web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "threats"

Epstein’s Former Cellmate Claims He’s Being Threatened to Stay Silent On Epstein’s Suicide

Westlake Legal Group jeffrey-epstein-mugshot-620x317 Epstein’s Former Cellmate Claims He’s Being Threatened to Stay Silent On Epstein’s Suicide threats suicide prison police Nicholas Tartaglione News Jeffrey Epstein Front Page Stories Allow Media Exception

FILE – This July 27, 2006 arrest file photo made available by the Palm Beach, Fla., Sheriff’s Office shows Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, has been arrested in New York on sex trafficking charges. Two law enforcement officials said Epstein was taken into federal custody Saturday, July 6, 2019, on charges involving sex-trafficking allegations that date to the 2000s. (AP Photo/Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office, File)

Things around the Epstein suicided case continue to get weirder as attorney’s representing Jeffrey Epstein’s former cellmate have filed a request with the court to move him to another prison according to recent filings.

The New York Post reported on Tuesday that cellmate and former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione shared a cell with the financier, but was transferred out before Epstein’s “suicide.” Now he’s being threatened by guards to stay silent about it:

Jeffrey Epstein’s former Manhattan cellmate says guards at the lockup have been threatening him since the financier’s death, according to a legal filing by his attorneys Tuesday asking a judge to move him to a new prison.

Hulking ex-cop Nicholas Tartaglione — who briefly bunked with Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center — has been told by various guards there to “shut up,” “stop talking” and “stop complaining,” as questions swirled about how the accused sex trafficker was able to commit suicide in federal custody, Tartaglione attorney Bruce Barket says in a letter to White Plains federal Judge Kenneth Karas.

Tartaglione’s lawyer, Bruce Barket, wrote a letter to White Plains federal Judge Kenneth Karas, telling him that Tartaglione is in possession of very damaging information about the people who are in charge of him and has been threatened into silence, suggesting that he is in very real danger.

“The clear message Mr. Tartaglione has received is that if he conveys information about the facility or about [Epstein’s] recent suicide, there will be a price to pay,” Barket wrote. “Whether or not the investigators into the suicide chose to interview Mr. Tartaglione about the attempted suicide to which he was witness or about how the facility is run and the conditions under which the inmates are forced to live, the correction officers know he has information potentially very damaging to the very people now charged with guarding him or their coworkers.”

Tartaglione, 51, is currently on death row himself for a drug-related slaying of four. Epstein claimed his neck injuries suffered in July were given to him from Tartaglione, but Barket has fiercely denied that according to the New York Post.

The post Epstein’s Former Cellmate Claims He’s Being Threatened to Stay Silent On Epstein’s Suicide appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group jeffrey-epstein-300x153 Epstein’s Former Cellmate Claims He’s Being Threatened to Stay Silent On Epstein’s Suicide threats suicide prison police Nicholas Tartaglione News Jeffrey Epstein Front Page Stories Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Here we go. Twitter can now censor Trump’s tweets

Westlake Legal Group Twitter Here we go. Twitter can now censor Trump’s tweets twitter threats The Blog suspension donald trump banned

Twitter’s latest policy change regarding how they choose to trample on the speech of their users and avoid triggering anyone went into effect last week and now it’s being fully kicked into gear. They are also no longer making exceptions for world leaders, candidates for office or anyone else of the sort. Yep… they’re looking at you, President Trump.

Real Clear Politics has the rundown of the new changes, with a particular focus on how it may directly impact the @RealDonaldTrump account. They also highlight much of the inconsistency in Twitter’s policies in general.

Last week Twitter announced that it would no longer exempt most tweets by government officials from its rules regarding what it deems abusive behavior. Historically, tweets such as President Trump’s were allowed to remain up, even if the company determined that they violated its policies, due to their being in the “public interest” as an official communication by a head of state.

Now, the company will hide and deprioritize those tweets — and possibly even suspend accounts — for language it deems outside its view of acceptable speech.

Under the new policy to “protect the health of the public conversation on Twitter,” which went into effect June 27, tweets that, in Twitter’s eyes, represent threats of violence can result in a public official’s account (or that of a candidate for office) being suspended until he or she deletes the offending messages. Nonviolent tweets the company sees as violating its speech rules will be hidden behind an overlay that users must click through to view the tweet, as is the case with pornography and other “sensitive” content. The tweets will also be deemphasized by Twitter’s algorithms to massively reduce their discoverability.

