web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Front Page Stories" (Page 69)

Iran Tried to Hack a 2020 Presidential Candidate As the Media Suddenly Don’t Care About Election Interference

Westlake Legal Group AP_06060409666-620x794 Iran Tried to Hack a 2020 Presidential Candidate As the Media Suddenly Don’t Care About Election Interference Politics Obama media bias Iran hack Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections election interference double standards donald trump dirt candidate ben rhodes 2020

Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivers a speech on the 17th anniversary of death of the late revolutionary founder Ayatollah Khomeini, in his mausoleum just outside Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 4, 2006. Khamenei, warned Sunday that energy supplies from the Gulf region would be disrupted if Iran came under attack from the United States and insisted his country would not give up the right to produce nuclear fuel. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

The Democrats’ favorite rogue terrorist regime is at it again. This time they got caught trying to hack a 2020 Presidential candidate, among other government figures, in an apparent attempt to interfere in the coming election.

Here’s the report from Politico.

Hackers linked to the Iranian government have targeted the campaign of at least one 2020 presidential contender, Microsoft announced today in a blog post.

The technology giant also witnessed “significant” digital activity by the group, which it dubbed “Phosphorous,” against current and former U.S. government officials, journalists covering global politics and prominent Iranians living outside of Iran.

Not one major news source is reporting in their headlines who the actual target was. I’ll let you decide if that’s purposeful or not, but we do indeed know the answer.

I have a feeling that if Elizabeth Warren was almost hacked by Russia, for example, that she’d make the headline. Instead, the media are downplaying this as they always do when anything doesn’t play into their narrative. NBC put out a video on it but no print story. The Washington Post tried to spin it as “hundreds targeted” in order to downplay Trump as a victim. CNN couldn’t be bothered to even report it as of this writing.

It’s amazing how a foreign dictatorship trying to hack the 2020 election is all the sudden a page A47 story when it can’t be blamed on Trump. Odd, right? Of course, if Trump now asks for an investigation, he’ll probably be accused of trying to influence the election or something.

This is a serious problem though. For all the gnashing of teeth about Russia, Iran is a more prominent threat right now and they have every reason to see to it that Trump isn’t re-elected. Their dream scenario is to get another weak kneed Democrat to sign another “deal” with that guarantees them the farm. You can expect China to get in on the action as well. Meanwhile, you can also expect the media to not care at all.

————————————————

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Iran Tried to Hack a 2020 Presidential Candidate As the Media Suddenly Don’t Care About Election Interference appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group eu-iran-300x169 Iran Tried to Hack a 2020 Presidential Candidate As the Media Suddenly Don’t Care About Election Interference Politics Obama media bias Iran hack Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story elections election interference double standards donald trump dirt candidate ben rhodes 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Young Black Immigrant Captures People’s Hearts with Beautiful Moment at the White House

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-05-at-5.06.18-PM Young Black Immigrant Captures People’s Hearts with Beautiful Moment at the White House white house The White House republicans religion President Trump prayer Patriotism Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Black Republicans

Screenshot from this video

One of the things that isn’t getting a lot of attention from the mainstream media this weekend is the Young Black Leadership Summit at the White House.

The conference, organized by Turning Point USA, is an annual event for the Trump administration.

Many people lined up excitedly to get into the White House.

Once there, President Donald Trump invigorated the crowd when he came out to speak, sparking lots of cheers and chant of “USA, USA.”

You can see more of the event here.

Here’s some of the speech, released by the White House:

Our philosophy is grounded in the sacred bonds of love and loyalty that unite all Americans. And we really have been united. It’s been an incredible thing. A lot of great things have been happening. You don’t necessarily see it at the top of government, where the hatred is tremendous — the hatred toward us. And a lot of it is because of the success. We’re having such success. We’re showing them what’s going on — when you look at your unemployment numbers, how great they are. The best in history. You look at your employment numbers. You look at the poverty numbers. You look at all of the things that have been so beneficial, it’s driving them crazy, because they never produced numbers like that. And they’re losing African American votes, and they can’t do that. They just can’t do that. They haven’t done anything for you. They haven’t done anything. A hundred years — they haven’t done anything.

At long last, you have a government that puts Americans first, puts you first, puts your families and your communities first.

Trump listed some of the many accomplishments of the administration including the lowest unemployment in 50 years and criminal justice reform.

But he also praised the young leaders for having their own minds and not listening to the Democratic line.

You speak out for the values and principles that have made America the most exceptional nation anywhere on Earth. And I will say this today: It’s greater than it ever was before — our military, our economy. (Applause.) We have the greatest economy in the world. We have the greatest economy we’ve ever had. Tremendous numbers just came out today. You heard that.

But you stand up for the oppressive forces — and you do. You stand right up to those forces in our country that demand conformity and control. You refuse to be censored, you refuse to be silenced, and you will never back down. (Applause.) And don’t. Don’t ever back down.

But the moment that really captured the heart of the crowd and anyone who saw it on social media was this moment with a young woman who had emigrated as child from Ethiopia. She was so taken by the moment and her love for America she asked the crowd to pray for Trump and to pray for the nation.

With so many negative things going on, how lovely to have such a beautiful moment!

The post Young Black Immigrant Captures People’s Hearts with Beautiful Moment at the White House appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group Screen-Shot-2019-10-05-at-5.06.18-PM-300x186 Young Black Immigrant Captures People’s Hearts with Beautiful Moment at the White House white house The White House republicans religion President Trump prayer Patriotism Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Black Republicans   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

University of Kansas Apologizes for Launching its Family-Friendly Basketball Season with Stripper Poles and an R-Rated Rap Star

Westlake Legal Group university-of-kansas-rap-show-stripper-SCREENSHOT-620x348 University of Kansas Apologizes for Launching its Family-Friendly Basketball Season with Stripper Poles and an R-Rated Rap Star Uncategorized Front Page Stories

[Screenshot from Twitter, https://twitter.com/hizzey520/status/1180586901859794947]

 

Imagine you’ve taken your young son and daughter to a college basketball game to celebrate the beginning of the season. You’ve got your cokes, nachos, and those cancer-causing hotdogs.

