Group Bill-Clinton-with-cigar UPDATE: Here’s an Even Hilariously Larger Number of Democrats Claiming the Clinton Impeachment Was a “Lynching” the washington post The New York Times Politics Lynching lynch mob lynch impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception

Apparently, when I jokingly said yesterday that “every Democrat in existence” had described Bill Clinton’s impeachment as a “lynching,” I was underselling matters. Go figure.

Overnight, RedState received dozens more examples of the term being thrown out to defend the former President, who I’m pretty sure is a white guy. More hilariously, many of the legacy media outlets that feigned outrage the past few days unsurprisingly chose to circle the wagons around Clinton, using the terms lynch, lynching, lynch mob, etc. to describe what was happening in 1998.

I’m not going to post every new example I’ve got because it’s a hilariously large number, but here’s some highlights.

Rep. Danny Davis (D-IL) Called The Impeachment Of President Clinton A “Lynching.” “So, Mr. Speaker, I will not vote for this nightmare before Christmas. I will not vote for this lynching in the people’s House. I will vote against these resolutions.” (Danny Davis, Congressional Record)

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) Called The Impeachment Proceedings Of President Clinton A “Lynch Mob.” REP. CHARLES RANGEL (D-NY): “Whether it is the FBI files, whether it is Whitewater, whether it is discussing something that Hillary has done, or whether it is Lewinsky, the whole idea is a lynch mob mentality that says this man has to go.” (Charles Rangel, Congressional Record)

Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) Again Compared Impeachment To “Lynchings” In The South. REP. CHARLIE RANGEL: “You better weigh the rules very carefully.  There’s been a whole lot of lynchings done…in South where they followed the rules but they knew they were going to lynch the guy in the beginning.” (Rep. Charlie Rangel, “1998: The Year In Review,” CNN)

Congressman Robert Brady (D-PA) Referred To Impeachment Proceedings Against President Bill Clinton As A “Political Lynching.” REP. ROBERT BRADY: “I’m not going to talk about Constitutional Law, except to say that I don’t see how the President can be removed from office in this case even if the charges could be proven. While President Clinton is guilty of bad behavior and lack of moral judgment in this issue, he didn’t put the country in jeopardy. Instead, I’ll tell you about the political lynching that’s been going on, how we got here, and why we can’t seem to get back to the issues of the people of America.” (Robert Brady, Congressional Record)

Rep. Major Owens (D-NY) Referred To The Clinton Impeachment Effort As A “Religious Lynching.” REP. MAJOR OWENS: “As a member of Congress I am sorry that there is an escalating hysteria that may lead to the religious lynching of a great president. President Clinton has gone further than he should have been asked to go in offering a public statement about his intimate personal life.” (Major Owens, Congressional Record)

Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-RI) Described The Clinton Impeachment As A “Political Lynching.” REP. PATRICK KENNEDY: “Representative Patrick J. Kennedy, Democrat of Rhode Island, a nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy, spoke of ‘a political lynching…’” (R.W. Apple, “With Partisan Rancor, A Bitter House Debates The President’s Impeachment, The New York Times)

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) Referred To The Clinton Impeachment As A “Political Lynching.” “Speaking just off the House floor, Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, decried the Republican effort to impeach the president, charging that it was an attempt to undo the results of the past two elections. ‘This has been a partisan lynching,’ she said. ‘They have hijacked the Constitution to impeach our agenda and to impeach our ideas.’”  (David Lightman and Michael Remez, “Clinton Impeached,” Hartford Courant)

House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt Invoked The Term Lynch Mob To Describe Impeachment. REP. RICHARD GEPHARDT: “This is a sacred process. This goes to the heart of our democracy. This is not a second election. This is not politics. This is not spinning. This is not polling. This is not a lynch mob. This is not a witch-hunt. This is not trying to find facts to support our already-reached conclusions. This is a constitutional test.” (Richard Gephardt,Congressional Record)

In 1998, Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) Referred To Talk Of Impeachment As “Irresponsible,” “Absurd,” And Reflecting A “Lynch-Mob Mentality.”“The ranking Democratic member of the panel, Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, said talk of impeachment was irresponsible and absurd and reflected a “lynch-mob mentality.’ ‘Let’s consider what we don’t know,” said Conyers of taped conversations with Lewinsky. ‘None of us know what is on the tapes. Even if there are incriminating statements, none of us know whether any of the statements are reliable.” (“Patrick Sloyan, “The Specter Of Watergate / Beset President, Wary Congress”)

In 1998, Rep. Tim Roemer (D-IN) Compared Clinton’s Impeachment To A “Lynch Mob.” “Rep. Tim Roemer (D-Ind.) said an inquiry is warranted. He first voted for the Democratic alternative because it provided a time frame, but once it was defeated, he supported the Republican measure. ‘I don’t think the high threshold necessary for impeaching a president has been reached’ so far, he said, adding that the inquiry must be fair. ‘The distinction between a lynch mob and a constitutional inquiry is politics.’”  (“Deborah Barfield and Elaine S. Povich, “31 Democrats Back GOP / Break With Party, See Need For Unlimited Probe”)

James Carville Referred To Ken Starr As “The Leader Of This Nasty Little Lynch Mob.”  (James Carville, And The Horse He Rode In On: The People V. Kenneth Starr)

I’m gonna stop there because I think we all get the point.