Before getting to the specifics of how the rules are applied to President Trump (and presumably other world leaders) it’s worth noting the language that Twitter uses in discussing their capabilities. Remember how virulently they denied shadowbanning people? What does the phrase “deemphasized… to massively reduce their discoverability” sound like to you? That’s the definition of shadowbanning. They’ve been doing it for a long time and they are doing it still. Don’t expect it to change.

The hilarious part of the rules change is that they’re claiming they can apply the same rules to Presidential communications that they do to personal conversations or even trolling. For example, their policy against threats of violence could, in the opinion of Twitter’s spokesperson, be applied to a Trump tweet where he threatens military action against Iran if they don’t comply with international agreements or thwart sanctions. Also, anything they perceive as being racist, sexist, homophobic or what have you could result in an account suspension until the tweets are deleted With enough violations, the account could be scrapped.

Anyone care to place a wager on what the President’s first reaction will be if they suspend him for what they define as a naughty tweet? I’m guessing that “all options will be on the table.” But all it would take would be a press release saying that Donald Trump had created a Gab account and that app would shoot into the stratosphere overnight.

Here’s the thing, though. As sad as it may be to consider it, I really can’t criticize Twitter for any of this. We’re not talking about a Free Speech issue because Twitter isn’t the government. They’re a private company and they get to set the rules for the use of their product. Of course, those rules will pretty much only be enforced against conservatives because of their staggering liberal bias, but that’s how the free market tumbles. If we don’t like it we can vote with our feet.

Of course, so can the President. And if he goes to another platform he’ll be bringing millions of people with him.

The post Here we go. Twitter can now censor Trump’s tweets appeared first on Hot Air.

Westlake Legal Group Twitter-300x159 Here we go. Twitter can now censor Trump’s tweets twitter threats The Blog suspension donald trump banned   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Reddit Ignores Calls for Violence On Left-Leaning Subreddits Despite Censoring Pro-Trump Subreddit

Westlake Legal Group conservatives-silenced-620x326 Reddit Ignores Calls for Violence On Left-Leaning Subreddits Despite Censoring Pro-Trump Subreddit Violence threats subreddit Social Media Reddit r/the_donald Politics Internet Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Censorship Allow Media Exception

Reddit recently gagged the subreddit r/The_Donald with a “quarantine” that essentially makes the subreddit invisible unless you go searching directly for it. When you do, it asks you if you want to see the content within, giving you the impression that it’s dangerous.

It’s not.

The subreddit is a pro-Trump room that, as its defenders describe it in an article by Cullen McCue at Reality Circuit, is a pro-Trump, pro-law enforcement community within Reddit. It’s also a very large community that is heavily policed by its own moderators. However, from time to time, bad characters are going to pop up. Typically, any calls for violence or overt shows of racism are removed from the subreddit with the commenter banned.

However, because it’s a pro-Trump subreddit, it’s been the target of multiple left-leaning groups:

Like any online community, r/the_donald is subject to any number of characters. You’ve got trolls, people who never leave the internet and full on radicals. Sure you can ban their accounts/remove comments – as r/the_donald has always done – but there will still be out of bounds content that seeps through the cracks. Any reasonable person can understand this, but there are agendas at play here.

R/the_donald has long been a target of Reddit. Subs like r/againsthatesubreddits – Reddit’s version of Media Matters – have long had the sub in their cross-hairs. Reddit is also an overwhelmingly left-leaning site as a whole, so TD has always been under increased scrutiny.

Interestingly, as McCue points out, far left subreddits are typically left well alone, and even members from groups like Antifa have a subreddit where they congregate, and calls for violence are often ignored:

Since Reddit is overwhelmingly left-wing (and a recipient of Chinese investment), far left subreddits are undisturbed. R/ChapoTrapHouse is the home of every edgy socialist you’ve ever met. Ya know that kid you vaguely remember from high school who posts Antifa tier shit on Facebook to the point where you unfriend him, but is a skin and bones pussy when you run into him at the grocery store? This subreddit is where they all congregate.

Chapo is filled with calls to violence, edgelord reactions to the suffering of their political opponents and just overall scumbaggotry. R/LateStageCapitalism is more of the same and supposedly “neutral subs” like r/politics are only populated by the most radical of leftists. Calls to violence (not removed and with up-votes) have been well documented there, in r/news, r/pics and other subs.

McCue then gave a massive list of threats and calls for violence. Here are some of the highlights.

