web analytics
a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2015 Libero Themes.
All Rights Reserved.

8:30 - 6:00

Our Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

703-406-7616

Call For Free 15/M Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Search
Menu
Westlake Legal Group > Posts tagged "Vice"

Mystery solved: How a fresh, pristine In-n-Out burger ended up 1,500 miles away from the nearest franchise

Westlake Legal Group i Mystery solved: How a fresh, pristine In-n-Out burger ended up 1,500 miles away from the nearest franchise Vice The Blog New York City lincoln boehm In-N-Out helen vivas burger

To cleanse the palate, I owe you closure on this after having pronounced it the most compelling minor mystery in American news yesterday. The facts are straightforward: A guy walking down the block in Jamaica, Queens (i.e. greater NYC) a few days ago spotted an In-n-Out burger lying in the street, much to his surprise. Why surprise? Because there are no In-n-Out franchises east of Texas. And this burger didn’t look old. It looked fresh. Immaculate. Not soggy and worn, as a burger with all the fixins normally quickly would. How? “It genuinely shook me to my core,” said the burger’s discoverer, Lincoln Boehm, who’s apparently easily shaken.

One theory: Rich people. New York City has a lot of ’em! If Mike Bloomberg or any of several thousand other ultra-rich New Yorkers get a hankering for In-n-Out, they can have it delivered without a problem. But if some rich eccentric had ordered out to Texas, why was there just one burger in the street? Presumably the whole order would have been lost en route.

And why the hell was it in Jamaica? The rich folk live in Manhattan and Brooklyn.

Another theory kicking around the Internet as this picked up media steam was that it was a viral marketing stunt by In-n-Out itself. What if they were planning to begin operations on the east coast and this was part of a still-secret promotion? First someone would find a random burger on the street in Jamaica. Then one would turn up in Staten Island. Then a few would be discovered in the Bronx. “NEW YORK ROCKED BY UNEXPLAINED BURGER INVASION,” the tabloids would scream. Were they being carried into the City by rats somehow? Were they multiplying of their own accord, like tribbles? And then, voila — In-n-Out would spill the beans about new locations in NYC and all would be revealed.

But there were no other burgers. And In-n-Out claimed to be “surprised” by the discovery. Hmmm.

My own theory from yesterday’s post: Either Boehm took the photo in some other city and was pranking the media about finding it in NYC to show that they’ll print anything without fact-checking *or* “someone brought some In-n-Out with them on a flight home to NYC from out west and then got careless at the curb outside their apartment when they were focused on unloading their luggage from the cab.”

I almost had it right. Boehm has a piece up at Vice today with the apparent solution to the mystery: A 16-year-old girl from Queens reached out to him after the story of his burger discovery went viral to say that the burger was almost certainly hers. It was one of several she bought at an In-n-Out in Encinitas, California, on the night of July 19, before a long red-eye flight home to New York. She told the employees there that she was going to eat them on the plane and over the course of the following day so they took the produce and sauce off and put those in separate containers to keep the burgers from getting soggy. She has screenshots of the gate at the airport terminal and even of the In-n-Out receipt. She landed in NYC early on the 20th and rushed to make the bus for home — where the fateful mishap happened:

She landed at JFK a bit earlier than her 5:27 am estimated arrival time (again, props to JetBlue) and immediately made her way to the JFK-Jamaica AirTrain. She got off in Jamaica to make her transfer to the Q44 bus that would take her back to her home in Flushing, Queens when she saw the bus sitting a block away at the stop, about to leave.

This was when her badminton training came in handy. She started running down the street to try and catch the bus with the now slightly greasy bag of three In-N-Out Burgers in her hand. The good news: She caught the bus. The bad news: The bag burst open at the bottom while she made this fateful sprint.

Again, thanks to her badminton training, her reaction time was elite enough to enable her to catch two of the three burgers before they fell to the ground. But once she sat down on the bus and caught her breath, she noticed that the Double-Double was missing—and she even has text exchanges to prove it.