It didn’t stop with Democrat Congressional members either. The media were right there to parrot their rhetoric, as they always are.

In An Op-Ed By Frank Rich In The New York Times, Called The Impeachment Proceedings Of President Clinton A Lynch Mob Due To The Anti-Clinton Members Of Congress Being White Southerners. “If nothing else, this is a measure of how deeply blacks still fear that our legal machinery can be stacked in favor of a lynch mob. And it’s hardly a mindless argument. The most rabid Clinton-haters in Congress are white Southerners, led by Bob Barr, who has spoken before the racist Council of Conservative Citizens. An impeachment trial’s jury of 100 senators will be whites only.” (Frank Rich, “Journal; Let It Bleed,” The New York Times)

A New York Times Op-ed, By Bob Herbert, Referred To Impeachment Proceedings As A Lynch Mob. “Forget about the will of the people, the democratic process and the good of the country. The extremists in the Republican Party are trying to bludgeon their way to an impeachment that hardly anybody wants and nobody needs. If the Government and perhaps even the economy are thrown into a tailspin as a result — well, so be it. The fanatics of the right are willing to pay any price, bear any burden, to hammer the man they hate above all others, Bill Clinton. I’m no champion of the President, but I know a lynch mob when I see one.” (Bob Herbert, “In America; The Capitol Hill Mob,” The New York Times)

A New York Times Op-ed, By Maureen Dowd, Referred To America’s Dislike Of Lynch Mobs When Discussing Clinton Impeachment.The Clintons attack Mr. Starr to deflect attention from the President’s immoral behavior. They appeal to decent American impulses — we do not like lynch mobs, we do not like hate-mongering, we do not like women who rat out girl friends, we do not like Big Brother peeking through bedroom windows. The Clintons elicit our public-spirited impulses and use them for their private political gain. But the choices they ask us to make are false ones. You can think the notion of impeachment is ludicrous and still think that Mr. Clinton has acted with monstrous selfishness.” (Maureen Dowd, Op-ed, “Liberties; Saturday Night Bill,” The New York Times)

In An Op-ed In The New York Times, William Safire Described The Bork Hearings As A “Lynching.” “Every liberal pressure group in Washington was patting itself on the back. Senators Joe Biden and Ted Kennedy, champions of integrity and protectors of womanhood, were congratulating each other on their triumph in turning the Bork hearings into the personal vilification and public lynching of a proponent of judicial restraint. The media gathered at the White House for the surrender and humiliation they had been predicting for weeks.” (William Safire, “ESSAY; Judge Bork’s Victory,” The New York Times)

And that’s just The New York Times. What about The Washington Post?

A Washington Post Op-ed, By Elizabeth Drew, Claimed That Clinton Impeachment Was Currently Threatening To Look Like A Lynching. “The Republicans don’t seem to realize what a dangerous game they’re playing, near- and long-term. To begin with, impeachment has to be bipartisan if it is to have legitimacy. And it can’t look like a lynching, which it is currently threatening to do. The Democrats were engaging in a bit of crocodile-ism in their show of outrage that documents and the famous tape were being released: Some among them, including the former inquisitor John Dingell, urged the Democrats to not let the Republicans control the materials and leak them as they chose.” (Elizabeth Drew, Op-ed, “Why Clinton Will Be Impeached, The Washington Post)

A Washington Post Op-ed, By Richard Cohen, Claimed “The Republicans Are Trying To Lynch Clinton” Regarding Campaign Fund-Raising. “The whole thing is a study in disproportion, in a madness that, in other places, would entail an examination of the water supply. Campaign financing badly needs reform but, rather than do that, congressional Republicans are trying to lynch Clinton and Gore for what, it appears, is their most serious offense: winning the last election. No independent counsel is going to change that.” (Richard Cohen, Op-ed, “Who Needs An Independent Counsel?,” The Washington Post)

What’s the media’s response to all this? That it’s different of course.

Makes sense. It’s not like the term lynch wasn’t historically charged 21 years ago. The awful things done to black Americans were not new revelations at the time. So why was it ok then, but not now? Screaming Orange Man Bad isn’t much of an answer, even though the Post tries really hard to make it one.

Here’s the reality. We just live in stupider times. Back in the 90’s, people simply didn’t get up in arms like they do today over the use of metaphors and analogies. The use of the term lynch to describe political battles is not new. It’s not even that controversial and it doesn’t suddenly become so because Trump.

If someone thinks that people should not use the term lynch outside of the Jim Crow era context, that’s fine. There’s nothing wrong with trying to be sensitive to that. But is it really that big of a deal? Was it worth two straight days of breathless coverage and dozens of op-eds?