Suddenly, out comes Snoop Dogg.

He tells the kids:

Top Dogg, bite em all, n*gga burn the sh** up
D-P-G-C my n*gga turn that sh** up
C-P-T, L-B-C, yeah we hookin back up
And when they bang this in the club baby you got to get up
Thug n*ggaz drug dealers yeah they givin it up
Lowlife, yo’ life, boy we livin it up
Takin chances while we dancin in the party fo’ sho’
Slip my hoe a forty-fo’ and she got in the back do’
B*tches lookin at me strange but you know I don’t care
Step up in this motherf****er just a-swangin my hair
B*tch quit talkin, Crip walk if you down with the set
Take a bullet with some d*** and take this dope from this jet

What do you do?

A) Wave your hotdog in the air, and wave it like you just don’t care
B) Something less parentally enthusiastic

Well, Friday night, a crowd of over 16,000 at the University of Kansas Jayhawks 2019-2020 season kickoff got the opportunity to figure it out.

Watch (Language Warning):

Eyebrows were certainly raised.

The stripper pole dancers also helped to liven the situation.

Since some in the audience went the less enthusiastic route, UK athletic director Jeff Long issued an apology afterward:

“We apologize for the Snoop Dogg performance at Late Night. We made it clear to the entertainers’ managers that we expected a clean version of the show and took additional steps to communicate to our fans, including moving the artist to the final act of the evening, to ensure that no basketball activities would be missed if anyone did not want to stay for his show. I take full responsibility for not thoroughly vetting all the details of the performance and offer my personal apology to those who were offended. We strive to create a family atmosphere at Kansas and fell short of that this evening.”

Westlake Legal Group hizzey-snoop-kansas-tweet-SCREENSHOT-620x444 University of Kansas Apologizes for Launching its Family-Friendly Basketball Season with Stripper Poles and an R-Rated Rap Star Uncategorized Front Page Stories

The school is subsequently facing five NCAA Level I violations, including a failure to meet the coaching responsibilities standard and a lack of institutional control.

Head coach Bill Self told the USA Today the event went a bit differently than he’d preferred:

“That’s not the direction that anybody at our school would want that to go, at all. Regardless of the entertainment that it provided many. It was still not the right way to provide the entertainment. I’ve heard from some people that bad publicity is better than no publicity. I actually don’t believe that for a second, but it felt good to say.”

Well, regardless of the strippers and vulgarity, everybody went home a little richer: Snoop used a cannon to shoot money into the crowd.

It may be hard to spend, though: Each bill sports the face of Tha Doggfather.

-ALEX

 

Relevant RedState links in this article: here.

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

 

The post University of Kansas Apologizes for Launching its Family-Friendly Basketball Season with Stripper Poles and an R-Rated Rap Star appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group university-of-kansas-rap-show-stripper-SCREENSHOT-300x169 University of Kansas Apologizes for Launching its Family-Friendly Basketball Season with Stripper Poles and an R-Rated Rap Star Uncategorized Front Page Stories   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

News Summary from the Week that Was (29 September – 5 October)

Westlake Legal Group censored-620x331-copy News Summary from the Week that Was (29 September – 5 October) Uncategorized Ukrainian collusion in 2016 election Ukraine investigation into 2016 election interference Ukraine socialism religion Media Hillary Clinton Email Scandal Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Culture & Faith Crooked Hillary Clinton corruption Corrupt Democrats climate alarmism cia scandal Catholic Church bill barr biden Abuse of Power

Here is some of the news from last week that the legacy media buried or obfuscated because the stories don’t fit their “Republicans bad, Democrats good” narrative.

1. This is a great way to get the ball rolling this week! There are a TON of culpable criminals who enabled Shrillary during her tour as secretary of state. She’s always been guilty of mishandling TS/SCI information, too.

[T]he Washington Post reported State Department officials informed up to 130 Clinton aides that they were found to be “culpable” of handling information that was classified lower than they should have been when transmitted through the private server. Although some former Obama administration officials have attempted to discredit the investigation by accusing the Trump administration of targeting them, one official retorted that “the process is set up in a manner to completely avoid any appearance of political bias.”

A Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigation into Clinton’s server found at least 100 emails containing classified information, including 65 emails declared “Secret” and 22 regarded as “Top Secret.” Additionally, the State Department retroactively classified 2,093 emails that were not initially marked as such. Some experts charge Clinton broke multiple laws, including 18 U.S. Code § 1924, which forbids “unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material.”

Read the rest here. I’m one of those experts noted in the article based on over 45 years as a national security professional (albeit have never been interviewed and quoted formally). There is no statute of limitations on mishandling classified information (especially of the TS/SCI variety!).

2. Next, Peter Schweizer provides the goods on the Bidens’ corruption that the legacy media continues to hide:

[Peter] Schweizer told host Mark Levin that the former vice president’s son was being paid by Ukraine despite not having expertise in the energy sector while Joe Biden was the “point-person” on former President Barack Obama’s administration in dealing with Ukraine. “The key question here that nobody seems to want to ask in the media is: What was he being paid for? He wasn’t being paid for his expertise. What was he being paid for? And what were the Ukrainians expecting to get in return?” Schweizer stated. “I think when you overlay the financial payments with the fact that Joe Biden as point person on Obama administration policy to Ukraine was steering billions of dollars of Western money to Ukraine it becomes crystal clear exactly why they were paying him money. They wanted access and they wanted to influence Joe Biden. And Joe Biden has been around a long time here, and he had to know exactly why his son was being paid.”

Source. It’s only a matter of time until the stalking horse for Shrillary is forced to retire from the Democrats’ Star Wars bar scene field of wannabes.

3. CNN and MSNBC are infested with former Obama national security and intelligence community political hacks who rail against POTUS, but they won’t touch this story with a 10-foot pole:

Former CIA officer John Kiriakou explained why he feels President Donald Trump should ask the Senate to investigate the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Appearing on Monday night’s edition of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Kiriakou described the difference between an instance during his own employment where he filed a whistleblower complaint, and the highly published complaint regarding Trump’s July 25 phone call to the president of Ukraine. The former CIA officer described his 1996 complaint, then the current one that “went through layers of editing and coordinating and lawyers were involved and managers were involved.”