  • r/LateStageCapitalism MOD announcement – “No one can reasonably argue that the Republican congressmen shot today didn’t deserve it. They absolutely did. They created this situation of unparalleled division. They’re trying to destroy society to line their own pockets.”
  • r/politics “Let’s put arsenic in drinks and slip it to Trump supporters”
  • [Regarding Republicans] “What else can be done?”  “Going to the homes of Republican lawmakers in the middle of the night  dragging them into the street and turning them into tree ornaments [Lynching].” [+37]
  • “We’re getting to the point that it’s past the need for protest  but time for violent and extreme actions. The government needs to be reminded that is has a reason to be afraid of us.”
  • r/anarchism praising the stabbing of a Trump supporter just for being white

There’s plenty more than that.

Reddit is filthy with left-leaning conspiracy theories and calls for radicalism, yet these often go untouched because no one is really looking into them as they are right-leaning or pro-Trump subreddits.

More importantly, they see that pro-Trump subreddits are perfect distribution centers of information that runs contrary to leftist and mainstream narratives. Silicon Valley’s recent drive to harness the flow of information to make it harder to counteract the lies is what made the r/The-Donald subreddit a quarantine zone, not any kind of violent rhetoric.

 

The post Reddit Ignores Calls for Violence On Left-Leaning Subreddits Despite Censoring Pro-Trump Subreddit appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group conservatives-silenced-300x158 Reddit Ignores Calls for Violence On Left-Leaning Subreddits Despite Censoring Pro-Trump Subreddit Violence threats subreddit Social Media Reddit r/the_donald Politics Internet Front Page Stories Featured Story donald trump Censorship Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Scandals Involving Joe and Hunter Biden Are Becoming a Problem and the Media Have Finally Noticed

Westlake Legal Group ap-joe-biden-620x413 Scandals Involving Joe and Hunter Biden Are Becoming a Problem and the Media Have Finally Noticed vice president Ukraine threats primary Politics Love Child Joe Biden influence peddling hunter biden Getting Rich Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story denial democrats corruption China ashley madison 2020 election 2020 Democrats

Vice President Joe Biden speaks as he campaigns for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at Bucks County Community College in Bristol, Pa., Friday, Oct. 7, 2016. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, has an extremely checkered history when it comes to business dealings and ethics. Not so much anything he did in those business dealings, but how he possibly got them. Namely, the implication based on serious evidence is that his father used his influence as Vice President to get Hunter some very lucrative positions in countries like Ukraine and China.

Until now, this has mostly been the domain of right-wing media. That was to be expected as anything that’s harmful to a Democrat is typically buried in the mainstream media.

We’ve now entered a different phase though, as the Democratic primary heats up and the debates start next week. Biden is not currently running against a Republican, he’s running against 20 (or so) other Democrats and those Democrats want to take him down. That means the media can’t just ignore what’s happening in unison anymore.

Case in point, this latest write-up by ABC News, which goes right at the heart of Joe Biden’s scandals involving influence peddling for his son.

In April of 2014, the then-vice president led a U.S. delegation to Kiev tasked with rooting out corruption and advocating for Ukraine to diminish its reliance on Russian oil. The Obama administration had pledged aid money to support a fledgling Ukrainian administration recovering from a revolution that ousted the country’s previous leader.

“You have to fight the cancer of corruption that is endemic in your system right now,” Biden told the Ukrainian parliament during the first of several post-revolution visits to the country. “And with the right investments and the right choices, Ukraine can reduce its energy dependence and increase its energy security.”

Within weeks of his visit, Ukraine’s largest energy producer, Burisma Energy, appointed Hunter Biden to a paid directorship on the firm’s board.

Just months before, in December of 2013, there was a similar episode when the then-vice president led an Obama administration effort to tamp down tensions in the Far East. Hunter Biden disembarked from Air Force Two in Beijing alongside his father, ahead of a series of meetings between the vice president and several high-ranking members of China’s ruling party. Upon his departure, Joe Biden called Chinese President Xi Jinping a “good friend.”

Within weeks of that visit, Hunter Biden was doing business there, as a participant in a firm called Bohai Harvest RST. The corporation formed a novel Chinese-American investment partnership that involved such Chinese state-owned firms as the Bank of China. Reports at the time said they sought to raise $1.5 billion.

The idea that all of that is just coincidence strains belief. The younger Biden was even on the trip to China. Two weeks later he’s getting a lucrative position with a Chinese investment firm that’s partnered with Chinese government owned banks. Come on.