There are in fact screenshots of a text exchange in which she tells a friend that one of her In-n-Out burgers was lost. That was around 5:30 a.m.; Boehm came strolling along an hour or so later, when the sauce-less, veggie-less burger would have been only 10 or so hours old.

And thus was the mystery solved. It turns out that, in the age of commercial flight, people can transport things long distances in short periods of time and then misplace them. Great.

Now we need to turn to the other major mystery involving In-n-Out, which is how anyone can willingly consume the cardboard garbage they call “fries.” Good lord.

Exit question: Now that that’s over, what’s the new best mystery in the news? I think it’s “How many years in prison will Michael Avenatti spend for allegedly defrauding Stormy Daniels?”

The post Mystery solved: How a fresh, pristine In-n-Out burger ended up 1,500 miles away from the nearest franchise appeared first on Hot Air.

Westlake Legal Group i-300x153 Mystery solved: How a fresh, pristine In-n-Out burger ended up 1,500 miles away from the nearest franchise Vice The Blog New York City lincoln boehm In-N-Out helen vivas burger   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Vice Writer Becomes Hilarious Victim of Twitter Censorship, Gets Banned for Threatening Planters Peanut Mascot

Westlake Legal Group 00029000072121_A1C1-620x620 Vice Writer Becomes Hilarious Victim of Twitter Censorship, Gets Banned for Threatening Planters Peanut Mascot Vice twitter The Law Of Unintended Consequences planters peanuts Mr.Peanut Luke Taylor Front Page Stories Free Speech Featured Story Culture

We’re all familiar with Twitter’s infamous bans. The reasoning behind the bans can get pretty crazy and fairly one-sided.

But it can’t get much crazier than being banned for threatening a peanut.

Luke Taylor at Vice wrote a hilarious wrap-up of his online “war” with the Planters mascot Mr. Peanut. Apparently Mr. Peanut is one of Luke’s favorite trash talk targets on Twitter.

A few months ago, I was suspended indefinitely from Twitter for threatening to kill Mr. Peanut. To be fair, this wasn’t my first time menacing the Planters mascot. Or my second or my third. By the time I was banned, I had been systematically harassing the peanut man for about four months. Sometimes, I promised to destroy him. Other times, I’d doctor a tweet to make it look like he’d done something you’d expect from someone super bourgeois or elitist—I once photoshopped a tweet suggesting that he would use his peanut empire money to avoid a military draft.

Westlake Legal Group mr-peanut1-620x485 Vice Writer Becomes Hilarious Victim of Twitter Censorship, Gets Banned for Threatening Planters Peanut Mascot Vice twitter The Law Of Unintended Consequences planters peanuts Mr.Peanut Luke Taylor Front Page Stories Free Speech Featured Story Culture

His tweets seemed to fly under the radar as something more amusing for the sake of amusing himself than anything truly obnoxious. That is until a “famous” Twitter account caught it and retweeted.

But otherwise, my game was going off without a hitch. That is, until May 31, when the monocled legume tweeted a nut-themed take on the phrase that made Bhad Bhabie famous. It read, “Cashew in the snack aisle how ’bout that.” Putting aside the fact that that particular reference was a few years beyond its expiration date, it was my duty, as ever, to take the nut man down. I replied, “I will fly anywhere in the world to kill you. Just name the place.” But then, a strange thing happened. Bhad Bhabie replied to my tweet with a quick “thank you,” and soon over 1000 people had liked my post. A day later, I received a notice from Twitter that I’d been banned.

Just in case you don’t know, “Bhad Bhabie” is that dumb “cash me outside” girl who has been inexplicably rewarded for her bratty behavior with a rap contract and representation in the entertainment industry.

Before you think the pretend peanut man was feeling genuinely threatened, note he gives as good as he gets.