I’d posit not, and the fact that Democrats and the media found it be perfectly acceptable when defending Clinton’s impeachment tells us all we need to know. This was nothing but partisan rancor and now they are scrambling to justify their hypocrisy.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post UPDATE: Here’s an Even Hilariously Larger Number of Democrats Claiming the Clinton Impeachment Was a “Lynching” appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group clowncar-300x160 UPDATE: Here’s an Even Hilariously Larger Number of Democrats Claiming the Clinton Impeachment Was a “Lynching” the washington post The New York Times Politics Lynching lynch mob lynch impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Democrat Asks Mark Zuckerberg a Series of Bizarre Identity Question During Clown Show of a Hearing

Westlake Legal Group Capture-11 Democrat Asks Mark Zuckerberg a Series of Bizarre Identity Question During Clown Show of a Hearing Social Media Politics Mark Zuckerberg LGBT Front Page Stories Diversity democrats Allow Media Exception Al Green

Congressional hearings can be chock full of ridiculous questions, like whether or not Guam will tip over because of overpopulation.

During Wednesday’s hearing with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Democrats didn’t disappoint, specifically Texas Rep. Al Green.

What was already known to be a dog and pony show of a hearing got more than bizarre when Green’s turn to grill Zuckerberg came around. In his very low and slow voice, Green began by asking about the “Libra Project,” which is Facebook’s attempt at starting up their own cryptocurrency.

His question had almost nothing to do with the goal of the project itself instead focused on the social justice aspect of who was working on it. That may have come as no surprise, given that California Rep. Maxine Waters took the same line of questioning.

Green asked Zuckerberg to confirm whether or not multiple corporations were working on the Libra Project. Zuckerberg confirmed it, adding that 21 different companies and non-profit groups were in on it.

That’s when Green broke out the clown questions.

“Of the 21, how many are headed by women?” asked Green.

Why Zuckerberg was expected to have this information locked away in his brain for a moment just like this is beyond me, and Zuckerberg politely informed Green that he doesn’t have that information off the top of his head, but that he could get that information for him.

“One would assume you would know who heads these corporations that are going to be running this global company,” said Green.

“How many of them are minorities, Mr. Zuckerberg,” Green continued.

Once again, Zuckerberg answered that he didn’t know off the top of his head. Seemingly feeling that he had Zuckerberg pushed into a corner, Green pushed forward.

“Are there any members of the LGBTQ-plus community associated with this association Mr. Zuckerberg,” asked Green.

Green clarified quickly that he meant those who are identifying themselves openly as members of the LGBT community. He quickly moved on to accusing the Libra Project of being run by primarily white men.

What any of this has to do with the Libra Project isn’t exactly clear. It would seem that both Waters and Green are of the mind that they can somehow paint this project as racist, sexist, and homophobic. What someone’s race, sex, or sexuality have to do with their ability to run a cryptocurrency company wasn’t exactly discussed in detail.

But what really stood out was that Green wanted Zuckerberg to identify LGBT members of the team. Again, Zuckerberg knowing that off the top of his head is already a pretty ridiculous thing to expect, but more than that, Zuckerberg — and possibly other CEOs who may be faced with a Democrat firing line — to keep track of who is and isn’t gay within their working groups.

That’s not exactly everyone’s business, to begin with, least of all Al Green’s. It’s also not something CEO’s should really have to worry about. CEO’s should be hiring based on whether or not a person can do a job, and do it well. Green seems to believe that talent and ability mean nothing in the face of someone’s identity.

Is Green suggesting that Zuckerberg include “are you a homosexual” among the questions asked when it comes to choosing who he hires or groups he works with?

But I’m willing to bet it’s only certain identities. I’d doubt very much Green would give the same line of questioning to anyone who primarily hires minorities or LGBT people.

The post Democrat Asks Mark Zuckerberg a Series of Bizarre Identity Question During Clown Show of a Hearing appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Capture-11-300x171 Democrat Asks Mark Zuckerberg a Series of Bizarre Identity Question During Clown Show of a Hearing Social Media Politics Mark Zuckerberg LGBT Front Page Stories Diversity democrats Allow Media Exception Al Green   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Biden Apologizes for Use of the Term ‘Lynching,’ But Somehow Makes It Even Worse

Westlake Legal Group JoeBidenAPimage-1 Biden Apologizes for Use of the Term ‘Lynching,’ But Somehow Makes It Even Worse Trump Lynching impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats clinton biden Allow Media Exception

Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden speaks during a campaign event at Keene State College in Keene, N.H., Saturday, Aug. 24, 2019. (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)

Media and Democrats flipped out yesterday over President Donald Trump using the term “lynching” in describing the Democratic effort trying to remove him from office.

“Impeachment is not ‘lynching,’ it is part of our Constitution,” Joe Biden ranted. “Our country has a dark, shameful history with lynching, and to even think about making this comparison is abhorrent. It’s despicable.”

Of course, then it was revealed that virtually every Democrat used the term to defend Bill Clinton. Even CNN, incredibly, used the term in describing the questioning of Hillary Clinton on Benghazi.

If ever there was a wrong usage of the term, that would be it.

And of course, despite deploring the term yesterday, Joe Biden also used it to defend Bill Clinton. Whoops.

He apparently forgot all about how despicable and abhorrent he was then.

But now he’s backtracking on his comments then and apologizing for his use of the term.