“It looks like a legal document,” he said. “It doesn’t look like a whistleblower complaint, and that leads me to believe that this whistleblower that we’re talking about is just a face of an entire group that’s at the CIA that’s pushing this forward.” Kiriakou speculated that the complaint likely went “through the chain of command” to CIA Director Gina Haspel herself before landing at the office of the DNI.

Read the rest here. The experienced among us know that is was a set-up and political hit-job yet again, folks. Period.

4. Joe Biden is running scared on the Ukraine issue. He’s trying to squelch political free speech by using his campaign to pressure networks to not interview Rudy Giuliani:

Joe Biden’s presidential campaign demanded on Sunday that news networks stop booking Rudy Giuliani for interviews, handing President Donald Trump and his allies a new talking point against the former vice president. Biden’s campaign sent a letter to executives and anchors at ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, and NBC, according to the NYT, which first obtained the letter. In it, Biden campaign officials Anita Dunn and Kate Bedingfield call interviews with Giuliani “a disservice to journalism.”

“We are writing today with grave concern that you continue to book Rudy Giuliani on your air to spread false, debunked conspiracy theories on behalf of Donald Trump,” the letter begins. “While you often fact check his statements in real time during your discussions, that is no longer enough. By giving him your air time, you are allowing him to introduce increasingly unhinged, unfounded and desperate lies into the national conversation.”

Read the rest here. Biden’s toast. That video of him bragging that he forced the Ukrainian president to fire the prosecutor investigating his son Hunter and Burisma Holdings sounded his political death knell. It’s just a matter of time until he’s gone.

5. More on Ukraine that the anti-Trump media and Democrats are ignoring – but it’s going to bite them all BIGLY where the sun don’t shine!

[T]he president never spoke with Attorney General William Barr “about having Ukraine investigate anything relating to former Vice President Biden or his son” or asked him to contact Ukraine “on this or any other matter,” and that the attorney general has not communicated at all with Ukraine. It also contains the following morsel: “A Department of Justice team led by U.S. Attorney John Durham is separately exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

While the Attorney General has yet to contact Ukraine in connection with this investigation, certain Ukrainians who are not members of the government have volunteered information to Mr. Durham, which he is evaluating.” When you grope through the miasma of Slavic names and follow the daisy chain of related people and entities, it appears that Ukrainian officials who backed the Clinton campaign provided information that generated the investigation of Mr. Manafort—acts that one Ukrainian court has said violated Ukrainian law and “led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state.”

Read the rest here. Bit by bit, the real truth about Ukraine is seeping out – and it AIN’T good for the Democrats.

6. It’s about time the vegans got a little pushback. This is one less thing that the leftist fascists can force down our throats.

A new study states that previous claims of the harm done by eating beef and pork are inaccurate. It was thought for decades that eating too much red meat contributes to heart disease, diabetes, and certain forms of cancer. But the study, published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine, concluded that meat was probably only a contributing factor to disease — not decisive — and cutting consumption would only marginally improve risk factors.

Read the rest here. Another long-held leftwing myth is debunked. Who knew?

7. The Democrats are rushing headlong to impeach @POTUS no matter what. It’s not going to work out for them they way they think it will.

Back in 2017, Rep. Adam Schiff was crowing that there was evidence in plain sight that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. The intel committee boss never produced the evidence and neither did Robert Mueller with his police-state tactics. Schiff has now turned to improvised dialogue about President Trump pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden in exchange for military aid. That is a tough act to follow but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is up to the task.

President Trump is like Paul Newman in Absence of Malice, being set up by someone with no face and no name. The whistleblower is reportedly a CIA employee but the president wants to know who this person is and face his accuser. The accuser is being represented by Andrew Bakaj, a former CIA officer who says the whistleblower “is entitled to anonymity.” Democrats want more of Trump’s phone calls with Vladimir Putin and other world leaders. Adam Schiff wants to see if “the president was also undermining our security in a way that he thought would personally benefit his campaign.” For his part, Trump wants Schiff questioned “at the highest level for Fraud & Treason,” and he wants to know who was spying on him.

Progressives believe they have somehow escaped the repressive conditioning of the masses and are wise enough to usher in the utopian state. This has all been predetermined by history, so if the progressive candidate loses, it can only be due to trickery or theft. Progressive candidates cannot accept that outsider Donald Trump defeated … Hillary Clinton. Democrats are worried that if they don’t impeach Trump he will win again in 2020. Others don’t care about the election and just want him impeached by any means necessary.

President Trump, the most powerful man in the world, could extend deployment of his power to declassify. That could prove interesting, even for someone like POTUS 44, who in 2012 told Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have “more flexibility” to deal with contentious issues like missile defense after the U.S. presidential election. And of course he and Hillary Clinton gave the Russians everything they wanted. They also colluded with Russia to take down candidate and President Trump. Vice President Joe Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor investigating a firm whose board included Biden’s son.

Trump thinks Ukraine should investigate, and that was what the call was about. Yet Trump, not Biden, faces the barrage.

Read the rest here. The focus is corruption as it always has been, not the false Democrat spin of quid pro quo.

8. POTUS is not your typical pol (thank God!).

He wasn’t supposed to release the transcripts. Or the whistleblower report.  He was expected to do what any president would have done – what President Obama always did. Hide the evidence. As scripted, the president was intended to (rightly) claim executive privilege and withhold the written notes of his July 25 conversation with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. That would allow House Democrats to ramp up speculation about what the president was hiding.

In contrast, President Trump did the unthinkable:  he actually waived both executive privilege and attorney-client privilege for the Mueller investigation.  What other president would allow his general counsel to be interviewed for more than 30 hours? Donald Trump does. He should be winning awards for his openness and transparency. We’ve never seen anything like it before.  And it’s messing with the Democrats’ narrative.