Westlake Legal Group mr-peanut-2-620x409 Vice Writer Becomes Hilarious Victim of Twitter Censorship, Gets Banned for Threatening Planters Peanut Mascot Vice twitter The Law Of Unintended Consequences planters peanuts Mr.Peanut Luke Taylor Front Page Stories Free Speech Featured Story Culture   Westlake Legal Group mr-peanut-3-620x353 Vice Writer Becomes Hilarious Victim of Twitter Censorship, Gets Banned for Threatening Planters Peanut Mascot Vice twitter The Law Of Unintended Consequences planters peanuts Mr.Peanut Luke Taylor Front Page Stories Free Speech Featured Story Culture

Taylor says he knows his humor may have been over the top, but he never threatened a living person and it was all in good fun.

So, yeah, I’m mad. Of course I understand that in Twitter’s opinion, what I was doing was against the rules. But come on, it’s Mr. Peanut! It’s hard not to question the loss of my right to free speech on the platform for pointing my vitriol at a fictional character, even if that fictional character is the mascot for a brand. But brands play a strange role in culture now. In an article in The Atlanticlast year, the critic Ian Bogost wrote that there are, “new, personal bonds between companies and customers [that] feel uncanny—the brands are not real human friends, exactly, but neither are they faceless corporations anymore.” And when you are banned for having insulted one, it really starts to feel like social media companies at least, consider brands not only real, but also human.

LOL! Corporations aren’t people…or something.

Taylor laments his banning and the unjustness of being banned for good even after his appeal. He wonders aloud if he just got caught up in the “unintended consequences” of Twitter’s new speech policing.

The only thing I learned from being banned was that I’ll have to be more subtle with my jokes on my new account. (I’ll ask questions like why Mr. Peanut can’t afford more clothes than just a top hat and monocle, if he’s so rich). I’m still curious as to why Twitter would ban me when it has so many other realproblems to worry about? Twitter has been under fire recently for their inaction on banning hate speech on the platform; it’s possible my desire to fight a cartoon nut was just collateral damage?

Ya think? We on the right have been warning about this from day one.

First they came for the conservatives and I said nothing.

Then they came for the liberals who haven’t purged their social media comments from the last ten years and I said nothing.

Then they came for the pretend peanut mascots…and there was no one left to speak for me.

Good luck to Taylor as he slums it with the rest of the Twitter banned. He may be beaten down, but it looks like he’s still got some fight in him.

The most messed up thing about this whole saga though, is that throughout my tireless fight against corporate America, getting banned for my bravery, and now trying to fight back, no one’s even asked me how much money I would pay Planters for one bare-knuckled round against Mr. Peanut. Just name your price.

The post Vice Writer Becomes Hilarious Victim of Twitter Censorship, Gets Banned for Threatening Planters Peanut Mascot appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group 00029000072121_A1C1-300x300 Vice Writer Becomes Hilarious Victim of Twitter Censorship, Gets Banned for Threatening Planters Peanut Mascot Vice twitter The Law Of Unintended Consequences planters peanuts Mr.Peanut Luke Taylor Front Page Stories Free Speech Featured Story Culture   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Ten years after he became VP, news outlets decide Biden’s track record on busing is noteworthy

Westlake Legal Group b-14 Ten years after he became VP, news outlets decide Biden’s track record on busing is noteworthy Vice The Blog President Obama Media kamala harris constitutional busing biden amendment

The response here will be that “news outlets” didn’t decide anything. Kamala Harris decided that Biden’s track record on busing is noteworthy and made major national news by attacking him for it at the debate. And the only reason Harris attacked, she would say, is because Joe Biden decided to stupidly tout his cordial relations with segregationists like James Eastland as a young senator a few weeks earlier. Straight-line cause and effect: Biden made himself sound soft on segregation, Harris saw an opportunity in that and used his stance on busing to litigate the point, and the media simply followed up by looking into what Biden’s said about busing in the past. For instance, here’s NPR spelunking through its archives yesterday to find Biden circa 1975 in favor of a constitutional amendment to ban busing:

ENSOR: What about a constitutional amendment, I asked Biden. Isn’t that what you’re going to end up supporting if you want to stop court ordered busing too?