“This wasn’t the right word to use and I’m sorry about that,” Biden said. “Trump on the other hand chose his words deliberately today in his use of the word lynching and continues to stoke racial divides in this country daily.”

So wait, he didn’t chose his words deliberately when he said it back in 1998?

Twitchy picks up on some of the stunned responses.

And this guy wants to be president? Yikes.

The post Biden Apologizes for Use of the Term ‘Lynching,’ But Somehow Makes It Even Worse appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group JoeBidenAPimage-1-300x153 Biden Apologizes for Use of the Term ‘Lynching,’ But Somehow Makes It Even Worse Trump Lynching impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post donald trump democrats clinton biden Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Breaking: Dozens of Republicans Storm Schiff’s Closed Impeachment Proceeding

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-23-at-12.07.41-PM Breaking: Dozens of Republicans Storm Schiff’s Closed Impeachment Proceeding republicans Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post due process donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power

Screenshot from this video

Finally!

Republicans are fighting back against the ridiculous Schiff Star Chamber “impeachment hearings.”

Democrats led by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) have been holding hearings and questioning witnesses in private and then leaking out what they think is helpful to their narrative, while holding back that which is helpful to the president. They’ve prevented the public and Republicans from knowing everything that’s going on and haven’t even afforded witnesses such as those from the State Department the right to bring in State Department lawyers to determine if there is any inappropriate (classified) material being discussed, according to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

This, despite having taken no formal vote by the House to even hold an impeachment inquiry or even stating what the alleged offense is that the president is supposed to have committed that would qualify for impeachment.

Prior impeachment incidents had a formal vote of the whole House to open an inquiry because the power of impeachment rests in the House, according to the Constitution, not just by declaration of the House Speaker.

In the case of Bill Clinton’s impeachment, you not only had a formal vote for an inquiry, you also had a formal finding from Ken Starr, the independent counsel, that Clinton had committed a felony. Now you have nothing.

More troubling are reports such as Schiff seemingly trying to influence a witness in a secret meeting to testify in accordance with the Schiff’s narrative. That should disturb all Americans.

Today, Republicans showed, finally, that they’d had enough.

About thirty Republicans members of Congress stormed the closed door questioning of defense department official Laura Cooper.

They blasted the man behind it all, Rep. Adam Schiff, and the lack of transparency of the proceedings.

First, they held a press conference outside.

Then, several tried to storm the SCIF where the questioning was going on.

Some did get in and managed to delay the proceeding. Some complained that despite the fact that they are on relevant committees, they have been denied access to information.

Here’s the full video:

Good for them, they’re fighting back. Now the Senate needs to support them and say they wouldn’t go along with the sham. If they’re not going to follow the Constitution and due process, the Senate should refuse to even entertain anything that comes from the House.

The post Breaking: Dozens of Republicans Storm Schiff’s Closed Impeachment Proceeding appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-23-at-12.07.41-PM-300x182 Breaking: Dozens of Republicans Storm Schiff’s Closed Impeachment Proceeding republicans Impeachment of President Trump impeachment Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story Featured Post due process donald trump democrats Congress Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Delays in Release of IG FISA Abuse Report Make Sen. Grassley Suspect it may be ‘Deep Sixed by the Deep State’

Westlake Legal Group grassley-kavanaugh-hearing-1-620x460 Delays in Release of IG FISA Abuse Report Make Sen. Grassley Suspect it may be ‘Deep Sixed by the Deep State’ Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, speaks as Christine Blasey Ford testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 27, 2018. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, Pool)

 

Many of us are wondering when the highly anticipated DOJ Inspector General report on FISA Abuse will be released. IG Michael Horowitz delivered his completed report to Attorney General William Barr on September 13 for declassification, a process that generally takes several weeks. In two days, it will have been six weeks.

A couple of weekends ago, Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo announced that the report would be released on October 18th. She then had to walk that back and said she was hearing it would be released by the end of the month. There’s been no word on a release date since.

Last week, former Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) reported on “Hannity” that “intra-agency squabbles” about specific redactions were causing the slowdown. He indicated that stonewalling by FBI Director Christopher Wray was contributing to the wait.

He said, “Evidently, there’s an intra-agency debate and really a food fight if you will about the classification issues. Remember in the last report put out by Horowitz, there were only seven words or so that were redacted. The Democrats threw a fit that they couldn’t see the whole thing. This could have 10 to 20 percent of the report redacted.”

Chaffetz added that former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan could be fighting its release.

I haven’t given any thought to the idea that it might not be released until today. Two items in the news caught my attention.

The first was a tweet from Sen. Charles Grassley (R-OH) which read, “All of the delays and excuses why the Horowitz IG FISA report isn’t public yet after several months of anticipation of its issues leads me to the suspicion it’s going to be ‘deep six’ [sic] by the deep state.”

The second, and perhaps the more ominous of the two was a tweet  by investigative reporter Paul Sperry. He wrote, “3/3 The IG report along with all the classified docs are still being held back from the public. If impeachment beats their release, then you know the fix is in.”

This possibility, I have to say, had never occurred to me. Is he saying that Democrats could be trying to run out the clock? Are they trying to delay its release indefinitely and impeach Trump in the meantime?