Biden’s issues in Ukraine also go deeper than just his son getting a job out of nowhere. There’s also the admission by Biden that he threatened to withhold aid from Ukraine if they didn’t fire a prosecutor who just happened to be investigating the very firm Hunter Biden was working for.

Here’s the details.

Back in 2016, as The Daily Wire previously reported, Biden pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to replace the country’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin. Biden later bragged in 2018 that he was able to get Shokin removed by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees. Shokin was fired.

What Biden neglected to mention is that at the time he was working to get Shokin fired, the prosecutor was looking into Burisma Holdings, a company that employs Hunter Biden. Hunter’s American based firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC, also received monthly transfers of more than $166,000 from Burisma from 2014 to 2015. Shokin was investigating these payments, the Wire previously reported.

With Shokin out of the picture, the investigation into Burisma and by extension, Hunter, ended. This kept the issue from affecting Democrats in 2016, specifically, Hillary Clinton’s election campaign. Clinton still lost.

We are again told by the Biden campaign that it’s all just happenstance.

But it’s not just foreign dealings haunting Joe Biden in relation to his son’s actions. This news broke today and could get messy in a hurry.

This stems from a women who gave birth to a child back in 2018. She’s not making this accusation idly or just in the media. She’s going to court and putting the weight of action behind what she’s saying. What the circumstances of the relationship were aren’t really known yet. Did Hunter Biden abandon the mother and child knowingly? Is it even his child? We’ll find out eventually but his past doesn’t do much to absolve him of the possibility. He was revealed as part of the Ashley Madison hack back in 2015, a pro-adultery website. After getting divorced, he dated his deceased brother’s widow and just recently married another woman last month.

If this were a general election, I’d dismiss all this as going nowhere. Noway would our stalwart media allow any of this to take down Biden in a race against Trump. But we aren’t in a general election and there are a lot of 2020 candidates gunning for him who have more liberal credibility with the Democratic primary base. That means the media will end up reporting this stuff and it’s going to get brought up, whether in interviews or in the debates.

Biden’s got a slog ahead of him and things are going to get ugly. Of course, if he makes it to the general election, you can expect all of this to go away very quickly.

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

 

 

The post Scandals Involving Joe and Hunter Biden Are Becoming a Problem and the Media Have Finally Noticed appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group joe-biden-300x169 Scandals Involving Joe and Hunter Biden Are Becoming a Problem and the Media Have Finally Noticed vice president Ukraine threats primary Politics Love Child Joe Biden influence peddling hunter biden Getting Rich Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story denial democrats corruption China ashley madison 2020 election 2020 Democrats   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Defying the Hysterics, Mexico Starts Caving to Trump’s Tariff Threats

Westlake Legal Group mexican-police-caravan-620x413 Defying the Hysterics, Mexico Starts Caving to Trump’s Tariff Threats United States threats Tariffs Politics Migrant Flows Mexico Mexican National Guard Illegal Immigration Guatemala Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump democrats deal Caving border enforcement

Mexican federal police in riot gear receive instructions at the border crossing between Guatemala and Mexico, in Ciudad Hidalgo, Mexico, Friday, Oct. 19, 2018. Members of a 3,000-strong migrant caravan have massed in this Guatemalan border town across the muddy Suchiate River from Mexico, as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens retaliation if they continue toward the United States. (AP Photo/Moises Castillo)

I’ve been critical of Trump’s trade policies at times. My instinct is to oppose tariffs, especially if they are targeted to benefit certain industries at the expense of consumers and other workers. For example, I don’t think Pennsylvania residents are inherently more entitled to steel manufacturing jobs than any other American. Trump’s messaging can often be confusing and that’s been part of the issue. Tariffs as leverage are good. Tariffs as a means to their own end are inevitably harmful.

Despite my prior concerns, at some point I made the decision that I was done reacting rashly toward the President’s trade policy. I found much of the hysteria on the right over every new rumor of a tariff to be tedious and an overreaction. The economy is not going to crash because your Chipotle burrito might cost $0.05 more and even dealing with the bigger items, we were actually talking small fractions of the overall price being affected. One could certainly argue that even small increases are worthy of disapproval and harmful, but the constant preaching of Armageddon is all just a bit much.

I say all that to say that when President Trump announced new tariff threats toward Mexico in order to get them to help with illegal immigration, I took a wait and see approach. It was clear to me that this was a leverage play and that Mexico had far more to lose than we did. I opined at the time that I doubted they’d ever even go into effect.