BIDEN: That would clearly do it. We are trying to figure out whether or not we can come up with an innovative piece of legislation which would limit the remedy and I don’t honestly don’t know whether we can come up with something constitutional. And if we can’t I will not in an attempt to eliminate busing violate the Constitution. I won’t do that. The only way if I’m going to go at it, I’m going to go at it through a constitutional amendment if it can’t be done through a piece of legislation.

Today it’s CNN that’s digging through its own tapes to find Biden saying in 1981 that busing is “the least effective remedy” to segregation:

But the 1981 CNN interview illustrates that Biden’s objections to busing to end segregation in schools were much broader than he casts them today.

“I happen to be one of those so-called people that are labeled as a liberal on civil rights, but oppose busing,” Biden said. “And I support the effort to curtail the ability of courts to bus.”

“What I have argued as one who grew up in the civil rights movement and ran for office as a public defender and a member of an active participant in civil rights cases, I have argued that the least effective remedy to be imposed is the busing remedy,” Biden said at another point in the interview.

Don’t blame NPR and CNN for making this newsworthy, blame Harris and ultimately Biden — or so the defense goes. But that’s too pat. For one thing, stories about Biden’s record on busing were trickling into the media long before he made his comments about Eastland a few weeks ago. Here’s WaPo in March serving notice to the political world that This Will Be An Issue. CNN was on the busing beat in April. Biden’s allies in Congress were being challenged about his record on busing in May. The subject has turned up in mainstream sites’ op-ed pages as well. And of course various progressive activists have been jabbing at him online over it for months, hoping to dent the centrist Biden’s support among Obama’s base of black voters.

The deeper question is why Biden’s record on busing and other racial issues, like the crime bill, weren’t “problematic” to the media when he was nominated for vice president in 2008. Overlooking racial politics that year might have been understandable, if not excusable, had the candidates been uniformly white. They were not, rather famously. Race was front and center in that year’s presidential election in a way that it had never been before in the entirety of American history. And Joe Biden ended up on the ballot of that election, on the winning side thanks to historic turnout among African-American voters. It would have been asking too much to ask the media to delve into Biden’s racial record after he’d already been named VP, as our very impartial press wasn’t about to create a headache for Obama en route to a likely victory. But what’s the excuse for not investigating Biden’s — and every other VP hopeful’s — civil-rights credentials in depth while the party’s first black nominee was mulling whom to choose as his running mate?

Did Team Obama, at least, do that investigation? Vice presidents are normally vetted within an inch of their lives before being selected. Presumably O and his team knew all about Biden’s view of busing, the crime bill, and so on and determined that they were collectively not so problematic that they should look elsewhere for a running mate. But the media was free to render a different verdict, as it’s now in the process of doing, and to challenge Obama aggressively on it. They didn’t. And it’s no mystery why.

I think the most charitable explanation for this oversight is simple laziness. They didn’t give Biden the kid-gloves treatment in 2008 because they were in the tank and determined not to make trouble for a historic Democratic nominee, one might say. They gave him the kid-gloves treatment because they don’t do much investigating themselves, even of their own archives. Even this year, it may be the case that most of the media reports about Biden’s history with busing have been spoonfed to them by rival campaigns like Sanders’s or Harris’s. The reason Uncle Joe didn’t get dinged for this a decade ago might be as simple as the RNC’s oppo team having either dropped the ball or concluded that there was little to be gained by feeding the press stories about Biden’s opposition to busing (a position overwhelmingly shared by Republicans). But again: If you prefer this theory, you’re stuck believing that the press is uninterested in doing the basics of its own job, even when there are potentially high-stakes consequences in a national election.