Both Grassley and Sperry appear to be very reasonable men. And, it would appear that the President and the Attorney General make the decision of when to release the report.

Still, Republicans have appeared especially impotent lately. Except for a handful of House Republicans such as Devin Nunes (CA), Kevin McCarthy (CA), John Ratcliffe (NC), Jim Jordan (OH), Matt Gaetz, FL and a few others, few seem to be standing by President Trump. As I posted yesterday, Lindsey Graham, who talks a good game, has failed to act. He could be calling all of Adam Schiff’s witnesses to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee which he chairs. Last night, Graham appeared on “Hannity” and railed once again about the “illegitimate” House impeachment inquiry. He said he planned to introduce a resolution condemning the House’s action against Trump. Try doing something more constructive. Issue some subpoenas.

Many Republican senators appear to be distancing themselves from Trump. And leading that group appears to be the majority leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell. My colleague, Joe Cummingham posted on this topic earlier today here.

In an interview with Sean Hannity on Monday night, President Trump said the one positive thing he could say about Democrats is that they stick together and they fight. The same cannot be said about Republicans.

This is a very critical moment for Republicans. It may even be an existential moment for the Party. Will Republicans come together and fight for the President?

The post Delays in Release of IG FISA Abuse Report Make Sen. Grassley Suspect it may be ‘Deep Sixed by the Deep State’ appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group grassley-kavanaugh-hearing-1-300x223 Delays in Release of IG FISA Abuse Report Make Sen. Grassley Suspect it may be ‘Deep Sixed by the Deep State’ Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Maxine Waters Just Proved Democrats Want Facebook to Be Their Propaganda Arm

Westlake Legal Group MaxineWatersAPimage-620x317 Maxine Waters Just Proved Democrats Want Facebook to Be Their Propaganda Arm twitter Social Media Regulation Propoganda Politics News Media Maxine Waters Mark Zuckerberg Internet Front Page Stories facebook democrats Allow Media Exception

House Financial Services Committee Chair Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., asks a question of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton, during a committee hearing, Tuesday Sept. 24, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

If you really want to know what the end game is for Democrats, I’ve always found that listening to California Rep. Maxine Waters grill someone during a congressional hearing is a good way to find out. This is the same Waters that told an oil and gas CEO that the end goal was for the government to take over their companies, after all.

In the case of the hearing featuring CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, we learned a few things. For instance, we know that Democrats don’t know what the purpose of a social media network is, but we also know what they want it to be.

Waters was asking Zuckerberg about what kind of fact-checking Facebook does when it comes to political ads. The social media CEO told Waters that they do no fact-checking themselves, and find it important to allow politicians to display their ads because they believe it is important for politicians to be heard plainly.

Waters continuously interrupted, seeming to drive the point home that Facebook does no fact-checking itself. Zuckerberg kept attempting to explain that it does occur thanks to third-party fact-checkers that activate whenever a post is flagged by the Facebook community, or by its technical systems.

Waters didn’t seem to be interested in the answers Zuckerberg was giving and cut him off to say that her time had expired.

What can this tell us?

We know that Democrats view the mainstream media as their territory, and mainstream media tends to agree. Much of what we see from major news networks tend to look more like propaganda than actual news, with an ever-present slant constantly giving the left the high ground.

It’s why ABC News attempted to pass an event at a gun range in Kentucky off as Turkey attacking Kurds in Syria after Trump’s decision to pull the U.S. military out of the region. It’s why they’ll breathlessly report on the heinous racism of a smirking high school student wearing a MAGA hat without looking for any more details.

Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter are some of the most highly trafficked websites in the world, with a constant stream of news and opinion floating through it thanks to its users. Left alone, this could be really bad news for Democrats, who rely on throwing out talking points in a vacuum for a narrative to thrive.

It would behoove people like Waters to ask questions that create a narrative about the nature of Facebook itself. They need to paint it as unreliable and dangerous to the public. This, in turn, does one of two things. It makes people wary of anything they may see on the platform that runs counter to their narrative, and it also sets up the possibility for government regulation with public support.

The end goal is simple. Make Facebook a publisher and not a platform. If they can do that, they can likely make a social media company another propaganda arm.

Judging by the amount of censorship, blacklisting, shadow banning, and punishing that we know occurs on social media platforms against right-leaning people already, they pretty much are publishers already. But it’s much more lucrative and less dicey for Facebook to claim platform status than admit they’re a publisher already. It results in less government oversite and intervention.

Waters wants that intervention. She and the Democrats want to drag Facebook under the control of the state so that they can then decide what is and isn’t proper conduct when it comes to news dissemination. Like she admitted to the oil companies, Waters’s goal is to have the government run the show.