I may end up being right because Mexico is currently in the process of caving to Trump’s demands.

This follows reports that Mexico is already beefing up its southern border.

Mexican soldiers, armed police and migration officials blocked hundreds of migrants after they crossed the border from Guatemala in a caravan into southern Mexico on Wednesday, and detained dozens of them, a witness from a migrant aid group and an official said.

The Mexican response in the border town of Metapa, which included dozens of soldiers, marked a toughening of the government’s efforts to curb the flow of mainly Central American migrants, said Salva Cruz, a coordinator with Fray Matias de Cordova.

“That many sailors and military police, yes, it’s new,” Cruz said, by WhatsApp, from Metapa, in the southern border state of Chiapas, where the vast majority of migrants cross into Mexico.

Things are moving quickly and there’s still a lot up in the air but what’s clear is that Mexico got the message.

They have no desire to take the hit when they so heavily rely on exports to the U.S. for their economic stability. In the past, the Mexicans have rebuffed signing a “safe 3rd country” agreement with us. We have such an agreement with Canada already. What it essentially does is say that migrants (they aren’t technically illegal aliens yet) must make their asylum claims in the first country they arrive in that isn’t their own. Guatemalans must do so in Mexico while Hondurans would do so in Guatemala, etc.

This helps stem the flow of “asylum shopping,” where migrants pass up perfectly safe offers of asylum in order to get to the U.S. for economic reasons. Asylum is not an ticket to try to find the best situation possible. It’s there to mitigate life threatening situations.

Now, Mexico and Guatemala are working with us to setup proper asylum procedures, where they aren’t making a dangerous 2,000 mile trip when asylum is being offered to them where they are in Mexico.

The news has some conservatives changing their tune on the whole ordeal.

Good for Shapiro. One of the reasons I enjoy his material is that he does his best to be an honest broker. He’s willing to admit he was wrong here when a lot of other “conservative” voices wouldn’t.

If I’m Donald Trump, I take this deal or something close to it. There’s only so much Mexico can do and these latest terms seem like a max effort to me. It’s unrealistic to think they can actually stop all migrant flows to the the U.S. but if they are willing to help us enforce logical asylum policies and send thousands of troops to their southern border, that’s a big win for the President.

Even if a deal is struck in the next few days, one thing is certain. Democrats will oppose it because the goal for them has never been to stop illegal immigration or secure the border. They want these people making the inhuman journey at the behest of the cartels because they see these people as political leverage. No doubt some liberal judge will attempt to get involved here as well.

Regardless, it appears that Trump’s leverage play has worked and perhaps that’ll earn him a little more benefit of the doubt next time. Ah, who am I kidding?

————————————————-

Enjoying the read? Please visit my archive and check out some of my latest articles.

I’ve got a new twitter! Please help by following @bonchieredstate.

The post Defying the Hysterics, Mexico Starts Caving to Trump’s Tariff Threats appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group migrant-caravan-adjusted-cropped-AP-300x159 Defying the Hysterics, Mexico Starts Caving to Trump’s Tariff Threats United States threats Tariffs Politics Migrant Flows Mexico Mexican National Guard Illegal Immigration Guatemala Front Page Stories Front Page Featured Story donald trump democrats deal Caving border enforcement   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

John Bolton is sending a message to Iran

Westlake Legal Group john-bolton-is-sending-a-message-to-iran John Bolton is sending a message to Iran threats The Blog john bolton Iran aircraft carrier

Westlake Legal Group Trump-Bolton John Bolton is sending a message to Iran threats The Blog john bolton Iran aircraft carrier

The USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group, along with a collection of bombers, is on their way to the Middle East to send a “clear an unmistakable message” to Iran, according to National Security Advisor John Bolton. This was a curious way to announce a shift in military deployment (more on that in a moment) but it comes following some unspecified intelligence indicating that Iran was preparing to engage in some hostilities. It’s also happening at the same time that Iranian backed terrorists have been launching hundreds of missiles into Israel. (NY Post)

John Bolton warned on Sunday that the Trump administration would send a “clear and unmistakable message” to Iran as a carrier strike group was traveling to the region amid tensions in Gaza.

President Trump’s National Security Advisor said in a statement that the country was deploying USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and a bomber task force to the region.

“The United States is not seeking war with the Iranian regime, but we are fully prepared to respond to any attack, whether by proxy, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or regular Iranian forces,” Bolton said in the statement.