Americans are not fooled. By now most of us have heard the message loud and clear. Rep. Al Green told us exactly what it was about when he told MSNBC in May, “I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.”

Read the rest here. I’ll take the transparency and responsiveness of @POTUS to the secrecy of the Deep State and Democrats any day of the week!

9. The Catholic Church goes off the deep end on enviro-wacko-ism. Funny, I thought the goal was to save souls, not “the planet.” There’s a lot of work to do on that front; just consider all the elected Democrats who support unrestricted abortion!

[T]he movement is not confined to secular discourse: it coincides with escalating rhetoric from the Vatican about environmentalism. This issue is quickly becoming central to contemporary Catholicism, just as economic justice rose to the fore in the late 19th century. This is not merely a passing phase either. The language the Church uses to discuss environmentalism today will have profound ramifications for how we think about God, humanity, creation, and salvation itself.

Pope Francis’s 2015 encyclical Laudato Si was acclaimed as being for environmental justice what Pope Leo XIII’s landmark work Rerum Novarum was for economic justice in 1891. But the comparison is more aspirational than accurate. But Laudato Si, unlike Rerum Novarum, falls into the trap of adopting secular language to describe what is essentially a spiritual problem. It’s rife with the doomsday language that dominates secular environmentalism. Doomsday language does not lend itself to well-rounded philosophical frameworks or to judicious, practical applications. Instead, it promotes panic, and panic leads to moral compromise.

The unjustified moral panic over the Amazon fires is not unique. The last five decades are full of climate doomsday predictions that have been proven false. Some—like the 1970 proclamation that, by 2000, the world would be gripped in a new Ice Age—are exactly the opposite of current climate panics. For climate change activists, these facts simply don’t matter. What matters is that they see an impending climate disaster—a disaster which they believe justifies distorting the truth. This is exactly the same kind of prevarication Catholics must watch out for.

Because many leaders in the Church—including the Holy Father—have come to believe that there is an impending climate disaster, we shouldn’t be surprised if we see doctrinal distortions as a result. By elevating neo-pagan tribes to the level of moral arbiters and castigating Western Catholics en masse, activists within the Church lose sight of the Church’s primary purpose, which is to affect the salvation of human souls—the bringing of souls into harmony with God—through its preaching and sacramental ministries. All other Church activities must flow from that purpose and not from any other, lest we fall into a trap set by the forces of darkness.

Read the rest here. That article nailed how the Pope and the church hierarchy have gone off the rails, didn’t it? The Devil is hard at work boring from within.

10. A DNC contractor was digging for Trump dirt in Ukraine in 2016, but there is total silence about this in the legacy media.

There is a media narrative that is false. How do we know it’s false? The documents I possess show it’s false. They said there is no evidence that the Ukraine embassy was ever asked for help to help the Democrat national committee. She called that Russia propaganda. I have a statement from the Ukrainian embassy in Washington on the record from their sitting Ambassador in Washington that in fact Alexander Toluca, the DNC contractor came to the Ukraine embassy in spring 2016 and asked for help in finding dirt on Donald Trump in hopes of staging a congressional hearing to hurt Donald Trump. That is the on the record statements.

In addition, they state that he also asked the Ukraine president to visit the United States and spend time with an investigative reporter trying to turn up dirt on Donald Trump and Paul Manafort. What did the embassy do? They say they recognize this request for what it was, and improper efforts to influence the election and they refused to cooperate. That is a very important confirmation of something the rest of the media is calling tinfoil hat, conspiracy.

Watch the video here. Where are the legacy media in following up on this bombshell? Why, running for the hills, of course!

11. Finally, there is more circumstantial evidence that Rod Rosenstein wasn’t a “white hat,” as some have speculated.

Judicial Watch released 145 pages of Rod Rosenstein’s communications that include a one-line email from Rod Rosenstein to Robert Mueller stating, “The boss and his staff do not know about our discussions” and “off the record” emails with major media outlets around the date of Mueller’s appointment.

The time period referred to in this suit is critical. On May 8, 2017, Rosenstein wrote a memo to President Trump recommending that FBI Director James Comey be fired. The next day, President Trump fired Comey. Just three days later, on May 12, Rosenstein sent an email assuring Robert Mueller that “The boss and his staff do not know about our discussions.”

In a May 16, 2017 email, sent the day before Mueller’s appointment, Rosenstein emailed former Bush administration Deputy Attorney General and current Kirkland & Ellis Partner, Mark Filip stating, “I am with Mueller. He shares my views. Duty Calls. Sometimes the moment chooses us.”

Read the rest here. Occam’s razor says that Rosenstein indicted himself with his own words. I’ll wait for definitive proof to the contrary, no speculation.

Here are a couple of honorable mentions from this weeks news:

Here’s the short summary of the items in this weekly news summary:

  • Up to 130 State Dept personnel stand to lose their security clearances as a result of the Shrillary email server debacle. Frankly, it’s not enough; they need to be prosecuted because they knew about it and did nothing.
  • Peter Schweizer exposes the Bidens’ epic corruption.
  • A former CIA officer who submitted a whistleblower compliant opines that the Ukraine complaint reads like it was a legal brief, not a submission by a genuine whistleblower.
  • Joe Biden is pressuring the networks not to interview Rudy Giuliani on their news programs. Sure seems like a desperate move to me (not to mention typical Democrat fascism by attempting to stifle opposing political speech).
  • AG Barr is methodically looking into foreign influence in the 2016 elections. Ukraine is on the menu to the consternation of the Democrats.
  • Red meat isn’t bad for humans after all. I learned “everything in moderation” long ago. Glad to see a return to sanity.
  • Biden did the crime, yet it’s @OTUS who is the focus of Democrat allegations. Yeah, it’s nothing but transference!
  • POTUS upset the Democrats’ impeachment apple cart by releasing the Ukraine phone call transcript summary because he’s not your average brain-dead RINO.
  • The Pope apparently is on the green bandwagon, and saving souls seems to be second fiddle.
  • A DNC contractor was fishing for dirt on Donald Trump in Ukraine in 2016.
  • Looks like Rod Rosenstein was a bad guy after all; he implicates himself with his own words.