The post Maxine Waters Just Proved Democrats Want Facebook to Be Their Propaganda Arm appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group MaxineWatersAPimage-300x153 Maxine Waters Just Proved Democrats Want Facebook to Be Their Propaganda Arm twitter Social Media Regulation Propoganda Politics News Media Maxine Waters Mark Zuckerberg Internet Front Page Stories facebook democrats Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Mittens, the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS

Westlake Legal Group mitt-romney-looking-heavenward-620x317 Mittens, the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS Uncategorized Ukraine President Trump Mitt Romney John Brennan Impeachment of President Trump Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Featured Story FBI and DOJ Corruption fake news donald trump democrats democrat media complex Deep State Coup corruption Corrupt Democrats Cofer Black cia biden Barack Obama Abuse of Power

Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, waits to participate in a mock swearing-in ceremony in the Old Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 3, 2019, as the 116th Congress begins. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

 

Recently, one of my email pals sent me an incredible opinion piece from Howell Woltz at The International Centre for Justice, in Warsaw, Poland. He is the author of Justice Denied: The United States vs. the People,” a very interesting book about the US justice system and federal prisons and the need for some serious reform. Occasionally, an opinion piece is so profound that it simply MUST be disseminated to a much wider audience than a simple blog post. This is one of such article. In this commentary, he opines on the DoJ/FBI cabal’s ongoing coup against POTUS while explaining some key connections among John Brennan , Mitt Romney, Cofer Black, Burisma Holdings (Ukraine), Bararck Obama, Hillary Clinton, and all the rest. It fills in a lot of gaps and explains much about what is going on with respect to the Ukraine kerfuffle.

While I can’t vouch for the veracity of all the claims here, this just rings true to me and connects a lot of very interesting dots. As usual, I caution you to “trust but verify.” If nothing else, it serves as a departure point for your own dot-connecting activities. The more independent analysis is conducted by all, the clearer picture becomes over time. These are some extended excerpts from Woltz’s opinion piece. More than a few light bulbs may be turned on for you after reading this. Note: this article was published on 8 October, so keep this in mind as you read it.

Donald J. Trump is not a RINO or DC insider.  He’s a tough-guy billionaire from Queens, New York and a street-fighter. When the Democrats realised last week that Trump was actually heading up his own investigation rather than leaving it to their Deep State apparatchiks—and doing so directly with the leaders of Ukraine, Australia, and Italy (and perhaps the U.K.)—they did the political equivalent of starting a fire in a theatre. House of Representatives Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, announced impeachment proceedings against the president just three hours after stating in a speech that she would not. Speaker Pelosi had zero evidence, cause, stated reason and lacked the required vote of the House of Representatives to do so, but announced it anyway.

Strangely enough…and what caught my attention… Mitt Romney jumped on the “Impeach Trump” train that same day. How did Nancy go from “There will be no impeachment proceedings,” that morning in New York to announcing impeachment proceedings that afternoon when she got back to Washington, DC? Meet the Grand Master of the Deep State in America. Admitted Communist, John Brennan, who has some serious explaining to do now that his attempted coup of U.S. President Donald Trump has been exposed…and continues! So why did Romney want to shut down any investigation of Ukraine’s role as well? That’s the question that got this investigation started and it’s shocking.

Romney’s National Security Advisor, Joseph Cofer Black, sits on the Board of the same Burisma Holdings that was being investigated for corruption back in 2014, and the Vice President and Obama Administration demanded be shut down. Why? Because Burisma was/is their vehicle for corrupt practices in Eastern Europe. And CIA Director, John Brennan’s 9/11 Deep State partner, Cofer Black, is still the link to all that goes on there. In fact, I can state unequivocally that Burisma is the centre of Ukraine corruption and the Democrats’ shadow organisation for corrupt activities. I live in Eastern Europe (Poland) and my sources are first-hand. And I know this matters greatly to Mitt Romney as he is not yet done with politics. If Black is busted, it will reflect on Romney, and it only makes sense that Cofer Black is the Deep State ‘plant’ in case Romney ever rises above polishing knobs in the U.S. Senate. Romney wants to run for President again in 2024 and if he wins, Cofer Black will be back with his fingers on the strings either as DNI or CIA Chief of Corruption. Burisma Holdings is the hub of U.S. Democrat activities to corrupt both Ukraine and American politics and there is proof. Ukraine President Zelenskyy’s win surprised both Brennan and Black’s Deep State ops as much as Trump’s did in 2016 in America.

So who is this Cofer Black guy? Joseph Cofer Black, joined the CIA in 1974 and rose to be Director of The National Counterterrorism Center, before joining Mitt Romney. If it were not for researching this article, I admit, he was unknown to me as well. What a revelation. Black was also the Head of Counterintelligence who somehow missed the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, though according to The Economist, 16 foreign leaders and heads of intelligence agencies warned him it was not only going to happen but when. Oh well. And nothing was done about Cofer Black for this, indicating this is what the Deep State wanted. But it goes deeper. John Brennan and this guy, Cofer Black, are how 19 terrorists got into the U.S.A. to attack the U.S. on 9/11.

Editor Harry will jump on me or make Nurse Ratched give me a dose of Castor Oil if I say something I can’t prove, so I’m just going to quote the CIA whistleblower at the Jeddah, Saudi Arabia CIA staff hearing, who is the source: “According to Freedom Outpost, Brennan was the CIA station chief in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, when the 9/11 hijackers were given visas to travel to the United States. In September 2014, a whistleblower named Greg Ford, a former military intelligence officer, told Ground Zero Radio’s Clyde Lewis that the CIA had objections to the approval of those visas but Brennan actually overrode them.”