We probably don’t need to see the actual intel that was received to believe that Iran was up to something. They have a history of aggressive behavior even in the best of times and President Trump has been beating them up with sanctions and nixing Obama’s nuclear deal, so these are far from being “the best of times.” It’s also long been known that Iran funnels money and weapons to Hezbollah to assist them with attacks on Israel. None of this comes as too much of a shock to anyone who has been paying attention.

What is curious here is that the announcement came from the National Security Advisor. The NSA has no direct role in the chain of command of the military. Normally, an announcement like this would have come from either the President himself or the Department of Defense. Bolton wouldn’t have come out and made such announcement without marching orders from President Trump (or at least I hope he wouldn’t), so we can assume that this was done with the blessings of the White House.

Bolton is no doubt enjoying the role since he’s one of the more hawkish members of the administration, to say the least. He was recently rattling sabers in the direction of Venezuela, suggesting that military intervention there on behalf of Juan Guaido was still being considered. He’s also long been a stern critic of Iran. I’m not sure that having him deliver the message really does any damage, but it’s yet another example of the President’s frequently unconventional approach to policymaking.

The crews of the Abraham Lincoln and her escorts are in for some taxing duty in the days, weeks and probably months to come. Standing guard over Iran is no fun, I can assure you. Back in 1980, I spent nearly 100 days straight sailing in circles on a different aircraft carrier during the Iran hostage crisis without ever touching land. We were on a desolate stretch of empty water in the Gulf of Oman that came to be unaffectionately known as Gonzo Station (Gulf of Oman Naval Zone of Operations). The atmosphere tends to be stagnant and hot, with everyone operating on edge, waiting for a possible order to launch a strike.

Best of luck to our sailors, pilots and support crews. I don’t envy you the task in front of you.

The post John Bolton is sending a message to Iran appeared first on Hot Air.

Westlake Legal Group Trump-Bolton-300x153 John Bolton is sending a message to Iran threats The Blog john bolton Iran aircraft carrier   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

NY Post Was Not Playing Around With Its Take Down Of Ilhan Omar’s 9/11 Comments

Many are rightfully outraged by Rep. Ilhan Omar’s comments about the terrorists that attacked on 9/11 taking the lives of some 3,000 innocent people, with Omar describing it as “some people” who “did something.”

As Ed Morrisey highlighted at Town Hall, hardly anyone in the mainstream media covered this overtly horrid way of describing one of the worst tragedies to befall the United States. The New York Post, however, did cover Omar’s comments.

Not only did they cover the comments, but they also made it their front page story, and pulled zero punches in their takedown of Omar.

Inside, the New York Post’s editorial board eviscerated Omar for not only her comment, but her response to the outrage by pointing at those angry of her making light of the deaths of 3,000 American civilians by claiming those expressing anger were guilty of “incitement.”

Some people did something? Wow. What a way to describe the heinous surprise attack on America that claimed 3,000 lives. …

Yet Omar upped the obscure-the-facts ante Wednesday, declaring criticism of her “some people did something” line to be “incitement,” on the grounds that she has received death threats.

Huh? She’d rightly be outraged if anyone minimized those threats as merely “some words from some people.”

Omar’s cavalier brushing off of the murder of thousands of innocents on 9/11 should shock all Americans, Muslims included.

She even tripled down on her comments while appearing on CBS’ Late Night with Stephen Colbert, saying that the only reason people are as angry with her as they are is that she’s a Muslim.

“It is very much embedded in a lot of our culture these days, where you will have people come after minorities for things that they say, that they might have insinuated,” she said according to the NYP.

I have to agree with Morrisey about how to view Omar’s comments, at least if we’re to go by her own rules. The death threats coming at Omar could be viewed as “some people” who are “doing something.” It’s gross that Omar believes that the only time we should take death seriously is when it pertains to her in some way, and that racism is totally okay if it’s directed at Jewish people, but not Muslims.

I applaud the New York Post for this massive verbal slap. Every publication should show a bit of bravery and call out horrific things like the kind Omar did.

 

The post NY Post Was Not Playing Around With Its Take Down Of Ilhan Omar’s 9/11 Comments appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group OMAR-300x166 NY Post Was Not Playing Around With Its Take Down Of Ilhan Omar’s 9/11 Comments threats racism Politics New York Post Muslims Media Jewish People incitement Ilhan Omar Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats death Allow Media Exception 9/11   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com