There is, I suppose, another possibility. Maybe America’s just woker now than it was in 2008, when it, uh, elected the first black president. Certainly the white progressive activist class is more influential and more ostentatiously woke than it was then, and our very impartial media pays a lot of attention to that class. So do candidates, which I suppose explains why Kamala Harris is claiming to be pro-busing even in 2019:

Here’s what national polls on busing look like, though, at least circa 1999:

Westlake Legal Group b-15 Ten years after he became VP, news outlets decide Biden’s track record on busing is noteworthy Vice The Blog President Obama Media kamala harris constitutional busing biden amendment

NPR notes that a Gallup poll taken in 1973, back when Biden was in full anti-busing swing, found that just five percent thought busing was the best way to achieve integration, including a mere nine percent of blacks. I think the partisan split would be *somewhat* more balanced today since the subject of busing is now largely academic and hyper-partisanship has encouraged people to support whatever it is that the other party opposes. But unquestionably, Biden’s position is still the position of a heavy majority. It’s probably also the position of a majority of the Democratic Party. But whether it’s the position of a majority of black Democrats is an open question. And in the end, black Democrats are the key to whether Biden or Harris is the frontrunner in this race.

Here’s a very cynical Cory Booker, the odd man out in the Biden/Harris battle for black voters, doing his best to muscle his way in. It is … quite a theory that Uncle Joe, the person in the race with the most obvious appeal to both working-class Rust Belt whites and southern black Obama voters, is the candidate who has a problem bringing people together while Kamala Harris is out there demanding that America relitigate busing.

The post Ten years after he became VP, news outlets decide Biden’s track record on busing is noteworthy appeared first on Hot Air.

Westlake Legal Group b-14-300x153 Ten years after he became VP, news outlets decide Biden’s track record on busing is noteworthy Vice The Blog President Obama Media kamala harris constitutional busing biden amendment   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

The Quietly Sinking Ship of the Leftist Media

Westlake Legal Group the-quietly-sinking-ship-of-the-leftist-media The Quietly Sinking Ship of the Leftist Media Vice transgender Social Media Social Justice Politics pedophilia News MSNBC Media Mainstream Media Leftist media Kotaku Huffington Post Gizmodo Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats CNN Buzzfeed Allow Media Exception

Westlake Legal Group sinking-ship-620x465 The Quietly Sinking Ship of the Leftist Media Vice transgender Social Media Social Justice Politics pedophilia News MSNBC Media Mainstream Media Leftist media Kotaku Huffington Post Gizmodo Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats CNN Buzzfeed Allow Media Exception

I wouldn’t blame you if you didn’t know that left-leaning media is currently dying a very slow death. Nobody wants to talk about how badly they’re failing. It doesn’t inspire much confidence, and to boot, the political aspect of its failure would run contrary to the “everybody is on our side” narrative that the left likes to tout.

The truth of the matter is that in almost everywhere you look, left-leaning media from print to screen is finding itself sinking like it’s in quicksand.

CNN is one one of the best examples, as it is currently experiencing viewership at a four year low with April as its worst month on record. As I’ve previously reported, CNN has lost more than 25 percent of its primetime audience. None of its programs are cracking the top 25 in cable news shows, and its primetime lineup can’t even surpass a million viewers.

If fact, you’re more likely to run into someone who practices witchcraft or paganism than you are to run into a CNN viewer.

Like CNN, MSNBC also took a hit after the release of the Mueller report, which cleared Trump of every charge the left has been throwing at him since his presidency began. Now, the two leftist networks can’t equal out to the prime time of right-leaning Fox News combined.

Over in the digital sector, Buzzfeed’s left-leaning news arm was considered a “drag” on the site and was forced to lay of 15 percent of its workforce (around 250 jobs) after it failed to meet revenue targets. Huffington Post is suffering a similar fate as it had to cut an entire swath if its website off along with everyone who worked. That part of the website that had to go was the ultra-leftist “HuffPo Opinions.” Vice also had to undergo layoffs.