The second in command of the CIA station was directly quoted by the whistleblower as saying, ‘No way, absolutely we are not going to stamp those visas.’ But CIA Saudi station chief, John Brennan, overrode the officer in charge and ordered the visas to be stamped and issued. They came, they learned to ‘take off’ an airplane but said they were not interested in ‘how to land.’ Cofer Black ignored the reports about this strange behaviour, though it was made, I know as a fact, from the people who made it. I was also a Florida-based pilot in 2001.

You know the rest of the story. America lost over 3,000 citizens that day, and I sat for an hour trying to get past the terrorist pilots’ apartment in Coral Springs, Florida. Freedom Outpost concluded, “If it weren’t for John Brennan, 9/11 may never have happened.” I’d add to that, if Cofer Black weren’t the head of Counterterrorism, Brennan could not have gotten his men in to do the job. It took (these) two to tango. That’s an opinion, not news, but I’ll bet money I don’t have, that I’m right as it’s a no risk bet. These are partners in crime.

“Joseph Cofer Black – the former Director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center (1999-2002) and Ambassador at Large for counter-terrorism (2002-2004).”

“Mr. Black is an internationally recognized authority on counterterrorism, cyber security, national security, and foreign affairs.” (these are quotes from Burisma’s website)

Brennan definitely had help in this. These terrorists had to have someone at the highest level in U.S. Counterintelligence to let their mission come to pass and succeed by ignoring all the warnings. They even took their flight training near my home, and I remember being locked down in Coral Springs, FL after 9/11 where they lived for three days while the FBI went through their apartment just a few blocks away. And this is where Romney’s man, Joseph Cofer Black, comes in. He was the partner in crime of John Brennan, (the Deep State Master), as well as being Mitt Romney’s National Security Advisor. Bad news for Mittens. And Cofer Black is the reason Romney is desperate to have President Trump’s real investigation shut down. As Obama’s CIA Director, John Brennan was also in charge of the dirty tricks campaign against then-candidate, Donald Trump. All of that has now been uncovered by investigative reporters Gregg Jarrett (The Russia Hoax) and Peter Schweizer (Secret Empires) with enough references to satisfy Editor Harry and Nurse Ratched.

Amazingly, the plot was actually laid by the Deep State in 2014 before they even knew Trump would be Hillary’s foil in 2016. I found that part pretty amazing. The Ukraine/Russia story was created for whomever was the candidate to run against Hillary Clinton.

For John Brennan, it really didn’t matter to him who ran on the Republican side. He just cared that whomever it was, lost to the Deep State’s choice – Hillary Clinton. Brennan, Black, James Clapper, James Comey and a host of others were prepared to make sure of it. It was exposed just last week that Brennan flew under a fake passport to avoid detection on his trip to set this up in Eastern Europe as early as 2015. There is no explanation for a CIA Director to do this unless what he was doing was illegal.

Now let’s go back to Joseph Cofer Black. He is Romney’s Ukraine man, and Brennan’s long-time associate who is still covering here in Eastern Europe (from where I am reporting) for the Deep State in America. Brennan came back Stateside from the Saudi Arabian CIA office the year after arranging for the 9/11 attackers to get into America. So what did he do? He took over CIA Counterintelligence from his partner, Cofer Black.  Convenient, eh? The Counterintelligence guy who ‘missed’ the 16 warnings on 9/11, and the guy who granted the attackers visas to get into the U.S. to take pilot training and do it, swap jobs, perhaps to prevent detection? Well it worked…until now.

And history repeats. The tag team is back at it. Barack Obama chose (or was told) to make John Brennan his CIA Director. Brennan then sets up the Russian hoax through the Ukraine government and intel operatives covertly in 2015 to target any candidate who might face Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Once Trump became the Republican candidate, President Obama authorised illegal spying on Trump’s campaign, we now know, because it was labeled a ‘counterintelligence operation’ which can only be authorised by a President.

The script for the Ukraine/Russia hoax was actually written back in 2007 to use against Republican candidate, John McCain. It was temporarily deployed but then shut down and recycled when it was clear RINO McCain would get his ass handed to him by Obama in 2008 without CIA involvement.. So, Brennan decided to use the script in 2016. The Republican’s candidate would be targeted using the same plan, according to one of Obama’s own secret service agents, now author, Dan Bongino, in his new book, Exonerated (just out last week).

The original script was written by Fusion GPS owner, Glenn Simpson. That’s the same man and company who would be paid $12 million by the Clinton Campaign, The Democrat National Committee and the FBI in 2016 for “the Steele dossier” that caused the Russia Hoax against Trump—though actually written years earlier. Glenn Simpson simply changed the names.

Unfortunately, there was a problem. Socialist Bernie Sanders was leading the Democrats side over the Chosen, Hillary, and had to be eliminated. To achieve this, the Clintons literally did a forced takeover of The Democrat National Committee and its funds. They immediately cut off Hillary’s rival, Bernie Sander’s campaign (as admitted by former DNC Director, Donna Brazille, on television) eliminating Bernie from the race.