The Democrats flawed impeachment gambit (refer to the last bullet in item 12 above) continues to dominate the news. Watching their and their paid media lies, given the phone call transcript, is just amazing. Completely disgraceful! Now they’re shifting to China since that dog won’t hunt. Meanwhile, AG Barr and USA Durham continue their work, making the Democrats more desperate by the day. I love it! And no one has mentioned the DoJ OIG FISA abuse report that’s “under final review” lately. There’s a lot happening, folks; stay tuned!

The end.

The post News Summary from the Week that Was (29 September – 5 October) appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group censored-620x331-copy-300x160 News Summary from the Week that Was (29 September – 5 October) Uncategorized Ukrainian collusion in 2016 election Ukraine investigation into 2016 election interference Ukraine socialism religion Media Hillary Clinton Email Scandal Hillary Clinton Front Page Stories Featured Story Economy donald trump democrats Culture & Faith Crooked Hillary Clinton corruption Corrupt Democrats climate alarmism cia scandal Catholic Church bill barr biden Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

High School Teacher in Georgia Instructs Students: the Confederate Flag is a Marry-Your-Sister ‘Save the Date’ Card

Westlake Legal Group flag-36421_1280-620x394 High School Teacher in Georgia Instructs Students: the Confederate Flag is a Marry-Your-Sister ‘Save the Date’ Card Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story

 

 

Did you happen to grow up with the Confederate flag? Was it on the backs of trucks? On bedroom walls? On the General Lee?

What did it stand for to you?

Whatever it was, a teacher in Georgia wants your child or grandchild to know the symbol well — and its meaning.

As reported by Augusta’s WRDW-TV, kids at Hephzibah High School were treated to a photo of the flag accompanied by the following description on the board:

“[It’s] a sticker you put on the back of your pickup truck to announce that you intend to marry your sister. Think of it like a white trash ‘Save the Date’ card.”

One parent posted a picture of the display to social media.


Melissa Fuller stuck it on Facebook and told WRDW, “A lot of it is that it’s not morally correct. It’s unethical. It’s just something you don’t want to discuss today in today’s world and especially inside of a classroom. Why was that (text) used? With it being such a rough area, why would you put that our there to a class discussion that could have turned very ugly?”

The teacher’s been placed on (paid) administrative leave, and the school’s issued a statement:

“The Richmond County School System is committed to creating a diverse, equitable learning environment for students. The language used in the example was unacceptable and has no place in our classrooms.”

Melissa’s daughter previously wore a belt sporting a Confederate flag buckle to school. She was told to remove it, which she did.

But she still go an in-school suspension.

The Facebook post has received over 150 comments, many siding with Melissa.

What are your thoughts on this? What do you think of the flag?

I look forward to hearing from you in the Comments section.

-ALEX

 

Relevant RedState links in this article:

See 3 more pieces from me:

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.


Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

The post High School Teacher in Georgia Instructs Students: the Confederate Flag is a Marry-Your-Sister ‘Save the Date’ Card appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group flag-36421_1280-300x191 High School Teacher in Georgia Instructs Students: the Confederate Flag is a Marry-Your-Sister ‘Save the Date’ Card Uncategorized Front Page Stories Featured Story   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Oh My: AOC Says Criticism of Adam Schiff Is Now Anti-Semitism

Westlake Legal Group AOCThisWeek Oh My: AOC Says Criticism of Adam Schiff Is Now Anti-Semitism Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Democrat Anti-Semitism Congress AOC anti-semitism Allow Media Exception

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY-14). Screen grab via ABC’s “This Week.”

You knew Democrats were going to come to the defense of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) as he is getting blasted by Republicans and those who care about truth for his fabrications in regard to the Ukraine whistleblower story.

But it looks like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) wins the prize for the most ridiculous defense.

Are you ready? Here it is:

“Understand that Trump is engaged in deliberate, atrocious, targeted antisemitism towards Chairman Schiff,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “Then ask yourself why no one cares to denounce it – esp when his accusation of it towards others drove full news cycles earlier this year.”

Wait, what? Criticism of Schiff is anti-Semitism? Is she kidding? The article she cites basically says Trump calling Democrats “savages” and Schiff “shifty” is anti-Semitic.

Um, perhaps the criticism has to do with the fact that Schiff has a small problem with the truth that everyone has seen, from fabricating quotes and not telling the truth about the whistleblower matter to telling Americans he has “evidence” that will prove collusion between the Trump team and Russia, but never producing it.

How about calling out your colleague for not telling the truth?

Maybe this says more about what’s going in AOC’s head then anything else, that she equates perfectly reasonable criticism of lying to anti-Semitism.

But this isn’t even so much a defense of Adam Schiff as an attempt to excuse her sisters in The Squad, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) who have gotten in trouble for their anti-Semitic comments in the past, hence the reason for the second sentence in her tweet.

Needless to say, she got justifiably schooled for this hot take, as Twitchy notes.

Perhaps the best response came from former White House Press Secretary for George W. Bush, Ari Fleischer:

The post Oh My: AOC Says Criticism of Adam Schiff Is Now Anti-Semitism appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group AOCThisWeek-300x176 Oh My: AOC Says Criticism of Adam Schiff Is Now Anti-Semitism Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump democrats Democrat Anti-Semitism Congress AOC anti-semitism Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

On Kickbacks and Democrats, Ukraine-Style

Westlake Legal Group 17329344-1af8-4a1f-8631-ab65d20076a0-1-620x317 On Kickbacks and Democrats, Ukraine-Style Ukrainian collusion in 2016 election Ukraine investigation into 2016 election interference Ukraine President Trump Front Page Stories Foreign Aid Featured Story donald trump Democrats Unhinged democrats Democrat hypocrisy Democrat corruption and graft corruption collusion bill barr Barack Obama Abuse of Power