The social justice laden Gizmodo Media Group are also feeling the sting of defeat. Univision had bought the property that includes gaming site Kotaku, and after two years, Univision already sold it off to Great Hill Partners.

 

There’s no telling how bad it’s going to get from here on, but there’s definitely a demoralization problem amongst the leftist media. When it comes to navigating the digital wild west, a plethora of things factor into a sites failure. Social media sites and search engines are the primary way we see news, and they’re changing up their algorithms and methods at absurd speeds. Advertising works differently from day to day, and what’s popular now may have a shelf life of five minutes.

All that considered, it can’t be overlooked that the primary sufferers of these setbacks are left-leaning rags.

We can surmise why by looking at the way other industries have suffered. As places like the ESPNDick’s Sporting Goods, the NFL, and Gillette proceeded to get more “woke,” they found themselves becoming more broke. Being a radical leftist is just bad for business, but the radical left is accepting nothing but absolute fealty. It was only a matter of time before the news outlets that would create and foster this radical leftist outrage became infected by its own nonsense.

Leftist sites that bear this radical social justice and identitarian messages became boring to read. They made it a point to find outrage in anything and everything, even by their own admission.

Former social justice leader and game critic Anita Sarkeesian once said:

“Yeah, absolutely. I sort of joke about how it was the most liberating thing that ever happen to me and also the most frustrating for everyone around me, because like when you start learning about systems everything is sexist, everything is racist, everything is homophobic and you have to point it all out to everyone all the time, so there is a good year of my life. There is a good year in my life where it was just most obnoxious person to be around. And then you settle into it, you start to understand like oh people they can living within the systems and it was just sort of liberating movement for me and you learn how to pick and choose your battles and that sort of thing.”

Reading any number of leftist sites will give you a taste of her meaning. Yesterday I covered how MTV News called Avengers: Endgame an “ableist” movie because of its three-hour runtime. One HuffPo writer told people they had to choose between Chick-fil-A and being an ally to the LGBT community.

Miserable people are miserable to be around, and while misery loves company, no one really likes misery.

Beyond that, they continue to take the wrong side in every fight. The Hill ran defense for “this won’t be a country of white people” Rep. Ilhan Omar after conservatives were angry over her defense of terrorists. CNN can’t stop defending domestic terrorist group, Antifa.

The leftist mainstream media is the definite bad guy in this situation. While there are definitely examples of bad guys existing in the right-leaning media, even the most bombastic of them don’t hold a candle to the left. The left actually calls for racism and sexism to thrive. It encourages bigotry and attempts to normalize the sexualization of children, be it attempting to push transgenderism or pedophilia.

This is, at least in my opinion, why I think the mainstream media is taking on more water than it can bail out. It had a long-running monologue going, but despite its best efforts, it’s now faced with having a dialogue with its political opposites.

It may front like its the lead source for all things information, but the mainstream left is in trouble. Its message is floundering, and its sites and channels are becoming ghost towns. It’s a very slow, very quiet death, but it is dying.

And good riddance.

The post The Quietly Sinking Ship of the Leftist Media appeared first on RedState.

Westlake Legal Group sinking-ship-300x225 The Quietly Sinking Ship of the Leftist Media Vice transgender Social Media Social Justice Politics pedophilia News MSNBC Media Mainstream Media Leftist media Kotaku Huffington Post Gizmodo Front Page Stories Featured Story democrats CNN Buzzfeed Allow Media Exception   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com 

Hollywood awards-shows nadir: Hail Satan, y’all

Westlake Legal Group bale-satan Hollywood awards-shows nadir: Hail Satan, y’all Vice The Blog Hollywood Golden Globe awards christian bale awards

SCENE: Executive offices at a Hollywood production company. Three people sit around a shadowy conference table, expressions of anxiety on their faces. 