John Brennan then began leaking the ‘dossier’ to Congressional Democrats, including then-House Speaker, Harry Reid and their media co-conspirators to begin the take down of the Republican candidate, Donald J. Trump. Ironically, Brennan also leaked the fake dossier to Sen. John McCain, it’s original target, and McCain leaked it back to its original source—the FBI—to apply for warrants to spy on Trump using their own laundered information. The FBI literally paid for the fabricated information, leaked it to the media and politicians who hated Trump, then used their reports and that dossier when fed back to them, to get warrants to spy on Trump. But then the kimchee hits the fan for real. Trump gets elected! So, who jumps over to Ukraine to protect the conspiracy from being found out? Brennan’s 9/11 partner, Joseph Cofer Black…

Within days of Trump’s inauguration was immediately put in place in Ukraine to prevent anyone from talking. The Board of Burisma Holdings—the same centre of Ukraine corruption used by Joe Biden in 2014 to enrich his kid— was the base from which to shield the Democrat origins of the Russia Hoax and its intel roots from any real investigation.

By February of 2017, Cofer Black was a voting member of the Board of Burisma. You’ll hear the screams around the world this week as the democrats realise that Trump has taken this investigation on personally rather than leaving it to the deep state vermin. It’s all starting to fit together now, isn’t it? So, here’s what to expect.

Yes. There will be wailing a-plenty and gnashing of teeth over coming days, and this is the point where the president’s security needs to be at an all-time high, cause The Deep State is spinning out of control and desperate. If the new leaders of the nations that aided Brennan, Black and the Dems—all of whom are admirers of POTUS—have investigated the crimes of their predecessors as Trump asked, he likely has the evidence on his desk rather than having it hidden by the Deep State criminals.

This past Friday, it became known that President Trump had not only launched his own investigation with foreign leaders into the 2016 Election tampering, but that it was almost complete. As soon as that happened, the freak-out began. At 65 years of age, I’ve not seen one quite like it. The Deep State was and is in paroxysms of unmitigated fear and psychosis. They ramped up an immediate media assault using the usual outlets—CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and Washington Post—and the same exact leak specialists who put America through The Russia Hoax.

The media spectacle on Friday past was immediately followed with a sua sponte announcement by Speaker Pelosi that she was impeaching the President—a power she does not possess no matter how many cocktails she’s had. A completely false narrative was spun of what was said in President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, knowing Trump would never allow them to have a copy of the classified transcript to disprove their lies. But guess what?  Within 24 hours, in another act of unprecedented transparency The Donald did just that. He released the full, unredacted transcript of the call, publicly proving them all to be Pinocchios. And I just watched his Attorney, Rudy Giuliani, announce that he is drafting a lawsuit to file against those who lied about his client, Donald Trump—another unprecedented event to my knowledge.

So the price of lying about the President is about to get expensive, and while Rudy’s suit will be in civil court, if proven that these public officials violated Trump’s civil rights ‘under colour of law’,  it might become a criminal referral under 18 USC §§ 241, 242 (Deprivation of rights under colour of law and a conspiracy to do so). I personally believe this is why the President and his lawyers are doing it. Through the civil suit, they’ll have the right of discovery to get records they could never access in any other way. By then, Trump’s team will have enough evidence in the civil suit to refer the defendants for criminal prosecution by the Dept. of Justice.

In the Deep State’s current state of mania, an assassination attempt is not only likely but perhaps inevitable. I predict they will have one of their insiders still in the White House do it, or a foreign team (CIA trained) do the hit on his helicopter. Not a single CIA, DOJ, NSA, DNI or Secret Service leftover from Barack Hussein Obama should be allowed near him and then all 17 illegal spy agencies that have so disgraced my nation should be shaken up or even better, shut down.

No other leader in my nation’s history would have the audacity to take on these evil forces—or have a chance of winning other than Donald Trump—and they will do everything possible to take him out before he gets them. In my opinion, we’ll either have a presidential funeral followed by a descent into the darkness of Socialism, or a brighter and better day with dozens of Deep Staters eating institutional food and wearing orange for life. I’m praying for Door #2.

Like I said, the preceding rings true to me, and it comports with my own thinking on the whole sordid subject based on what has been uncovered by many independent journalists over the past two years. There is absolutely no question that the Deep State has been trying to take out President Trump from even before his inauguration in January 2017. There is more to this article which can be read here. Think about the details of this article in the context of everything that has been going on regarding Ukraine since the “whistleblower” started to dominate the news. It’s obvious that the Deep State and their paid media allies are extremely agitated – and for good reason! And why else other than complicity in the corruption would Mitt Romney be out front in the “get Trump” brigade these days? To reiterate, as with all sources, I recommend that you trust but verify, but I’m praying for Door #2, too!

The end.

The post Mittens, the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group mitt-romney-looking-heavenward-300x153 Mittens, the Deep State, and the Ongoing Coup Against POTUS Uncategorized Ukraine President Trump Mitt Romney John Brennan Impeachment of President Trump Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Featured Story FBI and DOJ Corruption fake news donald trump democrats democrat media complex Deep State Coup corruption Corrupt Democrats Cofer Black cia biden Barack Obama Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com