FILE – In this Jan. 30, 2010, file photo, Vice President Joe Biden, left, with his son Hunter, right, at the Duke Georgetown NCAA college basketball game in Washington. Hunter Biden is expressing regret for being discharged from the Navy Reserve amid published reports that he tested positive for cocaine. The Wall Street Journal reports that Hunter Biden failed the drug test last year and was discharged in February. In a statement issued Thursday, Oct. 16, Biden doesn’t say why he was discharged. He says he’s embarrassed that his actions led to his discharge and that he respects the Navy’s decision. The vice president’s office declined to comment.(AP Photo/Nick Wass, File)

The Democrats – including those embedded in the legacy media – will NEVER figure out President Trump. He has them chasing their tails with each tweet and public utterance. There are several reasons for his public statements: forcing focus on a topic of his choice, misdirection, fortifying his base, doubling down when Democrats attack him, etc. Oh, and I think he has fun doing it, too! Take his public requests to China, Ukraine, and other foreign countries to help “investigate the Bidens’ corruption.” The Democrats take everything at face value and almost always miss the point. It’s not about the Bidens per se; they are merely the vehicle by which the larger topic of public corruption among the political class is being addressed.

When POTUS speaks of dealing with corruption, I believe he is taking a much more expansive view of the subject. It should be remembered that he has been speaking about corruption as it relates to foreign aid for a long time. It was a keen topic of interest way back during the transition period, and the moribund US and global foreign policy establishment went apoplectic in pushing back on suggestions that US foreign aid (and funds for the UN) be curtailed due to corruption and ineffectiveness. Here is just one article among many such that pushed back on the notion of foreign aid cuts. And the flagship Foreign Policy Magazine spins it in terms of “saving foreign aid in the age of Trumpian populism”:

[T]he political mood in the United States, the United Kingdom, and other wealthy Western countries has turned against spending on foreign aid. National interests, not global goals, seem the currency of the times. The win-win mindset inherent in U.S. President John F. Kennedy’s invocation that “a rising tide lifts all boats” is today challenged by a Trumpian zero-sum mindset that appeals to America Firsters, Brexiteers, and nationalist, xenophobic, populist parties across Europe.

Read the rest here. That’s really twisting JFK’s famous quote into a pretzel! There is a contrary view that foreign aid supports corrupt regimes, and that US political elites have figured out how to cash in via kickbacks, etc. Hold that thought for a minute.

As is now known, President Trump spoke about dealing with corruption in Ukraine back in May on Fox News. And we also know that AG Barr and Special US Attorney Durham have been making the rounds overseas investigating the origins of the counterintelligence investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign, with Ukraine being the next stop after Italy. Isn’t it just a bit coincidental that this Ukraine “whistleblower” complaint just popped up in advance of their lawful investigative mission to Ukraine?

And yes, it’s ENTIRELY a legal mission, as the US and Ukraine have a mutual legal assistance treaty for just such actions. The treaty is entitled, “Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters.” It obligates the two countries to collaborate in exchanging information on criminal activities in either country. I like this quote from the letter of transmittal:

Mutual assistance available under the Treaty includes: taking of testimony or statements of persons; providing documents, records, and articles of evidence; serving documents; locating or identifying persons; transferring persons in custody for testimony or other purposes; executing requests for searches and seizures; assisting in proceedings related to restrain confiscation, forfeiture of assets, restitution, and collection of fines; and any other form of assistance not prohibited by the laws of the requested state.

Read the whole treaty here. That sure reads to me like POTUS had plenty of legal standing to go after Ukrainian collusion with the DNC and Clinton campaign, as well as the Bidens’ corruption!

The Democrats and their lickspittle media have been apoplectic about that investigation and are doing everything they can – including bald-faced lying by members of Congress and paid media – to twist the Ukraine story into something it’s not. It’s ironic that the Democrats are accusing Trump of doing something he has not done (demanding a quid pro quo) when one of their leading presidential candidates actually admitted getting a quid pro quo from Ukraine on videotape! Anything to shift the topic away from Democrat crimes and corruption. And that’s what this is all about. The Democrats are misdirecting bigly in the face of mounting evidence of Democrat shenanigans in Ukraine during the 2016 election, as well as the Bidens’ corruption.

By now, everyone has heard about Hunter Biden receiving the princely sum of $50,000 per month from Burisma Holdings Ltd, an “independent” gas conglomerate in Ukraine. There has been a LOT of speculation about what that money bought since Hunter Biden had zero prior experience in the oil and gas industry. But there has been very little consideration given to where that money actually came from.

The Democrats have been masters at using public funds for corrupt political purposes for a long time. They have learned how to launder public money through federal agencies to their cronies, donors and family members. [Republicans do it, too, but on a much smaller scale.] Examples include congressional earmarks (as reported annually by Citizens Against Government Waste), grants from federal agencies (e.g., to Solyndra and other green companies during the Obama regime), funds to public employee unions (with in-kind kickbacks to Democrat Party operations), and tax-exempt donations from all sources (including foreigners) to foundations set up expressly for the purpose of laundering money, nepotism, and pay-for-play.

I believe there is a real nugget in POTUS’s quest to deal with Ukraine (and the Bidens) that has not been mentioned, and that nugget is what has the Democrats so up in arms and willing to march over the cliff politically with this impeachment ruse. There is a high likelihood that US taxpayer funds in the form of foreign aid were laundered through Ukraine (and other corrupt countries), with kickbacks to the likes of Hunter Biden and other politically-connected Americans. And there are even reports that Nancy Pelosi’s son Paul Jr. was on the board of a Ukrainian energy company, too! No wonder San Fran Nan is pressing ahead with the impeachment “inquiry.” Here is one of those reports:

https://twitter.com/HowleyReporter/status/1179893713214025729

Did you know that US foreign aid to Ukraine DOUBLED from $272M in 2015 to $513M in 2016? I wonder where that money went? Accountability under the Petro Poroshenko regime in Ukraine was a joke, and corruption was the key issue that led to Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s landslide victory in April 2019. I am certain that Poroshenko’s defeat was a severe blow to Democrats, in particular the Bidens, because they expected him to keep the lid on their corrupt dealings. However, the new Ukraine president is a reformer who is tackling corruption, and that is welcome news for those of us who, like our president and attorney general, want to find out about the likes of Crowdstrike’s and also various DNC operatives’ activities in Ukraine during the 2016 campaign.