NETWORK EXEC: We’ve got fifteen awards shows coming up in prime time over the next six weeks, and hardly anyone’s watching these things any more. What’s the problem?

INDUSTRY ANALYST: Our data shows that viewers feel as though Hollywood has lost touch with them. These shows obsess over movies and shows hardly anyone cares about, and people aren’t interested in four hours of political haranguing. Heck, even Trump knows to keep it under an hour and to make it a little entertaining.

NETWORK EXEC: [turns to producer] We need to connect to the people! What do you plan to do about it?

BIG-TIME AWARDS SHOW PRODUCER: I know! We’ll find a way to talk about religion! The people looooooove religion!

[crossfade]

Hollywood is welcoming the new year with the start of the awards season. The 76th Annual Golden Globe Awards aired January 6 on NBC. Though the show was mostly tame in political rhetoric from the award winners, presenters, and hosts, that streak was broken when Christian Bale won the Best Actor Award for his role as former Vice President Dick Cheney in the movie Vice. Along with thanking Satan for inspiration, he also mused about playing Senator Mitch McConnell as the next in a series of “charisma-free a******s.”

BALE: Thank you to that geeser, Adam. He said I’ve got to find somebody who can be absolutely charisma-free and reviled by everybody, so he went, oh, it’s gotta be Bale in it. Thank you. And for all the competition I will be cornering the market on charisma-free [assholes]. What do you think, Mitch McConnell next, that could be good, couldn’t it? Thank you to Satan for giving me inspiration on how to play this role.

Aaaaaaaand …. scene.

Does anyone think Bale was really giving thanks to Satan? Naaaah. But Bale was epitomizing, in perhaps the most reductio of all reductio ad absurdums, precisely why most people despise these awards shows and despise Hollywood in general. The smugness of his declarations, as well as the audience’s embrace of them, show just how insular this crowd has become. Bale’s speech also pointed out another truth: Hollywood has no interest in producing films about political history with any sense of truth or honesty, but only as vehicles for derision and the progressive-Left didactic. Giving a shout-out to Satan is just the feculent icing on an excrement cake.

It’s worth noting, disconnect-wise, that Vice is currently drowning at the box office despite its six Golden Globe nominations and all-star cast. It came in seventh at the box office in its second weekend after coming in sixth in its first weekend, despite the fact that only one major release opened on Friday (the thriller Escape Room).  The Mule took in almost twice as much and did almost $600 better per screen despite being in its fourth week. Vice lost 25% of its previous-week momentum despite adding 92 theaters. It’s getting middling reviews on Rotten Tomatoes (63% fresh), but this review from The Daily Beast is devastating — and from a liberal perspective. After watching Bale’s chortling over the person he portrays, I suspect it comes much closer to the truth.

That’s what Hollywood awards shows have become, however — celebrations of Hollywood’s politics rather than artistic achievement. That’s also why people don’t watch them any more, and why people stay away from pictures like Vice, Lions for Lambs, and Rendition even when they fill the frame with as many A-listers as possible. It’s not that these subjects aren’t worthy of discussion and debate through art … it’s just that no one trusts Hollywood to do it competently or honestly.

Addendum: Here’s another classy moment from the show, captured by Rolling Stone:

As hosts, Oh and Samberg had real comic chemistry, like when she introduced the cast of the NBC weeper This Is Us: “Break out the tissues! Because you’re going to want to masturbate to all of them!”

As soon as everyone’s done masturbating over Vice, presumably.

The post Hollywood awards-shows nadir: Hail Satan, y’all appeared first on Hot Air.

Westlake Legal Group bale-satan-300x162 Hollywood awards-shows nadir: Hail Satan, y’all Vice The Blog Hollywood Golden Globe awards christian bale awards   Real Estate, and Personal Injury Lawyers. Contact us at: https://westlakelegal.com