Bottom line: I strongly suspect that the retainer Hunter Biden received was part of the kickback scheme involving US foreign aid laundered through Poroshenko’s regime using Burisma Holdings Ltd. as a cutout. In short, US taxpayers paid Hunter’s salary, thanks to a real quid pro quo executed by his father who was the vice president of the United States! And this misuse of foreign aid dollars is what POTUS is actually targeting, with the Bidens being the means of exposing it all. That’s what the Democrats cannot tolerate because Ukraine wasn’t the only country in which this kickback scheme was practiced during the Obama era. For starters, think about Obama’s Iran nuke agreement and the $1.5 billion…

The end.

The post On Kickbacks and Democrats, Ukraine-Style appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 17329344-1af8-4a1f-8631-ab65d20076a0-1-300x153 On Kickbacks and Democrats, Ukraine-Style Ukrainian collusion in 2016 election Ukraine investigation into 2016 election interference Ukraine President Trump Front Page Stories Foreign Aid Featured Story donald trump Democrats Unhinged democrats Democrat hypocrisy Democrat corruption and graft corruption collusion bill barr Barack Obama Abuse of Power   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Andy McCarthy: ‘The fact that House Democrats invite you to their circus does not require you to beclown yourself’

Westlake Legal Group cummings-620x310 Andy McCarthy: ‘The fact that House Democrats invite you to their circus does not require you to beclown yourself’ President Trump Nancy Pelosi Impeachment process Impeachment of President Trump Front Page Stories Featured Story elijah cummings donald trump democrats corruption Congress Andy McCarthy Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power 2020

Late Friday evening, House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings sent a letter to White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney requesting he submit documents related to their impeachment inquiry by October 18th. In addition to Cummings, it was signed by Reps. Adam Schiff (Chair of House Intelligence Committee) and Eliot Engel (Chair of House Committee on Foreign Affairs). Cummings repeatedly insists that the letter is a subpoena.

The letter states, “We deeply regret that President Trump has put us—and the nation—into this position, but his actions have left us with no choice but to issue this subpoena.”

It cites several earlier deadlines which the White House has ignored.

Cummings writes that he is aware of President Trump’s intention to send a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Monday informing her that the White House refuses to cooperate with any document requests until a full House vote on impeachment has been taken.

Pelosi has refused to do so because once a vote is taken, Republicans will receive “some” rights to participate in the impeachment process. (Although the rights would be minor, Republicans currently have no rights. They can’t even question witnesses that come before the committee.) Additionally, she does not want to force Democrats serving in districts Trump won in 2016 to go on record voting for his impeachment.

He writes, “Speaker Pelosi has confirmed that an impeachment inquiry is underway, and it is not for the White House to say otherwise.” Mr. Cummings is telling Mulvaney it’s an impeachment inquiry because “Pelosi says it is.”

 

Not so fast, says former U.S. attorney and author Andrew McCarthy. He calls the Democrats’ impeachment action “Kabuki theatre.” He writes:

You are not to be faulted if you think a formal inquest is under way and that legal process has been issued. The misimpression is completely understandable if you have been taking in media coverage — in particular, reporting on a haughty Sept. 27 letter from House Democrats, presuming to direct Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on pain of citation for obstruction, to cooperate in their demands to depose State Department officials and review various records.

As mentioned above, McCarthy explains that until a formal vote is taken in the house, this is not an impeachment inquiry and their “subpoenas” are merely letters. “Legally, it has no compulsive power. If anything, it is rife with legal deficiencies.” Rather than conducting an impeachment inquiry, he says House Democrats are merely conducting their 2020 campaign.

He notes that “standing committees do have subpoena power,” but recipients often object to subpoenas and choose to litigate. “Such challenges take time, though, and Democrats are in a hurry to close this show after a short run. Democrats want to have an impeachment show — um, inquiry — on television; they do not want to defend its bona fides in court.”

McCarthy writes that the Democrats are trying to “ipse dixit” their way to impeachment. I had to look that one up. It means “an assertion made but not proved.” Yes, that’s exactly what they’re doing. That’s how the Russian collusion investigation began as well.

In both the letter to Mick Mulvaney and the letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, it says that failure to comply “shall constitute evidence of obstruction of the House’s impeachment inquiry.” But that is just not true.

The House is an independent body and can conduct an impeachment anyway they chose. However, McCarthy points out:

The courts maintain their authority to protect the legal rights of persons and institutions ensnared in kangaroo tribunals. The fact that House Democrats invite you to their circus does not require you to beclown yourself.

Any competent court asked to evaluate a demand for information under the rubric of impeachment will observe that the process has a history. When the Framers debated whether to include an impeachment clause in the Constitution, they had serious concerns. They were designing a separation-of-powers system that endowed the coordinate branches with checks and balances to police each other. They understood that impeachment authority was necessary, but feared it would give the legislature too much power over the executive.

They also worried that impeachment could be politicized. If it were too easy to do procedurally, or it could be resorted to for trifling acts of maladministration, factions opposed to the president would be tempted to try to overturn elections and grind the government to a halt.

To address these concerns, the Framers adopted a burdensome standard — high crimes and misdemeanors (in addition to treason and bribery) — that would restrict impeachable offenses to truly egregious abuses of power. Then they erected an even higher bar: a two-thirds supermajority requirement for conviction in the Senate.

All this was to ensure that the electoral will of the people must never be overturned in the absence of misconduct so severe that it results in a broad consensus that the nation’s well-being requires removing the president from power.

President Trump is not without defenses. He has various privileges available to him and McCarthy writes that judges are generally deferential toward an executive’s claims of privilege. But Congress is given wider latitude to probe in a real impeachment inquiry.

If the House went to court to enforce their demands right now, before a formal vote has been taken, a judge would be less apt to side with them. McCarthy said, “The first thing a court’s going to want to know is, ‘Has the House voted to have an impeachment inquiry?’ And, a lot hinges on that, including how much expansion a court would give a president’s claim of executive privilege and privilege over matters that are in the president’s duties under Article II.”

Impeachment actions in the past have followed bipartisan debate in the House. They are conducted when a president is perceived to have committed a crime. Trump has not committed a crime and Republicans are not part of this action. The Democrats know they don’t have an “impeachable offense,” which is why they want to move so quickly. They are using impeachment as a political tool which is the exact opposite of what our Founders had intended.

McCarthy notes that, “If Democrats truly thought they had a case, they wouldn’t be in such a rush — they’d want everyone to have time to study it. But they don’t have a case, so instead they’re giving us a show.”

The post Andy McCarthy: ‘The fact that House Democrats invite you to their circus does not require you to beclown yourself’ appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group cummings-300x150 Andy McCarthy: ‘The fact that House Democrats invite you to their circus does not require you to beclown yourself’ President Trump Nancy Pelosi Impeachment process Impeachment of President Trump Front Page Stories Featured Story elijah cummings donald trump democrats corruption Congress Andy McCarthy Allow Media Exception Abuse of Power 2020   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

From the International Journal of Social Robotics: Sex Robots Should be Programmed to Reject Their Owners in Order to Fight Rape Culture

Westlake Legal Group animal-2592-620x414 From the International Journal of Social Robotics: Sex Robots Should be Programmed to Reject Their Owners in Order to Fight Rape Culture Uncategorized The Sexes sexual harassment Sexual Assault Science rape culture Not Today Internet Front Page Stories Featured Story Culture Allow Media Exception #timesup #metoo

 

 

Do you touch couches inappropriately? Have you molested a footstool? Do you say shameful things to blenders?

You probably told your stove it was hot, you animal.

Well, a couple of university intellectuals wanna liberate you from your wiley ways by training you to always ask for consent from inanimate objects — or at least inorganic ones. In fact, if you master respect for the mechanical, you just might incorporate it into liaisons with the living.

Meet Pim Haselager and Anco Peeters.

Dr. Pim is an associate professor at Radboud University’s Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior in Nijmegan, Netherlands. Anco was a research assistant at Radboud and is currently a PhD student at Australia’s University of Wollongong.

The two fans of “virtue ethics” have teamed up to create an 11-page treatise on sex robots and their use in building a better world.

As the piece — published in the International Journal of Social Robotics — states, “We propose that virtue ethics can be used to address ethical issues central to discussions about sex robots. In particular, we argue virtue ethics is well equipped to focus on the implications of sex robots for human moral character.”

Their “evaluation develops in four steps”:

  • [W]e present virtue ethics as a suitable framework for the evaluation of human–robot relationships.
  • [W]e show the advantages of our virtue ethical account of sex robots by comparing it to current instrumentalist approaches, showing how the former better captures the reciprocal interaction between robots and their users.
  • [W]e examine how a virtue ethical analysis of intimate human–robot relationships could inspire the design of robots that support the cultivation of virtues. We suggest that a sex robot which is equipped with a consent-module could support the cultivation of compassion when used in supervised, therapeutic scenarios.
  • [W]e discuss the ethical implications of our analysis for user autonomy and responsibility.

How might it assist in the “cultivation of virtue”?

Well, like this:

One way of preventing unwanted behavioural patterns is by providing sex robots with a module that can initiate a consent scenario. Like consenting humans, a robot and its human partner will have to communicate carefully about the kind of interaction that will take place and the human will be confronted by the subject-like appearance and the behaviour of the robot. And like in a relationship between humans, this communication could potentially result in the robot sometimes not consenting and terminating the interaction. Such interaction with a robot might prevent the practice of unidirectional behavioural habits and a resulting increased objectification of other humans.

So imgaine it: There you are — so pitiful, you need to a robot in order to get lucky. Then you make your move, give it your best shot, but she’s not in the mood.

“Not tonight, I have a core processorache.”

You get shot down by a gadget. One that was solely made to have sex.

But look on the bright side — it’ll teach you to mind your manners with your end table.

And let’s just pretend you don’t even own a vacuum.

Back to your cold fish of a sex machine, the authors say she’s on her way. Or he.

In fact, they’re trusting AI expert and author David Levy, who believes a human will marry a robot by 2050.

From the report:

For the present discussion, we will assume that the physical aspects of these robots can be worked out more or less along the lines which Levy describes. Interestingly, Levy goes so far as to say that “robot sex could become better for many people than sex with humans, as robots surpass human sexual technique and become capable of satisfying everyone’s sexual needs.”

Pim and Anco conclude their piece thusly:

The implications of developing love and sex robots are potentially huge and we have striven to tentatively chart one path, a virtue theoretical approach, within this domain. … We suggest that there is the possibility, worthy to be investigated, that some changes might be for the good. When we realize that the way we design and use such robots is bound to affect us, we can think about ways of improving ourselves through the technology, by careful consideration and monitoring.

So there ya go. Love and robots — it’s coming.

But sex? You’ll have to ask.

-ALEX

 

See 3 more pieces from me:

Woman’s Boyfriend Shoots Her In The Head, But She Forgets For Almost Two Months So They Keep Dating

Man Gets Harassed And Accused Of Shoplifting Over The Suspicious Bulge In His Pants. He Keeps Insisting It’s His Penis

How Far Would You Go For A Lost Love? Here’s An Incredible Story About A Family And Their Commitment To Never Give Up

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 

The post From the International Journal of Social Robotics: Sex Robots Should be Programmed to Reject Their Owners in Order to Fight Rape Culture appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group animal-2592-300x200 From the International Journal of Social Robotics: Sex Robots Should be Programmed to Reject Their Owners in Order to Fight Rape Culture Uncategorized The Sexes sexual harassment Sexual Assault Science rape culture Not Today Internet Front Page Stories Featured Story Culture Allow Media Exception #timesup #metoo   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com